Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Exploring Nietzsche's Political Perspective and Wise's Global Money SolutionsNietzsche, a philosophical figure, offers political insights, while Wise, a financial service, simplifies international money transfers

      Wise is a financial service that enables users to manage and convert money across different currencies, offering real-time exchange rates and avoiding hidden fees. With over 16 million customers worldwide, Wise is a convenient solution for sending money internationally and eliminating the need for airport currency exchanges. Nietzsche, a 19th century German philosopher, is known for his profound and contradictory ideas, which have influenced modern thought despite his own mental breakdown and controversial views. Matt McManus, a lecturer at the University of Michigan and editor of a new Nietzsche essay collection, argues that Nietzsche can be seen as a political thinker, specifically a right-wing one, and that understanding this perspective can shed light on current political dynamics, including those of the far right and progressives. While Nietzsche's ideas can be challenging and potentially lead to dark places, they remain essential for understanding the complexities of modern thought and politics.

    • Exploring Nietzsche's problematic viewsAcknowledging Nietzsche's problematic views on women, slaves, and lower cultures enriches our understanding of his impact on political thought.

      Nietzsche, despite his electrifying impact on the speaker's life and his profound insights into modernity, also holds problematic views, particularly regarding women, slaves, and lower cultures. This complex relationship with Nietzsche's work has led the speaker to explore his politics in depth, revealing his extreme right-wing ideologies that have influenced generations of right and hard right thinkers. The speaker emphasizes the importance of acknowledging these problematic aspects of Nietzsche's thought, as understanding his politics provides a more comprehensive appreciation of his ideas and their impact on political thought.

    • Nietzsche's Intellectual History: From Philology to Great PoliticsNietzsche's ideas evolved from academic philology to a call for transformative 'great politics', influencing both Anglosphere existentialism and French political thought.

      Nietzsche, the philosopher, has had a complex and multifaceted intellectual history. Initially, he was known for his philological work, but his unconventional thinking in "Birth of Tragedy" led to his academic downfall. Later, he was appropriated by the Nazis, which tarnished his reputation. However, after World War II, he was rehabilitated by scholars like Walter Kaufmann, who presented him as a bohemian existential psychologist. This interpretation allowed Nietzsche to gain popularity in the Anglosphere without being associated with the far-right movements. In contrast, French intellectuals, mostly leftists, found political and philosophical significance in Nietzsche's work, leading to his appropriation in the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. Despite these different interpretations, Nietzsche's call for a "great politics" that would bring about a transformative war remains a significant aspect of his thought.

    • Nietzsche's 'God is dead' lamenting the crisis of European ChristianityNietzsche's 'God is dead' statement marks a shift in self-understanding, but society was unprepared for its implications, leading him to advocate for an active atheism or antitheism.

      Nietzsche's declaration of "God is dead" is not a celebration of atheism, but a profound lamentation on the crisis of European Christianity and the potential negative consequences of the secular worldview. This crisis, as Nietzsche saw it, was brought about by the natural sciences challenging the Christian worldview, leading to a new secular understanding of the universe. Nietzsche took religion and its impact on morality seriously, advocating for an active atheism or antitheism. His work reflects his dedication to addressing the issues he saw arising from this crisis, even if some of his solutions may be considered repellent. Essentially, Nietzsche's "God is dead" statement represents a significant shift in humanity's self-understanding and its place in the cosmos, and Nietzsche believed that society was unprepared for the implications of this shift.

    • Nietzsche's 'God is dead' declaration and its impact on meaning of lifeNietzsche challenged the notion that science and Christianity are opposing forces, arguing instead that the scientific pursuit of truth has roots in the Christian ethic. He believed that once we reject the idea of inherent life value, we must create our own values through self-effort in a more competitive world.

      Nietzsche's proclamation of "God is dead" was a profound and complex event in human history. It marked the realization that human life may not hold any inherent significance, and any meaning we attribute to it must be self-created. However, Nietzsche's perspective on antitheism was innovative and influential, challenging the notion that modern science and Christianity are inherently opposed. He argued that the scientific pursuit of truth has roots in the Christian ethic, which led to the question of whether this ethic itself is true. Nietzsche's aristocratic radicalism stemmed from his belief that conventional egalitarian systems, including liberalism, democracy, and socialism, are rooted in the Christian lie of equality of souls. With the foundation of absolute moral truth tied to God, Nietzsche believed that once we deny the idea of life having inherent value, we must will value into our lives through our own efforts in a more competitive and diverse world.

