Logo
    Search

    Did tea-drinking cut deaths in the Industrial Revolution?

    enApril 09, 2022

    Podcast Summary

    • The Surprising Impact of Tea Drinking on 18th Century England's HealthTea drinking led to boiling water, reducing waterborne diseases, and improving overall health in 18th century England. Modern companies like Mint Mobile and Burrow focus on customer needs through affordable prices and convenient services.

      The simple act of drinking tea and the subsequent practice of boiling water in 18th century England led to a significant decrease in the country's death rate. This surprising discovery was revealed in a new economics paper by Francisca Antman, an associate professor at the University of Colorado Boulder. The podcast discussed how the widespread adoption of tea drinking brought about the need to boil water, which in turn led to a reduction in waterborne diseases and improved overall health. Additionally, companies like Mint Mobile and Burrow are focusing on customer needs by offering affordable prices and convenient services. Mint Mobile, for instance, brought in a reverse auctioneer to lower prices for customers during inflation, while Burrow offers fast free shipping and modular seating that lasts and grows with you.

    • The industrial revolution and tea drinking's impact on water safetyDuring the industrial revolution, widespread tea drinking and subsequent water boiling may have contributed to reduced mortality rates due to safer water.

      The widespread adoption of tea drinking and the subsequent boiling of water during the industrial revolution in England might have played a significant role in reducing mortality rates. For the professor, this connection was personal, as she grappled with the safety of giving her own child tap water while balancing cultural traditions. This issue of safe drinking water is a global one, with the World Health Organization estimating that 1 in 4 people lack access. The professor's curiosity was piqued when she learned that during the industrial revolution, despite living in overcrowded, unsanitary conditions, there was a decline in mortality rates in England. This decline coincided with the increasing popularity of tea drinking and the subsequent boiling of water. While the intuitive thought is that boiling water makes it safer, the professor wanted to add data to support this theory. This anecdote highlights the potential impact of seemingly insignificant habits on public health.

    • The Tea Age: Increased Tea Consumption and Improved Public HealthDuring the Tea Age, the significant drop in tea tariff led to increased tea consumption, which might have contributed to improved public health, possibly due to the switch from unsafe water to boiled water for tea.

      The significant drop in tea tariff in 1784, as indicated by the Tea and Windows Act, played a crucial role in making tea more accessible to the English population, leading to a substantial increase in tea consumption from around 1 pound per person in 1761-1784 to about £3 by 1834. This period, also known as the "Tea Age," saw an improvement in public health, although the exact cause-and-effect relationship between the increased tea consumption and better health outcomes is not straightforward. Professor Antman, in her research, sought to explore this connection more deeply and identified water quality as a potential factor. However, during this time, there was no clear understanding or measurement of water quality. Instead, she used two proxies: the mortality rate and tea shipments. Her findings showed a correlation between the two, suggesting that as tea shipments rose, mortality rates dropped. This correlation could potentially indicate that people were switching from unsafe water to safe water that had been boiled for tea. However, it's important to note that further research is needed to establish a definitive causal relationship between tea consumption and improved health outcomes during this period.

    • Studying the effect of tea consumption on health during the 1700sResearcher Francisca Antman used water quality categories to study the impact of increased tea consumption and water boiling on mortality rates during the 1700s. Areas with poorer water quality saw larger drops in mortality after tea tariffs were lowered.

      During the 1700s, researchers can measure the mortality rate and water quality at a local level through parish records and historical data. However, they cannot directly measure tea consumption at a local level during this period. Researcher Francisca Antman cleverly divided English local areas into high and low water quality categories to study the effect of increased water boiling for tea on health more precisely. After the significant drop in tea tariffs in 1784, researchers observed larger drops in mortality in areas with poorer inherent water quality. This suggests that the widespread availability of tea and the resulting increase in water boiling may have had a more significant impact on health in areas with poorer water quality.

    • Study on tea's impact on mortality rates reveals significance of water quality on public healthImproving water quality leads to better health outcomes, particularly in areas with initially poor water quality.

      A natural experiment in economics, as shown in the discussion about the impact of cheaper tea on mortality rates, highlights the significance of water quality on public health. The study revealed that areas with initially poor water quality experienced a greater decline in mortality rates when tea became cheaper, indicating that the improvement in health was more pronounced in these areas. However, even in areas with better initial water quality, there was still a modest improvement in health outcomes. This experiment underscores the importance of addressing water quality issues to improve overall population health. Additionally, the discussion included advertisements for Celebrations Passport from 1-800-Flowers.com, a gift-giving site, and Health ProtectorGuard fixed indemnity insurance plans from UnitedHealthcare. These advertisements emphasized the importance of being prepared for various situations, whether it be for gift-giving or healthcare expenses.

    Recent Episodes from More or Less: Behind the Stats

    Election claims and erection claims

    Election claims and erection claims

    Are Labour right about the Liz Truss effect on mortgages? Are the Conservatives right about pensioners? Are Plaid Cymru right about spending? Are the Lib Dems right about care funding? Is Count Binface right about croissants?

    Why are MRP polls coming up with such different numbers?

    Do erections require a litre of blood?

    Tim Harford investigates the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Simon Tulett, Nathan Gower, Beth Ashmead Latham and Debbie Richford Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Rod Farquhar Editor: Richard Vadon

    Do ‘pig butchering’ cyber scams make as much as half Cambodia’s GDP?

    Do ‘pig butchering’ cyber scams make as much as half Cambodia’s GDP?

    So-called “pig butchering” scams take billions of dollars from people around the globe. But do the cyber scams run from compounds in Cambodia really take an amount of money equivalent to half that country’s GDP? We investigate how the scale of these criminal operations has been calculated.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Andrew Garratt Editor: Richard Vadon

    Worse mortgages, better readers, and potholes on the moon

    Worse mortgages, better readers, and potholes on the moon

    Will Conservative policies raise mortgages by £4800, as Labour claim? Are primary school kids in England the best readers in the (western) world, as the Conservatives claim? Are there more potholes in the UK than craters on the moon?

    Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Nathan Gower, Simon Tullet Beth Ashmead-Latham and Debbie Richford Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: James Beard Editor: Richard Vadon

    Shakespeare’s maths

    Shakespeare’s maths

    AWilliam Shakespeare might well rank as the most influential writer in the English language. But it seems he also had a knack for numbers.

    Rob Eastaway, author of Much Ado about Numbers, tells Tim Harford about the simple maths that brings Shakespeare’s work to life.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Readings: Stella Harford and Jordan Dunbar Producer: Beth Ashmead-Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: James Beard Editor: Richard Vadon

    Leaflets, taxes, oil workers and classrooms

    Leaflets, taxes, oil workers and classrooms

    What’s going on with the dodgy bar charts that political parties put on constituency campaign leaflets?

    What’s the truth about tax promises?

    Are 100,000 oil workers going to lose their jobs in Scotland?

    Will class sizes increase in state schools if private schools increase their fees?

    Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Nathan Gower, Beth Ashmead-Latham, Debbie Richford Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Neil Churchill Editor: Richard Vadon

    Why medical error is not the third leading cause of death in the US

    Why medical error is not the third leading cause of death in the US

    The claim that medical error is the third leading cause of death in the US has been zooming around the internet for years.

    This would mean that only heart disease and cancer killed more people than the very people trying to treat these diseases.

    But there are good reasons to be suspicious about the claim.

    Professor Mary Dixon-Woods, director of The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, or THIS Institute, at Cambridge University, explains what’s going on.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Vadon

    Debate, Reform, tax evasion and ants

    Debate, Reform, tax evasion and ants

    Were there any suspicious claims in the election debate between Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer?

    Do the claims in Reform UK’s policy documents on excess deaths and climate change make sense?

    Can the Conservatives and Labour raise £6bn a year by cracking down on tax avoidance and evasion?

    And do all the humans on earth weigh more than all of the ants?

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporters: Kate Lamble and Nathan Gower Producer: Beth Ashmead-Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Editor: Richard Vadon

    Data for India

    Data for India

    India’s election has been running since 19 April. With results imminent on 4th June, More or Less talks with Chennai based data communicator Rukmini S. She founded Data for India, a new website designed to make socioeconomic data on India easier to find and understand. She talks us through the changing trends to help give a better picture of the type of country the winning party will govern.

    Producers: Bethan Ashmead and Nathan Gower Sound Engineer: Nigel Appleton Production Coordinator: Brenda Brown Editor: Richard Vadon

    UK growth, prisons and Swiftonomics

    UK growth, prisons and Swiftonomics

    Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has said that the UK economy is growing faster than Germany, France and the US, while Labour says the typical household in the UK is worse off by £5,883 since 2019. Are these claims fair? We give some needed context.

    Net migration has fallen - we talk to someone who predicted it would - Dr Madeleine Sumption, director of the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford.

    Is Taylor Swift about to add £1 bn to the British economy as some media outlets have claimed? The answer is ‘No’.

    Why are our prisons full? We ask Cassia Rowland from the Institute for Government.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producers: Charlotte McDonald, Nathan Gower, Bethan Ashmead Latham and Ellie House Series producer: Tom Colls Sound mix: Neil Churchill Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Editor: Richard Vadon

    Is intermittent fasting going to kill you?

    Is intermittent fasting going to kill you?

    News stories earlier in the year appeared to suggest that time restricted eating – where you consume all your meals in an 8 hour time window – was associated with a 91% increase in the risk of death from cardiovascular disease.

    But is this true? Tim Harford looks into the claim with the help of Cardiologist Dr Donald Lloyd-Jones, chair of the Department of Preventive Medicine at Northwestern University in the US.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producer: Debbie Richford Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Vadon

    Related Episodes

    10 Years After Flint, The Fight To Replace Lead Pipes Continues

    10 Years After Flint, The Fight To Replace Lead Pipes Continues
    Ten years ago, Flint, Mich. switched water sources to the Flint River. The lack of corrosion control in the pipes caused lead to leach into the water supply of tens of thousands of residents. Pediatrician Mona Hanna-Attisha recognized a public health crisis in the making and gathered data proving the negative health impact on Flint's young children. In doing so, she and community organizers in Flint sparked a national conversation about lead in the U.S. water system that persists today.

    Today on the show, host Emily Kwong and science correspondent Pien Huang talk about the state of Flint and other cities with lead pipes. Efforts to replace these pipes hinge on proposed changes to the EPA's Lead and Copper Rule.

    Have questions or comments for us to consider for a future episode? Email us at shortwave@npr.org — we'd love to hear from you!

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Trafficking in Persons and Public Health

    Trafficking in Persons and Public Health
    Although largely framed as a legal issue, a social issue, and sometimes a geo-political issue, human trafficking is also a public health issue. Public health approaches consider all of these factors to take local information to make locally-appropriate interventions. It can also take local data to help feed our global pool of knowledge regarding this complex issue. Human Trafficking is both an individual as well as a public health issue. While direct health care is important, health professionals and organizations need to move beyond this and get involved in prevention, research, developing appropriate treatment guidelines, and monitoring and evaluation of health care interventions. We are against human trafficking because it harms people - so let's take approaches that will really work to mitigate, or even prevent, that harm.

    Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health in the Middle East: The Need for Responsive Health System

    Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health in the Middle East: The Need for Responsive Health System
    More than half of the Middle East population, 54% are under the age of 25 including 90 million adolescents (10-19 years of age). The growth spurt challenges of the second decade of life is mounted with early sexual debut and early marriages. Consequent unintended pregnancies and child birth, the risk of contracting sexually transmitted infections and HIV/AIDS threaten the fragile adolescent still under physical and psychological development. Pervasive conflict and displacement in the region overwhelm prevailing adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) issues and unmet needs.
    National health systems and the private sector do not typically recognize nor address sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of young people, especially unmarried adolescents. Health care providers do not recognize nor address health risks and needs of adolescents. Evidence show that adolescent health services -if exist- are fragmented and poorly coordinated. Inherent social norms, attitudes, taboos around sexual health and discriminating gender differences hinder adolescents’ SRH health literacy and access to quality services.
    What should the health sector do to transform the current approach that ignores ASRH issues? How do we respond to the urgent unmet SRH needs of the 90 million adolescents living in the Middle East?