Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Discussing the future of energy production and consumptionWe need to shift towards renewable energy sources and electrify the economy to reduce reliance on finite resources and mitigate environmental issues.

      We're at a pivotal moment in history where the way we produce and consume energy is at the forefront of shaping our future. As Sean Fennessey discussed on the Prestige TV podcast, we've made significant progress in harnessing more concentrated and versatile forms of energy, but our reliance on finite and nonrenewable resources has led to environmental issues and the need for change. Ramesh and Vinod, two experts in the field, shared their insights on the advancements being made in clean energy and the importance of electrifying as much of the economy as possible while generating electricity from renewable sources. Vinod's investment in fusion technology is a promising sign of the potential for groundbreaking innovations in this area. Overall, the conversation emphasized the importance of continuing to progress towards a clean energy economy and the potential benefits it holds for the planet and future generations.

    • The fight for a clean energy futureDespite the challenges, the exponential price decline of clean energy technologies gives us hope for a future with affordable, renewable energy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving human well-being.

      The global energy transition from fossil fuels to clean energy is a massive undertaking that will require trillions of dollars and touch every aspect of human life. However, the exponential price decline of clean energy technologies gives us reason for optimism. Solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources are now cheaper or on par with fossil fuels, and their adoption is growing rapidly. Yet, the limited time we have to address climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions makes the task urgent. We have come a long way from the dire predictions of catastrophic warming, but we are not out of the woods yet. The fight to bring down future warming and ensure a livable future for future generations requires continued momentum and innovation. As Derek Thompson, the speaker in the podcast, puts it, we're in the "messy middle" of climate change, and every tenth of a degree Celsius matters. The challenge is great, but the potential rewards are even greater: a world with clean energy, improved human well-being, and a more sustainable relationship with nature.

    • Renewable energy becoming cheaper than fossil fuelsBy 2030, renewables and electric vehicles will be cheaper alternatives to fossil fuels nearly everywhere on earth, driven by the exponential price decline in solar, wind, and battery technology.

      Clean energy is becoming increasingly cost-competitive with fossil fuels, leading the way towards a more sustainable energy future. This trend, driven by exponential price declines in solar, wind, and battery technology, is disrupting traditional energy markets and making renewable energy sources cheaper than their fossil fuel counterparts. By 2030, renewables and electric vehicles are expected to be the cheaper alternatives nearly everywhere on earth. This shift is unprecedented in the history of physical energy infrastructure and has surprised even the most optimistic experts. The continued advancement of policy and technological innovation will further accelerate this trend, ultimately contributing to lowering carbon emissions and mitigating climate change.

    • Solar and Wind Energy's Slow but Steady GrowthSolar and wind energy are rapidly gaining ground, surpassing coal generation in the US and accounting for most new electricity capacity globally. Exponential growth is expected to continue, driving down fossil fuel generation worldwide.

      Despite solar and wind energy being cheaper and more efficient than ever before, they still make up less than 10% of the total energy generation in the US. This discrepancy can be attributed to the long-term nature of energy infrastructure and the slow transition towards renewable energy sources. However, solar and wind are rapidly gaining ground, with solar recently surpassing coal generation in the US and solar and wind accounting for 80-90% of all new electricity capacity generation globally in 2022. This exponential growth from a small base is expected to continue, with solar and wind on the verge of driving down fossil fuel generation around the world. The race is on to make this transition quickly as we are already in a climate crisis.

    • Regulatory and logistical challenges hinder clean energy transitionAddressing interconnection queues, building long-range transmission lines, and overcoming local opposition and regulatory hurdles are necessary to accelerate the clean energy transition.

      The transition to clean energy is being hindered by several key bottlenecks, primarily related to grid integration and transmission. One major issue is the lengthy interconnection queues, which can take several years to process, preventing new solar and wind projects from connecting to the grid. Another issue is the difficulty of building long-range transmission lines to transport renewable energy from areas with abundant resources to areas with high demand. Local opposition to wind and solar farms, known as NIMBYism, and regulatory hurdles further complicate the process. To accelerate the clean energy transition, clearing these regulatory and logistical obstacles is crucial. This includes streamlining the approval process for renewable energy projects and building the necessary long-range transmission infrastructure. The fastest transition to clean energy is occurring in areas where these challenges have been effectively addressed.

    • Fastest renewable energy growth in Texas due to competitive market and resourcesThe US's fastest renewable energy growth is in Texas due to its competitive market, abundant resources, and easier permitting and transmission hookups, contrasting with most American states where utilities operate as monopolies and hinder consumer choice and clean energy imports.

