Logo
    Search

    Experts Predicted a Recession This Year. How Were They So Wrong?

    enAugust 08, 2023

    Podcast Summary

    • Period of immaculate disinflation in US economyExpert predictions of a recession were wrong, US economy has low inflation, low unemployment, rising real wages, and narrowing inequality

      Despite expert predictions of a recession, the US economy is experiencing a period of immaculate disinflation, characterized by falling inflation, historically low unemployment, rising real wages, and narrowing inequality. This is a stark contrast to past recessions and economic crises, such as stagflation, the Volcker crisis, and the Great Recession. The confidence of economic experts in predicting a recession this year reached an all-time high, but their predictions have not materialized. It's important to note that while the US economy is in a good state, there are still challenges that need to be addressed, such as the high cost of essentials like housing, education, and healthcare. The use of AI tools like Canva for presentations and Indeed for hiring can help streamline work processes and make them more efficient.

    • Experts underestimated the economy's resilienceUnexpectedly low interest rates, effective fiscal policies, and quick resolution of disruptions led to a stronger economy than predicted, despite past inflation and incorrect recession predictions

      Despite the ongoing impact of inflation from previous years and some incorrect economic predictions, the economy is in a better shape than expected. Experts were wrong about a predicted recession in 2023 due to several factors, including unexpectedly low interest rates, effective fiscal policies, and the quick resolution of some supply chain disruptions and energy shocks. While the economy is not perfect and challenges remain, it's essential to acknowledge the progress made and continue learning from these experiences to improve our understanding of economics and economic forecasting.

    • US Economy Faces Multiple Shocks, But No Recession in SightDespite multiple economic shocks, underlying inflation remains around 3.5% and the economy has not entered a recession. Labor market cooling is a normal part of the economic cycle.

      The US economy has faced multiple shocks, including fiscal policy, monetary policy, supply chain disruptions, and the energy crisis from the Russia invasion. Economists, including Larry Summers, predicted inflation would lead to a recession, but the economy has not entered a recession. The debate was over how much of the inflation was transitory. Underlying inflation is currently around 3.5%, down from the highest predicted rate. The relationship between labor market tightness and inflation is nonlinear, meaning small changes can lead to significant inflation, but the impact decreases as the labor market loosens. The labor market has cooled, with job openings falling, rather than the unemployment rate rising. This cooling has been expected and is a normal part of the economic cycle.

    • Public's perception vs. economic dataDespite improving labor market and falling inflation, public's negative views of the economy are at record highs, contrasting with actual data. Factors like echo chambers, past inflation, and lack of excitement about job gains may contribute to this gap.

      Despite the labor market improving and inflation falling, there is a significant gap between the public's perception of the economy and the actual data. This disconnect was highlighted in a poll where record-high negative views of the economy coincided with a 60-year low unemployment rate. The speaker suggests that this gap could be due to various factors such as echo chambers, lingering effects of past inflation, or a lack of excitement about job gains. While the economy may not be as bad as some perceive, it's essential to understand and address this disconnect to ensure that policies and interventions are effective.

    • The Federal Reserve's role in shaping expectationsDuring the 2010s, the Federal Reserve drove economic growth, but its efforts to stimulate growth were only moderately successful. The economy may be less responsive to interest rates than assumed, and expectations and psychological factors may play a significant role in economic outcomes.

      The Federal Reserve's role in the economy may be more about shaping expectations than directly controlling economic conditions through interest rates. During the 2010s, the Federal Reserve was the primary driver of economic growth as fiscal policies were stalled. However, its efforts to stimulate growth were only moderately successful, and during the 2020s, the Federal Reserve's attempts to curb inflation through interest rate hikes did not result in a recession as some had anticipated. This could suggest that the economy may be less responsive to interest rates than previously thought, and the Federal Reserve's power may be more limited than assumed. Expectations and psychological factors, such as fear of a recession, may play a significant role in economic outcomes. While this theory is speculative, it highlights the importance of understanding the complex interplay between monetary policy, economic conditions, and public perception.

    • The Fed's role in shaping economic conditions goes beyond interest ratesThe Fed's communications and actions can significantly impact economic expectations and activity, beyond the actual change in interest rates

      The relationship between fiscal policy and monetary policy, specifically the role of the Federal Reserve, in shaping economic conditions may be more complex than previously thought. While fiscal policy has proven effective in stimulating an economy during downturns, it has shown limited ability to help cool down an overheating economy. On the other hand, the Federal Reserve's impact on the economy might not solely depend on the actual increase in interest rates, but rather on the "vibes" or expectations it creates. This idea, which requires further research, suggests that the Fed's ability to change the economic outlook through its communications and actions could be a significant driver of economic activity. This challenges the traditional view of the Federal Reserve as a joystick for interest rates and highlights the importance of understanding how people process economic information and form expectations.

