Logo

    251 | Rosemary Braun on Uncovering Patterns in Biological Complexity

    enSeptember 25, 2023
    What benefits does Indeed offer for hiring candidates?
    How does Rocket Money help manage personal finances?
    What role do circadian clocks play in biological systems?
    How can gene expression profiles aid healthcare advancements?
    What challenges do researchers face in analyzing complex biological data?

    Podcast Summary

    • Leveraging Platforms for Hiring and Managing FinancesIndeed streamlines hiring with features like scheduling, screening, and messaging, while Rocket Money helps manage finances by identifying and canceling unwanted subscriptions and monitoring spending.

      For hiring, instead of actively searching for candidates, utilizing a platform like Indeed can help streamline the process and provide high-quality matches. Indeed, with over 350 million monthly visitors, offers features like scheduling, screening, and messaging to help connect with candidates quickly and efficiently. The platform is trusted by 93% of employers for delivering the highest quality matches compared to other job sites. On the other hand, when it comes to managing personal finances, Rocket Money serves as a valuable tool to help identify and cancel unwanted subscriptions, monitor spending, and lower bills. With over 5 million users, Rocket Money has helped save its members an average of $720 a year and over $500 billion in canceled subscriptions. In the realm of science, specifically biology, it's fascinating to learn that every cell in our body has its own circadian clock, influencing the cell's behavior based on the time of day. This intricate system, which includes the nervous and metabolic systems, is a testament to the complexity of biological organisms and the potential for discoveries through advanced data analysis, computational power, and innovative research.

    • Understanding complex systems in biologyBiology is shifting towards understanding complex systems and networks instead of individual organisms or species, requiring a systems perspective to identify key interactions and variables

      In the field of biology, there has been a shift towards understanding complex systems and networks instead of focusing solely on individual organisms or species. This change has been driven by advancements in molecular biology profiling technologies, which have made it possible to assay gene expression and genetic variations in great detail. However, making sense of this vast amount of data requires a systems perspective. Researchers are trying to identify the key interactions between microscopic elements that produce macroscopic features. More data is not always useful by itself, and it's essential to identify the state variables that the system actually cares about. This process is referred to as coarse graining and emergence, where we focus on a small number of variables to understand the overall behavior of the system. For example, in physics, we don't need to know the exact position and velocity of every atom to understand how the Earth orbits the sun. Instead, we focus on the center of mass and velocity. Similarly, in biology, it's crucial to identify the essential interactions and variables that govern the behavior of cells and organisms. The Mindscape Big Picture Scholarship, offered by Bold.org, aims to support young students who are interested in thinking deeply about these fundamental concepts.

    • A biology professor's perspective on self-organization in living systems through computational omics researchA biology professor uses computational methods to study self-organization in living systems, collaborating with experimentalists and running an in silico 'dry lab'. She acknowledges skepticism towards theoretical research but believes interdisciplinary approaches are key to understanding complex biological systems.

      The speaker, a biology professor with a background in theoretical physics, is passionate about understanding how living systems self-organize at various scales, from molecular complexes to ecological networks. She approaches this problem from a computational perspective and collaborates extensively with experimentalists to test her models. Despite being a theorist, she runs a "dry lab" where all experiments are in silico. She acknowledges that there's still skepticism towards theoretical or non-experimental research in biology, but she believes that this is changing as the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in understanding complex biological systems becomes more recognized. The term "omics" refers to various fields of study that focus on large-scale analysis of biological data, such as genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics.

    • From Genomics to Transcriptomics and ProteomicsGenetic research has evolved from DNA sequencing to analyzing mRNA and protein abundances, providing a more comprehensive understanding of gene function and regulation.

