Podcast Summary
Government report on 1987 stock market crash leads to creation of ETFs: The 1987 stock market crash revealed a need for a more efficient hedging tool, leading to the creation of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) as an alternative to portfolio insurance.
The Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) industry, which allows investors to make bets on various indices, commodities, or sectors as a single entity, emerged from an unexpected source - a government report following the 1987 stock market crash. The report, which was over 800 pages long, found that portfolio insurance, a strategy used by institutions to hedge against market downturns, exacerbated the crash due to a lack of buyers for sellers in the insurance market. This discovery led to the creation of the ETF structure, which addressed the issue by offering investors a more liquid and efficient alternative to traditional portfolio insurance. The ETF market has since grown exponentially, with over $1 trillion in assets, and continues to innovate with new types of funds.
Black Monday: A Turning Point for ETFs: The 1987 stock market crash led to the creation of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) as a response to market volatility, allowing for trading of a basket of stocks as a single entity, revolutionizing the financial markets.
The 1987 stock market crash was caused by a massive sell-off of individual stocks, instigated by program traders. This sell-off led to a 22% drop in one day, known as the "Black Monday" crash. After studying the event, the SEC suggested an alternative approach to trading, which involved basket trading rather than individual stocks. Two executives at the American Stock Exchange (AmEx) read this report and saw an opportunity to create a new product. They approached Vanguard with the idea of trading an S&P index fund basket, but were rejected. Undeterred, they went on to develop the Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) as a response to this market volatility, which would allow for trading of a basket of stocks as a single entity. This innovation would later revolutionize the financial markets.
ETF inspired by commodities warehouse receipt model to save trading costs: ETF structure derived from commodities warehousing, enabling large volume trades without affecting long-term investors, and introducing a virtual custodian for added utility
The creation of the Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) was influenced by the desire to create a low-cost trading vehicle that wouldn't drive up costs for frequent traders, as Jack Bogle, a prominent figure in index investing, was not interested in such a product due to its trading nature. The team behind the ETF drew inspiration from the commodities warehouse receipt model, where merchandise isn't moved but receipts are traded instead, saving costs. This paradigm was applied to the ETF structure, allowing it to trade large volumes daily without impacting long-term investors like my aunt Joyce. The ETF's design, which included a virtual warehouse called a custodian, was more utility-rich than initially anticipated, making it a game-changer in the investment world.
ETFs have physically stored assets and a creation/redemption process to keep price aligned with NAV: ETFs, unlike derivatives, have underlying assets and a mechanism ensuring price alignment with NAV through APs and arbitrage opportunities
An Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF) is different from a derivative because its underlying assets are physically stored in a custodian, making it more resilient during market stress events. The creation and redemption process, where authorized participants (APs) exchange the ETF shares for the underlying assets or vice versa, keeps the ETF price close to its Net Asset Value (NAV). APs are motivated to participate in this process to earn a spread and engage in arbitrage opportunities, ensuring the ETF's price alignment with the NAV. This mechanism sets ETFs apart from closed-end funds, which have fixed shares outstanding and can result in significant premiums or discounts.
The Right Product at the Right Time and Shift in Investing Trends: The introduction of SPDRs in the late 1980s faced initial struggles due to regulatory hurdles and lack of broker commissions. However, during the 1990s market boom, individual investors and institutions saw its potential, leading to its success and the rise of discount retail and online brokerages, doubling assets every year after launch.
The introduction of the Standard and Poor's Depository Receipts (SPDRs), or "Spiders," revolutionized the investment industry due to its low cost and economic incentive for all parties involved. However, its initial struggle to gain traction was due to regulatory hurdles and the lack of commission for brokers selling it. The real catalyst for its success came during the 1990s market boom when individual investors began investing for themselves, and institutions, such as pensions, saw its potential. Despite early challenges, the SPDRs became a game-changer in the investment world, leading to the rise of discount retail and online brokerages, and doubling assets every year after its launch. While the identity of the wealthy Seattle investor who adopted SPDRs early remains uncertain, it's clear that the combination of the right product at the right time, along with the shift in investing trends, played a significant role in its success.
ETFs have expanded and standardized various investment strategies: ETFs offer easy access to complex investments, putting pressure on active mutual funds to adapt or lose assets
Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have evolved significantly since their early days, expanding into various asset classes and offering new investment strategies like smart beta. This standardization allows investors to easily buy, sell, and understand the pricing of previously complex investments. The growth of ETFs has led to concerns from the active mutual fund industry, which faces pressure to adapt or lose assets as investors seek lower-cost, tax-efficient alternatives. Despite this, active mutual funds continue to make substantial fees, creating a gravy train effect. The future of investing may lie in the intersection of passive and active strategies offered through ETFs.
Concerns about effectiveness of smart beta and factor ETFs: Despite concerns over herd mentality and potential regulations, the popularity of smart beta and factor ETFs continues to grow. Understanding investment objectives and risks is crucial.
The evolution of smart beta and factor investing through ETFs has led to concerns about the effectiveness of these strategies as they become more accessible and cheaper to implement. The herd mentality can lead to overcrowding in certain factors, potentially diminishing their returns. However, some factors, like dividends, may still hold value for long-term investors seeking stability and consistent income. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed rules focusing on ETF liquidity and derivatives use, which could impact certain types of ETFs, such as bond and leverage ETFs. These rules may limit the ability to sell off assets quickly and restrict the use of high leverage, respectively. Despite these concerns and regulations, the popularity of smart beta and factor ETFs continues to grow, making it essential for investors to understand their investment objectives and the potential risks involved.
ETFs Face Challenges During Market Volatility: Despite benefits, ETFs can face difficulties in volatile markets and retail investors should be cautious with complex ETFs.
While Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) have brought numerous benefits to investors such as transparency, liquidity, and cost-effectiveness, there are concerns regarding their ability to function properly during market volatility and the potential risks associated with complex ETFs. The incident on August 24, 2015, also known as "Black Monday 2," highlighted the challenges ETFs face when markets halt, making it harder for ETFs to trade accurately. Additionally, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is also concerned with complex ETFs like multifactor and thematic ETFs, which may not be fully understood by retail investors. Overall, ETFs have been a net positive for investors due to their advantages, but excessive trading and an overreliance on complex ETFs could potentially lead to negative outcomes.
The Evolution of ETFs: From Simple to Complex: ETFs started as low-cost investment tools but have grown complex, raising regulatory concerns, including the SEC's reevaluation of their structure for complex products.
The evolution of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) from their simple beginnings to their current complex state is a fascinating story of innovation and regulation. Originally designed as simple, low-cost investment vehicles, ETFs have since expanded to cater to various investor needs, including actively managed funds, leveraged funds, and those with illiquid underlying assets. However, this expansion has raised concerns among regulators, including the SEC, who are now reevaluating the appropriateness of the ETF structure for these complex products. As the evolution of ETFs continues, it will be interesting to see how regulators respond and where the market takes these innovative investment vehicles in the next 10 years. For those interested in learning more, I recommend checking out Jill Weisenthal's article in Bloomberg Markets Magazine or on Bloomberg.com, as well as Eric Balkin's upcoming book on the subject.
![Eric Balchunas – The Past, Present & Future of ETFs - [Invest Like the Best, EP.93]](https://www.podcastworld.io/podcast-images/invest-like-the-best-with-patrick-o-shaughnessy-3pmywn1q.webp)
