Logo
    Search

    Why the Left Had to Steal the Right’s Dark-Money Playbook

    en-usOctober 31, 2020

    Podcast Summary

    • Facebook and Twitter: Navigating Complex Systems to Foster Positive ChangeSociologist Sudhir Venkatesh shares insights from his experiences addressing issues like bullying, harassment, hate speech, and terrorist activity at Facebook, and the challenges in fostering positive change on Twitter due to their unique ecosystems and business models.

      Sociologist and ethnographer Sudhir Venkatesh, known for his research on various understudied communities including crack sellers, sex workers, gun traffickers, and the wealthy, shared insights from his experiences at Facebook and Twitter. At Facebook, he worked with the PAC Protecting Care team to address issues like bullying, harassment, hate speech, and terrorist activity. He noted that while Facebook had good intentions, its scale and business model made it challenging to fully address these problems. Transitioning to Twitter, he described a simpler ecosystem but greater challenges in fostering positive change due to the core issue of how nice people choose to be with each other online. Throughout his career, Venkatesh's work has highlighted the importance of understanding complex systems and the difficulties in addressing systemic issues within them.

    • Bridging the gap between virtual and real worldsThe podcast sheds light on technology's impact on our lives and the need for a better understanding of its development and consequences on democracy and society.

      While there is valid criticism against the lack of oversight and regulation in the digital universe, particularly social media, it's essential to approach the discourse with a clear and informed perspective. The podcast being discussed aims to bridge the gap between the virtual and real worlds by shedding light on how technology impacts our lives, featuring interviews with industry insiders, designers, engineers, and political operatives like Tara McGowan. The failure of technology to meet outsized expectations, as seen in the Iowa caucus app debacle, underscores the need for a better understanding of how these platforms are developed and the potential consequences they may have on our democracy and society. The "move fast and break things" mentality prevalent in tech companies should be reconsidered when it comes to the impact on families, democracy, and society as a whole.

    • From Journalist to Political Strategist: Tera McGowan's Journey in the Digital Political LandscapeTera McGowan, a journalist-turned-political strategist, revolutionized politics through digital campaigns with Acronym, challenging traditional methods of communication and amplifying direct communications and social media's impact.

      The digital age has significantly transformed the political landscape, making it an uncharted territory where the rules of the game have been rewritten. Tera McGowan, a journalist-turned-political strategist, has been at the forefront of this revolution. She started Acronym, a political organization that executes social media campaigns in key swing states, and is known for her role in Obama's digital strategy. McGowan shares how she got into politics to affect change but felt detached from the impact she desired as a journalist. She moved to DC and eventually joined Obama's reelection campaign, where she became a digital strategist due to the campaign's focus on digital prowess. McGowan's unique perspective as a digital native led her to question the traditional methods of communication in politics, leading to the increasing importance of direct communications and social media in politics. Trump's presidency further highlighted this shift, as he ignored mainstream media and leveraged digital channels in unprecedented ways.

    • Obama's Digital First Campaigns Revolutionized PoliticsObama's campaigns prioritized digital tactics, reaching voters cost-effectively and at scale, and professionalizing digital consulting may have stifled innovation

      The Democrats' innovative use of digital strategies during Obama's campaigns was a game-changer in politics. Digital first campaigns, which prioritize digital tactics over traditional media, became essential due to necessity, as there was no clear path to victory for Obama. This shift allowed campaigns to reach voters more cost-effectively and at scale through the internet and social media. The digital team on Obama's reelection campaign was the largest and most well-resourced from day one, while traditional media super PACs like Priorities USA had to adapt and hire digital experts to keep up. However, in the process of professionalizing digital consulting, there was a risk of losing the incentive to innovate.

    • Navigating high-stakes environments with authentic communicationIn politics, authentic communication on native platforms is vital for reaching large audiences, despite legal restrictions and the need to fill gaps in established campaigns.

      In high-stakes environments like elections, creating sustainable business models while keeping up with social media and technology innovation is crucial but challenging. Authentic communication on native platforms is key for reaching large audiences. Working on the pack side of politics, such as in super PACs, involves monitoring campaigns and filling gaps they cannot or should not address, while being legally barred from sharing valuable information. This can lead to frustration, especially when observing a lack of innovation in established campaigns. Personal relationships, even between campaign team members, can be affected by legal restrictions. Throughout it all, staying attuned to successful tactics and strategies is essential.

    • Right's media ecosystem vs Left's reliance on paid adsThe right's sustained media ecosystem gives them an edge over the left's heavy reliance on paid advertising in building political power.

      The left and right approach building political power differently, with the right having a more sustained media ecosystem while the left relies heavily on paid advertising. This disparity was highlighted during the 2016 election, where the Trump campaign's significant investment in digital advertising and data acquisition gave them an edge. The left has been trying to catch up, but the right's head start has made it an uphill battle. Trump's campaign's continued spending on digital advertising and data acquisition has only widened the gap. The ban on political ads on platforms like Twitter and Facebook has been a topic of debate, but the reality is that the majority of misinformation spread online is organic and not through paid ads. It's crucial for the left to focus on building a sustainable media ecosystem and investing in digital infrastructure to compete effectively in the political arena.

