Logo

    487. Is It Okay to Have a Party Yet?

    en-usDecember 23, 2021
    What is the birthday effect in relation to Covid-19?
    How can individuals minimize risks during mass gatherings?
    What alternatives to traditional gatherings are suggested?
    Why is understanding risk assessment crucial during the pandemic?
    How do vaccines impact decisions about attending events?

    • The Birthday Effect of Covid-19: Weighing Risks and Rewards of Mass GatheringsWhen considering attending or hosting mass gatherings during Covid-19, it's crucial to prioritize public health by following safety protocols, considering individual contexts, and being mindful of the larger community to prevent inadvertently spreading the virus.

      Freakonomics, M.D. episode sheds light on the birthday effect of Covid-19. The episode also highlights the necessity of weighing risks and rewards before hosting or attending mass gatherings amidst the pandemic. Despite vaccines, younger people attending such events may inadvertently spread Covid-19 to more vulnerable individuals, causing a ripple effect. Medical experts recommend making informed decisions by following safety protocols, considering individual contexts, and being mindful of the larger community. As the pandemic poses an ongoing challenge, it is vital to prioritize public health and work together to curb the spread of the virus without compromising safety.

    • Making informed decisions for safe gatherings during the pandemic.Even with vaccinations, there is still a risk of Covid-19 spread. Consider the potential impact on others, prioritize safety, and use options like greeting guests outdoors or limiting party size to mitigate risk and protect the community. Stay informed and make responsible choices.

      Even with vaccinations, there is still a risk of Covid-19 spread at gatherings and events. It is important to make informed decisions and consider the potential impact on others, such as unvaccinated family members who may be more susceptible to severe illness or death. While autonomy over personal decisions is important, it is crucial to prioritize the safety and well-being of everyone in the community. Options like greeting guests outdoors or limiting party size can help mitigate risk while still allowing for socialization. As the pandemic continues, it is essential to stay informed and make responsible choices to protect ourselves and those around us.

    • Navigating Social Gatherings in the Era of COVID-19Balancing risks and benefits can help individuals make informed decisions about in-person social gatherings during the pandemic, while adaptable approaches and technology can help maintain connections while minimizing spread.

      The COVID-19 pandemic has caused people to find alternatives to traditional gatherings by leveraging technology, such as virtual birthday parties. However, as vaccines become available and rapid tests are more widely accessible, it may become safe for people to gather again. Economics and health intersect in finding solutions to pandemic-related problems, as seen in the Freakonomics Radio Network's segment 'Covid and 'The Birthday Effect.'' While guidelines and regulations may vary by location, people can make informed decisions about their own safety by weighing the risks and benefits of gathering in person. As we continue to navigate the pandemic, adaptable approaches and technology will play a crucial role in maintaining social connections while minimizing the spread of the virus.

    • Birthday Celebrations with Loved Ones Could Be a Driving Force of COVID-19 SpreadEven small gatherings with friends and family can contribute to the spread of COVID-19, especially in areas with high infection rates. It's important to continue following social distancing measures and remain vigilant to protect ourselves and loved ones.

      Smaller get-togethers, like birthdays with close friends and family, could be a potential driving force of Covid-19 spread. Researchers found that in counties with low Covid rates, there was no increased rate of infection in the weeks following birthdays. However, in counties with high Covid rates, there was a 30% increase in Covid diagnoses following a household member's birthday. Birthdays serve as a natural experiment for studying the impact of smaller group gatherings on Covid spread, providing an opportunity to crunch big data. This highlights the need for continued vigilance and adherence to social distancing measures, even in small get-togethers with loved ones.

    • Celebrating Birthdays During a PandemicBirthday celebrations in households with Covid-19 hotspots can increase the chance of infection by 30%, especially for children. Parents should consider alternative celebration methods to reduce the risk of transmission.

      Birthday celebrations in households with Covid-19 hotspots can increase the likelihood of infection by 30%, with children's birthdays having three times the effect. This is likely due to the challenges of canceling children's birthday parties and difficulty in enforcing social distancing and mask-wearing among children. The correlation between birthdays and Covid-19 was confirmed through a falsification test. The political leanings of the county and shelter-in-place policies did not affect the association between birthdays and Covid-19 infection. Parents should consider alternative ways to celebrate their child's birthday during the pandemic to reduce the risk of transmission.

    • The Link Between Social Gatherings and COVID-19 InfectionsBirthday parties and college sports celebrations have been linked to increased COVID-19 infections. It's important to follow public health guidelines and limit gatherings to prevent the spread of the virus, especially among vulnerable populations. Natural experiments like college basketball tournaments can provide insights into the impact of social gatherings on transmission.

