Podcast Summary
Embracing Change: Community, Second Chances, and Liminal Spaces: During uncertain times, focus on building strong community connections, embrace second chances through reskilling, and navigate liminal spaces with resilience and hope.
In uncertain times, building strong community connections can bring hope and prepare us for challenges. Neighbor to Neighbor, a California volunteer network, emphasizes the importance of connecting with neighbors for social bonds and disaster preparedness. Meanwhile, second acts, like Lisa Schneider's dog rescue, can be made possible through reskilling courses offered by AARP. The NBA playoffs serve as a reminder of the excitement and energy that comes with embracing new opportunities and challenges. In the digital world, liminal spaces, represented by dreamlike photos of human constructs, illustrate the ambiguity and disorientation of transitions, whether between time, purpose, or physical spaces. As we navigate through the current economic and technological boom, it's crucial to remember that we're in a liminal space between progress and potential global challenges. By focusing on community, second chances, and embracing change, we can navigate this transitional phase with resilience and hope.
Understanding Hyperobjects: Climate Change and Beyond: Hyperobjects, like climate change, challenge our perception of reality and existence, extending beyond our ability to fully comprehend or observe them.
Climate change and other hyperobjects are massive, complex phenomena that transcend our regular perception of time and space. They cannot be fully grasped or understood directly but can only be approached by associating with adjacent ideas or concepts. Hyperobjects, such as climate change, black holes, or the biosphere, have effects on the world whether or not they are observed and are things in their own right. Unlike ordinary objects, they cannot be fully perceived or experienced in their entirety and challenge our sense of presence and being in the world. Their impact is not limited to humans and can force us to reflect on our place on Earth and in the cosmos. The discovery of hyperobjects raises fundamental questions about existence and the nature of reality. The challenge they present is not just about the physical world but also our temporal reality, as their effects extend beyond our ability to fully comprehend or observe them.
Understanding Hyperobjects: Large-Scale Phenomena with Unique Characteristics: Hyperobjects, like climate change, are vast and complex phenomena with viscous, non-local, and interobjective characteristics, making them difficult to comprehend but essential to understanding our interconnected world.
Hyperobjects are large-scale phenomena that have unique characteristics which set them apart from traditional objects. These characteristics include their viscous nature, where they adhere to any object they touch and make the notion of "away" obsolete. Hyperobjects also have a molten or Gaussian quality, making them impossible to fully comprehend due to their massive size and time-stretched existence. They are non-local, meaning that any local manifestation is not the hyperobject itself, but rather a manifestation of its effects. Lastly, hyperobjects exhibit interobjective relationships, meaning they can be detected through the interrelationships between aesthetic properties of objects rather than being directly observable. Understanding hyperobjects can help us grasp the interconnectedness of the world around us and the complex ways in which large-scale phenomena impact our lives.
Understanding Hyperobjects: Transdimensional Entities in Our World: Hyperobjects, like climate change, are complex entities that exist beyond our three-dimensional understanding and have significant impacts on our world. Recognizing their interconnectedness is crucial for taking action to mitigate their effects.
Hyperobjects, such as climate change or radiation sickness, are real entities that exist beyond our three-dimensional understanding. They are transdimensional and can only be perceived as pieces or manifestations as they interact with our world. These hyperobjects are formed by complex relationships between various objects and cannot be fully grasped by our current perception. They exist in an interobjective mesh, where every object is connected to others in a shared consensual space. While we may only experience brief patches of these hyperobjects, they have significant impacts on our world. It's essential to recognize their existence and interconnectedness to take action and mitigate their effects. For instance, climate change is not just a mathematical abstraction, but a real object that affects other objects, such as the rise in sea levels and temperature changes. By understanding the interobjective nature of hyperobjects, we can appreciate the complexity of our world and the importance of taking action to address these issues.
Understanding Climate Change as Part of Daily Life: Recognize climate change's impact on daily life, abandon anthropocentric thinking, and focus on interconnectedness for ecological coexistence.