    • Nietzsche's Prediction of Moral Crisis and NihilismNietzsche foresaw the collapse of religious morality, predicting various responses including passive nihilism, scientific realism, and active destruction or utopianism. He criticized attempts to maintain a Christian ethic without God.

      That Friedrich Nietzsche predicted the collapse of the moral order shaped by religion would lead to various forms of nihilism, a state of moral and spiritual collapse. He believed this crisis would force humanity to confront the question of what it truly means to be human. Nietzsche predicted different responses to this crisis, including passive nihilism, a commitment to scientific realism, and active forms of destruction or utopianism. He was critical of those who tried to maintain a Christian ethic without God, believing they were not fully dealing with the implications of the death of God. Nietzsche's predictions, made over a century ago, are striking in their relevance to contemporary debates about morality, meaning, and the role of religion in society.

    • Nietzsche's Anticipation of Ideological Conflicts and the Need for AbsolutesNietzsche foresaw the destruction of traditional beliefs leading to ideological conflicts, emphasizing the human need for meaning and absolutes, while he himself sought to reject illusions and embrace faith, introducing the concept of the Ubermensch as an ideal of human greatness.

      Nietzsche anticipated a new kind of ideological conflict in the 20th century due to the destruction of traditional religious beliefs. He believed human beings have a deep need for absolutes and a sense of meaning, which can be fulfilled by political ideologies or new forms of belief systems. Nietzsche himself was a complex thinker who wanted to reject illusions while recognizing the need for faith. His concept of the Ubermensch, or Superman, represents an ideal of human greatness and the ability to will one's own identity. The Ubermensch is a powerful and proud individual who does not allow external factors to diminish their sense of near divinity, but Nietzsche also acknowledged that this ideal may be unattainable for most people. In the realm of practical finance, Wise offers a solution for managing money in different currencies with ease and no hidden fees, allowing individuals to send and spend money worldwide at the real-time mid market exchange rate. With over 16 million customers and $100 billion in transfers in 2023, Wise is a trusted choice for managing money across borders.

    • Nietzsche's Complex View of ChristianityNietzsche admired Christianity's creation of a new moral universe but critiqued its impact on the human soul. He respected Jesus for his sacrifice and opposed Christianity's use as social glue. Nietzsche championed hierarchical values and saw French Revolutionaries as true Christians.

      Nietzsche held a complex view of Christianity, admiring its creation of a new moral universe but also critiquing its role in shaping the human soul with concepts like guilt and conscience. He saw Jesus as a figure worthy of his respect due to his supreme act of sacrifice. Nietzsche's opposition to Christianity was not rooted in a rejection of religion but rather a desire for a hierarchical society that valued individual strength and greatness. He criticized those who used Christianity as a social glue, and instead, saw the French Revolutionaries as the true embodiment of Christian values due to their commitment to human equality and freedom. Nietzsche is considered one of the most profound and dark defenders of hierarchical reaction in the modern era due to his unyielding critique of democratic and egalitarian ideals.

    • Nietzsche's Rejection of EqualityNietzsche believed in the fundamental inequality of souls, advocating for an aristocratic society where some lead and others are used as slaves

      Nietzsche rejected the idea of equality as the foundation of society, particularly in the context of socialism, liberalism, and democracy. He believed that human souls are not equal and that some individuals are superior and should be allowed to lead, while others may be considered inferior and even reduced to slavery. Nietzsche saw democracy as a triumph of the least creative and a reduction of all human beings to the most animalistic level. He did not provide compelling arguments for this belief, and it seems he was not fully confident in it himself. Instead, he saw some people as herds or animals that do not contribute much to life and can drag the truly great individuals down. He advocated for an aristocratic radical society where the lower orders can be used as slaves to allow the great individuals to produce edifying enterprises in human life. However, his arguments for this fundamental inequality of souls are not convincing, and it's unclear how seriously he held this belief.

    • Nietzsche's healthy minds vs. right-wing hierarchyNietzsche's 'healthy minds' and political right's hierarchy are distinct ideas. Nietzsche valued individual strength, but didn't define it. Right-wing values inequality, but their defense of hierarchy goes beyond tradition.

      That Nietzsche's concept of "healthy minds" and the political right's defense of hierarchical organization are two distinct ideas. Nietzsche believed that there are healthier and stronger minds, but he didn't provide a clear definition or template for this. The political right, on the other hand, is defined by its commitment to inequality and the belief that some people are demonstrably superior and entitled to higher status, influence, and wealth. The political right's efforts to push back against liberal and egalitarian movements often involve transformative change, despite their claims to tradition. This distinction is important today as it challenges the assumption that the political right is solely focused on tradition and gradual change, and highlights the need for more theoretically sophisticated defenses of equality.

