Logo
    Search

    Are there more possible games of chess than atoms in the universe?

    enJanuary 20, 2024

    Podcast Summary

    • The Number of Possible Chess Games is Beyond Human ComprehensionThe number of possible chess games is estimated to be a vast, unfathomable number, far beyond the reach of human comprehension or imagination.

      The number of possible ways to play a game of chess is estimated to be a vast number, approximately 10 to the power of 120. This figure is beyond human comprehension and surpasses the number of atoms in the observable universe. This intriguing fact was brought to our attention by a listener who had come across it in the novel "The Midnight Library" by Matt Haig. We consulted mathematician Dr. James Grime to help us understand the mathematics behind this claim. Chess is a complex game with a vast number of possible moves and combinations. The exact number is calculated using the number of possible positions on the board, which is 8x8 = 64, multiplied by the number of possible moves for each piece in its first move, and then raised to the power of the total number of moves in the game, assuming perfect play from both players. The result is an unfathomably large number, far beyond the reach of our current understanding and imagination. This illustrates the depth and complexity of even seemingly simple games, and the vastness of the mathematical world that surrounds us.

    • Claude Shannon's Estimation of Chess Games' ComplexityClaude Shannon estimated the number of possible chess games to be a massive figure, demonstrating the game's intricacy and depth, inspiring advancements in computer science.

      Claude Shannon, a pioneer in computer science, attempted to estimate the number of possible chess games by considering a game lasting approximately 80 moves and assuming 30 possible choices for each move. This results in the massive figure of 10 to the power of 120 possible games, which is a testament to the complexity and depth of chess. This estimation by Shannon is not an attempt to calculate every possible chess game, but rather an illustration of the vast number of possibilities in the game. Shannon's work demonstrates the intricacy and depth of chess, and his approach to programming a computer to play the game was a significant step in the development of computer science.

    • The Complexity of Chess and the Shannon Number vs. The Number of Atoms in the Observable UniverseAlan Turing and Claude Shannon recognized the immense complexity of creating a perfect chess-playing machine, with the Shannon number exceeding the capabilities of computers at the time. The observable universe's number of atoms is much larger, highlighting the limitations of calculating or observing complexity.

      Alan Turing and Claude Shannon recognized the immense complexity of creating a computer that could play a perfect game of chess. Shannon calculated that the number of possible moves in an 80-move game was beyond the capabilities of a machine operating at the time. This number, known as Shannon number, is much smaller than the number of atoms in the observable universe, which is a finite space as far as we can see. Astronomer Royal for Scotland, Katharine Haymonds, explains that the observable universe is the part of the universe we can observe and study, and its edge is marked by the heat left over from the Big Bang. The Shannon number and the number of atoms in the observable universe illustrate the vastness of complexity in different fields, showcasing the limitations of what we can calculate or observe.

    • The potential number of chess games outnumbers the atoms in the universeThe universe's vastness is impressive, but the potential number of chess games is even greater due to exponential growth

      The universe contains a vast number of atoms, with estimates ranging from 5 x 10 to the 79 atoms to 7 x 10 to the power of 79 atoms. However, even this enormous number pales in comparison to the potential number of possible chess games, which is much larger due to the power of exponentials. For instance, the Shannon number, which represents the number of possible unique chess games, is 10 to the power of 120. Although many of these games may be strategically nonsensical, the sheer volume of possibilities is a testament to the power of exponential growth. The universe's vastness and the number of atoms it contains are truly impressive, but they are dwarfed by the potential number of chess games that could be played.

    • Exploring the Variety of Services Offered by 1800flowers.com and UnitedHealthcare1800flowers.com offers more than just gifting services, focusing on love and care in every product and service. UnitedHealthcare provides flexible short-term insurance plans for various durations.

      The number of possibilities can grow extremely large when multiplied together. This was discussed during the podcast episode. For those with numerical queries, they can reach out to the BBC team. Additionally, 1800flowers.com is more than just a platform for gifting on birthdays, anniversaries, or "just because." The company prides itself on the love and care put into every product and service, from their farmers and bakers to their florists and makers. The goal is to deliver smiles to customers and their loved ones. To learn more about 1800flowers.com, visit their website at 1800flowers.com/acast. An interesting fact shared during the podcast was that a crocodile cannot extend its tongue. Lastly, UnitedHealthcare offers short-term insurance plans underwritten by Golden Rule Insurance Company, providing flexible and budget-friendly coverage for health insurance for durations as short as a month or less in some states. For more information, visit uhone.com.

    Recent Episodes from More or Less: Behind the Stats

    How a tick box doubled the US maternal mortality rates.

    How a tick box doubled the US maternal mortality rates.

    he US has been portrayed as in the grip of a maternal mortality crisis. In contrast to most other developed nations, the rate of maternal deaths in the US has been going up since the early 2000s.

