Logo
    Search

    Health Fads and Fictions: VO2 Max, Supplement Mania, Sunlight, and Immortality

    enApril 19, 2024

    Podcast Summary

    • Trust in Health Information: A Shift in DynamicsIn the post-pandemic world, trust in traditional health institutions is declining, leading to an increase in reliance on independent media and influencers for health advice, resulting in contradictory information and confusion.

      In the current post-pandemic world, there's a shift in trust dynamics when it comes to health information. With the decline of trust in traditional health institutions like the FDA and CDC, many people now turn to independent media and influencers for guidance. This trend is evident in the rise of health fads and the contradictory advice given, from masks to vitamins. In this podcast episode, Nathan Hubbard discusses the latest pop releases, while also touching upon the independent health media landscape. He highlights the rise of trust in influencers and the confusion caused by contradictory health advice. Additionally, the episode features a sponsorship from Canva, a tool that simplifies the process of creating presentations, and Indeed, a platform for hiring and connecting with candidates.

    • The future of trust in health info may shift from traditional sources to independent voicesRecognize the difference between supplements and medicines, approach supplements critically, and be aware of limited data on their effectiveness.

      The future of trust in health and wellness information may be shifting from top-down, traditional sources to bottom-up, independent voices. However, it's essential to recognize that there is a significant difference between supplements and medicines, with supplements having much less regulatory oversight. While it's legal to make vague health claims about supplements, it's crucial for consumers to be aware that they don't have to work to be sold. The supplement industry's growth over the past few decades has been massive, but not all consumers may fully understand what they're putting in their bodies. It's important to approach supplements with a critical and informed mindset, considering the limited data available on their effectiveness. Science, as always, encourages experimentation, but consumers should be wary of supplements with little to no scientific backing.

    • VO2 max may not be as indicative of performance or overall health as we thinkVO2 max is just an indicator, other factors like endurance and efficiency are crucial for overall health and fitness

      While VO 2 max, or the maximum amount of oxygen the body can utilize, is a widely discussed health and fitness metric, it may not be as indicative of performance or overall health as we think. Although it has a strong correlation with longevity, most studies measuring its impact on mortality use the speed reached during exercise, not the actual VO 2 max value. It's essential to remember that VO 2 max is just an indicator, and other factors like gas tank size (endurance) and miles per gallon (efficiency) are also crucial for understanding overall health and fitness.

    • Focus on speed or pace during aerobic activities for fitness assessmentAssess fitness level through speed or pace during aerobic activities, compare progress to general population, and maintain cardiovascular health through regular aerobic exercise

      While VO2 max is an important indicator of cardiovascular health and longevity, it's not necessary to know your exact VO2 max number to assess your fitness level. Instead, focusing on your speed or pace during aerobic activities, such as running or cycling, can provide similar predictive information. This simplified approach allows individuals to measure their progress and compare their fitness levels to the general population, without the need for expensive lab tests. Additionally, regular aerobic exercise, regardless of the specific activity or metric used, is crucial for maintaining cardiovascular health, even for those who engage in strength training.

    • Maintain overall fitness for longevityRegular strength training, aerobic activities, and morning sunlight exposure contribute to overall fitness and reduce risk of early death. Aim for 150 minutes of aerobic activity and 2 days of strength training per week.

      Maintaining good fitness, both cardiorespiratory and muscular strength, is crucial for longevity. Regular strength training and aerobic activities like brisk walking can significantly contribute to overall fitness and reduce the risk of early death. Additionally, morning sunlight exposure plays a role in regulating our circadian rhythm and preparing our bodies for the day, which can positively impact our health. The government guidelines recommend 150 minutes of moderate to intense aerobic activity and 2 days of strength training per week for optimal fitness. These simple practices, while not overly technical, can have a profound impact on our health and longevity.

    • Morning routines: Balance benefits and complexityEnjoy a simple, early morning routine for overall health benefits, but avoid overly complex rituals that focus on self-optimization.