Our perception of reality and the concept of hyperobjects, such as climate change, can be overwhelming and disconnect us from the real-world impacts. We need to recognize that climate change is a part of our daily lives and can influence our decisions. The constant bombardment of digital realities and the disassociation between humans and nature add to this feeling of detachment and confusion. To address this, we must abandon anthropocentric thinking and understand that we are part of the natural world, not separate from it. Reification, or the reduction of complex concepts to simplified versions, can be harmful, as seen with the concept of nature. Instead, we should strive for an ecology without nature, recognizing the interconnectedness of all things. The threat of climate change is not only political but ontological, challenging our perception of reality and the end of the world. To fully engage with our ecological coexistence, we must awaken from the dream that the world is about to end and focus on taking action in the present.
Understanding interconnected issues through hyperobjects: Recognizing hyperobjects and their interconnectedness can empower us to address complex issues and create a more sustainable future
Understanding complex, interconnected issues, such as climate change, can be empowering and help us navigate the world around us. The concept of hyperobjects, which are vast, non-local, and non-human entities, can help us grasp the cognitive dissonance and confusion surrounding these issues. However, acknowledging hyperobjects can also be challenging, as they require us to think beyond the present and consider the long-term consequences of our actions. It's essential to recognize that many of our problems are interconnected and have shared root causes, even if the connections may not be immediately apparent. By embracing this perspective, we can work towards finding solutions that address the root causes and create a more sustainable future. For those who find the concept of hyperobjects abstract or difficult to grasp, resources like Timothy Morton's book "Hyperobjects" can provide valuable insights and help deepen our understanding. Ultimately, acknowledging the existence of hyperobjects and the interconnectedness of our world can help us build stronger communities and work towards a more sustainable future.
Beyond the popularized pyramid of Maslow's hierarchy of needs: Maslow's hierarchy of needs is more complex than the popularized pyramid representation, with individuals experiencing overlapping needs and societal issues impacting psychological well-being.
Self-actualization, as depicted in Maslow's hierarchy of needs, is a complex concept that goes beyond the popularized pyramid representation. It's important to remember that Maslow himself didn't depict it this way, and the pyramid has been subject to various critiques. The needs of individuals can overlap, and it's possible to be fulfilling some needs while struggling with others. For instance, while some people may have their basic needs met, they might still feel anxious about larger societal issues. Additionally, the needs hierarchy doesn't account for the fact that our brains aren't shaped like pyramids, and our psychological needs don't always fit neatly into distinct categories. It's crucial to keep in mind the complexity of human needs and the interconnected nature of our psychological well-being.
Understanding societal impact on psychological needs through Maslow's hierarchy: Unmet social and self-actualization needs due to societal factors can lead to feelings of alienation and depression, prioritizing financial stability over personal growth
Maslow's hierarchy of needs provides a framework to understand how various societal and structural issues impact our psychological needs. While safety and physiological needs are often prioritized, social connections and self-actualization are frequently overlooked or unattainable due to factors like capitalism, long work hours, and lack of resources. These unmet needs can lead to feelings of alienation, depression, and a focus on financial security over personal growth. The discussion highlighted how people often prioritize financial stability over self-actualization due to the overwhelming burden of debt and exploitative interest rates. However, in other societies and cultures, there may be different approaches to addressing human needs and psychology, offering alternative perspectives for addressing these challenges.
Influence of indigenous Blackfoot culture on Maslow's self-actualization theory: Maslow's self-actualization theory was influenced by the Blackfoot's communal perspective, emphasizing the importance of community in personal growth and cultural perpetuity.
Abraham Maslow's theory of self-actualization was influenced by his experiences with the 6th Circuit Blackfoot, an indigenous people who view humans as born self-actualized and inextricably linked to community actualization. This perspective challenges Maslow's individualistic hierarchy and emphasizes the importance of community in personal growth. The Blackfoot philosophy also values cultural perpetuity, considering the impact on future and past generations. This approach to education and personal development could lead to a more collaborative and supportive environment, contrasting the competitive nature of traditional Western education.