    • Combining Technology and Financial Planning for SuccessUse clear instructions with AI text generators for effective documents. Define personal wealth goals and stay adaptable to economic changes.

      Both technology and financial planning play crucial roles in achieving success and discovering the "magic" in life. Canva's Magic Write, an AI text generator, can help create specific and effective documents for various purposes. However, the more detailed and clear the instructions given to the AI, the better the results. Edward Jones emphasizes the importance of financial strategies to support a fulfilling life, encouraging individuals to define what "rich" means for them. Workday, on the other hand, offers a platform that pairs finance and HR for efficient and agile business operations. Regarding economic predictions, it's essential to remember that recessions can be unforeseeable and may come unexpectedly. While some economic experts may predict a recession, it's crucial not to rely solely on such predictions, as the unemployment rate and other economic indicators can provide some context but are not foolproof measures. The 2007-2008 financial crisis serves as a reminder that recessions can start without warning, and it's important to stay adaptable and prepared.

    • Risks to the US Economy's ResilienceMonetary policy's lagged effects, higher interest rates, cash flow issues for businesses, especially real estate, slowing consumer spending, and geopolitical risks are potential threats to the US economy's resilience.

      While the US economy has shown resilience in the face of various supply shocks and monetary policy changes in the last 18 months, there are risks that could derail this trend. These risks include the lagged effects of monetary policy leading to higher interest rates and cash flow issues for businesses, especially in sectors like commercial real estate. Additionally, recent financial tightening due to rising mortgage rates and the 10-year treasury yield could depress homebuilding. The American consumer's spending, which played a significant role in the non-recession last year, may also slow down. Furthermore, geopolitical risks, such as oil price fluctuations and global conflicts, could cause unexpected shocks to the economy. It's challenging to predict when and where the next geopolitical crisis will come from, but it's essential to keep an eye on these risks.

    • Economy's resilience to oil price shocks improvedDespite geopolitical tensions and supply concerns, the economy's resilience to oil price shocks has improved due to energy efficiency and current supply situation. However, external factors like European recession and global trade deterioration could make the economy more sensitive to supply shocks.

      While there are geopolitical tensions between Israel and Iran that could potentially impact oil prices, the current supply situation and energy efficiency improvements mean that oil prices have less impact on the economy than in the past. However, if Europe enters a recession and global trade deteriorates, it could make the economy more sensitive to supply shocks. Economic predictions are uncertain, but it's worth noting that Europe has experienced negative growth in the last two quarters due to energy shocks and reliance on Russian energy. The US economy has avoided a recession so far, but the American consumer's saved funds may soon run out. Overall, the economy's resilience to oil price shocks has improved, but external factors could still impact growth.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Welcome to the ‘Take This Job and Shove It’ Economy

    Welcome to the ‘Take This Job and Shove It’ Economy

    This is a strange moment in the economy. Wages are up, but so is inflation. Jobs are growing, but maybe not fast enough. Quit rates are at a 21st-century high. It isn’t clear what’s a trend, what’s a blip, what’s a transition and what’s now normal. And all this as the virus continues to stalk us and we process the trauma of the last 18 months.

    “We all will have various times in our life where we’ll stop and say, ‘Whoa — am I going in the right direction? Is this the right occupation for me? Should I do something differently?’” says Betsey Stevenson. “But I can’t think of any other time when it’s been a correlated shock across the entire country, where we’ve all been faced — no, forced — to ask questions.”

    Stevenson is an economist, and a highly accomplished one at that. She served as the chief economist of Barack Obama’s Department of Labor and later a member of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers. Now she’s a professor of public policy and economics at the University of Michigan, as well as co-host of the podcast “Think Like an Economist.” She has a rare talent to blend a rigorous approach to labor market economics with a recognition that people — our psychologies and fears and dreams — matter, and they shape our economic decisions. Particularly now.

    So I invited Stevenson on the show to discuss the big picture of what’s happening right now in the U.S. economy — wages, employment, inflation and the animal spirits driving much of it. She didn’t disappoint. I came away from this conversation far less confused than when I walked into it.

    Mentioned in this episode: 

    “The Jobs Report Takeaway: A Huge Reallocation of People and Work Is Underway” by Betsey Stevenson 

    “Examining the uneven and hard-to-predict labor market recovery” by Lauren Bauer, Arindrajit Dube, Wendy Edelberg, and Aaron Sojourner

    “Why we got more inflation than I expected” by Matt Yglesias

    “Do Hiring Headaches Imply a Labor Shortage?” by Paul Krugman

    Recommendations: 

    Klara and the Sun by Kazuo Ishiguro

    The Undercover Economist Strikes Back by Tim Hartford 

    Career and Family by Claudia Goldin

    If you enjoyed this episode, check out our previous podcast “Employers Are Begging for Workers. Maybe That’s a Good Thing” with Cornell political scientist Jamila Michener 

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of "The Ezra Klein Show" at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast, and you can find Ezra on Twitter @ezraklein.