    • Ban on political ads during election week may lead to misinformationSocial media companies should prioritize factual information over engaging content to prevent the spread of lies and misinformation, regardless of whether it's paid or organic.

      The ban on political ads during the final week of an election, while well-intended, can lead to the dissemination of misinformation on social media platforms, particularly when right-wing media outlets are not held to the same standard. Algorithms on these platforms prioritize and scale the distribution of salacious content, making it more likely to spread rapidly. Instead of focusing on limiting targeted advertising, efforts should be made to curb the spread of lies and misinformation more effectively. This includes addressing the root cause of the problem, which is the prioritization of engaging content over factual information. Social media companies have a responsibility to solve this issue and prevent the rapid spread of lies, regardless of whether they are paid or organic.

    • Acronym: Building Progressive Infrastructure with a Conservative ModelAcronym, a progressive nonprofit, models its structure after conservative groups and invests in companies for political influence and charitable work.

      Acronym, the organization founded by Anne Filippini, is modeled after the conservative ecosystem, specifically the Koch Brothers' infrastructure on the right. Acronym is structured as a 501c4, a nonprofit organization that can influence politics and elections directly with 49% of its work, while the remaining 51% is dedicated to charitable work. Acronym has invested in two companies: a digital agency for progressive political advertising and a for-profit local news network called Career Newsroom. The goal is to build infrastructure and deploy effective tactics within the bounds of the law, while also striving for reform. Acronym also incubated Shadow Inc., a progressive technology company that helped design the app for the Iowa caucus. The intention is to build power and infrastructure, while also being mindful of the dangers of focusing too much on moral purity tests and losing sight of the bigger picture.

    • Lack of oversight in tech projects can lead to crisesUnderestimating the importance of oversight can result in major issues, especially in high-risk projects. It's crucial to focus on doing fewer things but doing them better.

      Underestimating the need for oversight in a technology company, especially when it comes to high-risk projects, can lead to major crises. In the case of the Iowa Caucus debacle, the speaker's lack of experience and trust in a partner led to a lack of oversight, which contributed to the delay in reporting results due to a coding error in the app. The speaker learned from this experience that they couldn't solve every problem and that they needed to focus on doing fewer things but doing them better. The Career Newsroom project, on the other hand, raises questions about the nature of modern media. The digital newspapers published in key swing states may appear to be local news, but their intention is to promote progressive candidates. Whether this constitutes news, marketing, or political instruments is up for debate. Regardless, it highlights the blurred lines between these categories in today's media landscape.

    • Addressing the lack of local, trusted news sourcesThe importance of local journalism and trusted news sources in driving civic engagement cannot be overstated, especially in the context of state elections. Stelter's Acronym aimed to address this issue, and despite its uncertain future, he remains committed to the success of Courier as a permanent solution.

      The lack of local, trusted news sources is leading to decreased civic participation and a void in democratic communication. Acronym, founded by Stelter, aimed to address this issue by creating a progressive media infrastructure, including the newsroom Courier. While the future of Acronym is uncertain, Stelter remains committed to the success of Courier as a permanent solution to the ongoing evolution of technology and media consumption habits. The importance of local journalism and trusted news sources in driving civic engagement cannot be overstated, especially in the context of state elections where decisions affecting our lives are made. Despite the challenges and changes in the media landscape, Stelter believes in the necessity of permanent institutions to drive innovation and communication in Democratic politics.

    • The Future of Democracy and Civic Life: Navigating Complex ChallengesDespite the challenges posed by technology and societal trends, strengthening personal connections and empathy are key to fostering a healthy civic society. However, finding ways to use technology to build understanding and bridge divides remains a complex issue.

      The health of democracy and civic life is a complex issue influenced by technology and societal trends. Robert Putnam's essay "Bowling Alone" highlighted the importance of associational life and community engagement in fostering a healthy civic society. However, the impact of technology on these aspects is a subject of ongoing debate. Some argue for a return to pre-digital ways of engaging, while others suggest using technology to foster healthy interactions. Social media, in particular, has been criticized for reinforcing existing belief systems and making empathy more difficult. Despite these challenges, Tara McGowan, the founder of Acronym, remains optimistic and believes that building personal connections and empathy are key to strengthening our society. However, her organization faces the challenge of using the same techniques that contribute to a polarized and uncivil environment to improve it. Ultimately, the future of democracy and civic life will depend on how we navigate these complex issues and find ways to bridge divides and build understanding.

    • Understanding Technology's Impact Through InterviewsSociologist Sudhir Venkatesh interviews tech creators and managers to explore technology's influence, listeners can suggest podcast name, produced by Stitcher and Dubner Productions, available on any podcast app, complete transcripts at freeeconomics.com

      Sociologist Sudhir Venkatesh interviews the creators and managers of technology to gain insights into its impact. Listeners are encouraged to provide feedback, including suggestions for a podcast name, at Radio at Freakonomics.com. Freakonomics Radio is produced by Stitcher and Dubner Productions, with a team including Matt Hickey, Allison Craiglow, Greg Ripin, Zach Lipinski, Daphne Chen, Mary Tduke, Corinne Wallace, Emma Terrell, and James Foster. The podcast is available on any podcast app and offers complete transcripts at freeeconomics.com.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President?