      The fastest growth of renewable energy in the US is currently happening in Texas due to its open competitive market, abundant sun and wind resources, and relatively easy permitting and transmission hookups. This contrasts with most American states where utilities operate as monopolies, making it difficult for consumers to choose their energy provider and incentivizing utilities to generate and sell their own power rather than importing cheaper alternatives. The Biden administration has passed legislation aimed at accelerating decarbonization, but it has not directly addressed the utility regulation issue. The failure to pass a permitting reform bill is a missed opportunity to make it easier to build new clean energy infrastructure and transmission lines. The Federal Electricity Regulatory Commission is working on administrative rule-making to ease transmission and make utilities more competitive, but comprehensive utility reform remains a state-by-state issue.

    • Bridging the gap between energy preferences and political priorities in rural areasTo make national decarbonization a reality, focus on energy arguments in rural Republican areas, promote renewable energy sources, and address NIMBYism, permitting, and political persuasion.

      To make national decarbonization a reality in the US, especially in rural Republican areas where long-distance transmission lines need to be built, there's a need to bridge the gap between voters' energy preferences and their political priorities. Deregulation of utilities to make them compete instead of monopolies can help, but it's essential to focus on energy arguments rather than climate or decarbonization. Renewable energy sources like solar and wind are more popular than coal or natural gas among Americans, and they generate jobs and are cheaper. However, winning the political persuasion to build long-distance transmission lines and win over rural Republican areas is a significant challenge. The MES plan suggests overcoming NIMBYism, reforming permitting, and winning the war of political persuasion to ensure renewable energy abundance for all. It's not about sacrifice but about clean energy abundance and a brighter future.

    • Persuading people to embrace clean energyFocus on benefits like cleaner air, economic growth, and energy independence to persuade people, rather than asking for significant sacrifices.

      Persuading people to embrace clean energy and reduce their carbon footprint requires acknowledging their values and framing the transition in terms that resonate with them. The use of nuclear energy is a contentious issue, with some arguing it's necessary for a 100% renewable energy future due to the land requirements of solar and wind. However, research shows that people have "solution aversion," meaning they don't want to be asked to make significant sacrifices. Instead, focusing on the benefits of clean energy, such as cleaner air and water, economic growth, and energy independence, can be more effective in persuading people. Even those with political views that may seem opposed to clean energy solutions can be reached by reframing the issue in terms of energy security and self-sufficiency. For example, emphasizing the potential for local solar and electric vehicle usage can appeal to those who value energy independence and reducing reliance on foreign sources. Ultimately, it's essential to find common ground and emphasize the shared benefits of transitioning to a cleaner energy future.

    • Diverse Energy Mix: Nuclear, Renewables, and BeyondEmbrace a diverse energy mix with nuclear, renewables, and emerging technologies to ensure a clean, firm, and economically viable energy future.

      A diverse energy mix is crucial for meeting future energy needs while addressing environmental concerns and economic considerations. The speaker emphasized the importance of nuclear energy as a key component of this mix, acknowledging concerns about solar and wind energy's land usage but highlighting the potential for coexistence and the benefits of offshore wind and small modular nuclear reactors. The speaker also emphasized the need for continued research and development in various energy technologies, including next-generation geothermal and even space-based solar, to ensure a reliable and sustainable energy future. Ultimately, the goal is to have a variety of energy sources that are clean, firm, and economically viable to meet the remaining energy demands beyond what renewables can provide.

    • Decreasing cost of renewables vs increasing cost of nuclearRenewable energy sources and batteries are becoming more affordable, but the nuclear industry must reduce costs, especially for small modular reactors, and explore geothermal energy to remain competitive. Agriculture, forestry, and land use change are major sources of emissions and require innovative solutions.

      The cost of renewable energy sources like solar and wind, along with batteries, has been decreasing exponentially, while the cost of building new nuclear reactors has been increasing. The nuclear industry needs to make significant strides in reducing costs, especially with the emergence of small modular reactors, which are built in factories and have the potential for economies of scale. Another promising area is geothermal energy, which could potentially turn any part of the United States into a source of clean energy similar to Iceland. However, the biggest challenge lies in reducing emissions from agriculture, forestry, and land use change, particularly from cattle farming and deforestation. These sources account for a significant portion of global carbon emissions and require innovative solutions. Overall, while progress is being made in reducing emissions from electricity and transport, more work is needed to address industrial emissions and the challenges of decarbonizing agriculture.

    • The challenges of alternative proteins: cultural adoption and economicsContinued innovation and investment are crucial to address the challenges of making alternative proteins culturally adopted and economically viable, while reducing emissions from traditional agriculture and inventing new clean energy technologies.

      While investors have shown interest in alternative proteins, the cultural adoption of new foods and the economics of producing them, particularly cultured meat, are significant challenges. Ramesh Naram emphasized the importance of making traditional agriculture more productive and reducing emissions from related processes to address a significant chunk of global emissions. Despite the potential of clean energy tech, Vinod Khosla noted that many of the technologies needed to decarbonize the economy fully have yet to be invented. Both guests highlighted the importance of continued innovation and investment in these areas to tackle the complex challenges facing us.