      Social gatherings, such as birthday parties and college sports celebrations, have been found to be associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 infections. Families were more likely to experience COVID-19 cases in the weeks following a child's birthday party. Similarly, college sports celebrations resulted in a higher number of COVID-19 cases across 64 colleges in the country. This highlights the importance of limiting social gatherings and adhering to public health guidelines to prevent the spread of COVID-19, especially among vulnerable populations. Natural experiments, such as the college basketball tournament held during the pandemic, can provide valuable insights into the effects of social gatherings on COVID-19 transmission.

    • March Madness and its Role in Covid IncreasesSocial connection is important, but public health decisions must balance the tradeoffs and consider human behavior. Harm-reduction strategies and understanding human needs can improve pandemic responses.

      According to Ashley's study, counties with colleges that participated in March Madness experienced a significant increase in Covid cases starting eight days after the final game. This highlights the importance of feeling connected to others and the potential consequences of public health decisions that limit social interaction. The study also reminds us of the tradeoffs that public health decisions involve and the need for harm-reduction strategies in response to pandemics. Vinay Prasad, an epidemiology and biostatistics expert, emphasizes the importance of accounting for human behavior in pandemic responses, as not everyone will follow guidelines as expected. Overall, understanding human needs and behavior can improve the effectiveness of pandemic responses.

    • Understanding the Risks and Tradeoffs of Celebrating Life Events During the PandemicWhen it comes to hosting events during the pandemic, we need to carefully consider the potential risks and make informed decisions based on available data. It's ultimately up to us to balance celebrating important moments with keeping ourselves and others safe.

      When it comes to celebrating life events during the pandemic, it's important to understand and quantify the potential risks. Small gatherings with close friends or family may seem safe, but they can still pose a significant risk. Our ability to assess risk may not be as good as we think, and it's important to make informed decisions based on available data. The decision to host events during the pandemic requires careful consideration of the tradeoffs between celebrating important moments and keeping people safe. Ultimately, it's up to each individual to make responsible choices based on better understanding of risk.

    • Precautions and Testing: Vital Steps in Containing Covid-19Testing and taking precautions, such as quarantining and isolation, are crucial in stopping the spread of Covid-19. Evidence-based decisions can help navigate through the pandemic. The next episode of Freakonomics M.D. explores the impact of retirement on the brain.

      Testing and taking precautions are crucial in preventing the spread of Covid-19. The ability to test has changed the way we approach gatherings and events. Rules and norms are still being shaped as we navigate through this pandemic. Despite the challenges, the power of facts and evidence-based decisions can make a huge difference. Quarantining and isolation are necessary measures if exposed to the virus. In the upcoming episode of Freakonomics M.D., the impact of retirement on the brain will be explored.

    • The Impact of Politics on Healthcare DecisionsPolitics and ideology can influence healthcare decisions made by doctors, highlighting the need for awareness and informed decision-making by doctors and policymakers. Patients must be aware of this potential impact on their care.

      Politics can play a major role in determining the decisions that doctors make when caring for patients. Though doctors take an oath to prioritize patient's best interests, their beliefs and ideologies can potentially impact their care decisions. Additionally, medicine can also influence politics, as shown by former U.S. Senator Bill Frist, who first worked as a doctor. Freakonomics, M.D. successfully presents facts and analysis which educate listeners on the process of learning what is most likely to be true. By sharing the reasoning behind their conclusions, the podcast enables listeners to make more informed decisions. Overall, patients can be affected by politics more than they may realize, making it important for doctors and policymakers alike to be aware of the potential impact their beliefs and ideologies may have on healthcare decisions.

    Was this summary helpful?

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    603. Did the N.F.L. Solve Diversity Hiring? (Part 1)

    603. Did the N.F.L. Solve Diversity Hiring? (Part 1)

    The biggest sports league in history had a problem: While most of its players were Black, almost none of its head coaches were. So the N.F.L. launched a hiring policy called the Rooney Rule. In the first episode of a two-part series, we look at how the rule succeeded — until it failed.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 19, 2024

    EXTRA: In Praise of Maintenance (Update)

    EXTRA: In Praise of Maintenance (Update)

    We revisit an episode from 2016 that asks: Has our culture’s obsession with innovation led us to neglect the fact that things also need to be taken care of? 

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Martin Casado, general partner at Andreessen Horowitz.
      • Ruth Schwartz Cowan, professor emerita of history and sociology of science at University of Pennsylvania.
      • Edward Glaeser, professor of economics at Harvard University.
      • Chris Lacinak, founder and president of AVPreserve.
      • Andrew Russell, provost of SUNY Polytechnic Institute.
      • Lawrence Summers, professor and president emeritus of Harvard University; former Secretary of the Treasury and former director of the National Economic Council.
      • Lee Vinsel, professor of science, technology, and society at Virginia Tech.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 16, 2024

    602. Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think?

    602. Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think?

    Young people have been reporting a sharp rise in anxiety and depression. This maps neatly onto the global rise of the smartphone. Some researchers are convinced that one is causing the other. But how strong is the evidence?

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 12, 2024

    601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?

    601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?

    Only a tiny number of “supertaskers” are capable of doing two things at once. The rest of us are just making ourselves miserable, and less productive. How can we put the — hang on a second, I've just got to get this.


    Come see Stephen Dubner live! 

    “A Questionable Evening: A strategic interrogation from two people who ask questions for a living,” featuring Stephen Dubner and PJ Vogt from Search Engine.

    Thursday, Sept. 26th, at the Bell House in Brooklyn, NY. 

    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/a-questionable-evening-evening-with-stephen-dubner-and-pj-vogt-tickets-1002544747327

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Olivia Grace, senior product manager at Slack.
      • Gloria Mark, professor of computer science at the University of California, Irvine.
      • David Strayer, professor of cognition and neural science at the University of Utah.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 05, 2024

    What Is the Future of College — and Does It Have Room for Men? (Update)

    What Is the Future of College — and Does It Have Room for Men? (Update)

    Educators and economists tell us all the reasons college enrollment has been dropping, especially for men, and how to stop the bleeding. (Part 3 of our series from 2022, “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Zachary Bleemer, assistant professor of economics at Princeton University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • D'Wayne Edwards, founder and President of Pensole Lewis College.
      • Catharine Hill, former president of Vassar College; trustee at Yale University; and managing director at Ithaka S+R.
      • Pano Kanelos, founding president of the University of Austin.
      • Amalia Miller, professor of economics at the University of Virginia.
      • Donald Ruff, president and C.E.O. of the Eagle Academy Foundation.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College, Brown University, and Prairie View A&M University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 29, 2024

    EXTRA: Why Quitting Is Usually Worth It

    EXTRA: Why Quitting Is Usually Worth It

    Stephen Dubner appears as a guest on Fail Better, a new podcast hosted by David Duchovny. The two of them trade stories about failure, and ponder the lessons that success could never teach.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 26, 2024

    The University of Impossible-to-Get-Into (Update)

    The University of Impossible-to-Get-Into (Update)

    America’s top colleges are facing record demand. So why don’t they increase supply? (Part 2 of our series from 2022, “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Peter Blair, professor of education at Harvard University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • Zachary Bleemer, assistant professor of economics at Princeton University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • Amalia Miller, professor of economics at the University of Virginia.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 22, 2024

    What Exactly Is College For? (Update)

    What Exactly Is College For? (Update)

    We think of them as intellectual enclaves and the surest route to a better life. But U.S. colleges also operate like firms, trying to differentiate their products to win market share and prestige points. In the first episode of a special series originally published in 2022, we ask what our chaotic system gets right — and wrong. (Part 1 of “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Peter Blair, faculty research Fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research and professor of education at Harvard University.
      • Catharine Hill, former president of Vassar College; trustee at Yale University; and managing director at Ithaka S+R.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College, Brown University, and Prairie View A&M University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 15, 2024

    EXTRA: Here’s Why You’re Not an Elite Athlete (Update)

    EXTRA: Here’s Why You’re Not an Elite Athlete (Update)

    There are a lot of factors that go into greatness, many of which are not obvious. As the Olympics come to a close, we revisit a 2018 episode in which top athletes from a variety of sports tell us how they made it, and what they sacrificed.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 12, 2024

    600. “If We’re All in It for Ourselves, Who Are We?”

    600. “If We’re All in It for Ourselves, Who Are We?”

    Tania Tetlow, a former federal prosecutor and now the president of Fordham University, thinks the modern campus could use a dose of old-fashioned values.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 08, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 1

    Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 1

    Our wellbeing depends on the health of animals, plants and our environment. What affects one affects all the others, and increasingly so.


    A One Health perspective is about joining forces to find integrated solutions to common challenges such as climate change and antibiotic resistance.


    Join us to hear from experts at five EU scientific agencies about how we can put One Health into practice. Whether it's safeguarding access to life-saving medicines or combating the next pandemics, a One Health approach will be essential to how our society navigates the future. 


    This is the first of our two part episode with speakers from five EU agencies.

     

    Host

    James Ramsay, Head of Communications - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)


    Guests

    • Carlos das Neves, Chief Scientist - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

    • Wim De Coen, Head of Hazard Assessment at the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

    • Mike Catchpole, Chief Scientist at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

    • Dario Piselli, Expert in environment and health at the European Environment Agency (EEA)

    • Steffen Thirstrup, Chief Medical Officer at the European Medicines Agency (EMA)


    Check our website and stay updated by subscribing to our newsletter.


    Useful links 


    **************


    Follow us on:


    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.  

    Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 2

    Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 2

    Our wellbeing depends on the health of animals, plants and our environment. What affects one affects all the others, and increasingly so.


    A One Health perspective is about joining forces to find integrated solutions to common challenges such as climate change and antibiotic resistance.


    Join us to hear from experts at five EU scientific agencies about how we can put One Health into practice. Whether it's safeguarding access to life-saving medicines or combating the next pandemics, a One Health approach will be essential to how our society navigates the future. 


    This is the second of our two part episode with speakers from five EU agencies. Listen to the first episode here.

     

    Host

    James Ramsay, Head of Communications - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)


    Guests

    • Carlos das Neves, Chief Scientist - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

    • Wim De Coen, Head of Hazard Assessment at the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

    • Mike Catchpole, Chief Scientist at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

    • Dario Piselli, Expert in environment and health at the European Environment Agency (EEA)

    • Steffen Thirstrup, Chief Medical Officer at the European Medicines Agency (EMA)


    Check our website and stay updated by subscribing to our newsletter.


    Useful links 


    **************


    Follow us on:


    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.  

    Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health in the Middle East: The Need for Responsive Health System

    Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health in the Middle East: The Need for Responsive Health System
    More than half of the Middle East population, 54% are under the age of 25 including 90 million adolescents (10-19 years of age). The growth spurt challenges of the second decade of life is mounted with early sexual debut and early marriages. Consequent unintended pregnancies and child birth, the risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections and HIV/AIDS threaten the fragile adolescent still under physical and psychological development. Pervasive conflict and displacement in the region overwhelm prevailing adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) issues and unmet needs.
    National health systems and the private sector do not typically recognize nor address sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of young people, especially unmarried adolescents. Health care providers do not recognize nor address health risks and needs of adolescents. Evidence show that adolescent health services -if exist- are fragmented and poorly coordinated. Inherent social norms, attitudes, taboos around sexual health and discriminating gender differences hinder adolescents’ SRH health literacy and access to quality services.
    What should the health sector do to transform the current approach that ignores ASRH issues? How do we respond to the urgent unmet SRH needs of the 90 million adolescents living in the Middle East?

    Wellness Check: The Current State of Women’s Health

    Wellness Check: The Current State of Women’s Health

    Julie Alvin is the SVP of content at TheSkimm & a trusted digital media executive, content strategist, and editor with expertise in women’s health & lifestyle media. She’s previously held roles at Bustle Digital Group, Time, Inc., and Refinery29, overseeing coverage of everything from news and politics to health, career, money, style, and entertainment. She is a former adjunct professor at NYU’s Master’s in Publishing program and a founding member of Chief Executive Women’s network. Julie’s appeared on Fox News, CBS, ABC, Cheddar, and other networks discussing topics like the #MeToo movement, the cost of fertility treatments, and the gender wage gap.

    On today’s episode of The Business of Wellness, we discuss: 

    • Data & highlights from The Skimm’s State of Women survey– what are women concerned about when it comes to health & wellbeing in a post-pandemic world? What are the chief concerns among women of all ages as it relates to their health? 

    • Discerning myth vs. fact on social media & across digital content: What does it mean to be an “expert” in 2023? What are TheSkimm’s editorial standards that help champion appropriate subject-matter experts for specific topics, content platforms & distribution channels? 

    • The past decade’s media  evolution/revolution: What’s different about media today? Post-pandemic? What are readers looking for from content platforms & channels, and from health professionals? How can media help women feel more empowered when it comes to their personal health, advocating for themselves & their families, and having the right information that helps arm them for any/every interaction with our current healthcare system? 

     

    🎙️Follow The Business of Wellness on Apple Podcasts & leave a 5-star rating & review 

    🎙️Hire me to consult before you invest in or get to work on that “better-for-you” product  

    🎙️Follow me @jaclynlondonrd

     

    **Advice provided on this podcast should not replace medical advice provided by your physician. 

    Dr. Usama Bilal, PhD in Epidemiology | Assistant Professor at Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health

    Dr. Usama Bilal, PhD in Epidemiology | Assistant Professor at Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health

    In this episode, we discuss what led Usama to pursue a PhD in epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University, how his doctoral training prepared him for a career in academia, and the role of activism in his past, present, and future professional journey.

    Hosted by Brooklyn Arroyo

    To connect with Usama and to learn more about his story, visit his page on the PHutures #100AlumniVoices Project website.

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io