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    “The Ezra Klein Show” is produced by Annie Galvin, Jeff Geld and Rogé Karma; fact-checking by Michelle Harris; original music by Isaac Jones; mixing by Jeff Geld, audience strategy by Shannon Busta. Special thanks to Kristin Lin.

    How is "Transitory" Inflation Going?

    How is "Transitory" Inflation Going?
    Enjoyed the podcast? Comment below! 💬 ⭑ Subscribe to Economics Explained Youtube Channel 👉 https://bit.ly/sub2ee ⭑ Enjoyed? Hit the like button! 👍 Q&A Streams on EEII (2nd channel) → https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOTgNyfQG4vVP5sCXrJaS4g ✉️ Business Enquiries → EconomicsExplained@ibg.yt 🎧 Listen to EE on Spotify! 👉 https://anchor.fm/EconomicsExplained Follow EE on social media: Twitter 🐦 → https://twitter.com/EconomicsEx Facebook → https://www.facebook.com/EconomicsEx Instagram → https://www.instagram.com/EconomicsExplained Discord → https://discord.gg/MJGcTH6 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ECONOMICS EXPLAINED IS MADE POSSIBLE BY OUR PATREON COMMUNITY 👊🙏 Support EE by becoming a Patron today! 👉 https://www.patreon.com/EconomicsExplained

    Q3 2023 in Perspective | Part Two: Top Stories from the Third Quarter

    Q3 2023 in Perspective | Part Two: Top Stories from the Third Quarter

    Rising oil prices have animated market participant’s fears of reinvigorated inflation pressures, increasing the chances that the Federal Reserve will impose more interest rate hikes. Join Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Investment Communications Strategist (Consultant), and Tom Romano our Head of Strategic Relationships & Product Development, for a detailed recap of some notable market events from Q3 of this year.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on LinkedInFacebook, YouTube, and Instagram. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss.
    Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions.
     
    Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice. 

    Is A Recession Ahead? Danielle DiMartino Booth Reveals What's Next For The Economy

    Is A Recession Ahead? Danielle DiMartino Booth Reveals What's Next For The Economy

    Episode 94:

    On today's show I speak with the amazing Danielle DiMartino Booth about the REAL state of the economy and what is really going on. We talk about leading indicators and focus on several key areas: DEBT, ERC, Labor, Manufacturing, Housing, Higher For Longer, Inflation, and Recession.

    What's next for the economy and markets? An episode you don't want to miss! 👉

    Danielle DiMartino Booth, CEO and Chief Strategist, QI Research. Prior to QI Research, DiMartino Booth spent nine years at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

    Danielle is also best selling author of "FED-UP!" an intellectual insider perspective of her experiences from 9 years at the FED of Dallas leading up to and during the financial crisis.

     

    ➡️Follow Danielle on Twitter: https://twitter.com/DiMartinoBooth

    ➡️Visit Qi Research: https://quillintelligence.com/

     

    ✨SUBSCRIBE to The RO Show Podcast!✨
    https://youtube.com/@theroshowpodcast

     

    ➡️CONNECT with ROSANNA PRESTIA & The RO Show⬅️


    ✨ONE SITE FOR ALL: https://sociatap.com/RosannaPrestia

    ✨YOUTUBE: https://youtube.com/@TheROShowPodcast

    ✨TWITTER: https://www.twitter.com/@rosannainvests

    ✨TWITTER: https://www.twitter.com/@theroshowpod

    ✨WEBSITE: https://www.rosannaprestia.com

     

    THINK Different with Rosanna
    ©️ 2022-2023

    Could the inflation spike lead to stagflation - or is it the start of a growth spurt?

    Could the inflation spike lead to stagflation - or is it the start of a growth spurt?
    The cost of living jumped by the largest amount on record to hit 3.2 per cent in August – is it set to run out of control and prompt the Bank of England to raise interest rates?

    Meanwhile, a gloomy report has lead some economists to talk about stagflation once more. What is it, is it a threat and does it matter?

    This week, Simon Lambert, Lee Boyce and Georgie Frost discuss the 'flations' and what it could mean for the coming months, and the pandemic recovery.

    Alongside this, there are supply chain problems and staff shortages. Can we expect higher prices in shops and is Britain set for a hiring boom?

    It's not just shops that are suffering, soaring costs and tradesmen shortages are leaving families doing home improvements themselves - or stuck with half-finished renovations.

    And we go inside the pocket sized houses aimed at first time buyers in London. We left the cat at home: there wasn't enough room to swing it…