    595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President?

    American politics is trapped in a duopoly, with two all-powerful parties colluding to stifle competition. We revisit a 2018 episode to explain how the political industry works, and talk to a reformer (and former presidential candidate) who is pushing for change.

     

    • SOURCES:

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 04, 2024

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    It’s hard to know whether the benefits of hiring a celebrity are worth the risk. We dig into one gruesome story of an endorsement gone wrong, and find a surprising result.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • John Cawley, professor of economics at Cornell University.
      • Elizabeth (Zab) Johnson, executive director and senior fellow with the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Alvin Roth, professor of economics at Stanford University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 27, 2024

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    Broadway operates on a winner-take-most business model. A runaway hit like Stereophonic — which just won five Tony Awards — will create a few big winners. But even the stars of the show will have to go elsewhere to make real money. (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 20, 2024

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    The Berlin dance mecca Berghain is known for its eight-hour line and inscrutable door policy. PJ Vogt, host of the podcast Search Engine, joins us to crack the code. It has to do with Cold War rivalries, German tax law, and one very talented bouncer.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Lutz Leichsenring, executive board member of Clubcommission Berlin and co-founder of VibeLab.
      • PJ Vogt, reporter, writer, and host of the podcast Search Engine.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 17, 2024

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    Hit by Covid, runaway costs, and a zillion streams of competition, serious theater is in serious trouble. A new hit play called Stereophonic — the most Tony-nominated play in history — has something to say about that. We speak with the people who make it happen every night. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 13, 2024

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    Every December, a British man named Tom Whitwell publishes a list of 52 things he’s learned that year. These fascinating facts reveal the spectrum of human behavior, from fraud and hypocrisy to Whitwell’s steadfast belief in progress. Should we also believe?

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 06, 2024

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    An update of our 2020 series, in which we spoke with physicians, researchers, and addicts about the root causes of the crisis — and the tension between abstinence and harm reduction.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Gail D’Onofrio, professor and chair of emergency medicine at the Yale School of Medicine and chief of emergency services at Yale-New Haven Health.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.
      • Nicole O’Donnell, certified recovery specialist at the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy.
      • Jeanmarie Perrone, professor of emergency medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Eileen Richardson, restaurant manager.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 03, 2024

    590. Can $55 Billion End the Opioid Epidemic?

    590. Can $55 Billion End the Opioid Epidemic?

    Thanks to legal settlements with drug makers and distributors, states have plenty of money to boost prevention and treatment. Will it work? (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.
      • Christine Minhee, founder of OpioidSettlementTracker.com.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 30, 2024

    589. Why Has the Opioid Crisis Lasted So Long?

    589. Why Has the Opioid Crisis Lasted So Long?

    Most epidemics flare up, do their damage, and fade away. This one has been raging for almost 30 years. To find out why, it’s time to ask some uncomfortable questions. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • David Cutler, professor of economics at Harvard University.
      • Travis Donahoe, professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 23, 2024

    Extra: Car Colors & Storage Units

    Extra: Car Colors & Storage Units

    Presenting two stories from The Economics of Everyday Things: Why does it seem like every car is black, white, or gray these days? And: How self-storage took over America.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Tom Crockett, classic car enthusiast.
      • Zachary Dickens, executive vice president and chief investment officer of Extra Space Storage.
      • Mark Gutjahr, global head of design at BASF.
      • Kara Kolodziej, self-storage unit tenant.
      • Anne Mari DeCoster, self-storage consultant.
      • Nikkie Riedel, carline planning manager at Subaru of America.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 20, 2024

    Related Episodes

    13. This is really primal stuff - Ritsaart Reimann

    13. This is really primal stuff - Ritsaart Reimann

    There’s been a drum beat, suggesting that social media and information silos, echo chambers, are a driving force behind our divisiveness and polarization.

    New research suggests this may be overstated.

    It may have more to do with the very nature of how we come to know or believe things in the political realm.

    In this episode, I sit down with researcher Ritsaart Reimann who looked at decades of research to propose some hypotheses for what’s going on as well as some ideas for improving the situation.

    The insights will change how you think about politics and social media, political identities, and disinformation.



    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Follow me, David Beckemeyer, on Twitter @mrblog. Follow the show on Twitter @OutrageOverload or Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload.

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the OO hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    How an AI pope pic fooled us

    How an AI pope pic fooled us
    An AI-generated image of Cool Pope in immaculate drip went viral over the weekend and most everyone thought it was real. The Verge’s James Vincent explains how we should navigate our new internet reality. This episode was produced by Amanda Lewellyn, edited by Matt Collette, fact-checked by Avishay Artsy and Siona Peterous, engineered by Paul Robert Mounsey, and hosted by Sean Rameswaram.  Transcript at vox.com/todayexplained   Support Today, Explained by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices