Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Discussing Hiring, Presentations, and Crypto TrialsBill Simmons shares insights on using Indeed for hiring, Canva for presentations, and updates on Sam Bankman Fried's crypto trial on his podcast.

      Bill Simmons' podcast, which is the most downloaded sports podcast of all time, offers a wide range of guests and topics three times a week. During this episode, Simmons discussed the benefits of using Indeed for hiring and Canva for presentations. He also mentioned his transition back to work after parental leave and shared a live update on the trial of former crypto golden boy, Sam Bankman Fried. Simmons had previously expressed skepticism towards crypto in a 2020 episode with New York Times columnist Kevin Roos. However, at the time, crypto was experiencing significant price increases, making asset prices go up rapidly. Bankman Fried, who made his fortune through arbitrage trades with his trading fund Alameda Research, became the youngest self-made billionaire in recorded history.

    • Allegations against Sam Bankman Fried: Misusing Customer FundsThe crypto industry offers vast rewards but comes with significant risks, as seen in the ongoing trial of Sam Bankman Fried, accused of using customer deposits for personal gains.

      Sam Bankman Fried, the founder of Alameda Research and FTX exchange, made a fortune through arbitrage trading and building an exchange, but faced allegations of misusing customer funds and personal gains. The prosecution accuses him of using customer deposits to cover losses and fund personal expenses, while the defense argues it was a mistake or incompetence, not criminality. The trial is ongoing, with some of his lieutenants testifying against him. Despite the fraud charges, some defenders, including author Michael Lewis, argue for his innocence. The case highlights the risks and potential rewards of the crypto industry.

    • Testimony reveals misuse of $1B in FTX customer fundsThe prosecution alleges that Alameda Research, Sam Bankman-Fried's hedge fund, misused over $1B of FTX customer funds for various investments, real estate purchases, and political donations. Bankman-Fried encouraged his co-head to lie and use euphemisms, and believed in utilitarianism to justify his actions.

      Key takeaway from the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried and the testimony of his former girlfriend and Alameda Research co-head, Caroline Ellison, is that the prosecution alleges that Bankman-Fried's hedge fund, Alameda Research, misused over $1 billion of FTX customer funds for various investments, real estate purchases, and political donations. Ellison testified that Bankman-Fried encouraged her to lie and use euphemisms in financial dealings, including referring to FTX customer money as "FTX borrows" and calling a $150 million bribe to a Chinese official as "the thing." Ellison also revealed that Bankman-Fried believed in utilitarianism, which he used to justify his actions, including lying and stealing, if it maximized utility. The emotional tenor of Ellison's testimony shifted from chipper and composed to emotional and tearful as she recounted the collapse of FTX and her relief at no longer having to lie. The trial continues to unfold, with Bankman-Fried expected to take the stand soon.

    • Betrayal and Manipulation in the FTX ScandalThe FTX scandal involved intricate schemes to manipulate funds, including attempts to use fake identities and alter exchange code, leading to the downfall of Alameda Research, FTX, and Sam Bankman-Fried.

      The FTX scandal involved not only betrayal of trust but also intricate schemes to manipulate funds. Caroline's testimony revealed an attempt to use the identities of Thai prostitutes to withdraw trapped funds, while Gary Wong's confession implicated Sam in asking to change the exchange's code to allow Alameda to withdraw more money than it had, including illiquid tokens. These actions, which went beyond justifiable limits, contributed to the downfall of Alameda Research, FTX, and Sam Bankman-Fried. The scam's complexity and the emotional relationships involved add layers to the ongoing trial.

    • FTX's Special Treatment of Alameda ResearchFTX allegedly exempted Alameda Research from its risk management rules, allowing the firm to withdraw more money than it had in its account and not be liquidated even when its bets went bad. FTX's insurance fund, meant to backstop any losses, was actually a made-up number.

      The FTX exchange, where Sam Bankman-Fried's empire came crashing down, operates differently than a regular investment platform. In a futures exchange, investors can borrow money to leverage their positions, but the exchange is supposed to manage these accounts to prevent traders from racking up impossible debts. FTX touted its risk management system, called the liquidation engine, which was supposed to prevent traders from going negative. However, Alameda Research, a firm closely linked to FTX, was allegedly exempt from these rules. Alameda was allowed to withdraw more money than it had in its account and was not liquidated even when its bets went bad. Additionally, FTX's insurance fund, which was meant to backstop any losses, was actually a made-up number. These revelations raise serious concerns about Sam Bankman-Fried's claims that FTX had solved the complex mathematical challenge of managing risk on a futures exchange. Instead, it appears that there were special rules for certain favored traders, creating an unfair and potentially fraudulent system.

