Logo

    Do we eat a credit card's worth of microplastic each week?

    enAugust 24, 2024
    What is the estimated amount of microplastics consumed weekly?
    How did the World Wildlife Fund contribute to this research?
    Why are current microplastic consumption figures considered an exaggeration?
    What factors influence the variation in microplastic consumption?
    What is needed for better understanding of microplastics' health impact?

    Podcast Summary

    • Microplastics consumptionThe claim of consuming a credit card's worth of microplastics weekly is an approximation, and actual consumption varies greatly depending on individual diet and habits, with more research needed on potential health risks.

      The claim that humans consume a credit card's worth of microplastics every week has gone viral, but it's important to note that this figure is an estimation based on research. The World Wildlife Fund commissioned a study from the University of Newcastle in Australia, which found data on microplastics in various food and drink items. However, the exact amount of microplastics consumed can vary greatly depending on individual diet and habits. While some studies suggest a link between microplastics and health issues, more research is needed to fully understand the risks. The claim is effective in raising awareness about microplastics, but it's important to remember that it's an approximation and not an exact measurement.

    • Misrepresentation of microplastics consumptionMedia outlets exaggerated the figure of 5.5 grams of microplastics consumed per week, which is an inaccurate estimate. The actual consumption range is much smaller, between 0.1 and 5.5 grams, with an average of 2.8 milligrams. Future research should focus on more precise measurements to understand the true impact on human health.

      The commonly reported figure of 5.5 grams of microplastics consumed per week is an exaggeration. This number was derived from a research study that aimed to provide a rough estimate but was simplified and sensationalized by media outlets. The actual range of microplastics consumption is much smaller, between 0.1 and 5.5 grams, with the average particle mass being around 2.8 milligrams. However, the researchers made assumptions and applied data from ocean microplastics to microplastics in drinking water without considering the differences in particle sizes and distributions. This led to an inaccurate comparison and a misleading headline. It's important to remember that microplastics come in various sizes, shapes, and weights, and future research should focus on more precise measurements to better understand the true impact on human health.

    • Microplastics intake estimationRecent analysis challenges the assumption that all microplastics consumed are small, potentially leading to overestimation of weekly intake.

      The study estimating the weekly intake of microplastics through food and water may have overestimated the amount due to incorrect assumptions about the size and weight of microplastic particles. The study, which found that people consume an average of 2.8 milligrams of microplastics daily, focused on particles smaller than one millimeter. However, recent analysis suggests that a significant portion of the microplastics consumed may be larger than 1 millimeter, leading to inflated estimates when the weight of larger particles is applied to smaller ones. While the error may not matter much for a single particle, the accumulation of errors from thousands of particles consumed weekly can result in a substantial overestimation. A more accurate ballpark for weekly microplastic intake remains to be determined.

    • Size and composition of microplasticsResearch is shifting from total microplastic consumption to the size and potential health implications of nanoplastics, which have the potential to enter the bloodstream and impact major organs

      The consumption of microplastics through food and water is a topic of ongoing research and debate, with estimates varying greatly. While some studies suggest weekly consumption in the microgram range, others indicate much smaller amounts. The focus of research is shifting from the total amount consumed to the size and potential health implications of microplastics. Smaller microplastics, known as nanoplastics, have the potential to enter the bloodstream and impact major organs. Research is needed to understand where these microplastics are getting stuck in the body and the potential health consequences when they break down. Therefore, the size and composition of microplastics, rather than just the total amount consumed, should be the focus of future research.

    • Data Analysis ImportanceOver 2.5 quintillion bytes of data are generated daily, emphasizing the importance of data analysis and interpretation for improved decision-making, efficiency, and new opportunities. Staying curious and open to new information is crucial for uncovering insights.

      During the discussion, Jamie Woodward from the University of Manchester in the UK and Yuval Rosenberg, a self-declared loyal listener, brought up an interesting statistic. They mentioned that it's estimated that over 2.5 quintillion bytes of data are generated every day. This is a staggering amount of information, and it highlights the importance of data analysis and interpretation in today's world. This statistic underscores the significance of being able to make sense of the vast amounts of data that are available to us. It also emphasizes the need for effective data management and analysis tools. The ability to extract insights from data can lead to improved decision-making, increased efficiency, and new opportunities. Moreover, this discussion also emphasized the importance of staying curious and being open to new information. Whether it's a statistic you've come across or a new idea, it's essential to take the time to explore it further. You never know what insights you might uncover or what new perspectives you might gain. So, in summary, the discussion underscored the importance of data analysis and interpretation in today's world, emphasized the significance of staying curious and being open to new information, and highlighted the staggering amount of data that is generated every day.

    Recent Episodes from More or Less: Behind the Stats

    Nate Silver: Do risk-takers run the world?

    Nate Silver: Do risk-takers run the world?

    Big stakes poker player and elections analyst Nate Silver is no stranger to a calculated risk.

    In his new book, On The Edge, he makes the case that people willing to take massive calculated risks are winning in the modern economy.