    • Patience and persistence in venture capital for climate techStaying patient and persistent in venture capital, particularly in climate tech, can lead to significant returns despite longer timelines and complexities. Early investments in companies like QuantumScape, Impossible Foods, and Commonwealth Fusion exemplify this perspective.

      Staying patient and persistent in venture capital, particularly in the field of climate tech, can lead to significant returns despite the challenges of longer timelines and deployment complexities. Companies like QuantumScape and Impossible Foods, which had early investments, may not have been household names like software or fintech companies, but their markets were much larger and the potential rewards were substantial. Khosla Ventures' bet on Commonwealth Fusion, a fusion technology company, exemplifies this perspective, as the potential consequences of failure were minimal while the potential rewards were immense and addressed a pressing global issue like climate change. In the rapidly evolving world of quantum tech, patience and long-term vision can lead to groundbreaking innovations and substantial financial gains.

    • Harnessing the Power of FusionFusion technology is a clean, safe, and virtually limitless energy source, with the potential to replace coal and natural gas power plants by the early 2040s, once the net energy gain is achieved

      Fusion technology, unlike the nuclear power we're familiar with (fission), is a clean, safe, and virtually limitless energy source. It involves combining simple elements like deuterium and tritium to release energy, resulting in no nuclear waste or risk of nuclear proliferation. Fusion is expected to be more lightly regulated and easier to deploy, as it can be integrated with existing energy infrastructure. The main challenge is achieving a net energy gain (q factor greater than 1), which is believed to be on the horizon within the next few years. Once this milestone is reached, mass production of fusion reactors could begin, potentially converting every coal and natural gas power plant in the country by the early 2040s. This would represent a major energy breakthrough, as fusion currently supplies 0.0% of the world's energy needs.

    • A new era for fusion energyFusion energy's future looks promising with rapid progress, diverse efforts, and potential benefits like accelerated permitting, simplicity, safety, and cheap power.

      The fusion energy field is experiencing a paradigm shift, driven by a new generation of talented researchers, innovative experimentation, and entrepreneurial approaches. This optimism stems from the rapid progress made by companies like Commonwealth Fusion, which have achieved significant milestones in just a few years that were once considered impossible. The diversity of efforts in the field increases the likelihood of a successful fusion breakthrough, potentially leading to the first fusion power plants in the 2020s, with large-scale implementation following in the 2030s. Despite the speculative nature of fusion technology, its potential benefits, such as accelerated permitting, simplicity, safety, and cheap power, make it an attractive alternative to traditional energy sources like coal and natural gas. Contrasting this, cement manufacturing, the most used material in the world after water, remains an energy-intensive process, making the potential advancements in fusion energy all the more significant.

    • Making cement production greener through carbon capture and reuseCarbon capture and reuse in cement production can significantly reduce its carbon footprint, utilizing existing infrastructure, and is a scalable and cost-effective solution.

      Cement production, a key contributor to carbon emissions, can be made greener and more energy-efficient by capturing and reusing the carbon dioxide produced during the process. This approach, which is currently being demonstrated at a power plant in California, has the potential to significantly reduce the carbon footprint of cement production, making it a more sustainable solution for infrastructure development. Furthermore, this approach can be implemented using existing cement plants, making it a scalable and cost-effective solution. The politics of this approach are also optimistic, as existing cement producers could become partners in the transition rather than opponents. This focus on utilizing existing infrastructure is a recurring theme in addressing climate challenges, as it allows for a more realistic and achievable approach to decarbonization.

    • Believing in the potential for new breakthroughsVenture capitalist Vinod Khosla emphasizes the importance of optimism and focusing on the process to achieve seemingly impossible goals in large-scale innovation, such as renewable energy and technology. He cites examples of unexpected successes and rapid growth in language models and companies like OpenAI.

      Vinod Khosla, a venture capitalist, believes that large-scale innovation, such as in the fields of renewable energy and technology, is often dismissed by skeptics and pundits who focus on the past and underestimate the potential for new breakthroughs. He cites examples like the rapid growth of large language models like ChatGPT and the unexpected success of companies like OpenAI. Khosla argues that optimism and a focus on the process of making things happen are key to achieving seemingly impossible goals. He also emphasizes the importance of considering factors like resource use, land use, and capital returns in scaling new technologies. Despite the challenges, Khosla remains confident that advancements in areas like fusion energy are on a path to major breakthroughs.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    HIBT Lab! Quaise Energy: Carlos Araque

    HIBT Lab! Quaise Energy: Carlos Araque

    Growing up in Colombia, Carlos Araque and his father liked to take apart bicycles and motorcycles then put them back together. This love of tinkering led Carlos to study engineering at MIT and eventually launch a career in the oil and gas industry. After 15 years of this work, Carlos realized he was uniquely suited to be a part of the global energy transition away from fossil fuels. He returned to his alma mater to help run a startup accelerator, and soon, Quaise Energy was born.

    This week on How I Built This Lab, Carlos shares how his company plans to drill the deepest holes ever to unlock the nearly limitless potential of geothermal energy. Carlos explains why he sees such promise with this energy source and how he spread his optimism to investors to raise more than $70 million and counting. 

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Energy Minute: Untangling 100% Renewable vs. 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Goals

    Energy Minute: Untangling 100% Renewable vs. 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Goals

    Why do are forward-leaning companies centering their decarbonization strategy around 24/7 carbon-free energy? How is it different from a 100% renewable energy target? This episode revisits fundamental concepts on renewable energy (including RECs), looks at the difference in these two models, and explains why hourly data is critical to meeting 100% decarbonization goals.

    #88 EVgo Lead Data Scientist, Austin Zaccor, on What the VW Dieselgate Scandal & EVgo Share in Common (Part 1)

    #88 EVgo Lead Data Scientist, Austin Zaccor, on What the VW Dieselgate Scandal & EVgo Share in Common (Part 1)

    Austin Zaccor was formerly the lead Data Scientist at EVgo, one of the US’s largest public fast charging networks, with 850 charging locations and growing quickly! They’re on a mission to speed up mass adoption of electric vehicles by cranking up the convenience factor. More than 140M people in the U.S. live within a 10 mile drive of an EVgo fast charger, but only 2-4% of the 250M cars in the US are EVs. Why is that? Find out in today’s episode. Austin is an MIT Masters graduate in Business Analytics and a data wiz with an impressively powerful left brain. As of recent, Austin used data to predict the best locations for each future EVgo station. Show notes can be found at https://climatemayhem.com/austin. Subscribe to Climate Mayhem on any podcast platform.

     

    Connect with Ty Wolfe-Jones and Jakub Kubicka

     

    Subscribe to Climate Mayhem

     

    Energy Minute: The Next Step to Net Zero is Hourly Tracking

    Energy Minute: The Next Step to Net Zero is Hourly Tracking

    How can companies better work towards meeting their clean energy adoption goals?

    This episode is about obtaining the best available data to inform your energy decisions. Tracking energy and by extension, carbon data by the hour provides granular-level insights you can’t get from a monthly utility bill. By switching from monthly to hourly emissions reporting, energy procurement and ESG/sustainability teams gain a deeper understanding of their firm’s carbon mix—consumption versus energy sources—and can monitor their decarbonization progress more effectively.

    Tune in to learn more about how using more granular hourly data can help close the gaps in your company’s energy load.

    Can Europe quit Russian fossil fuel by next winter?

    Can Europe quit Russian fossil fuel by next winter?
    Europe imports about 45% of its natural gas from Russia. As the conflict in Ukraine escalates, pressure is mounting for Europe to wean itself off Russian energy as quickly as possible. European sanctions against Russia have excluded the energy trade, meaning that European purchases of oil and gas – which fund about 40% of Russia’s federal budget – are in effect funding the Russian war effort in Ukraine. So how could Europe eliminate the import of Russian fossil fuels? In this episode Shayle talks to Princeton energy professor Jesse Jenkins about how to do it. The EU’s current plan is to cut its import of Russian gas by two thirds by the end of the year. Jesse’s energy modeling team is working on a plan to cut 100% of Russian energy imports by October 1. Shayle and Jesse explore the immediate impact of the war in Ukraine on energy markets and the ripple effects on other markets like fertilizer, food and carbon markets.  Then they discuss the tools Europe and its allies have at their disposal in the short term, such as switching from gas to coal, ramping up heat pump installations and extending the operation of nuclear plants. They also examine a possible path for the US – decreasing domestic use of fossil fuels while increasing exports of coal and liquid natural gas to Europe.  Finally: How could this rapid shift in Europe accelerate the energy transition in the long term? We want to hear from you! Take our quick survey for a chance to win a $100 Amazon gift card. This will help us bring you more relevant content. Catalyst is supported by Antenna Group. For 25 years, Antenna has partnered with leading clean-economy innovators to build their brands and accelerate business growth. If you’re a startup, investor, enterprise or innovation ecosystem that’s creating positive change, Antenna is ready to power your impact. Visit anten​na​group​.com to learn more. Catalyst is supported by Nextracker. Nextracker’s technology platform has delivered more than 50 gigawatts of zero-emission solar power plants across the globe. Nextracker is developing a data-driven framework to become the most sustainable solar tracker company in the world — with a focus on a truly transparent supply chain. Visit nex​track​er​.com/​s​u​s​t​a​i​n​a​b​ility to learn more.