      While morning routines and rituals, including getting morning sunlight, can be beneficial for our health and well-being, it's important to avoid becoming overly obsessed with complex routines and stacks. These can resemble religious rituals in their complexity and focus on self-optimization, rather than building relationships or connections with others. While there's nothing inherently wrong with having routines, it's crucial to remember that placebo effects can be just as powerful as real ones. Additionally, morning sunlight is generally good for our circadian rhythm and possibly our vitamin D levels, but the specifics, such as the time or angle, may not matter significantly. So, aim for an early start to the day and enjoy the overall benefits of a healthy morning routine.

    • Morning, evening, and supplement routines can support foundational habitsFocus on getting enough exercise, sleep, and proper nutrition. Be cautious with supplements and consider simpler rituals for meaning and structure.

      While morning, evening, and supplement routines or rituals can help, they are often the final 2% in improving overall health and productivity. The most important aspects are getting enough exercise, sleep, and proper nutrition. For many people, these routines or rituals can serve as a helpful introduction to organizing their day and improving their habits. However, it's essential to be cautious about supplements, as 25% of them may be tainted, and to consider simpler alternatives like creating daily or weekly rituals to bring meaning and structure to one's life. These rituals can help us derive meaning from our lives and prevent the blurring of time. Overall, the focus should be on the basics of health and well-being, and any additional routines or rituals should serve to support these foundational habits.

    • The Ironic Effect of Relying on Supplements for SleepRelying too much on supplements for sleep can worsen insomnia, and lack of regulation can lead to unproven or dangerous products. A balanced lifestyle and regular medical check-ups are essential for true health.

      While supplements like magnesium and melatonin can help support a relaxing bedtime routine, trying to rely on them as a cure-all for insomnia can actually worsen sleep problems. This is known as the ironic effect, where the more we focus on something, the more problematic it becomes. When it comes to the explosion of supplement promotion in the health podcast world, regulation is a topic of debate. While supplements don't require FDA approval for structural claims, the lack of regulation can lead to unproven or even dangerous products. Historical precedence shows that attempts to regulate supplements have been influenced by industry funding, making it a complex issue. Overall, it's important to approach supplements with a critical and informed perspective, and to remember that true health often comes from a holistic approach, including a balanced lifestyle and regular medical check-ups.

    • Beware of unproven supplementsHalf of supplements may be contaminated or ineffective. Research well before consuming, focus on supplements with a solid scientific basis and a long history of research.

      Not all supplements are created equal or safe. Up to 50% of supplements may be contaminated, and some may not even work as advertised. It's essential to be cautious and do thorough research before consuming any supplements, especially those that claim to offer miraculous cures or quick fixes. The best supplements are those that have a solid scientific basis, are independently tested and verified, and have a long history of research supporting their effectiveness. Creatine, for instance, is a well-researched supplement that can help increase muscle mass and strength in about 40-60% of people who take it. Creatine has been studied for decades and is considered safe, making it a good example of a supplement that delivers on its promises. It's crucial to be skeptical of supplement companies that don't invest in research or rely on influencer marketing to sell their products. Instead, focus on supplements that have a proven track record and are backed by science.

    • Regulating Health Advice: A Critical and Informed PerspectiveApproach health advice critically, recognize the role of institutions like the FDA, and look to reputable sources for evidence-based recommendations.

      While there are debates surrounding the regulation of supplements like creatine and the role of institutions like the FDA, it's important to approach health advice with a critical and informed perspective. Creatine, for instance, has shown to help muscle growth for many people with a good safety profile. However, promises of cures or elixirs for health should be met with skepticism, especially when they avoid regulatory scrutiny. The FDA, despite its mistakes, plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety and efficacy of drugs and supplements, and its process for remedying mistakes is important. It's also essential to recognize that there's often misinformation and straw manning in the health advice space, and it's important to look at actual recommendations from reputable sources, such as the FDA and USADA, for a balanced and evidence-based approach to health and nutrition.

    • Trust in Food and Health Sources: A Complex IssueCritically evaluate sources of health information, prioritize evidence-based knowledge, and support regulation to ensure trustworthy and safe products.

      The issue of trust in regulatory bodies, particularly when it comes to food and health, is complex and multifaceted. While some criticize the FDA and pharmaceutical companies for potential biases and lack of transparency, others look to influencers and supplement companies as alternative sources of trust. However, these sources may not be as reliable or regulated as one might assume. The ease of creating a supplement company and the potential for influencers to profit from selling their image and platform raises concerns about the authenticity and safety of these products. The case of Alex Jones, who built his empire on supplement sales before becoming known for conspiracy theories, highlights the potential dangers of blindly trusting these sources. Ultimately, it's crucial to critically evaluate the sources of information we trust and to prioritize evidence-based knowledge and regulation when it comes to our health and wellbeing.

    • The complexities and ethical considerations of unconventional means for individual trust and longevityExploring unconventional methods for trust and longevity raises ethical questions about accuracy, effectiveness, intentions, and the potential for financial gain.

      The pursuit of individual trust and longevity through unconventional means, such as supplements or experimental drugs, raises important questions about accuracy, effectiveness, and intentions. While some may see it as a misallocation of attention or even creepy, others argue that if these individuals are willing to be human guinea pigs and the experiments yield valuable results, then more power to them. However, it's crucial to consider whether the measures they're using are accurate and if the experiments can actually tell us anything. The sheer number of interventions and supplements makes it difficult to isolate the effect of any one thing. Additionally, it's essential to consider whether the pursuit is driven by genuine curiosity or financial gain. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities and ethical considerations surrounding the quest for individual trust and longevity.

    • Approaching Unconventional Health Methods with Skepticism and Scientific RigorMaintain a healthy dose of skepticism towards unconventional health methods and ensure they're backed by solid scientific evidence before adopting them.

      While some individuals, like Brian Johnson, may promote unconventional health methods and supplements, it's crucial to approach them with a healthy dose of skepticism and scientific rigor. Johnson's use of terms like "snake oil" and his seemingly constant changes in health protocols can be confusing and off-putting. However, there's a small part of optimism that he might stumble upon something beneficial for millions. Ultimately, the key is to ensure that any discoveries are backed by solid scientific evidence and can be scaled up for widespread use. As listeners, we should remain informed and critical, but also open-minded to the potential for breakthroughs. The importance of good science and rigorous testing cannot be overstated.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    SupplySide West 2023

    SupplySide West 2023
                                                                                      14:25 Sandy Almendarez, VP of Content for SupplySide, joins Mark Alyn to discuss SupplySide West, an upcoming nutrition and supplement industry event in Las Vegas from October 23 - 27.  Exhibitors from all over the world will share the latest information on scientific developments, products, and sustainability to bring better health to more people and help them live better lives!

    Living with Parkinson's Disease

    Living with Parkinson's Disease
                                                                                        8:27 Parkinson’s Disease (PD) affects nearly one million people in the U.S., and more than 90,000 are newly diagnosed each year – a 50% increase from previous estimates of 60,000 diagnoses per year.  John L. Lehr, President and CEO of the Parkinson’s Foundation, and Vikas Chinnan, a person living with Young-Onset Parkinson’s disease (YOPD), visit with Mark Alyn on Late Night Health to discuss how to recognize the disease and share information about resources available to help the PD community. 

    5 Steps to Losing Your “Holiday Weight”

    5 Steps to Losing Your “Holiday Weight”

    Okay, the holidays are officially over. Our holiday high is wearing off. And we kept telling ourselves “we’ll get serious about our health” on January 1st. But January 1st has come and gone and we are STILL struggling to “start over” again. Now we are thinking about starting some fad diet, or we are wanting to eat as little as we can to lose our holiday weight. In our minds we can’t stop thinking about, “How can I get this holiday weight off ASAP?!” Is any of this sounding familiar? I also know right now we are being sold left and right on New Year New Your diets, supplements, workout plans, all the things. Girl, DO NOT FALL FOR IT.

    In this episode, I am going to share a clear-cut plan on how to actually lose your holiday day weight WITHOUT deprivation, without fad dieting, without unnecessary supplements, without any of the BS…

    Big Brain, Little Brain: How to Control Which One Speaks for You

    Big Brain, Little Brain: How to Control Which One Speaks for You
                                                                                      25:00 In today’s world, anything you say, text, tweet, or post can go viral in an instant.  Most of us know better than to blurt out or rant our unfiltered feelings.  So, why is it so hard to control our words?  How can we prevent conversations from becoming confrontations?  Kevin Thomas McCarney joins Mark and reveals ways to thoughtfully communicate.