Encouraging children to make a positive impact on their community: Teaching children to cook and engage in communal activities fosters a strong sense of connection to their community and cultivates important life skills, leading to increased self-confidence and personal accomplishment.
In a society that values community and self-actualization, children would be encouraged to engage in projects that improve their community and make a positive impact on those around them. This sense of fulfillment and contribution can be seen in children's natural impulses, such as their love for creating and helping, which can be directed towards meaningful activities. Cooking is an excellent example of a skill that not only teaches self-sufficiency but also fosters a sense of selflessness and community. By teaching children to cook and engage in communal activities, we can help them develop a strong sense of connection to their community and cultivate important life skills. Additionally, allowing children to take on responsibilities and contribute to their families and communities can lead to increased self-confidence and a sense of personal accomplishment.
Exploring the Value of Cooking Experiences: Cooking experiences offer self-actualization, community building, and lessons in various subjects beyond just cooking. Cooking classes foster freedom, imagination, and stronger relationships through exploratory learning.
Cooking experiences can provide valuable lessons for self-actualization and community building. These experiences go beyond just learning about knives and heat, but also encompass topics like safety, chemistry, and even math. Cooking classes can foster a sense of freedom and imagination, allowing individuals to explore and direct their own learning paths. This approach can lead to stronger relationships within the community, as individuals gain new skills and form connections with people from diverse backgrounds. By reimagining education as a less restrictive, more exploratory experience, we can facilitate growth and foster a sense of belonging for individuals of all ages. This approach challenges traditional educational models and encourages a more collaborative, supportive community.
Isolated communities may not lead to societal change: Community, cooperation, and connection to broader social movements are essential for personal and societal transformation
While creating isolated communities or spaces for personal growth and education can be beneficial, they may not lead to significant societal change if not connected to larger movements and supported by a transformative community. The example given was of anarchist education experiments in Italy that produced excellent schools but failed to change the wider society, resulting in the creation of well-educated capitalist leaders. Similarly, self-actualization and the concept of luxury have been co-opted and transformed into capitalist ends. True rest and the ability to recharge can only be found in supportive communities, and without that, individuals may lack the resources to truly revive and recharge. The importance of community, cooperation, and connection to broader social movements cannot be overstated in the pursuit of personal and societal transformation.
Building strong communities for self-actualization: Facilitating collective belonging, fostering solidarity, and providing mutual aid support can create enriching and powerful organizing cultures, ultimately leading to a more just and equitable society.
Self-actualization and building strong communities go hand in hand. The ability to rest and find support is crucial for individuals, and it becomes even more feasible when we have a community network to rely on. Anti-work movements and unionization efforts can benefit greatly from a strong community base, as people need the means to support themselves and their families during strikes and protests. By focusing on communal needs and supporting each other, we can create a more enriching and powerful organizing culture. To build strong communities, we should start by facilitating collective belonging among diverse groups and fostering solidarity in struggle. This can be achieved through bringing people together, providing mutual aid support, and cultivating a sense of community pride and trust. Remember, community actualization is not just about having a support system, but also about giving back and being there for others in times of need. It's the little acts of kindness and solidarity that can make a big difference in people's lives and ultimately lead to a more just and equitable society.
Fostering self-actualization through community projects and skills development: Engage with neighbors, offer help, and collaborate on community projects to strengthen connections and promote self-actualization.
Building a community that fosters self-actualization for its members involves collective achievements and the strengthening of connections between individuals. This can be achieved through community projects, such as establishing a community garden or fixing broken infrastructure, and by encouraging the development of helpful skills among members. However, the process of reconfiguring society at a fundamental level to create such a community is a complex and open-ended question. While there are broad steps that can be taken, such as connecting nodes and strengthening branches of the community tree, the specific actions will depend on the unique situation of each community. It's important to remember that building a more connected community starts with engaging with the people living around us and offering help when needed. Organizations like Neighbor to Neighbor can provide resources and support for those looking to make a difference in their neighborhoods.
Mexico's Hidden 'Dirty War': Mexico's history includes a 'dirty war' marked by state terrorism against political dissidents in the late 1960s and 1970s, resulting in over 1,000 disappearances in Guerrero.
