Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Supreme Court's Affirmative Action Decision: A Setback for Equal Opportunities?The Supreme Court's decision to strike down affirmative action in college admissions leaves many feeling uncertain about future opportunities for historically marginalized communities, with some sharing personal experiences of discrimination and the importance of acknowledging past and present challenges.

      The Supreme Court's decision to strike down affirmative action in college admissions has left many people, especially those from historically marginalized communities, feeling frustrated and uncertain about their future. Dr. Richard Sims, a 75-year-old emeritus professor of medicine, shared his experiences growing up as a black man in the United States, facing discrimination in education and healthcare. He expressed his disappointment with the Supreme Court's decision and the ongoing struggle for equal opportunities. The complex history of affirmative action and its impact on individuals' lives was a common theme among the stories shared on The Daily. While some people expressed gratitude for the benefits they received, others felt uncomfortable with the policy and worried about its future. Overall, the conversation highlighted the importance of acknowledging the past and present challenges faced by marginalized communities and the ongoing need for policies that promote equal opportunities.

    • From AP student to Harvard doctor: Dr. Sims' journeyDespite not being a top student, Dr. Sims used affirmative action to attend Harvard Medical School, faced skepticism, but felt no regret due to opened opportunities.

      The speaker, Dr. Sims, shared his personal journey from being an advanced placement student in high school, attending his dream school Amherst, and eventually getting into Harvard Medical School despite not being a top student. He acknowledged the possibility of affirmative action playing a role in his acceptance, but felt no regret about it since everyone had their own "lever" to get in. Dr. Sims recounted his experience at Harvard, expressing disappointment with receiving average grades and facing skepticism from some peers. He felt that his Harvard degree opened doors for him, but the experience was tainted by the negative feedback and his decision not to attend graduation. Overall, Dr. Sims' story highlights the complexities of affirmative action and the impact it can have on individuals' educational experiences.

    • Backgrounds shape perspectivesUnderstanding how upbringing and experiences influence perspectives is crucial for recognizing the importance of diversity and inclusion.

      Backgrounds and experiences shape our perspectives in significant ways. Tyler, who grew up in a predominantly white area in Pennsylvania, shared how he was naive about race growing up due to the color-blind culture in his community. His upbringing influenced his understanding of affirmative action, as he didn't fully grasp the importance of racial representation in higher education until he encountered it during his college application process. Despite having excellent academic scores, Tyler was surprised when his interviewer commented on his hobbies and seemed to imply that his racial background was unusual for someone with his interests. This interaction highlighted the importance of recognizing the role that race plays in shaping experiences and opportunities.

    • Personal and Tutoring Experiences with Affirmative ActionAffirmative action in higher education can bring both benefits and discomfort, leading to complex identity struggles for students.

      The conversation highlighted the complex and nuanced experiences of affirmative action in higher education. The speaker shared her personal experience of being a person of color in a competitive academic environment, where she felt both grateful for affirmative action but uncomfortable with the pressure to present a specific identity. She then shared her experiences as a tutor, where she observed students from various backgrounds struggling with the same dilemma of presenting their identity in a way that would benefit them in the admissions process. The speaker expressed her concern that the Supreme Court's ruling overturning affirmative action could lead to a deeper intertwining of race and value in students' consciousness and potentially worsen the negative externalities of affirmative action.

    • Pressure to Emphasize Racial Identity in College ApplicationsThe Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action may lead to students of color feeling pressured to emphasize their racial identity, while others may hide it, potentially causing negative externalities without actual benefits.

      The Supreme Court's decision on affirmative action in college admissions may result in students of color feeling pressured to emphasize their racial identity in college essays, while other students may find ways to hide it. This could lead to negative externalities without the benefits of actual structural redress and opportunity. Jia Shin, a recent high school graduate, shares her experience growing up with the expectation to attend an elite college due to her parents' hardships and desire for financial security and opportunities. Her mother's emphasis on elite schools stemmed from her own experiences and the belief that it would provide her daughter with more opportunities and financial freedom. However, the pressure to attend an elite institution tied Jia's self-worth to her results, ultimately leading her to question the value of her worth beyond her academic achievements.

    • Despite dedication and accomplishments, college rejection can leave students feeling shocked and ashamedCollege admissions are not solely based on merit and hard work, having a backup plan and persisting through disappointment is crucial.

      Ambition and hard work do not guarantee success, especially when it comes to college admissions. Despite putting in countless hours and effort into her high school experiences, including a 4.56 GPA, working as co-editor in chief for her newspaper and literary magazine, creating a nonprofit organization, and participating in extracurriculars such as cheer, martial arts, and playing the violin for 12 years, the speaker was still rejected from her dream school, the University of Pennsylvania. The rejection came as a shock, leaving her feeling numb, upset, and ashamed. She ended up attending her state school, Rutgers, and Boston University, feeling grateful for the opportunities but still struggling with the disappointment and self-doubt. The experience serves as a reminder that there are often factors beyond our control in the college admissions process and that it's important to have a backup plan and to keep working hard regardless of the outcome.

    • Navigating the complexities of affirmative actionAffirmative action evokes strong emotions, affects communities differently, and requires nuanced understanding, considering intersectionality and socioeconomic factors.

      Affirmative action, a policy intended to promote diversity and inclusion, can elicit complex and conflicting emotions, particularly within communities who have experienced both benefits and criticisms. The speaker shares their personal experiences of feeling disadvantaged and misunderstood due to race-based admissions discussions. They also express uncertainty about their stance on the issue, acknowledging the presence of various perspectives and misconceptions. Ultimately, they emphasize the importance of considering the intricacies and nuances of affirmative action, including its intersection with other factors like socioeconomic status and legacy admissions.

    • The Importance of Personal Growth in CollegeCollege admissions are not always fair and focusing solely on school names can limit opportunities. What truly matters is personal growth and becoming the best version of oneself.

      College admissions are arbitrary and focusing too much on the name of the school can be limiting. The speaker in this conversation, Gia, shares her experience of feeling that race may have played a role in her college admissions, but ultimately recognizes the importance of diversity in classrooms and the need for race-conscious acceptances. She also expresses her belief that the Supreme Court case ruling was not intended to make admissions color blind, as other factors like legacy and athletic recruitment still give certain groups an advantage. Despite not getting into her top choice schools, Gia is excited to start Boston University and is focused on making the most of her college experience to become the best version of herself. Her mother, who once valued elite schools, now recognizes that what matters is who her daughter becomes as a person. The conversation highlights the importance of personal growth and the need to move beyond the focus on school names as indicators of success or self-worth.

    • Milan Kundera's Critical Writings Led to Exile in FranceMilan Kundera, a Czech writer, was banned from his homeland due to his critical stance against authoritarian regimes. His works continue to resonate, exploring themes of identity and the impact of political systems on individual lives.

      Milan Kundera, a renowned Czech writer, gained recognition for exposing oppression under communist rule and delving into themes of identity and totalitarianism. His works were prohibited in communist Czechoslovakia, leading him to exile in France in 1975. This episode was produced by Stella Tan, Sydney Harper, Asha Chatharvedi, and Nina Feldman, with contributions from Rochelle Bonja, Liz O'Balon, Lisa Chow, Paige Kowett, Susan Lee, Marian Lozano, Dan Powell, Rowan Niemisto, Alyssa Moxley, Chris Wood, and Amy Harmon. Our theme music comes from Jim Bruntberg and Ben Landsberg of Wonderlee. Kundera's writings were banned due to their critical stance against authoritarian regimes, prompting him to leave his homeland. His works continue to resonate, offering insights into the complexities of identity and the impact of political systems on individual lives.

    Recent Episodes from The Daily

    France’s Far Right at the Gates of Power

    France’s Far Right at the Gates of Power

    The far right in France had a big win this month, crushing the party of President Emmanuel Macron in elections for the European Parliament. But the results did not affect France’s government at home — until Mr. Macron changed that.

    Roger Cohen, the Paris bureau chief for The Times, discusses the huge political gamble Mr. Macron has taken, which has brought the far right closer than ever to gaining real power in France.

    Guest: Roger Cohen, the Paris bureau chief for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    • Battered by the far right in voting for the European Parliament, Emmanuel Macron called for new elections in France.
    • The president has challenged voters to test the sincerity of their support for the far right. Were the French letting off steam in the European elections, or did they really mean it?

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 26, 2024

    The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress

    The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress

    A powerful group supporting Israel is trying to defeat sitting members of Congress who have criticized the country’s deadly war against Hamas.

    Nicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics for The Times, explains why it appears that strategy may work in today’s Democratic primary in New York.

    Guest: Nicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics and government for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 25, 2024

    The Army of Poets and Students Fighting a Forgotten War

    The Army of Poets and Students Fighting a Forgotten War

    Warning: this episode contains descriptions of injuries.

    Myanmar is home to one of the deadliest, most intractable civil wars on the planet. But something new is happening. Unusual numbers of young people from the cities, including students, poets and baristas, have joined the country’s rebel militias. And this coalition is making startling gains against the country’s military dictatorship.

    Hannah Beech, who covers stories across Asia for The Times, discusses this surprising resistance movement.

    Guest: Hannah Beech, a Bangkok-based reporter for The New York Times, focusing on investigative and in-depth stories in Asia.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 24, 2024

    'Animal,' Episode 4: Ferrets

    'Animal,' Episode 4: Ferrets

    In a broken world, what can we gain by looking another animal in the eye? "Animal" is a six-part, round-the-world journey in search of an answer. In Episode 4, the writer Sam Anderson soothes his anxiety by visiting a convention center in Ohio.

    For photos and videos of Sam's adventure with manatees, visit nytimes.com/animal.

    The Daily
    enJune 23, 2024

    America’s Top Doctor on Why He Wants Warning Labels on Social Media

    America’s Top Doctor on Why He Wants Warning Labels on Social Media

    Warning: This episode contains mentions of bullying and suicide.

    A rising tide of mental health problems among teenagers has sent parents, teachers and doctors searching for answers. This week, the U.S. surgeon general, Dr. Vivek H. Murthy, offered one: social media.

    Today, Dr. Murthy discusses his proposal to require platforms such as YouTube, TikTok and Instagram to include warning labels, like those that appear on tobacco and alcohol products.

    Guest: Dr. Vivek H. Murthy, the U.S. surgeon general.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 21, 2024

    The Mysterious Gun Study That’s Advancing Gun Rights

    The Mysterious Gun Study That’s Advancing Gun Rights

    In the battle to dismantle gun restrictions, raging in America’s courts even as mass shootings become commonplace, a Times’ investigation has found that one study has been deployed by gun rights activists to notch legal victories with far-reaching consequences.

    Mike McIntire, an investigative reporter for The Times, discusses the study and the person behind it.

    Guest: Mike McIntire, an investigative reporter at The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 

    The Daily
    enJune 20, 2024

    A Novel Legal Strategy for Mass Shooting Victims’ Families

    A Novel Legal Strategy for Mass Shooting Victims’ Families

    As mass shootings plague the United States, victims’ families continue to search for accountability. To that end, a pair of lawsuits by the families of victims of the Uvalde school shooting will try a new tactic.

    J. David Goodman, the Houston bureau chief for The Times, discusses the unusual targets of the lawsuits and profiles the lawyers behind them.

    Guest: J. David Goodman, the Houston bureau chief for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    • The Uvalde lawsuits are among the most far-reaching to be filed in response to the escalating number of mass shootings in the United States.

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 18, 2024

    Abortion United Evangelicals and Republicans. Now That Alliance Is Fraying.

    Abortion United Evangelicals and Republicans. Now That Alliance Is Fraying.

    The Southern Baptist Convention, the largest denomination of Protestant Christians in the United States, voted at an annual gathering last week to oppose the use of in vitro fertilization.

    Ruth Graham, who covers religion, faith and values for The New York Times, discusses the story behind the vote, the Republican scramble it prompted and what it could eventually mean for the rest of the country.

    Guest: Ruth Graham, who covers religion, faith and values for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 

    The Daily
    enJune 17, 2024

    'Animal,' Episode 3: Manatees

    'Animal,' Episode 3: Manatees

    In a broken world, what can we gain by looking another animal in the eye? "Animal" is a six-part, round-the-world journey in search of an answer. In Episode 3, the writer Sam Anderson travels to Florida to fulfill a lifelong dream: to swim with manatees.

    For photos and videos of Sam's adventure with manatees, visit nytimes.com/animal.

    The Daily
    enJune 16, 2024

    Related Episodes

    221: What People Don't Understand About Affirmative Action with Julie Kratz

    221: What People Don't Understand About Affirmative Action with Julie Kratz

    With this summer’s SCOTUS ruling against affirmative action, it is predicted that enrollment of students of color will decline at universities, leading ultimately to declines in workforce participation. This is problematic because younger generations are increasingly more diverse. The lack of representation in the workforce creates a disconnect between the population and employment where organizations will struggle to reflect the very communities that they are trying to serve.

    Despite this concern, only 36% of Americans perceive affirmative action positively. There are some common misunderstandings about affirmative action that people need to understand for these perceptions to shift.

    Learn what misunderstandings can help narrow the gap in this episode with Julie Kratz.

    Learn more at https://www.forbes.com/sites/juliekratz and at https://www.linkedin.com/in/juliekratz/ 

    YCBK 76: Mistakes Parents Make in the Application Process

    YCBK 76: Mistakes Parents Make in the Application Process
    In this episode you will hear: (5:03) In this week’s news, an article from The Atlantic, “College Sports Are Affirmative Action for Rich White Students” by Saahil, Desai. African American males are known to dominate college football and basketball, but according to Desai, this is not a true reflection of who has access to college sports. It was found that 61 percent of student athletes in 2017 were white, and that percentage was even higher for elite institutions. Lower profile sports favored by white student athletes like the following 13 sports: sailing, golf, water polo, fencing, and lacrosse (let me add squash and equestrian, ice hockey, gymnastics, crew, field hockey, diving and skiing are where a lot of the preference is being given in college admissions, even though this falls under the radar. . And though they are low profile to the general public, athletes in these sports are often white and affluent but unlike the public perception, they are getting more preference than alumni, students of color or any other admission preference. The irony is that these sports are expenditure sports, meaning they cost the colleges money. Furthermore, they rarely gather crowds of students in a way that injects school spirit and brings the community together. (25:52) We are in Chapter 76 of 171 Answers and Mark shares the mistakes that parents make in the college application process. Parents do so many wonderful things but the parents who listen need to know where many of the errors are made. Anika admits to making many of these errors herself. Mark and Anika discuss about eight common errors that parents make. If this topic interests you, Mark interviewed Brennan Barnard on episodes 39, 40 and 41 about this topic and we discussed 20 errors for a conversation that lasted about an hour over three episodes. This is an abridged version of that discussion. (39:26) This week’s question is from a listener who wants to find out which schools offer need blind or no loan financial aid that are not hyper-competitive. Mark starts out by explaining the difference between being need-blind and meeting full financial need, something that is often confused. No loan policies were introduced by Princeton in 2001. Mark shares the 19 schools that offer these plans for all incomes. He then shares many of the schools that do this for certain income caps and then Mark and Anika talk about some of the state plans that offer this. (58:16) Mark interviews Greg Roberts, Dean of Admissions, at the University of Virginia in “Differences Between Public and Private Universities”. This is part 1 of a 4 part excellent interview. The first two parts focus a lot on the differences between public and private universities. Greg Roberts has also worked at Emory and Georgetown, so he draws off of the differences between private colleges and public colleges and universities. Greg is very transparent and genuine. He is willing to answer the tough questions. (69:31) Mark’s recommended resource of the week is the book, The Price of Privilege: and the subtitle of the Price of Privilege is, How Parental Pressure And Material Advantage Are Creating A Generation Of Disconnected And Unhappy Kids, by Dr. Madeline Levine   Don’t forget to send your questions related to any and every facet of the college process to   Every episode of Your College-Bound Kid will align with a chapter from the book 171 Answers to the Most-Asked College Admission Questions. To get a copy visit  and if you want to see what future episodes will cover just click the red button “See exactly what 171 Answers covers.

    US Supreme Court and Affirmative Action: Impacts on Diversity and Inclusion in the workplace

    US Supreme Court and Affirmative Action: Impacts on Diversity and Inclusion in the workplace

    In today's episode, you'll learn about the potential impacts of the Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action in higher education admissions. We explore what this means for minority applications and diversity in the workforce. We discuss how this could affect DEI and CSR programs and strategies corporations may take to adjust. Finally, we consider how this highlights the importance of investing in minority-serving institutions.

    Timestamp of our conversation:

    1:31 - U.S. Supreme Court Ruling and impact on minority applications and admissions process 5:31 - Potential reset of higher level education admission process?

    8:52 - Role of minority servicing institutions like HBCU’s

    11:37 - Impact to diversity hiring and recruitment in the workforce

    17:18 - How can social impact programs and professionals prepare for polarized opinions on ESG and DEI?

     

    Connect with Jerome Tennile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jdtennille/

    Music by https://youtube.com/ikson

    @iksonmusic

    YCBK 90: Do Colleges Know Where Else Your Child Applies?

    YCBK 90: Do Colleges Know Where Else Your Child Applies?
    In this episode you will hear: (05:25) In this week’s news, an article from Insider Higher Ed, “Judge Upholds Harvard’s Admissions Policies”, by Scott Jaschik. Federal Judge Allison Burroughs of the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts has ruled that Harvard’s approach to affirmative action does not discriminate against Asian Americans. Judge Burroughs says that Harvard is admitting very qualified applicants of color who are adding valuable diversity to the campus and that Asian-Americans are not being discriminated against. Judge Burroughs accepted Harvard’s argument that when everyone in the applicant pool is imminently qualified. Judge Burroughs said that it is not illegal for a college to emphasis non-academic factors in their evaluation. We discuss this decision and we talk about where things go from here.     (21:44) We are in chapter 90 of 171 Answers and Mark answers whether or not colleges have access to knowing all of the schools where your child applies. We talk about three different sources that many people believe can let a school know where else applicants are applying for admission in addition to their college. For each of these three sources we talk about whether this is true or whether it is urban folklore. We also discuss whether applicants should let admissions officers or interviewers know where else they are applying.     (27:23) Our special bonus content segment discusses about a half dozen recent changes to the Common Application for the 2019-2020 year. Mark likes each and every one of these changes for the current year. The Common App releases its changes in August every year.   (52:55) Mark kicks off his interview with Peter Van Buskirk, Founder of Best College Fit, and Former VP of Enrollment at Franklin and Marshall, in “Understanding how colleges act as businesses in ways that are not in your best interest”- Part 1. Peter has over 40 years of experience in college admissions and he does not hold back. Mark is confident that this will be one of the most illuminating interviews we have had in our 20 ½ months of the “Your College-Bound Kid” podcast. Mark tells our listeners, this is not an interview that you are going to want to miss. This is Part 1 of 4 interviews that will air on 10/17, 10/24, 10/31 and 11/7.   (01:01:10) Mark’s recommended resource of the week is the Common App’s 27 minute long webinar about what is new with the Common App for 2019-20. Mark opens up by sharing two additional changes to the Common App that he didn’t mention in the Bonus content discussion but then he shares this webinar which covers additional changes for the year. The webinar opens by giving a great statistical overview of the Common App. It answers questions like, how many students use the Common App; how many applications are filed every year and so much more, but the meat of the webinar is an even fuller description of changes than the ones Mark covers earlier in this episode:     (01:13:28) Our College Spotlight for the week is Hawaii Pacific University, aka as HPU.   Don't forget to send your questions related to any and every facet of the college process to: questions@yourcollegeboundkid.com If you enjoy our podcast, would you please do us a favor and share our podcast both verbally and on social media? The more people that subscribe to our podcast the more our podcast will appear at the top when people search for college admissions podcasts. We would be most grateful if you can share Your College-Bound Kid with your friends. ! We are excited to give our listeners a chance to play a role in shaping what topics we discuss, as well as what guests we have on our podcast. You can let your voice be heard by completing this survey. Just put the following link in your browser and give us your honest feedback. We thank you in advance. Every episode of Your College-Bound Kid will align with a chapter from the book 171 Answers to the Most-Asked College Admission Questions. To get a copy go to Amazon and click: If you want to place a bulk order, you will save money by purchasing this book at 171answers.com. Every penny goes to The Atlanta Mission, a Christian organization that helps over 1000 homeless residents every day.  If you want to see what future episodes will discuss in the book chapter section,  just go to 171answers.com and then click the red button "See exactly what 171 Answers covers"

    The Valley Current®: Did SCOTUS just radically expand the 1st Amendment?

    The Valley Current®: Did SCOTUS just radically expand the 1st Amendment?

    What exactly is covered by the First Amendment? It’s something most American’s thought they knew, but when the Supreme Court ended its term on June 30th SCOTUS left us with a few questions on one of their latest rulings. Lorie Smith of 303 Creative (a single person web design LLC) won the right to not create a wedding website for a same-sex couple based on her First Amendments rights. While many across America see this as a win for free speech and religious freedom, others see this ruling as a setback to LGBT rights. Host Jack Russo and Professor Robert Acker revisit this controversial case of public accommodation vs freedom of expression.