    • Nietzsche's Influence on Traditionalist Figures and Their Attitude Towards ChangeNietzsche's ideas influenced traditionalist figures to challenge institutions, but his call for militant secularism and acceptance of fundamental inequalities remains controversial among them.

      Traditionalist figures, including those on the political right, are not averse to changing or even eliminating institutions they deem incompatible with their beliefs, even if they've been around for decades. William Buckley, a famous American conservative, is an example of this attitude. While many on the right aim to restore traditional hierarchies based on religion, Nietzsche argues that Christianity itself is the root cause of egalitarian movements. To truly challenge egalitarianism, Nietzsche advocates for militant secularism and acceptance of fundamental inequalities between people. Many conservatives drawn to Nietzsche's ideas balk at this, as they may dislike progressivism but still cling to Christian morality. This tension has never been reconciled, as some secularists may not believe in God but still support egalitarianism, while some on the right may claim to believe in God but reject his message. Ultimately, Nietzsche's call for radical change goes further than most are willing to go.

    • Nietzsche's ideas adopted by political groupsNietzsche's critique of societal norms resonates with some political groups, but his ideas should be used with caution to avoid misinterpretation and misuse.

      Nietzsche's ideas have been adopted by various political groups, including contemporary progressives and the alt-right. While MLK used Christian ethics to advocate for economic democracy and racial equality, Nietzsche's critique of societal norms and sacred cows has found an echo in the alt-right's rejection of political correctness and pluralism. However, the alt-right's appropriation of Nietzsche is often done in bad faith and misrepresents his ideas, which were meant to challenge the herd mentality and promote aristocratic radicalism, not endorse fascism or racism. The left could potentially learn from MLK's use of Christian ethics to advocate for progressive causes, while being mindful of the potential for Nietzsche's ideas to be misinterpreted and misused.

    • Nietzsche's philosophy and far-right movementsNietzsche's elitist ideas can attract discontented individuals towards far-right movements, but his critiques of resentment primarily focused on the left, potentially overlooking dangerous aristocratic resentment on the right.

      Nietzsche's philosophy can be seen as providing ammunition for far-right movements due to his advocacy for elitism and the superiority of certain individuals. However, it's important to note that Nietzsche was critical of nationalism and racism, making his relationship with far-right ideologies complex. His writings can be appealing to those feeling discontented and resentful, potentially leading them to imagine themselves as part of an elite. However, Nietzsche's critiques of resentment primarily focus on the political left, neglecting the dangerous aristocratic resentment prevalent on the right. This oversight is concerning, as right-wing resentment can manifest in malicious and destructive ways. Therefore, it's crucial to critically examine Nietzsche's philosophy and acknowledge the potential dangers of his ideas when they're misappropriated by extremist groups.

    • Encouraging individual growth through Nietzsche's workNietzsche's work inspires intellectual honesty, fosters creativity, and challenges us to confront our darkest instincts, despite its controversial politics.

      Nietzsche's work, despite its controversial politics, can have profoundly beneficial effects on individuals by encouraging intellectual honesty, fostering creativity, and inspiring deep thought. However, it is crucial to read Nietzsche carefully and recognize the deep politics in his work, which is fundamentally contrary to liberal and egalitarian values. While Nietzsche may lead one into an abyss when it comes to collective action and politics, his insights into the crisis of modernity make him an indispensable diagnostician. To counter Nietzsche's ideas, one can emphasize the importance of love as a basis for political action and the strength, creativity, and will required for progressive causes. Overall, Nietzsche's work is worth engaging with, as it challenges us to confront our darkest instincts and wrestle with complex ideas.

    • Fundrise Expands Real Estate Holdings with $1 Billion PortfolioMin. $10 investment, accessible to public, review investment details before investing via Fundrise.com/flagship

      The Fundrise flagship fund, with a current portfolio value of $1 billion, is planning to expand its holdings in the real estate market over the coming months. This investment opportunity is accessible to the public with a minimum investment of just $10 and can be added to one's portfolio through visiting fundrise.com/fox. However, it's important to thoroughly review the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses before investing, as outlined in the fund's prospectus available at fundrise.com/flagship. This advertisement is sponsored by Charles Schwab and their original podcast, Choiceology, which explores the psychological and economic factors behind our decision-making through interviews with Nobel Laureates, authors, athletes, and more. Listen to Choiceology at choiceology.schwab.com/podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts.

    Recent Episodes from The Gray Area with Sean Illing

    1992: The year politics broke

    1992: The year politics broke
    We’re living in an era of extreme partisan politics, rising resentment, and fractured news media. Writer John Ganz believes that we can trace the dysfunction to the 1990s, when right-wing populists like Pat Buchanan and white supremacist David Duke transformed Republican politics. He joins Sean to talk about the 1990s and how it laid the groundwork for Trump. His book is When the Clock Broke: Con Men, Conspiracists, and How America Cracked Up in the Early 1990s. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: John Ganz (@lionel_trolling). His book is When the Clock Broke.  Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The existential freedom of Blackness

    The existential freedom of Blackness
    Nathalie Etoke joins The Gray Area to talk about existentialism, the Black experience, and the legacy of dehumanization.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Nathalie Etoke. Her book is Black Existential Freedom. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The world after nuclear war

    The world after nuclear war
    A mile of pure fire. A flash that melts everything — titanium, steel, lead, people. A blast that mows down every structure in its path, 3 miles out in every direction. Journalist Annie Jacobsen spent years interviewing scientists, high-ranking military officials, politicians, and other experts to find out how a nuclear attack would be triggered, the devastation it would cause, the ruptures it would create in the social fabric, and how likely it is to happen today. She wrote about all of this in her new book Nuclear War: A Scenario. Jacobsen spends the hour clearly laying out the horrifying yet captivating specifics for Sean, and the prospects for avoiding catastrophe.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Annie Jacobsen. Her book is Nuclear War: A Scenario Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Gaza, Camus, and the logic of violence

    Gaza, Camus, and the logic of violence
    Albert Camus was a Nobel-winning French writer and public intellectual. During Algeria’s bloody war for independence in the 1950s, Camus took a measured stance, calling for an end to the atrocities on each side. He was criticized widely for his so-called “moderation.” Philosophy professor Robert Zaretsky joins Sean to discuss Camus’s thoughts on that conflict and the parallels with the present moment. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Robert Zaretsky Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    This is your kid on smartphones

    This is your kid on smartphones
    Old people have always worried about young people. But psychologist Jonathan Haidt believes something genuinely different and troubling is happening right now. He argues that smartphones and social media have had disastrous effects on the mental health of young people, and derailed childhood from real world play to touchscreens. He joins Sean to talk about his research and some of the criticisms of it. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Jonathan Haidt (@jonhaidt). His book is The Anxious Generation. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Life after death?

    Life after death?
    Sebastian Junger came as close as you possibly can to dying. While his doctors struggled to revive him, the veteran reporter and avowed rationalist experienced things that shocked and shook him, leaving him with profound questions and unexpected revelations. In his new book, In My Time of Dying, Junger explores the mysteries and commonalities of people’s near death experiences. He joins Sean to talk about what it’s like to die and what quantum physics can tell us about living that countless religions can’t. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Sebastian Junger. His new book is In My Time of Dying. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The world after Ozempic

    The world after Ozempic
    Ozempic and other new weight loss drugs are being touted as potential miracle cures for diabetes and obesity. Journalist Johann Hari experimented with the drug and dropped 40 pounds. In his new book, Magic Pill, Hari discusses his experience with Ozempic and speaks to many of the leading scientists to better understand how the drug works. He joins Sean to talk about what he’s learned and the complicated trade-offs involved in the decision to take these drugs. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Johann Hari (@johannhari101). His new book is Magic Pill. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Cristian Ayala Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    UFOs, God, and the edge of understanding

    UFOs, God, and the edge of understanding
    Religious studies professor Diana Pasulka was a total nonbeliever in alien life, but she began to question this after speaking with many people who claim to have had otherworldly encounters. She also noticed how these accounts parallel the foundational texts of many religions. She has since written two books on the topic, the most recent of which is Encounters: Experiences with Nonhuman Intelligences. She joins Sean to talk about extraterrestrial life, God, angels, and the renewed interest in UFOs.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Diana Pasulka (@dwpasulka). Her new book is Encounters: Experiences with Nonhuman Intelligences. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    How to listen

    How to listen
    Most of us don’t know how to truly listen, and it’s causing all sorts of problems. Sean Illing is joined by journalist Kate Murphy, the author of You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing and Why It Matters, to discuss what it means to be a good listener, the problems that are caused when we don’t listen to each other, and the positive impacts on our health when we do. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Kate Murphy, author of You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing and Why It Matters Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of The Gray Area. Subscribe in your favorite podcast app. Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey This episode was made by:  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Editorial Director, Vox Talk: A.M. Hall Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Everything's a cult now