    Tim Harford talks to Nate about the mindset that’s driving hedge fund managers, crypto true-believers and silicon valley investors.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producer: Beth Ashmead Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Katie Morrison Sound mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Vadon

    More or Less: Behind the Stats
    enSeptember 14, 2024

    How long does it take to turn around an oil tanker?

    How long does it take to turn around an oil tanker?

    Do illegal migrants receive more in benefits than pensioners? Was Energy Secretary Ed Miliband right to celebrate a “record breaking” renewable energy auction? Is one divided by zero infinity? Why don’t we spend more on evidence that government spending works? And how long does it actually take to turn around an oil tanker?

    Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Charlotte McDonald Producers: Natasha Fernandes, Bethan Ashmead-Latham and Nathan Gower Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Katie Morrison Sound mix: Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon

    More or Less: Behind the Stats
    enSeptember 11, 2024

    Who pays when trade wars heat up?

    Who pays when trade wars heat up?

    Donald Trump wants new tariffs on goods coming into the US, describing them as a tax on other countries. The Democrats are no stranger to trade tariffs themselves, with Joe Biden having added them to numerous goods coming into the US from China.

    We talk to Erica York from the Tax Foundation about how tariffs work and who ends up paying for them.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producers: Kate Lamble and Beth Ashmead Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Katie Morrison Sound mix: Steve Greenwood Editor: Richard Vadon

    More or Less: Behind the Stats
    enSeptember 07, 2024

    Exclusions, black holes and dividing by zero

    Exclusions, black holes and dividing by zero

    Do half of children in Wales have special educational needs? Are permanent exclusions at the highest ever level in England? Labour are talking about a £22bn black hole. Is that a new black hole in the finances? Are there more Ghanaian nurses in the UK than in Ghana? Can you divide one by zero?

    Tim Harford looks at some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporters: Kate Lamble and Nathan Gower Producer: Beth Ashmead Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Katie Morrison Sound mix: Andy Fell Editor: Richard Vadon

    More or Less: Behind the Stats
    enSeptember 04, 2024

    Where have Cuba’s people gone?

    Where have Cuba’s people gone?

    The Cuban government has announced that their population has fallen by 10% in two years – just days after a demographer on the Caribbean island suggested an even bigger fall.

    But which is the right number, and why are so many people leaving?

    We speak to Dr Emily Morris from University College London and Dr Jorge Duany from the Cuban Research Institute at Florida International University.

    Presenter: Kate Lamble Producer: Beth Ashmead Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Katie Morrison Sound mix: Sue Maillot Editor: Richard Vadon

    Do we eat a credit card's worth of microplastic each week?

    Do we eat a credit card's worth of microplastic each week?

    The claim we all swallow 5.5 grams of microplastic each week – the same as the weight of a credit card – has been repeated by charities, newspapers and the World Economic Forum.

    But when you understand how this number was calculated, and the range of possible answers for the amount of plastic you eat, you might not want to repeat it yourself.

    Professor Jamie Woodward from the University of Manchester explains what’s what.

    Presenter: Kate Lamble Producer: Beth Ashmead Latham Researcher: Ajai Singh Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Katie Morrison Sound mix: Giles Aspen Editor: Richard Vadon

    Are companies making more money from their customers?

    Are companies making more money from their customers?

    Recent reports claimed the average global mark-up, the difference between the price of production and the price that product is sold for, rose from 7% in 1980 to 59% by 2020.

    So is this true? Are some companies choosing to charge us more than ever for their products?

    We investigate the accuracy of these claims, and which companies are responsible with the help of Jan Eeckhout a Professor of Economics at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona

    Presenter: Kate Lamble Producer: Beth Ashmead Latham Production co-ordinator: Katie Morrison Sound mix: Neil Churchill Editor: Richard Vadon

    Is planet Earth getting greener?

    Is planet Earth getting greener?

    Canadian psychologist and culture war commentator Jordan Peterson says planet Earth has got 20% greener in the last 20 years.

    But satellite data tells a different story.

    We investigate the correct number, with the help of Dr Chi Chen, from Rutgers University in the US.

    Presenter: Kate Lamble Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Giles Aspen Editor: Richard Fenton-Smith

    Does a language die every two weeks?

    Does a language die every two weeks?

    Researchers have catalogued 7,164 languages spoken around the world - some are used daily by billions. Half are spoken by less than 8000 people. The death of a language, when it’s no longer spoken as a first language by anyone living is a deeply significant moment in the cultural life of communities.

    Multiple sources including the UN and National Geographic magazine have claimed this happens every two weeks. But we have reasons to be suspicious about that statistic. Gary Simons, executive editor of the Ethnologue language catalogue, explains where this idea came from.

    Presenter: Kate Lamble Producer: Debbie Richford Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Fenton-Smith

    Are women 14 times more likely to die in natural disasters?

    Are women 14 times more likely to die in natural disasters?

    The idea that women outnumber men by 14 to 1 as casualties of natural disasters has been repeated in newspapers and online for years - the UN have even used this statistic.

    But when you track down the source, the research behind this claim leaves much to be desired.

    Presenter: Kate Lamble Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Fenton-Smith