Podcast Summary
Principal Asset Management's comprehensive approach to real estate investment: Principal Asset Management uses local insights and global expertise to identify promising real estate investment opportunities. Despite the US economy outperforming China's, ongoing trade tensions and China's industrial powerhouse challenges persist, with debates surrounding US and China's contrasting industrial policies.
Principal Asset Management, as a real estate manager, leverages a comprehensive perspective, combining local insights and global expertise across various investment classes. This approach helps them identify the most promising opportunities. Meanwhile, the ongoing trade tensions between the US and China continue, with the US economy outperforming China's, despite China's industrial powerhouses causing concerns for legacy industries in the US and Europe. The US economy's success, however, is not without challenges, as China remains a formidable competitor in strategic areas like EVs, semiconductors, and aerospace. The US administration's industrial policy approach contrasts with China's targeted investments, leading to ongoing concerns and debates.
US-China trade relationship shifts with tariffs: Tariffs on Chinese goods under both US administrations have decreased Chinese sales to the US, potentially impacting factories and the US-China relationship.
The US-China relationship, particularly in regards to trade, has seen a significant shift over the past few years with the implementation and potential expansion of tariffs. From an economist's perspective, tariffs increase the cost of imports, leading to a decrease in demand. The US, under both the Trump and Biden administrations, have implemented tariffs on Chinese goods, resulting in a significant decrease in Chinese sales to the US. The Trump administration implemented a sweeping tariff review, affecting a wide range of Chinese industries, while the Biden administration has held those tariffs in place and even targeted specific technologies like semiconductors. If Trump were to win the presidency again, he has suggested increasing tariffs even further, which could have a devastating impact on Chinese factories and the overall US-China relationship.
Shifting consensus in Washington D.C. from tariffs to additional measures against China: The consensus in Washington D.C. has shifted from debating tariffs against China to implementing additional measures due to China's technological advancements and military threat. The Biden administration's use of economic statecraft tools reflects this new consensus.
The consensus in Washington D.C. has shifted from debating the removal of tariffs against China to implementing additional measures due to China's continued technological advancements and growing military threat. The Biden administration's use of economic statecraft tools, such as export controls on advanced semiconductors, reflects this new consensus. China's sudden rise in economic power and military capabilities, which was not a concern two decades ago, has changed the dynamic in Washington D.C. The bipartisan agreement is no longer about whether to implement restrictions on China, but rather on the degree of those restrictions. The concern is that if China catches up with US technology, it could pose a significant military threat and potentially use AI to power weapon systems. The Trump administration's earlier tariffs and sanctions against Chinese firms, such as Huawei, set the stage for this new consensus.
US Election System and China's Manufacturing Power: The US election system and China's rise as a manufacturing power have led to a strong argument for tough anti-China policies, with swing states and national security concerns driving the trend. However, these policies may not directly address job losses in the US manufacturing sector.
The US election system and the unique challenges posed by China's rise as a manufacturing power have come together to create a strong argument for tough anti-China policies in the US. Swing states, which hold disproportionate power in the US election system, are often located in areas that have suffered economically due to China's manufacturing dominance. Donald Trump's successful use of a tough stance on China during his 2016 campaign further fueled this trend. From a policy perspective, the national security concerns and social well-being issues related to China's rise are seen as interconnected. However, it's important to note that this approach may not provide a solution for those who have lost manufacturing jobs in the US, as nearshoring and friendsourcing may lead to job losses in the US but create opportunities in other countries. Biden's China policy includes a focus on sanctions, export controls, and continuing Trump's tariffs. The complexities of this issue lie in the fact that while these policies address national security concerns, they do not necessarily help those who have lost jobs in the US manufacturing sector.
Impact of Tariffs on Inflation: Not as Simple as It Seems: Tariffs can increase import costs, leading to inflation, but they also depress growth. Services inflation, not goods, is not significantly affected. US-China trade war could have far-reaching consequences. Domestic manufacturing investment offsets some inflation. Significant tariff increase could turn off trade and weaken global economy.
While the US has invested heavily in domestic manufacturing, the impact of tariffs on inflation is not as straightforward as it seems. Tariffs can increase import costs, which can lead to inflation, but they also have depressing effects on growth. Moreover, services inflation, which is more important than goods inflation, is not significantly affected by tariffs. The US and China, as major trading partners, account for a significant portion of global trade. If they were to stop trading due to tariffs, it could have far-reaching consequences, affecting not just the US and China, but also other economies around the world. The economic impact of tariffs should be considered not just at the aggregate level, but also at the sector level. The US government's investment in domestic manufacturing, along with other factors, has offset the inflationary impact of tariffs to some extent. However, a significant increase in tariffs could have catastrophic consequences, turning off trade between the world's two biggest economies and leading to a weaker global economy.
US Prioritizes Old Industries Over New: The US focuses on protecting industries like mining and steel, but this could harm industries in the electronics supply chain. Countries like Vietnam and Mexico could benefit from trade disruptions. US-China diplomacy improves, but challenges remain in clean energy. US aims to reduce fossil fuels, but Chinese low costs pose a challenge.
US policies prioritize supporting industries of the past, such as mining and steel production, over industries of the future, like semiconductors and advanced electronics, through high tariffs. This could negatively impact US industries that are exposed to the East Asian electronics supply chain. However, countries like Vietnam and Mexico, which have strong manufacturing bases, low costs, and good trade relationships with both the US and China, could potentially benefit from the trade disruption. Additionally, the US and China are working on improving diplomatic ties despite increasing hawkishness on China's advanced industries. Regarding the clean energy transition, the US aims to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and build up domestic capacity for clean energy technology. However, China's low production costs and high volume of renewable technology, including solar panels, present a challenge. The administration is likely considering both the need to build up domestic capability and the benefits of lower-cost Chinese production.
