Podcast Summary
Navigating the complex issue of monstrous art created by problematic artists: Ditterer's book invites readers to consider the emotional complexities of dealing with the art of monstrous men, offering a fresh perspective on the issue
Navigating the complex issue of monstrous art created by problematic artists requires nuance and understanding. Claire Ditterer, an essayist and author, explores this topic in her new book "A Fam's Dilemma." Ditterer's unique approach acknowledges both facts and feelings, allowing readers to grapple with the emotional complexities of the situation. She first became interested in this topic while writing a memoir about growing up in a predatory culture and using Roman Polanski as a symbol of predatory men. Despite learning about Polanski's heinous crime, Ditterer found herself still a fan of his work. This dilemma raises the question of what we should do with the art of monstrous men. While there have been many discussions on this topic, Ditterer's book offers a fresh perspective that invites readers to consider the complexity of the issue and the role emotions play in our decision-making.
Navigating the Complexity of Appreciating Art from Problematic Creators: The line between appreciating art and acknowledging an artist's problematic actions is complex. Separating art from artist may be suggested, but a more nuanced approach is needed to handle the issue of enjoying art from 'monstrous' creators.
The line between appreciating art and acknowledging the problematic actions of its creators is a complex one. The speaker, a film critic, shares her experience of consuming films by directors whose personal lives raised ethical concerns. She found herself unable to fully enjoy the art due to the unsettling feelings evoked by the knowledge of their biographies. This issue was met with the suggestion that art and artist should be separated. However, the speaker's personal experience and growing interest in the topic led her to question this approach. She defines a "monster" as an artist whose biography disrupts the viewer's experience of their work. The term "we" in the context of dealing with art created by monstrous men is questioned, with the speaker suggesting that it is both corrupt and make-believe, implying a need for a more nuanced and complex discussion.
The Evolution of Critical Authority and Personal Experience in Evaluating Art: The separation of art from artist and the rejection of art due to artist's behavior are evolving, leading to a more nuanced understanding of the artist-work relationship and personal experience in shaping critical reception. The 'genius' artist exemption is also being challenged.
The concept of critical authority and the role of individual experience in evaluating art, particularly in the context of controversial artists, has evolved significantly in recent years. The author's exploration of this topic in her memoir project began before the Me Too movement, but the public conversation around it brought new complexities to the discussion. Initially, there were two distinct camps: those who believed in separating the art from the artist, and those who advocated for rejecting the art entirely. However, as the conversation has evolved, there's been a growing recognition that denying ourselves of the work we love comes at a cost. The author sees this as a promising development, as it allows for a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between artists and their work, and the role of personal experience in shaping critical reception. Additionally, the idea of the "genius" artist who is exempt from societal norms has also been challenged, leading to a more balanced and thoughtful approach to evaluating art and the artists behind it.
The image of the genius and its evolution: The concept of genius, popularized by figures like Picasso and Hemingway, may be changing with the rise of new artists and shifting cultural narrative. It's important to consider artists' actions alongside their contributions, as the idea of genius is not a fixed term.
The concept of genius, particularly the idea of the free-spirited, white male artist, has been shaped and popularized by certain influential figures like Picasso and Hemingway. This image of the genius has been used to protect and even revered their behavior, despite any accusations or negative actions. However, this notion of genius may be changing, especially with the rise of new artists and the shifting cultural narrative. It's essential to remember that the idea of genius is not a fixed term, and it's important to consider the context and impact of the artists' actions alongside their artistic contributions. The discussion also touched upon the backlash against the idea that the figure of the genius has been dethroned, but it's clear that these artists and their works will continue to be part of the cultural conversation, even if the term "genius" is applied differently.
Managing Money in Different Currencies with Wise: Wise provides a cost-effective and efficient solution for managing money in various currencies, allowing users to send and receive funds globally at real-time exchange rates with no hidden fees.
Wise offers a seamless and cost-effective solution for managing money in different currencies, enabling users to send and receive funds worldwide at real-time mid-market exchange rates with no hidden fees. This service has facilitated over $100 billion in transfers, with over half reaching their destination faster than the length of this ad. The discussion also touched upon the concept of masculinity in art, particularly in the context of filmmakers like Woody Allen and the freedom of self-expression afforded to men in dominant roles. The figure of the genius in rock and roll was explored, with examples like Motley Crue showcasing the blurred lines between on-stage persona and off-stage behavior. Lastly, the comparison was drawn between the figure of the rock star and contemporary artists like Kanye West, highlighting the unique challenges and consequences of merging art and lifestyle in the modern era.
The Paradox of Genius and Morality: Bad Boy Artists: The 'bad boy genius' concept raises questions about separating art from artist's morality, especially in light of the Me Too movement.
The complex relationship between genius and morality has been a longstanding topic of fascination and debate. The author discusses how some artists, like Kanye West, embody the idea of the "bad boy genius," who, despite their questionable behavior, continue to captivate audiences. Kanye's quote about being a rock star rather than a rap star, with its underlying themes of freedom and backlash, is an example of this paradox. However, the idea of the genius bad boy artist has faced scrutiny in recent years due to the ongoing dialogue about consent and accountability, particularly in the wake of the Me Too movement. The author also explores the moral calculus that arises when considering whether to consume an artist's work, especially when it comes to separating the art from the artist. Ultimately, the book offers various perspectives on this issue, but the author suggests a prescriptive approach towards the end.