    • FTX Scandal: Sam Bankman Fried's Justifications for Alameda LoansSam Bankman Fried tried to downplay the extent of Alameda's borrowing and misrepresented FTX's financial health, raising concerns about his financial management and knowledge.

      The FTX scandal involves a complex web of misrepresentations and potential fraud, as evidenced by Sam Bankman Fried's statements about the financial health of FTX while assets were actually in jeopardy. During a conversation in his penthouse, Bankman Fried tried to justify large loans to Alameda, claiming he didn't know the extent of Alameda's borrowing and had handed off management to Caroline Ellison. However, when it was revealed that there was a significant discrepancy between reported and actual liquid assets, Bankman Fried attempted to explain it away as a misallocation or misaccounting of funds, acting as if it was a legal loophole. This lengthy interview raised questions about Bankman Fried's financial management and knowledge of FTX's true financial situation.

    • Complex Allegations in FTX Case: He Said, She SaidJudge criticizes defense tactics, witness admits to fraud as case against FTX and executives continues to unfold

      The ongoing court case involving Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX involves complex allegations of fraud, with multiple layers and potential parties involved. Sam has been trying to shift blame towards his ex-girlfriend and former Alameda CEO, Caroline Ellison, but the dynamic is more nuanced and involves a "he said, she said" situation with various other parties. Sam has also been accused of being aware of Alameda's lack of adherence to margin rules, which could be a significant issue for his defense. The judge presiding over the case has been critical of the defense's tactics, repeatedly interrupting them and instructing the jury to disregard certain lines of argument. The defense's strategy seems to be to repeat information already presented and not effectively challenge the government's witnesses. One witness, Adam Yedidya, admitted that FTX defrauded its customers, adding to the mounting evidence against the company and its executives. Overall, the case is far from clear-cut, and both sides face significant challenges in making their cases to the jury.

    • Defense's cross-examination in FTX trial perceived as ineffectiveDespite attempts to challenge witnesses, the defense's strategy in the FTX trial remains unclear, and their efforts to defend Sam Bankman Fried have not shifted the narrative, with some critics expressing support for Bankman Fried despite controversy.

      That the defense's cross-examination of witnesses in the FTX trial has been perceived as ineffective. This was evident when the defense attempted to question Yedidya about Venkman Fried's lifestyle to suggest he wasn't spending excessively. However, the prosecution quickly turned the tables and asked Yedidya about the FTX arena, which cost over $100 million to rename, eliciting laughter in the courtroom. The defense's strategy remains unclear, and it appears that their efforts to defend Sam Bankman Fried have not been successful in shifting the narrative. Michael Lewis, a nonfiction writer, has also expressed support for Bankman Fried, despite criticism from some quarters. This support was established during the height of the crypto craze when Bankman Fried hosted the Crypto Bahamas conference, which was essentially a long advertisement for FTX. The conference attracted high-profile attendees, including Katy Perry, Orlando Bloom, Tom Brady, Bill Clinton, and Tony Blair, further enhancing FTX's image.

    • Perception of Crypto Industry Changing, but Validity QuestionedThe crypto industry's perception has evolved, with some seeing it as surpassing traditional finance. However, skeptics question the substance behind crypto companies beyond asset price speculation, and even the authenticity of industry leaders like Sam Bankman-Fried may not guarantee legitimacy.

      That the perception of Sam Bankman-Fried and the crypto industry as a whole has drastically changed in recent years, with some, like Michael Lewis, believing that the financial system being built in crypto surpasses the existing one. However, the validity and sustainability of this belief were questioned, as many crypto companies were found to lack substance beyond asset price speculation. Additionally, Bankman-Fried's unconventional appearance and demeanor may have contributed to the widespread belief in his authenticity and the legitimacy of the crypto industry, which could have been a dangerous assumption.

    • FTX CEO's unconventional behavior in the workplaceFTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried's unusual demeanor towards people and business matters, even in important situations, and ongoing legal proceedings add to the intrigue surrounding him

      Sam Bankman-Fried, the CEO of FTX, was seen eating in the break room of his office without acknowledging the presence of a journalist who had come to write a profile on him. This incident, among others, showcases his unconventional and seemingly disinterested demeanor towards people and business matters, even those of great importance. Additionally, there are ongoing debates about the potential defense strategies for Bankman-Fried in the ongoing trial, with some suggesting that he may argue that less money is missing than initially thought, and that he used customer funds for investments that eventually paid off. However, the ethical implications of such actions, even if successful in the short term, remain questionable. This behavior, combined with the ongoing legal proceedings, adds to the intrigue surrounding Bankman-Fried and his business dealings.