      The study of genetics and gene expression has evolved significantly over the past few decades, moving beyond the sequencing of DNA to the analysis of mRNA and protein abundances. This progression, from genomics to transcriptomics and proteomics, has given scientists an unprecedented understanding of gene function and regulation. Initially, the focus was on understanding the DNA sequence and its variations between individuals or species. However, the development of microarray technology allowed for the simultaneous measurement of mRNA abundances across thousands of genes, providing insights into gene expression and function. This period was referred to as genomics and transcriptomics. Now, with next-generation sequencing technologies, scientists can analyze the entire genome, mRNA, and protein levels of a sample, gaining a comprehensive understanding of a given sample's biological state. This high-throughput approach has led to a more nuanced understanding of genes and their functions, revealing that a single gene can produce different isoforms under various conditions, leading to distinct proteins or regulatory properties. In summary, the study of genetics and gene expression has progressed from the sequencing of DNA to the analysis of mRNA and protein abundances, providing a more comprehensive understanding of gene function and regulation. This evolution has led to a more nuanced view of genes, revealing their complex and dynamic nature.

    • Biology challenges the lock-and-key model of protein functionIn biology, proteins and regulatory molecules can bind to multiple targets, challenging the assumption of a one-to-one relationship and offering new insights into systems-level control

      The binding of proteins to one another and the targeting of regulatory elements by regulatory proteins is not as specific as once thought. The assumption of a lock-and-key mechanism, where each protein has a clear and distinct function, may limit discoveries in biology. This concept is challenging to grasp because we often think of designed systems where each part has a specific purpose. However, in biology, the boundaries are not always clear, and evolution through natural selection results in complex systems where multiple functions can be served by a single protein or regulatory molecule. MicroRNAs, small noncoding RNA molecules, serve as an example of this concept. They are very short, 6 to 8 bases long, and can bind to multiple mRNA molecules, leading to a many-to-many relationship between microRNAs and their targets. This flies in the face of the one-to-one assumption that we are taught early on in biology. The evolution of such a nonspecific binding mechanism may serve a purpose in exerting systems-level control over entire processes by redundantly targeting different elements of that system. Gary Wilk and I investigated this concept using data from TCGA, a repository of genomic data, and found statistical evidence of systems-level control through redundant targeting of microRNAs and their targets. In this way, the biological world challenges our assumptions and offers new insights into the complex and interconnected nature of living organisms.

    • Understanding complex biological systems through gene interconnectedness and microRNA pathwaysResearchers analyze gene expression levels and microRNA interactions to measure pathway activity and infer network structure, ultimately aiming to understand individual node effects on system behavior.

      Researchers are working on understanding complex biological systems by analyzing the interconnectedness of genes and their pathways, as well as the potential interactions between them. This involves summarizing the expression levels of genes in a particular pathway to measure its activity and identifying microRNA pathway pairs where microRNA levels correlate with decreased pathway activity. However, researchers are now also considering the "wiring diagrams" or networks of putative interactions between genes, acknowledging that these diagrams are incomplete and subject to ongoing discovery. The ultimate goal is to understand the causal effects of individual nodes on the behavior of the system as a whole, but this is a challenging problem due to the vast amount of omics data available and the underdetermined nature of the problem. Researchers are making progress by looking for patterns of correlation in the data to infer network structure, but it's not yet at the level where everyone agrees on the circuits in the same way they agree on the organs in the body. This work is reminiscent of causal networks in other fields, such as social science and medicine, and the ultimate goal is to understand the causal effects of individual nodes on the behavior of the system as a whole.

    • Understanding biological networks requires detailed information beyond statistical propertiesBiological networks are complex, adaptive systems that require a nuanced approach combining domain expertise and computational analysis for accurate understanding and prediction

      While statistical properties of complex biological networks can provide some insights into their functionality, recovering every node and edge in detail is crucial for fully understanding their behavior. Biological networks, as rich and complex systems, are unique due to their adaptability, non-equilibrium state, and reliability despite environmental and genetic variations. These networks are not fine-tuned and exhibit a wide basin of attraction, meaning their systems-level effects are important. Machine learning and AI play significant roles in analyzing these networks, but a naive application of these techniques may not yield valuable results without prior knowledge of the biological context. The complex nature of biological systems requires a nuanced approach that combines computational analysis with domain expertise.