The Complex Relationship Between an Artist's Biography and Their Work: Consider emotional responses to art created by controversial artists, rather than making objective judgments about the work's quality.
The relationship between an artist's biography and their work is a complex issue that elicits a range of emotional and moral responses. People have different feelings about consuming art created by artists who have committed heinous acts, and these feelings are often rooted in personal experiences and subjectivities. The author argues that it's less useful to decide objectively whether the work is great or not, but rather to consider whether one feels a connection to it. This emotional response can come from the specificity of one's experience with the art and how it has shaped one's life. The author's book was particularly moved by Pearl Clegg's essay "Mad at Miles," where she writes about her deep love for Miles Davis' music, despite his confessed assaults, and how it has defined various moments in her life. Ultimately, the author suggests that these are not questions that can be thought out, but rather felt through.
The complex relationship between art and its audience, especially when artists are accused of heinous acts: It's unfair for audiences to bear the burden of deciding whether to engage with an artist's work based on their personal connection and moral responsibility. The subjective nature of our responses to art and the complexities of navigating the intersection of art, morality, and personal experience are important to consider.
The relationship between art and its audience, particularly when the artist is accused of heinous acts, raises complex questions about personal responsibility and subjective experience. The author of the book under discussion shares her personal connection to Miles Davis' music and her emotional response to his alleged crimes. She argues that it's unfair for the audience to bear the burden of deciding whether to continue engaging with the artist's work. This tension between personal connection and moral responsibility is a theme that has become more pronounced in recent years as society grapples with difficult issues. The author's exploration of this topic invites readers to reflect on their own experiences with art and morality. Ultimately, the book underscores the importance of acknowledging the subjective nature of our responses to art and the complexities of navigating the intersection of art, morality, and personal experience.
The Limits of Expressing Morality Through Consumption: Our consumption choices may not significantly change ethical issues, encouraging us to explore alternative ways to be good people.
Our consumption choices may not be as ethically impactful as we believe them to be. The speaker in the discussion shares how she came to understand the limitations of expressing morality through consumption, especially in the context of high-profile controversies involving celebrities. The example of Taylor Swift and Matt Healy's relationship is used to illustrate how fans' sense of supporting a politically virtuous artist can be shattered when the artist dates someone with problematic views. The speaker encourages us to reconsider the role of consumption in ethical living and consider alternative ways to be good people. The fact that our consumption, or lack thereof, may not significantly change the situation is a thought-provoking idea that invites further reflection on the relationship between personal actions and larger societal issues.
The Complex Relationship Between Art and Artist in the Digital Age: In the digital age, fans feel emotionally connected to celebrities' personal lives, blurring the lines between art and artist. The question of whether to judge art in isolation or hold artists accountable for their actions is complex and personal.
In our contemporary society, it's increasingly difficult to separate the art from the artist due to the prevalence of biography and parasocial relationships facilitated by the Internet. This dynamic is particularly evident in the case of celebrities like Taylor Swift, where fans feel emotionally connected to their personal lives and relationships. The question of what to do with the art of monstrous men is complex, and there's no easy answer. Some argue for judging the art in isolation, while others believe artists should be held accountable for their actions. Ultimately, it's a personal decision that requires considering the specific context and impact of both the art and the artist. The Internet has blurred the lines between art and artist biography, making it an integral part of our consumption experience. This intensely contemporary dynamic raises complex questions about how we engage with art and artists in the digital age.
Considering the Complexities of Art and No Contact: While cutting off contact with art or relationships can be necessary, it's essential to remember that people and art have both good and bad aspects, and engaging with the difficult parts can lead to growth and understanding.
While it's important to recognize when art or relationships become harmful and consider taking a break, it's also essential to consider the potential loss and complexity of the situation. The idea of cutting off contact entirely might not be a sustainable or complete solution. Instead, it's crucial to remember that people, like art, have both good and bad aspects, and engaging with the difficult parts can lead to growth and understanding. The conversation around art and no contact parallels the complexities of human relationships and the importance of acknowledging the gray areas. Ultimately, it's essential to approach these situations with thoughtfulness and an open mind, recognizing that the journey towards healing and growth may not be straightforward.
Investing in real estate during market downturns: Some investors are expanding their portfolios amidst challenging market conditions, with Fundrise planning to buy more assets. Min. $10 investment. Consider risks & rewards before investing.
Despite challenging market conditions, such as high interest rates and falling real estate prices, some investors are taking advantage of the situation to expand their portfolios. The Fundrise flagship fund, for instance, plans to buy more assets in the coming months, offering investors an opportunity to invest in real estate with a minimum investment of just $10. However, it's important to carefully consider the risks and potential rewards before investing, as outlined in the fund's prospectus. This strategy of buying low and selling high, while not easy to execute, can potentially lead to significant returns over time. The market downturn may present opportunities for savvy investors to grow their wealth.