Mexico's history, unlike its exceptionalist reputation, includes a "dirty war" that emerged in the late 1960s and continued into the 1970s, primarily in the southern state of Guerrero. This war was marked by systematic state terrorism against political dissidents, particularly armed guerrilla groups that had initially emerged as civic-minded social movements protesting political authoritarianism and economic injustice. When these movements followed the law and peacefully protested, they faced horrific state violence, as well as everyday violence from gunslingers working for elites. This radicalized some of these movements into separate guerrilla groups, the most notable being the Party of the Poor led by Lucio Cabanas. The Mexican government's response was a brutal counterinsurgency, involving disappearances, torture, rape, and the razing of entire communities. The most significant theater of this war was in Guerrero, where nearly 1,000 disappearances occurred between 1969 and the early 1980s. This history is an important reminder of Mexico's involvement in a "dirty war," which is often overlooked in discussions of Latin American history.
Insurgency movements in Guerrero, Mexico during the 1960s and 1970s: School teachers and union activists led rural-urban insurgency movements in Guerrero, Mexico, making significant inroads into urban areas, but were ultimately suppressed by local elites and military units.
During the 1960s and 1970s in Guerrero, Mexico, two insurgency movements, led by Lucio Cabanas' Party of the Poor and Hernan Vasquez's ACNR, aimed to connect the rural and urban communities, recognizing Mexico's rapid urbanization. These movements, led by school teachers and union activists, made significant inroads into urban areas, including cities and universities. However, their urban activities, such as bank robberies, exposed them to police actions and torture, which led to the hunting down of their comrades in the mountains. The local elites, who had managed to maintain power during the Mexican Revolution and agrarian reform, co-opted military units, allowing them to weather these challenges and ultimately contributing to the ruthless crushing of these movements.
Historical context of drug war in Mexico leading to state violence against marginalized communities: The Mexican drug war has long been used as a cover for state violence against poor people and local insurgencies, with the labeling of military operations as anti-narco being a facade for targeting peasants and campesinos.
The war on drugs in Mexico, particularly in regions like Guerrero, has historically been used as a cover for state violence against poor people and local insurgencies. From the 1920s to the 1970s, certain landed elite families in Coyuca de Catalan, Guerrero, maintained power and contributed to creating a narco fiefdom during a time of opium and heroin production. The 1970s, marked by a dirty war against guerrillas and a global history of drug displacement, saw new families aligning with the military to suppress insurgencies and enter the drug trade. Military operations were labeled as anti-narco, but in reality, they targeted peasants and campesinos, further criminalizing popularly supported guerrilla movements. This historical context sheds light on how the war on drugs has functioned as a tool for state violence against marginalized communities in Mexico.
The war on drugs in Mexico is more than just about drugs: The war on drugs in Mexico is a justification for eliminating political dissidents and challenging the Mexican government's rule, with the state's repressive apparatuses evident at the local level, exploiting a preexisting structure and leading to complex alliances between paramilitaries, cartels, the police, and the military.
The war on drugs in Mexico is not just about drugs, but rather a way to justify the elimination of political dissidents and challenge to the rule of the Mexican government. This counterinsurgency strategy involves labeling urban guerrillas as terrorists and rural guerrillas as cattle rustlers or narcos, creating a despicable other in Mexican society. Historically, the war on drugs can be traced back to the colonial era, where the Spanish colonial state criminalized indigenous consumption of drugs. The goal isn't really about drugs but about killing poor people, and the supposed anti-drug units often turn around and enter the drug trade for profit. The state in Mexico is complex, and the question of what the state is leads to significant consequences for understanding issues like the drug war and violence. At the local level in places like Coyuca de Catalan, the state's repressive apparatuses are evident, with a long-standing exploitative structure that has weathered social revolutions and reform efforts. Narcotics production was industrialized on top of this preexisting structure, leading to the complex alliances between paramilitaries, cartels, the police, and the military.