    • Understanding the geometry of biological data to identify meaningful variationsBiological data analysis benefits from integrating old and new data, but understanding the geometry of low-dimensional manifolds within high-dimensional feature spaces can help identify meaningful variations and insights into complex biological systems.

      In the field of biology, particularly in the area of machine learning and data analysis, there's a growing interest in integrating existing, albeit incomplete or erroneous, data with new discoveries. This approach contrasts with the strategy used in games like chess or Go, where it's better for the computer to learn on its own without human intervention. However, given the complexity of biological systems, with approximately 20,000 genes or mRNAs to consider, it might be beneficial to constrain the search space. This can be achieved by understanding the geometry of the low-dimensional manifold within the high-dimensional feature space of biological data. This geometry can help identify meaningful variations and deviations, providing insights into the behavior of biological systems as a whole. While significant progress has been made in this area through techniques like nonlinear dimension reduction and manifold learning, challenges remain. These include the vast amount of data and the need to accurately model the complex, non-linear relationships within biological systems.

    • Exploring gene-protein relationships for improved healthcareBy analyzing gene expression and circadian rhythms, researchers can develop better diagnostics and therapeutics, potentially improving overall health outcomes. Understanding the influence of feeding behaviors on circadian rhythms could lead to more effective jet lag recovery.

      Understanding the complex relationships between genes, proteins, and their respective roles in the body, particularly in the context of circadian rhythms, can lead to significant advancements in healthcare. By measuring physiological time through multi-gene expression profiles, researchers can potentially develop better diagnostics and therapeutic interventions. For instance, the circadian rhythm, a self-sustained 24-hour oscillation, can be influenced by feeding behaviors, with high calorie intake in the morning acting as a more effective phase resetting signal than other times of the day. This knowledge could help individuals recover from jet lag more efficiently and potentially improve overall health outcomes. However, the challenge lies in determining the appropriate scale for analyzing this vast, 20,000-dimensional data space. Future research will focus on adapting this scale to different regions of the data, enabling the discovery of new hypotheses and ultimately, better health outcomes.

    • Discovery of a molecular clock in every cellThe molecular clock, present in nearly every cell, regulates processes through a temperature-compensated transcription-translation feedback loop, enabling efficient coordination and orchestration of functions across the body.

      Our bodies have a molecular clock, nearly present in every cell, with an approximate 24-hour period. This discovery was surprising as it was initially thought that only the brain would require such a clock. This core clock circuit is a transcription-translation feedback loop, involving genes that regulate each other's transcription, creating negative feedback oscillations. These oscillations are temperature-compensated, allowing for consistent rhythms across a wide range of temperatures. This molecular clock system enables processes to be coordinated and orchestrated across the body without direct communication between cells. The discovery of peripheral clocks in every tissue raises questions about its purpose, one hypothesis being that it allows for efficient coordination and orchestration of processes in a spatially extended system. The clock's robust 24-hour period, despite varying temperatures, highlights its importance in anticipating daily changes. However, the exact mechanisms behind temperature compensation and its sensitivity to environmental temperature fluctuations are still not well understood.

    • Understanding the intricacies of biological clocksBiological clocks are complex systems that regulate various biological processes and function through chemical oscillators, temperature communication, and gene control. Their study has significant implications for health and therapeutic interventions.

      Our bodies have intricate biological clocks, which function through chemical oscillators, and these oscillators are connected to each other and to the environment through various signaling molecules and physical interactions. These clocks are crucial for various biological processes, including metabolism, lifespan, and reproduction. The design of these biological clocks is a complex challenge, as they need to function accurately under different temperature conditions and communicate with other cells and systems. The study of these clocks is ongoing, and many fundamental questions remain unanswered. For instance, the exact mechanism of communication between different oscillators and cells is not yet fully understood. The oscillators are not isolated entities but are part of larger networks, with many genes under circadian control. The discovery of these biological clocks and their functions has significant implications for understanding various health conditions and developing therapeutic interventions.