US Investment vs Chinese Competition in Critical Industries: The US is investing in critical industries, but faces potential dumping risks from Chinese firms, particularly in electric vehicles. The administration is considering tariffs and other measures to protect these industries, but also grappling with data security concerns and potential workarounds by Chinese companies.
The US is investing heavily in critical industries like semiconductors, electric vehicles, and clean energy. However, there's a concern that Chinese firms, operating under different market conditions, could potentially flood these markets with cheaper products, leading to significant dumping risks. This is particularly true in the case of electric vehicles, where Chinese companies are rapidly improving their quality and driving down costs. The US administration is considering increasing tariffs to protect these industries, but there are also concerns about Chinese companies trying to circumvent these restrictions by investing in neighboring countries or exploiting tax incentives. Additionally, there are data security risks associated with Chinese-made electric vehicles, which the administration is also considering. Overall, the US-China competition in these industries is complex and multifaceted, requiring careful consideration of both market dynamics and national security concerns.
Emergence of East-West Trade Blocks and US Economic Statecraft: The shifting global economic landscape could lead to the emergence of east-west trade blocks, potentially harming global growth but providing protection for countries facing US economic statecraft. Collaboration and diplomacy are crucial in navigating geopolitical tensions, particularly regarding access to advanced technologies.
The global economic landscape is shifting, and the influence of the US and its allies in shaping outcomes through sanctions and tariffs is decreasing due to the rising power of countries like China and India. This dynamic could lead to the emergence of east-west trade blocks, which could be detrimental to global growth but may serve as a buffer for countries facing US economic statecraft. The alignment of China and Russia has increased the credibility of US arguments about national security risks, causing European allies to pay more attention to US warnings, particularly regarding Taiwan. For instance, to restrict China's access to advanced semiconductors, the US needs the cooperation of key allies like the Netherlands, which is home to ASML, the leading maker of chip-making equipment. This interconnectedness highlights the complexities of global politics and the need for collaboration and diplomacy in navigating geopolitical tensions.
Global tech industry's interconnectedness poses challenges for economic statecraft: Trade restrictions on China, a major player in tech industry, could lead to unintended consequences and the creation of new supply chains, making a nuanced approach essential for economic statecraft.
The global supply chain, particularly in the tech industry, is intricately connected and interdependent, making it challenging to impose trade restrictions without causing unintended consequences. China, being a significant player in this industry, poses a complex challenge for economic statecraft. For instance, China is the largest share of ASML sales and houses the world's preeminent chipmaker. A trade war or restrictions on imports from China could lead to the creation of supply chains in other countries, such as Mexico or Vietnam, which may still benefit Chinese companies and result in continued revenue flow. Moreover, the global population's preferences in political candidates are another factor to consider, as shown by the survey that revealed about 60% of Chinese respondents preferring Trump. This complex web of interconnectedness highlights the need for a nuanced approach to economic statecraft and the potential for unintended collateral damage.
US-China Trade Tensions: Economic Competition and Military Concerns: The US's focus on trade restrictions against China is driven by economic competition, particularly in tech sectors, and military concerns. Progress in military-to-military and treasury-to-treasury communication exists, but trade constraints could lead to geopolitical issues. The US's potential autarky is a thought experiment, not an endorsement.
The US's focus on imposing trade restrictions on China is politically appealing due to concerns over economic competition, particularly in areas like semiconductors and clean energy technology, as well as the military aspect. This perspective was emphasized by Mackenzie and Tom during their discussion on Odd Lots. Additionally, they noted that despite economic constraints, there have been some areas of progress, such as military-to-military and treasury-to-treasury communication. However, this trade constraint could potentially create geopolitical problems, as Adam Posen of GMP previously warned. Another intriguing point raised during the conversation was the idea that, if any country could achieve autarky, it might be the US, given its abundant resources and talent. This thought experiment was not an endorsement of such a policy but rather a consideration of its potential implications. Another topic that was touched upon but not fully explored was Trump's inconsistent stance on currency policy, with him expressing seemingly contradictory views on wanting both a strong and weak dollar.
Bloomberg launches new podcast 'Money Stuff': Bloomberg introduces a new podcast, Money Stuff, featuring Matt Levine and Katie Greifeld. Subscribers can listen ad-free and engage with the Odd Lots community on Discord. Upgrade your business with the American Express Business Gold Card.
Bloomberg is expanding its podcast offerings with the launch of a new show called "Money Stuff," where Matt Levine and Katie Greifeld will bring the popular Money Stuff newsletter to life every Friday. For those who enjoy Odd Lots' in-depth analysis of economic topics, they're encouraged to leave positive reviews and check out Bloomberg's other podcasts, including Money Stuff, available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and other platforms. Additionally, Bloomberg subscribers can listen to all Odd Lots episodes ad-free by connecting their subscription to Apple Podcasts. And don't forget to join the Odd Lots Discord community for 24/7 discussions with fellow listeners. Lastly, consider upgrading your business with the American Express Business Gold Card, offering flexible spending capacity and annual statement credits on select merchants.
![[The Wire China] The sponge revolution](https://www.podcastworld.io/podcast-images/china-stories-wgyzssa9.webp)