Mexican Drug Trade: Power, Control, and the Plaza System: The Mexican drug trade in the late 20th century was not just about drugs, but also power and control at the local level. The plaza system emerged, where different drug organizations controlled different parts of Mexico, with state officials as the ultimate power brokers.
The Mexican drug trade in the late 20th century was not just about narcotics production and trafficking, but also about power and control at the local level. Gunslingers once employed by landed elites evolved into collaborators with drug farmers and traffickers, while also co-opting military, police, judges, and political officials. This created a dense network of people working together to maintain power and ensure the profitable economy of narcotics thrived. The Mexican state, rather than trying to eradicate the drug trade, aimed to rationalize and control it, leading to a plaza system where different drug organizations controlled different parts of Mexico, with state officials as the ultimate power brokers. This system worked well until the state began to lose control in the 1990s due to neoliberalization and weakened capacity to control various groups. At the local level, small-scale drug farmers sold their products to traffickers with connections to landed families, military, police, and politicians, ensuring the economy's continued success. State violence, such as the sending of military and federal police to Guerrero and Sinaloa in the late 1970s, paradoxically led to the formation of cartels by centralizing and rationalizing the drug trade.
Building strong community connections in uncertain times: Empowering individuals to create meaningful social bonds and prepare for emergencies, efficient organization in drug trafficking leading to higher levels of violence, and expanding healthcare offerings to provide quality care virtually and in person demonstrate the importance of community connections, organization, and adaptability in uncertain situations.
In uncertain times, building strong community connections can provide hope and support. Neighbor to Neighbor, a California volunteers network, empowers individuals to create meaningful social bonds and prepare for emergencies. Meanwhile, in the world of drug trafficking, the militarization of borders by the US government has led to an increase in centralization and organizational efficiency among cartels, resulting in higher levels of violence. The DEA and counternarcotics forces in Mexico also use this strategy to fragment different drug trafficking organizations, further fueling the violence. In the realm of health, CVS Health is expanding its offerings to provide quality care and support virtually and in person. Lastly, AT&T's in-car Wi-Fi allows passengers to work on the go, providing flexibility and productivity. Overall, these examples show the importance of community connections, efficient organization, and adaptability in uncertain situations.
Drug wars and localized violence: The capture of high-profile drug leaders can lead to increased violence and fragmentation of drug trafficking organizations, causing local suffering and economic instability.
The war on drugs, specifically the capture of high-profile leaders, can lead to increased violence and fragmentation of drug trafficking organizations at the local level. This was evident in the case of Guerrero, Mexico, which was under the control of the Beltran Leyvas drug trafficking organization. The organization's fragmentation due to a falling out with El Chapo Guzman's family resulted in an increase in localized violence and suffering for communities. Additionally, the failure of the Mexican state to support small-scale agriculture led farmers to turn to drug production as a means of economic survival. The emergence of industrial-scale marijuana and opium poppy production in Guerrero in the 1960s and 70s was a rational economic response to the broader macroeconomic situation. The involvement of local politicians, soldiers, and police in the drug trade further complicated the situation during this time, as a dirty war was being waged against peasant guerrilla movements.
Mexican government and drug trafficking: A complex relationship: The Mexican government's relationship with drug trafficking organizations is complex, with some state actors collaborating and others combating the cartels. The Mexican state has not been fully captured by drug traffickers, but has struggled to maintain control over the drug trade.
The relationship between the Mexican government and drug trafficking organizations is complex and multifaceted, with various parts of the state apparatus playing a role in both combating and collaborating with narco traffickers throughout the 20th century. While some elements of the Mexican state, such as the military and secret police, have been directly involved in drug trafficking, it is important to note that the state has not been "captured" by these organizations. Instead, the Mexican post-revolutionary state has struggled to maintain control over the growing drug trade within its borders. The rise of highly centralized drug trafficking organizations in the late 1980s and 1990s marks a shift in power dynamics, with cartels like the Juarez cartel making significant profits from the drug trade. Overall, the Mexican state can be seen as a fractal version of power, with various levels of control and collaboration between state actors and drug traffickers.