    • The circadian rhythm's impact on biological processesUnderstanding the circadian rhythm's role in regulating metabolism, gene expression, and other processes could lead to insights into healthy aging and extending lifespans.

      The circadian rhythm plays a crucial role in regulating various biological processes in organisms, including fruit flies and humans. These processes, such as metabolism and gene expression, can differ significantly depending on the time of day. Knocking out certain genes associated with the circadian rhythm can lead to arrhythmic behavior and similar lifespans, regardless of caloric intake. This suggests that the specific genes under circadian control have a significant impact on macroscopic outcomes, including lifespan. Furthermore, disruptions in sleep and circadian rhythms have been linked to neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's. Research is ongoing to understand the connections between circadian rhythms and healthy aging. In essence, the circadian rhythm acts as a complex system that regulates various biological processes, and understanding this system could potentially lead to insights into extending healthy human lifespans. The study of complex systems, including biological networks, offers a common approach to investigating these phenomena. While each system may have unique features, the methods used to study them can provide valuable insights.

    • Identifying minimal changes in networks to recover normal propertiesNetwork analysis can help identify statistical differences between normal and cancer samples, allowing researchers to target a smaller number of nodes and edges experimentally, while considering whether leading eigenvalues fully explain network function.

      While it's tempting to focus on specific genes or molecules when studying biological systems, it's important to remember that complex outcomes result from systems-level properties. However, to make interventions or produce desired outcomes, we need to narrow down our focus. One approach is to use network analysis to identify statistical differences between normal and cancer samples at the whole network level, and then identify the minimal number of edges that need to be altered to recover the statistical properties of the normal sample. This can help researchers target a smaller number of nodes and edges experimentally. Additionally, while coarse-grained statistical properties can provide valuable insights, it's important to consider whether recovering the leading eigenvalues of the graph is enough to understand the function of the network fully. Overall, this approach can help bridge the gap between understanding complex systems at a systems level and making targeted interventions.

    • Focusing on smooth patterns in complex networks and exploring 'rules of life' can lead to deeper insightsExploring smooth patterns and 'rules of life' in complex networks can simplify understanding, reveal underlying constraints, and bridge microscopic and macroscopic observations

      When analyzing complex networks, focusing on the smoothest patterns may provide valuable insights into the flow of information in a biologically meaningful way. The graph's coarse features can be mathematically characterized, potentially simplifying the understanding of the system without requiring extensive detail. Furthermore, the concept of "rules of life" is a useful one for understanding the relationship between microscopic and macroscopic observations. This concept refers to the constraints or organizing principles that enable us to move from microscopic descriptions, such as omics data, to macroscopic observations, like whether a cell is cancerous or an organism is a mouse or a frog. Discovering these rules can help us gain insight into the system and better understand the underlying constraints. In summary, focusing on the smooth patterns in complex networks and exploring the rules of life can lead to a deeper understanding of complex systems, allowing us to make connections between microscopic and macroscopic observations.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    AMA | September 2024

    AMA | September 2024

    Welcome to the September 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with AMA questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/09/02/ama-september-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    287 | Jean-Paul Faguet on Institutions and the Legacy of History

    287 | Jean-Paul Faguet on Institutions and the Legacy of History

    One common feature of complex systems is sensitive dependence on initial conditions: a small change in how systems begin evolving can lead to large differences in their later behavior. In the social sphere, this is a way of saying that history matters. But it can be hard to quantify how much certain specific historical events have affected contemporary conditions, because the number of variables is so large and their impacts are so interdependent. Political economist Jean-Paul Faguet and collaborators have examined one case where we can closely measure the impact today of events from centuries ago: how Colombian communities are still affected by 16th-century encomienda, a colonial forced-labor institution. We talk about this and other examples of the legacy of history.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/26/287-jean-paul-faguet-on-institutions-and-the-legacy-of-history/

    Jean-Paul Faguet received a Ph.D. in Political Economy and an M.Sc. in Economics from the London School of Economics, and an Master of Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. He is currently Professor of the Political Economy of Development at LSE. He serves as the Chair of the Decentralization Task Force for the Initiative for Policy Dialogue. Among his awards are the W.J.M. Mackenzie Prize for best political science book.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    286 | Blaise Agüera y Arcas on the Emergence of Replication and Computation

    286 | Blaise Agüera y Arcas on the Emergence of Replication and Computation

    Understanding how life began on Earth involves questions of chemistry, geology, planetary science, physics, and more. But the question of how random processes lead to organized, self-replicating, information-bearing systems is a more general one. That question can be addressed in an idealized world of computer code, initialized with random sequences and left to run. Starting with many such random systems, and allowing them to mutate and interact, will we end up with "lifelike," self-replicating programs? A new paper by Blaise Agüera y Arcas and collaborators suggests that the answer is yes. This raises interesting questions about whether computation is an attractor in the space of relevant dynamical processes, with implications for the origin and ubiquity of life.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/19/286-blaise-aguera-y-arcas-on-the-emergence-of-replication-and-computation/

    Blaise Agüera y Arcas received a B.A. in physics from Princeton University. He is currently a vice-president of engineering at Google, leader of the Cerebra team, and a member of the Paradigms of Intelligence team. He is the author of the books Ubi Sunt and Who Are We Now?, and the upcoming What Is Intelligence?


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality

    285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality

    Being rational necessarily involves engagement with probability. Given two possible courses of action, it can be rational to prefer the one that could possibly result in a worse outcome, if there's also a substantial probability for an even better outcome. But one's attitude toward risk -- averse, tolerant, or even seeking -- also matters. Do we work to avoid the worse possible outcome, even if there is potential for enormous reward? Nate Silver has long thought about probability and prediction, from sports to politics to professional poker. In his his new book On The Edge: The Art of Risking Everything, Silver examines a set of traits characterizing people who welcome risks.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/12/285-nate-silver-on-prediction-risk-and-rationality/

    Nate Silver received a B.A. in economics from the University of Chicago. He worked as a baseball analyst, developing the PECOTA statistical system (Player Empirical Comparison and Optimization Test Algorithm). He later founded the FiveThirtyEight political polling analysis site. His first book, The Signal and the Noise, was awarded the Phi Beta Kappa Society Book Award in Science. He is the co-host (with Maria Konnikova) of the Risky Business podcast.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | August 2024

    AMA | August 2024

    Welcome to the August 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/05/ama-august-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/seanmcarroll

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    284 | Doris Tsao on How the Brain Turns Vision Into the World

    284 | Doris Tsao on How the Brain Turns Vision Into the World

    The human brain does a pretty amazing job of taking in a huge amount of data from multiple sensory modalities -- vision, hearing, smell, etc. -- and constructing a coherent picture of the world, constantly being updated in real time. (Although perhaps in discrete moments, rather than continuously, as we learn in this podcast...) We're a long way from completely understanding how that works, but amazing progress has been made in identifying specific parts of the brain with specific functions in this process. Today we talk to leading neuroscientist Doris Tsao about the specific workings of vision, from how we recognize faces to how we construct a model of the world around us.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/29/284-doris-tsao-on-how-the-brain-turns-vision-into-the-world/