    But why? With the help of Saloni Dattani, a researcher at Our World in Data, Tim Harford explores how a gradual change in the way the data was gathered lies at the heart of the problem.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producer: Debbie Richford Production Co-ordinator: Brenda Brown Series Producer: Tom Colls Sound Mix: Emma Harth Editor: Richard Vadon

    Election claims and erection claims

    Election claims and erection claims

    Are Labour right about the Liz Truss effect on mortgages? Are the Conservatives right about pensioners? Are Plaid Cymru right about spending? Are the Lib Dems right about care funding? Is Count Binface right about croissants?

    Why are MRP polls coming up with such different numbers?

    Do erections require a litre of blood?

    Tim Harford investigates the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Simon Tulett, Nathan Gower, Beth Ashmead Latham and Debbie Richford Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Rod Farquhar Editor: Richard Vadon

    Do ‘pig butchering’ cyber scams make as much as half Cambodia’s GDP?

    Do ‘pig butchering’ cyber scams make as much as half Cambodia’s GDP?

    So-called “pig butchering” scams take billions of dollars from people around the globe. But do the cyber scams run from compounds in Cambodia really take an amount of money equivalent to half that country’s GDP? We investigate how the scale of these criminal operations has been calculated.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Andrew Garratt Editor: Richard Vadon

    Worse mortgages, better readers, and potholes on the moon

    Worse mortgages, better readers, and potholes on the moon

    Will Conservative policies raise mortgages by £4800, as Labour claim? Are primary school kids in England the best readers in the (western) world, as the Conservatives claim? Are there more potholes in the UK than craters on the moon?

    Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Nathan Gower, Simon Tullet Beth Ashmead-Latham and Debbie Richford Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: James Beard Editor: Richard Vadon

    Shakespeare’s maths

    Shakespeare’s maths

    AWilliam Shakespeare might well rank as the most influential writer in the English language. But it seems he also had a knack for numbers.

    Rob Eastaway, author of Much Ado about Numbers, tells Tim Harford about the simple maths that brings Shakespeare’s work to life.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Readings: Stella Harford and Jordan Dunbar Producer: Beth Ashmead-Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: James Beard Editor: Richard Vadon

    Leaflets, taxes, oil workers and classrooms

    Leaflets, taxes, oil workers and classrooms

    What’s going on with the dodgy bar charts that political parties put on constituency campaign leaflets?

    What’s the truth about tax promises?

    Are 100,000 oil workers going to lose their jobs in Scotland?

    Will class sizes increase in state schools if private schools increase their fees?

    Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Nathan Gower, Beth Ashmead-Latham, Debbie Richford Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Neil Churchill Editor: Richard Vadon

    Why medical error is not the third leading cause of death in the US

    Why medical error is not the third leading cause of death in the US

    The claim that medical error is the third leading cause of death in the US has been zooming around the internet for years.

    This would mean that only heart disease and cancer killed more people than the very people trying to treat these diseases.

    But there are good reasons to be suspicious about the claim.

    Professor Mary Dixon-Woods, director of The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, or THIS Institute, at Cambridge University, explains what’s going on.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Vadon

    Debate, Reform, tax evasion and ants

    Debate, Reform, tax evasion and ants

    Were there any suspicious claims in the election debate between Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer?

    Do the claims in Reform UK’s policy documents on excess deaths and climate change make sense?

    Can the Conservatives and Labour raise £6bn a year by cracking down on tax avoidance and evasion?

    And do all the humans on earth weigh more than all of the ants?

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporters: Kate Lamble and Nathan Gower Producer: Beth Ashmead-Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Editor: Richard Vadon

    Data for India

    Data for India

    India’s election has been running since 19 April. With results imminent on 4th June, More or Less talks with Chennai based data communicator Rukmini S. She founded Data for India, a new website designed to make socioeconomic data on India easier to find and understand. She talks us through the changing trends to help give a better picture of the type of country the winning party will govern.

    Producers: Bethan Ashmead and Nathan Gower Sound Engineer: Nigel Appleton Production Coordinator: Brenda Brown Editor: Richard Vadon

    UK growth, prisons and Swiftonomics

    UK growth, prisons and Swiftonomics

    Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has said that the UK economy is growing faster than Germany, France and the US, while Labour says the typical household in the UK is worse off by £5,883 since 2019. Are these claims fair? We give some needed context.

    Net migration has fallen - we talk to someone who predicted it would - Dr Madeleine Sumption, director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford.

    Is Taylor Swift about to add £1 bn to the British economy as some media outlets have claimed? The answer is ‘No’.