Paramilitary drug trade in Mexico leads to stronger power at the top: Paramilitary tactics and foreign military training have led to a cycle of violence and instability in Mexico, with drug trafficking organizations fragmenting and rebuilding, resulting in stronger power at the top
The paramilitary dynamics of the drug trade in Mexico have led to a strengthening of power at the top, rather than weakening it. The use of military and police to enforce drug policies has resulted in the fragmentation and rebuilding of drug trafficking organizations, creating a cycle of violence and paramilitarization. This process began in the late 1990s with the desertion of elite Mexican military members, who formed the first paramilitary wing of a major drug trafficking organization, the Gulf Cartel, and became known as the Zetas. Other drug trafficking organizations followed suit, leading to a paramilitarization of the conflict and driving much of the violence and bloodshed in Mexico since 2006. This violence has been fueled by training from foreign military advisors, leading to advanced tactics, weapons, and logistics. The result has been a devastating cycle of violence and instability in Mexico.
Challenges for leftist movements in Mexico's drug trade areas: Leftist movements in Mexico face complex power dynamics, requiring a combination of armed struggle and social pressure to challenge interconnected military, political, and criminal power structures. Despite the odds, they continue to resist, providing accurate analyses of the state's role in drug trafficking and social change.
The complex dynamics of power in Mexico, particularly in areas with high drug trade activity, make it a challenging environment for leftist movements. An example of this is the situation in Culiacan, where the Mexican military's attempt to arrest a son of a drug lord led to the city being taken over by paramilitaries, highlighting the interconnected nature of military, political, and criminal power structures. Furthermore, leftist movements in Mexico, such as those in Guerrero, have identified the state as a criminal entity that collaborates with drug trafficking organizations, transnational corporations, and political parties. Navigating this landscape requires a combination of armed struggle and social pressure, as seen in the Zapatista model. Despite the odds, movements like those in Guerrero continue to resist, demonstrating the resilience and determination of those seeking social change in the face of seemingly insurmountable challenges. Ultimately, the war on drugs in Mexico is a war on poor people, and leftist movements are essential in providing accurate analyses of the state at the local level.
Communities in Guerrero resist and fight for a better world: Inspite of long odds, communities in Guerrero resist neoliberalism and austerity measures, inspiring global movements
Despite the overwhelming odds against them, communities in places like Guerrero continue to resist and fight for a better world. This is evident in the formation of community police forces and the long-standing resistance of groups like the Zapatistas. However, these efforts come with challenges, including the risk of co-optation or corruption. Nonetheless, the example set by these communities serves as a powerful inspiration and threat to those in power, and has sparked global movements against neoliberalism and austerity measures. The impact of these movements can be traced back to the late 1980s and 1990s, with the Caracaso in Venezuela and the Zapatista uprising in Mexico being key catalysts. Personal experiences, like watching the Zapatista rebellion unfold on TV, have also left a lasting impact on individuals and their understanding of social and political struggles.
Political figures' biased comments shape public perception of social movements: Political figures' biased comments can negatively impact public perception of social movements. Focus on building stronger communities and seeking accurate information to promote understanding and connection.
The way people perceive social movements can be shaped by biased and condescending comments from political figures. This was evident during discussions about indigenous movements in Mexico, where the use of machetes was incorrectly equated with indigenous movements and the level of racist condescension was high. This experience led the speaker to do more research and spread awareness about these movements, which is still important today. Additionally, in these challenging times, it's crucial to focus on sources of hope and connection, such as building stronger communities through initiatives like Neighbor to Neighbor. For more information, you can find the speaker on Twitter at @atalexander_avina, where you can also access an article about the drug war in Guerrero and a book review on the Israeli arms industry and cold war Latin America. Remember, even small actions can make a big difference in creating meaningful social bonds and preparing for the future.
![Jason Citron - Building the Third Place - [Founder’s Field Guide, EP.4]](https://www.podcastworld.io/podcast-images/invest-like-the-best-with-patrick-o-shaughnessy-3pmywn1q.webp)