    Doris Tsao received her Ph.D. in neurobiology from Harvard University. She is currently a professor of molecular and cell biology, and a member of the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, at the University of California, Berkeley. Among her awards are a MacArthur Fellowship, membership in the National Academy of Sciences, the Eppendorf and Science International Prize in Neurobiology, the National Institutes of Health Director’s Pioneer Award, the Golden Brain Award from the Minerva Foundation, the Perl-UNC Neuroscience Prize, and the Kavli Prize in Neuroscience.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    Change is scary. But sometimes it can all work out for the best. There's no guarantee of that, however, even when the change in question involves the introduction of a powerful new technology. Today's guest, Daron Acemoglu, is a political economist who has long thought about the relationship between economics and political institutions. In his most recent book (with Simon Johnson), Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity, he looks at how technological innovations affect the economic lives of ordinary people. We talk about how such effects are often for the worse, at least to start out, until better institutions are able to eventually spread the benefits more broadly.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/22/283-daron-acemoglu-on-technology-inequality-and-power/

    Daron Acemoglu received a Ph.D. in economics from the London School of Economics. He is currently Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a fellow of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Econometric Society. Among his awards are the John Bates Clark Medal and the Nemmers Prize in Economics. In 2015, he was named the most cited economist of the past 10 years.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    The philosophy of mathematics would be so much easier if it weren't for infinity. The concept seems natural, but taking it seriously opens the door to counterintuitive results. As mathematician and philosopher Joel David Hamkins says in this conversation, when we say that the natural numbers are "0, 1, 2, 3, and so on," that "and so on" is hopelessly vague. We talk about different ways to think about the puzzles of infinity, how they might be resolved, and implications for mathematical realism.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/15/282-joel-david-hamkins-on-puzzles-of-reality-and-infinity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Joel David Hamkins received his Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley. He is currently the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Logic at the University of Notre Dame. He is a pioneer of the idea of the set theory multiverse. He is the top-rated user by reputation score on MathOverflow. He is currently working on The Book of Infinity, to be published by MIT Press.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Welcome to the July 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/08/ama-july-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    281 | Samir Okasha on the Philosophy of Agency and Evolution

    281 | Samir Okasha on the Philosophy of Agency and Evolution

    Just like with physics, in biology it is perfectly possible to do most respectable work without thinking much about philosophy, but there are unmistakably foundational questions where philosophy becomes crucial. When do we say that a collection of matter (or bits) is alive? When does it become an agent, capable of making decisions? What are the origins of morality and altruistic behavior? We talk with one of the world's leading experts, Samir Okasha, about the biggest issues in modern philosophy of biology.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/01/281-samir-okasha-on-the-philosophy-of-agency-and-evolution/

    Samir Okasha received his D.Phil. in Philosophy from the University of Oxford. He is currently Professor of the Philosophy of Science at the University of Bristol. He is a winner of the Lakatos Award for his book Evolution and the Levels of Selection, and is a Fellow of the British Academy.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Related Episodes

    112 | Fyodor Urnov on Gene Editing, CRISPR, and Human Engineering

    112 | Fyodor Urnov on Gene Editing, CRISPR, and Human Engineering

    Not too long ago nobody carried a mobile phone; now almost everybody does. That’s the kind of rate of rapid progress we’re seeing with our ability to directly edit genomes. With the use of CRISPR-Cas9 and other techniques, gene editing is becoming commonplace. How does that work — and perhaps more importantly, how are we going to put it to use? Fyodor Urnov has worked in this area from its beginning, having coined the term “gene editing.” We talk about how this new technology can be used to cure or prevent disease, as well as the pros and cons of designer babies.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Fyodor Urnov received his Ph.D. in Biology from Brown University. He is currently professor of Genetic, Genomics, and Development in the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology at UC Berkeley, as well as Director for Technology and Translation at the Innovative Genomics Institute. His research focuses on using CRISPR gene-editing techniques to develop treatments for sickle cell disease, radiation injury, and other conditions, as well as guiding IGI researchers as they bring these therapies from the lab to the clinic.

    Todays episode is sponsored by The Great Courses Plus. Mindscape listeners get a free trial if they sign up at http://thegreatcoursesplus.com/mindscape.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    88 | Neil Shubin on Evolution, Genes, and Dramatic Transitions

    88 | Neil Shubin on Evolution, Genes, and Dramatic Transitions

    “What good is half a wing?” That’s the rhetorical question often asked by people who have trouble accepting Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection. Of course it’s a very answerable question, but figuring out what exactly the answer is leads us to some fascinating biology. Neil Shubin should know: he is the co-discoverer of Tiktaalik Roseae, an ancient species of fish that was in the process of learning to walk and breathe on land. We talk about how these major transitions happen — typically when evolution finds a way to re-purpose existing organs into new roles — and how we can learn about them by studying living creatures and the information contained in their genomes.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Neil Shubin received his Ph.D. in organismic and evolutionary biology from Harvard University. He is currently the the Robert Bensley Distinguished Service Professor and Associate Dean of Biological Sciences at the University of Chicago. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Philosophical society. His first book, Your Inner Fish, was chosen by the National Academy of Sciences as the best science book of 2009, and was subsequently made into a TV special. His new book is Some Assembly Required: Decoding Four Billion Years of Life, from Ancient Fossils to DNA.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Q&A: BRUCE LIPTON, Ph.D., Author

    Q&A: BRUCE LIPTON, Ph.D., Author
    Aired 08/22/10 (Part 2 of 2) EVOLUTIONARY LEADERS CALL TO ACTION

    BRUCE LIPTON, Ph.D., a leading voice in new biology, bridges science and spirit. A cell biologist by training, he taught at the University of Wisconsin's School of Medicine, and later performed pioneering studies at Stanford University. He's the author of THE BIOLOGY OF BELIEF and his latest with Steve Bhaerman, SPONTANEOUS EVOLUTION.

    http://www.brucelipton.com/

    http://www.evolutionaryleaders.net/laevent/

    Elizabeth Jeffries PhD - Through the Kaleidoscope - 146

    Elizabeth Jeffries PhD - Through the Kaleidoscope - 146

    Elizabeth Jeffries PhD, author of Through the Kaleidoscope, sits down with Irenicast co-host Jeff, bringing forth spiritual treasures out of the world of molecular biology. For anyone seeking to ground their religious affections and theological process in the solid matter of the natural world, Jeffries offers fresh ideas-- herself having navigated a path of deconstruction with an open mind and open heart.

    Growing up evangelical, Elizabeth Jeffries was certain about how the world worked. She had an unfalsifiable understanding of scripture, sin, God’s will, and the role of women, and she carried this same certitude into her graduate study of cell biology. There, rather than discover the simplicity of the natural world, she instead discovered the simplistic lenses through which she was viewing the world all along.

    In her first book, a work of deep reflection and vulnerable storytelling, Elizabeth invites readers to candidly tour her conservative Christian upbringing and the self-condemning doctrines that shaped her identity.  With grace and intelligence, she critically engages her past without condemning it. She brilliantly draws from her insights in the laboratory and offers a new set of metaphors from the field of cell biology to help reframe concepts like identity, community, certainty, perfectionism and truth. The result is a rich tapestry of the scientific and the sacred.

    Through the Kaleidoscope is Elizabeth’s journey through the emergence, maturation, and collapse of the evangelical worldview—as well as her re-enchantment with an inclusive truth too deep and too wide to ever be contained in just one set of religious metaphors.

     

    RELEVANT LINKS 

    From Our Conversation with Elizabeth Jeffries PhD

     

    THANK YOU - ELIZABETH JEFFRIES PhD

    A big thank you to Elizabeth Jeffries PhD for being on the show this week.  Make sure to keep up to date on all her work on her website http://www.elizabethjeffrieswrites.com.  Also follow her on Instagram and Twitter.  And of course make sure to get your copy of Through the Kaleidoscope: How Exploring Cell Biology Transforms My Relationship with God

     

    YOUR SUPPORT

    Thank you for listening to Irenicast.  If you appreciate the show please consider sharing your appreciation by rating, reviewing and/or subscribing to the podcast on iTunes, Google Play, Stitcher, or whatever platform you’re listening on.

    You can also help support the show financially by going to irenicast.com/amazon to do your Amazon shopping.  This will cost you nothing, but Amazon will give a portion of the proceeds to the show.

     

    IRENCAST HOSTS

    Rev. Allen O’Brien, MAT | co-founder & co-host | allen@irenicast.com

    Allen is a venerator of emotionality. He thrives on education, peace, and interconnectedness— passions which permeate his work as pastor, writer, lover of all the things, and occasional vegan.

    You can connect with Allen (@RevAllenOB) on Facebook,Twitter, Instagram, GoodReads, & LinkedIn.

    Rev. Bonnie Rambob, MDiv | co-host | bonnie@irenicast.com

    As a pastor, activist, educator, mom, and possibility artist, Bonnie invites people into newness. She loves climbing trees, knitting and hiking while conversing with friends about smashing the patriarchy.

    You can connect with Bonnie on Facebook and at Parkside Community Church-UCC

     

    Pastor Casey Tinnin, MTS | co-host | casey@irenicast.com

    Preacher, protester, everybody’s pastor. Casey geeks out on comic books, talking theology, politics, and sex.  He’s most free when he is dancing, cooking with his partner Jose, or walking their dog Kole.

    You can follow Casey on Twitter and Facebook, or you can check out his blog The Queerly Faithful Pastor or loomisucc.org

    Jeff Manildi | co-founder, producer & co-host | jeff@irenicast.com

    Chaser of tales and climax initiator, Jeff rises to the occasion, edging to a satisfying completion. Get your mind out of the gutter, we’re talking story, not sex. Jeff expresses his creativity by curating diverse ideas, energies and people. 

    Follow Jeff (@JeffManildi) on facebook, instagram & twitter.  You can also listen to Jeff’s other podcast Divine Cinema.

    Rev. Rajeev Rambob, MCL | co-host | raj@irenicast.com

    Rajeev loves thoughtful and provocative conversation over food and drink, most often with his family. He’s a loyal, smart-ass friend who believes in the power of spiritual journeys. Feminist, Anti-colonial, Process Theology-nerd.  

    You can follow Rajeev on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn

     

    ADD YOUR VOICE TO THE CONVERSATION

    Join our progressive Christian conversations on faith and culture by interacting with us through the following links:

    Read Us on our blog Irenicon

    Email Us at podcast@irenicast.com

    Follow Us on Twitter and Google+

    Like Us on Facebook

    Listen & Subscribe to Us on iTunes, Google Play, Android, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn, iHeart Radio, Spreaker and SoundCloud

    Speak to Us on our Feedback Page and the Post Evangelical Facebook Group

    See Us on Instagram

    Support Us on Amazon

    Love Us?

     

    CREDITS

    Intro and Outro music created by Mike Golin.

     

    This post may contain affiliate links.  An Irenicon is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com

    67 | Kate Jeffery on Entropy, Complexity, and Evolution

    67 | Kate Jeffery on Entropy, Complexity, and Evolution

    Our observable universe started out in a highly non-generic state, one of very low entropy, and disorderliness has been growing ever since. How, then, can we account for the appearance of complex systems such as organisms and biospheres? The answer is that very low-entropy states typically appear simple, and high-entropy states also appear simple, and complexity can emerge along the road in between. Today’s podcast is more of a discussion than an interview, in which behavioral neuroscientist Kate Jeffery and I discuss how complexity emerges through cosmological and biological evolution. As someone on the biological side of things, Kate is especially interested in how complexity can build up and then catastrophically disappear, as in mass extinction events.

    There were some audio-quality issues with the remote recording of this episode, but loyal listeners David Gennaro and Ben Cordell were able to help repair it. I think it sounds pretty good!

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Kate Jeffery received her Ph.D. in behavioural neuroscience from the University of Edinburgh. She is currently a professor in the Department of Behavioural Neuroscience at University College, London. She is the founder and Director of the Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience at UCL.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.