    • A young ape leads the fight for survival of apes and humansIn 'Kingdom of the Apes', a young ape unites apes and humans against a ruthless king, promising an epic journey and a thought-provoking exploration of unity and survival.

      In the upcoming movie "Kingdom of the Apes," a young ape emerges as a hero fighting for the future of both apes and humans against a ruthless king who is expanding his empire at the expense of the remaining human race. This intriguing narrative brings together two seemingly disparate groups in a battle for survival. The film promises an epic journey and a thought-provoking exploration of unity and survival in the face of adversity. Get ready for an immersive experience as you witness this story unfold on the big screen. Don't miss the opportunity to secure your tickets for "Kingdom of the Apes" in IMAX on May 10th and in theaters everywhere.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    More Trump Charges & Biden’s Granddaughter Acknowledgement | 7.31.23

    More Trump Charges & Biden’s Granddaughter Acknowledgement | 7.31.23

    Former President Trump holds a rally after being hit with more charges, President Biden finally acknowledges his seventh grandchild, and one of the charges against disgraced crypto currency mogul Sam Bankman-Fried is dropped. Get the facts first with Morning Wire. 

    ZBiotics: "Get 15% off your order with promo code WIREhttp://www.ZBiotics.com/Wire"

    Black Rifle Coffee: Get 10% off your first order or Coffee Club subscription with code WIRE: https://www.blackriflecoffee.com/

    Sam Bankman-Fried Goes on Trial

    Sam Bankman-Fried Goes on Trial

    Sam Bankman-Fried, the fallen golden boy of crypto, is going on trial for what prosecutors are calling the largest financial fraud in recent history.

    David Yaffe-Bellany, a technology reporter for The Times, explains the case of the man who was supposed to save the cryptocurrency industry and what its outcome could tell us about why he did not.

    Guest: David Yaffe-Bellany, a technology reporter for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 

    Crypto’s crown prince in court

    Crypto’s crown prince in court
    FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s trial begins today; a guilty verdict could represent the final nail in crypto’s coffin. Bloomberg’s Zeke Faux, who spent two years chronicling SBF’s downfall, explains. This episode was produced by Amanda Lewellyn, edited by Amina Al-Sadi with help from Matt Collette, fact-checked by Serena Solin with help from Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd, and hosted by Sean Rameswaram. Disclosure: In August 2022, Sam Bankman-Fried’s philanthropic family foundation, Building a Stronger Future, awarded Vox’s Future Perfect a grant for a 2023 reporting project. That project is now on pause. Transcript at vox.com/todayexplained Support Today, Explained by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Collapse of FTX: What Went Wrong With Sam Bankman-Fried’s Empire?

    The Collapse of FTX: What Went Wrong With Sam Bankman-Fried’s Empire?

    Crypto investors have had their share of market meltdowns this year. Last month, all eyes were on the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, whose founder and former CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried, was recently arrested by Bahamian authorities in connection with multiple fraud charges involving FTX.

     

    The FTX collapse has sent shockwaves through the crypto space and will likely continue to do so for some time. But how exactly did a once multi-billion dollar company implode so spectacularly?

     

    In the last episode ​​of this four-part series on cryptocurrency, Dylan attempts to make sense of the dumpster fire that is the FTX collapse. Who is Sam Bankman-Fried? Where did things go wrong for FTX? What are the broader consequences of this fiasco for the cryptocurrency industry? And what can we learn from all of this?

     

    Show Highlights

     

    • [03:29] On Sam Bankman-Fried’s background
    • [07:54] What FTX is
    • [09:58] Why it’s not unusual for startups to be dumpster fires
    • [13:38] On Alameda Research and Caroline Ellison
    • [20:23] On the relationship between FTX and Alameda
    • [23:06] The beginning of the end for FTX
    • [28:12] Why the FTX collapse gets compared to Enron
    • [31:00] On Sam Bankman-Fried admitting to fraud in YouTube interviews
    • [38:07] Takeaways from the FTX scandal

     

    Links and Resources

     

     

    Books Mentioned

     

    The Trial of Crypto’s Golden Boy: Things Sam Is Testifying About

    The Trial of Crypto’s Golden Boy: Things Sam Is Testifying About
    With the jury in attendance, Sam Bankman-Fried took the stand to testify in his defense. Rachel Humphreys and Caitlin Ostroff break down where his story of the FTX collapse has differed from the testimony of his former colleagues Caroline Ellison and Nishad Singh. Further Reading: - What’s Happening Today at the Sam Bankman-Fried Trial  Further Listening: - The Trial of Crypto’s Golden Boy  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices