Podcast Summary
Unprecedented challenges in the tech industry during the coronavirus crisis: China's economy shows signs of recovery and government accelerates tech capabilities in response to crises, while a holistic perspective and empathy can lead to better outcomes in business and personal relationships.
The coronavirus crisis a year ago brought unprecedented challenges to the global economy, particularly in the tech industry due to supply chain disruptions. At the time, the focus was on Chinese manufacturing and its impact on tech companies. However, as we now know, the crisis evolved into a full-blown global health crisis, causing widespread economic disruption. Yet, despite these challenges, China's economy has shown signs of recovery, and the government has accelerated its efforts to improve its domestic tech capabilities in response to trade tensions and supply chain disruptions. Principal Asset Management, in the real estate sector, uses a 360-degree perspective to deliver local insights and global expertise, helping identify compelling investing opportunities. Similarly, being aware of invisible struggles, such as stress and burnout, can lead to better understanding and healthier companies. So, whether it's in business or personal relationships, having a holistic perspective and empathy can lead to better outcomes.
China's Brutal Efficiency in Handling the COVID-19 Crisis: China's quick response, strict measures, and prioritization of production made it the most capable society in handling the COVID-19 crisis, with life returning to normal by September.
China's response to the COVID-19 pandemic showcased its brutal efficiency and adaptability, making it the most capable society in the world in handling crises. Witnessing the situation firsthand in Beijing, the city was locked down, with strict measures in place to contain the virus. Despite reporting controversial data, China managed to control the spread by April, with life returning to normal by September. Chinese manufacturers quickly pivoted to produce masks on a massive scale, while consumer apps were altered to accommodate COVID tracking. China's ruthless approach to the pandemic, prioritizing production as its core competence, set it apart from many Western countries in dealing with the crisis.
China's COVID-19 response: Spontaneous adaptation and centralized directives: China's quick production of essential goods during COVID-19 was due to government instructions and societal adaptability, but challenges remain in complex manufacturing and technological advancements.
The effectiveness of China's response to the COVID-19 pandemic was a result of both spontaneous adaptation and centralized directives. The government's ability to issue clear instructions and establish pricing incentives, combined with the "can do" spirit of Chinese society, allowed for a nimble manufacturing sector to quickly adapt and produce essential goods like masks. However, this success does not necessarily translate to more complex manufacturing or technological advancements. The US, for example, distinguished itself through its scientific establishment and the development of mRNA vaccines. While China has made strides in some areas, it still faces challenges in becoming a leader in scientific fields like semiconductors and aviation.
US-China trade war: A new era for Chinese industrial policy: The US-China trade war has led to a shift in Chinese industrial policy, with US sanctions aligning the incentives of Chinese firms with the state's self-sufficiency agenda, potentially leading to a splenetic moment in China.
The US-China trade war escalated in 2020, and US actions towards Chinese industrial policy have made this time different. Chinese industrial policy has a long history of failures, but successes can be seen in sectors like solar and high speed rail. However, in sectors like semiconductors and aviation, Chinese firms have not been successful. The fundamental problem in the past was the Chinese government forcing state-owned firms to buy inferior Chinese technologies and hoping for innovation through scale. The Trump administration's sanctions on Chinese technology leaders like Huawei, Tencent, ByteDance, and SMIC have aligned the incentives of these firms with the state's self-sufficiency agenda. While the US reacted to the technological rise of the USSR and Japan by investing in itself, it's currently trying to kneecap China's leading firms, potentially triggering a splenetic moment in China. The successes in solar and high speed rail can't be easily explained by different industrial policies or demand side policies. Instead, it's been suggested that it's difficult to find clear patterns.
Impact of Chinese Regulations on Alibaba Unclear: Chinese regulations against Alibaba and its founder Jack Ma have caused losses, but it's uncertain if this will stifle entrepreneurship. China needs to focus on basic research and IP development to lead in technology.
The complexities of the semiconductor supply chain and the current political climate in China make it challenging to determine the impact of recent regulatory actions on Chinese tech companies, particularly Alibaba. The Chinese government's actions against Alibaba and its founder Jack Ma have led to significant losses for the company, but it remains unclear whether this will significantly cool entrepreneurial activity. The Chinese state has generally been supportive of its private sector, but has shown increasing repression and control in certain areas. Regarding the scientific community in China, there are still limitations to its cutting-edge capabilities, particularly in comparison to the US, which has shown a clear edge in areas like vaccine development. To become a true leader in technology, China needs to focus on building a strong foundation in basic research and developing intellectual property.
China's Semiconductor Industry: Making Progress but Still Lagging: China's investment in fundamental research is low, but they invest heavily in state-owned firms. Progress has been made in various segments, but they're behind in cutting-edge technology. Huawei is an exception, but China's leading semiconductor maker lags 5 years behind TSMC.
China's investment in fundamental scientific research is significantly lower than the US, with around 5-10% of R&D spending going towards it. Chinese firms may not be doing substantial amounts of cutting-edge technology, but they do receive substantial funding for research. China's approach to the semiconductor industry has been to invest heavily in state-owned companies, but they remain years behind global leaders like TSMC. China's semiconductor industry has made progress in various segments of the value chain but hasn't yet reached the cutting edge in any area. Companies like Huawei are exceptions, designing their own processors and leading in areas like assembling and packaging. However, China's leading semiconductor maker is consistently about 5 years behind TSMC, even before recent sanctions. In summary, China's semiconductor industry is making progress but still lags significantly behind global leaders.
China's Challenges in Competing with US in Semiconductor Industry: China faces hurdles in semiconductor production due to lack of competence in EDA tools and manufacturing equipment. US sanctions on Chinese firms like Huawei complicate matters. China aims to encourage producer-side subsidies and self-sufficiency, but success depends on bringing up new tech companies to compete.
While China has made strides in certain areas of semiconductor production, such as mask manufacturing and some chemical inputs, it remains significantly behind in critical areas like EDA tools and manufacturing equipment due to a lack of competence in these areas. The US government's sanctions against Chinese companies like Huawei have further complicated China's efforts to compete. The dynamic between performance and cost in technology development requires continuous investment, and a larger market can provide more resources for R&D. However, the US government's actions against Chinese firms have left Huawei scrambling for alternative suppliers. China's response to this challenge is to encourage producer-side subsidies and take a more self-sufficient approach to technology development. The success of this strategy will depend on China's ability to bring up new technology companies to compete with the leaders in the industry. The demand side, while important, is not enough on its own to catalyze expansion, innovation, and knowledge development. China's unique advantage lies in its ability to manage both the demand and supply sides of the equation.
China's Focus on Production and Tech Innovation: China prioritized production over consumption in 2020, emphasizing tech innovation for long-term self-reliance and reducing foreign technology dependence.
While Western countries focused on stimulating consumption through household checks and minimal interest rate cuts in 2020, China prioritized getting production back online and scaling up supply chains, resulting in continued export strength. China's leadership has emphasized the need for indigenous technology innovation, making science and technology a top priority for 2021. This long-term effort to build tech expertise is expected to continue despite new administrations or geopolitical changes, as China aims to reduce reliance on foreign technologies and prevent being choked off by capricious governments. The progress may not come in the form of immediate breakthroughs but rather in slow and steady improvements, as seen in the growth of Chinese value-add in the production of complex electronics like the iPhone.
China's Efforts to Recruit Top Talent and Overcome Challenges: China is recruiting top talent from Taiwan and Korea to build up tech expertise, but faces challenges in hiring entire teams and cooperating with suppliers. Beijing aims to engage with US businesses to preserve market access rather than retaliating.
China is making significant efforts to recruit top talent, particularly engineers from Taiwan and Korea, to build up its tech expertise domestically. However, they face challenges in hiring entire teams and cooperating with suppliers to continue innovating. China has not broadly retaliated against US firms, despite tensions, due to its reliance on American technology and the importance of US companies as major employers in the Chinese market. Beijing aims to engage with American businesses to preserve access to the Chinese market, rather than pushing them away through retaliation.
TSMC's Lead in Semiconductor Manufacturing and Geopolitical Tensions: Although TSMC leads in semiconductor manufacturing, military conflict over the company and Taiwan's status is unlikely due to technology's complexity, potential for critical engineers to evacuate, dependence on foreign technology, and decreasing demand for leading-edge semiconductors.
While Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) holds a significant lead in semiconductor manufacturing, the Chinese government's attitude towards the company and the broader tension over Taiwan itself, is not a guaranteed reason for military conflict. The complexity of technology and the potential for critical engineers to evacuate or be affected during conflict, along with the dependence on foreign technology for semiconductor production, make a military action over this reason unlikely. Furthermore, TSMC's lead may not be as crucial for Chinese firms as technology continues to advance, and not all components require the latest technology to be successful. The decline in the smartphone market, which has driven much of the technological advancements in semiconductors, also indicates that there may not be a huge demand for leading-edge semiconductors in various applications.
The Role of Technology vs. Business Factors in Tech Hubs: While tech dominance is crucial, business factors like pleasant weather, access to education, and a thriving ecosystem contribute significantly to successful tech hubs. The future of US tech hubs beyond Silicon Valley depends on maintaining these advantages.
While technological dominance in semiconductor manufacturing is important, it may not directly translate into business dominance. China can potentially catch up in the commoditized sector of semiconductors. Additionally, the success of tech hubs like Silicon Valley goes beyond just cutting-edge technology and research. Factors like pleasant weather, access to universities, and a thriving ecosystem of businesses and talent play a significant role. The future of new tech hubs in the US, such as Austin or Miami, depends on how quickly Silicon Valley unravels. While not all tech in these hubs may be hard science-based, there is still a lot of engineering expertise and marketing involved in building successful software businesses. As for the next big thing in semiconductors, there are exciting developments happening outside of semiconductors, and the broader technological stagnation may be coming to an end.
China's consumer tech industry's uncertain global competition: Despite China's technological advancements, cultural and political factors may hinder its consumer apps from replicating success globally, raising questions about its ability to compete on the global stage.
China's technological advancements, such as the potential for quantum computing and nuclear fusion, are noteworthy, but the success of consumer apps like TikTok may not be easily replicated due to cultural and political factors. The Chinese consumer internet industry's ability to compete on the global stage is uncertain, given the negative perception of China in Western countries and the increasing closure of markets to Chinese firms. Dan's unique perspective on China's potential to be "cool" in the consumer tech industry, coupled with his clear and insightful explanations, make him a highly requested guest on the show.
Insightful Discussion with Dan Wong on Technology, Space, and More: Listeners were captivated by Dan Wong's knowledge and perspectives on various topics, including technology and space. The hosts expressed their desire to have him back on the show and encouraged followers to check out his annual essay and Twitter account. A new podcast, Money Stuff, was also announced.
Dan Wong is a fascinating and knowledgeable individual with insightful perspectives on a wide range of topics. During his appearance on the Odd Thoughts podcast, he engaged in thought-provoking discussions about technology, space, and more. Tracy Alloway and Joe Weisenthal expressed their regret that they couldn't add much to the conversation and expressed their desire to have him back on the show in the future. They also encouraged listeners to check out Dan's annual essay on his website and follow him on Twitter. Additionally, they announced a new podcast, Money Stuff, featuring Matt Levine and Katie Greifelt, which will delve into Wall Street finance and other related topics every Friday. Overall, the podcast episode showcased the intellectual curiosity and engaging conversations that make Odd Thoughts a must-listen.
![[The Wire China] The sponge revolution](https://www.podcastworld.io/podcast-images/china-stories-wgyzssa9.webp)