    Why are our prisons full? We ask Cassia Rowland from the Institute for Government.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producers: Charlotte McDonald, Nathan Gower, Bethan Ashmead Latham and Ellie House Series producer: Tom Colls Sound mix: Neil Churchill Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Editor: Richard Vadon

    Related Episodes

    Mattermost, Go, and Tech Talk with Jesús Espino

    Mattermost, Go, and Tech Talk with Jesús Espino

    Jesús Espino is a Senior Staff Engineer at Mattermost specializing in Full Stack Development on the API side of the platform. Mattermost is an open source platform for secure collaboration across the entire software development lifecycle. Mattermost’s platform powers over 800,000 workspaces worldwide with the support of over 4,000 contributors from across the developer community.  In this episode, Jesús takes us on a journey through his time in the tech industry while sharing valuable insight and entertaining stories along the way.


    00:00 Introduction

    05:29 What is Jesús Doing Today? 

    10:50 First Memory of a Computer

    17:32 Thoughts on University

    25:21 Joining the Workforce

    33:03 First Job after University

    47:08 Moving Companies

    51:30 Transitioning to Go

    58:40 Deciding to Focus on Go

    1:03:40 Solving Problems with Internals of Go

    1:11:50 Thoughts on Mattermost

    1:13:16 Contact Info



    Connect with Jesús: 

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/

    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jesus-espino



    Mentioned in today’s episode:

    Mattermost: https://mattermost.com/

    Gophercon EU: https://gophercon.eu/



    Want more from Ardan Labs? You can learn Go, Kubernetes, Docker & more through our video training, live events, or through our blog!


    Online Courses : https://ardanlabs.com/education/ 

    Live Events : https://www.ardanlabs.com/live-training-events/ 

    Blog : https://www.ardanlabs.com/blog 

    Github : https://github.com/ardanlabs



    Stuart Hameroff - Anesthetic action on quantum terahertz oscillations in microtubules supports the Orch OR theory of consciousness

    Stuart Hameroff - Anesthetic action on quantum terahertz oscillations in microtubules supports the Orch OR theory of consciousness
    One in a series of talks from the 2019 Models of Consciousness conference. Stuart Hameroff Center for Consciousness Studies, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona The Penrose-Hameroff ‘Orchestrated objective reduction’ (‘Orch OR’) theory suggests consciousness arises from ‘orchestrated’ quantum superpositioned oscillations in microtubules inside brain neurons. These evolve to reach threshold for Penrose ‘objective reduction’ (‘OR’) by E=h/t (E is the gravitational self-energy of the superposition/separation, h is the Planck-Dirac constant, and at the time at which Orch OR occurs) to give moments of conscious experience. Sequences, interference and resonance of entangled moments govern neurophysiology and provide our ‘stream’ of consciousness. Anesthetic gases selectively block consciousness, sparing non-conscious brain activities, binding by quantum coupling with aromatic amino acid rings inside brain proteins. Genomic, proteomic and optogenetic evidence indicate the microtubule protein tubulin as the site of anesthetic action. We (Craddock et al, Scientific Reports 7,9877, 2017) modelled couplings among all 86 aromatic amino acid rings in tubulin, and found a spectrum of terahertz (‘THz’) quantum oscillations including a common mode peak at 613 THz. Simulated presence of 8 different anesthetics each abolished the peak, and dampened the spectrum proportional to anesthetic potency. Non-anesthetic gases which bind in the same regions, but do not cause anesthesia, did not abolish or dampen the THz activity. Orch OR is better supported experimentally than any other theory of consciousness. Filmed at the Models of Consciousness conference, University of Oxford, September 2019.

    Understanding Computation: Chapter 2: Denotational Semantics, Formal Semantics in Practice, Implementing Parsers

    Understanding Computation: Chapter 2: Denotational Semantics, Formal Semantics in Practice, Implementing Parsers
    Understanding Computation From Simple Machines to Impossible Programs by Tom Stuart Homepage: http://computationbook.com Sample: http://computationbook.com/sample Source Code: https://github.com/tomstuart/computationbook Amazon (US): http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449329276 Amazon (UK): http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1449329276 Kindle: http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Computation-Machines-Impossible-Programs-ebook/dp/B00CT3C4IM/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?_encoding=UTF8&sr=&qid= O'Reilly: http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920025481.do Readers: Justin Campbell Amy Unger Ashton Harris Brian Cobb Discussions: Preface, Just Enough Ruby Chapter 2: The Meaning of Programs, Operational Semantics Chapter 2: Denotational Semantics, Formal Semantics in Practice, Implementing Parsers Chapter 3: The Simplest Computers Chapter 4: Just Add Power Chapter 5: The Ultimate Machine Chapter 6: Programming with Nothing Chapter 7: Universality is Everywhere Chapter 8: Impossible Programs Chapter 9: Programming in Toyland Tom Stuart, and The Ineffable Magic of Computation CS Book Club: Computer Science for Everyone Listen to these and more at http://www.csbookclub.com/ Music by http://bensound.com