    Everything's a cult now
    The internet has fractured our world into a million little subcultures catering to the specific identities and habits of everyone online. Writer Derek Thompson believes this has led to a widespread cult-like mentality that has crept into all facets of modern life — pop culture, media, politics, and religion itself. He joins Sean to explain this theory, and why it’s maybe not such a bad thing. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Derek Thompson (@dkthomp). His podcast is Plain English, and he writes for The Atlantic. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Episode 017 - Ana Serrano

    Episode 017 - Ana Serrano

    In this episode Jake speaks with Ana Serrano. Throughout their conversation the two explore various ideas about framing a world view, political agendas, the bubble, mindfulness and how to be in the world. From the divisive left and right dichotomies, self-serving political agendas and the big question of what is truly best for everyone and who is going to determine that.

    Ep.88 HIGHLIGHT I Learning from past mistakes

    Ep.88 HIGHLIGHT I Learning from past mistakes
    WANT THE FULL EPISODE? Check out yesterday's episode Ep.88 I Spencer Klavan I Deciding to Save the West, or download it directly using this link.

    Spencer Klavan joins the show to discuss the modern crises that threaten Western civilization and the decisions required to overcome them.

    KEY TOPICS
    Aristotle’s lasting influence on modern decision-making.
    The pseudo-religious tendencies of Stoicism.
    The 5 modern crises that threaten the fabric of our civilization.

    Order your copy of Spencer’s book, “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises”: https://www.amazon.com/How-Save-West-Ancient-Wisdom/dp/1684513456

    CONNECT WITH US
    www.decidedlypodcast.com
    Join us on Instagram: @decidedlypodcast
    Join us on Facebook
    Shawn’s Instagram: @shawn_d_smith
    Sanger’s Instagram: @sangersmith

    MAKING A FINANCIAL DECISION?
    At Decidedly Wealth Management, we focus on decision-making as the foundational element of success, in our effort to empower families to purposefully apply their wealth to fulfill their values and build a thriving legacy.
    LEARN MORE
    www.decidedlywealth.com

    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY DECISION-MAKING TIP EMAIL

    Join us every Wednesday for more strategies to DEFEAT bad decision-making - one episode at a time!

    MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE
    “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises”: https://www.amazon.com/How-Save-West-Ancient-Wisdom/dp/1684513456

    Gateway to the Stoics: Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations, Epictetus’s Enchiridion, and Selections from Seneca’s Letters: https://www.amazon.com/Gateway-Stoics-Meditations-Epictetuss-Enchiridion/dp/1684514002

    CONNECT WITH SPENCER KLAVAN
    Instagram: @sklavan
    Twitter: @spencerklavan
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SpencerAKlavan/
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/spencer-klavan-0a963631/
    “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises”: https://www.amazon.com/How-Save-West-Ancient-Wisdom/dp/1684513456
    Gateway to the Stoics: Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations, Epictetus’s Enchiridion, and Selections from Seneca’s Letters: https://www.amazon.com/Gateway-Stoics-Meditations-Epictetuss-Enchiridion/dp/1684514002
    Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/young-heretics/id1513602173

    Spencer Klavan is a scholar, writer, and podcaster who has harbored a lifelong devotion to the great works and principles of the West. After studying Greek and Latin as an undergraduate at Yale, he spent five years at Oxford University to earn his doctorate in ancient Greek literature. Now an editor at the Claremont Institute, he has written for many outlets, including The Atlantic, the Los Angeles Times, City Journal, Newsweek, the Claremont Review of Books, The Federalist, The American Mind, and The Daily Wire.

    His most recent work sounded the alarm on the cultural decline of the Western world, titled “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises”. Spencer’s deep understanding of the roots of Western civilization makes him a trustworthy guide for navigating our evolving culture, and what we can do to help. His analysis: The situation is dire. But every crisis we face today we have faced—and surmounted—before.

    Ype de Boer over Nietzsche, Foucault en Agamben

    Ype de Boer over Nietzsche, Foucault en Agamben

    Welke definities hebben we gegeven aan het mens zijn? En wat gebeurt er als we de grenzen van ons traditionele denken over het mens zijn tegenkomen? In de tiende aflevering van de ISVW podcast geven we het woord aan Ype de Boer. Ype de Boer is filosoof en schrijft over het samenspel van denken en leven. In 2023 is hij te gast bij ISVW tijdens de filosofieweek Het vreemde lichaam.

    The Importance of a Strong Why

    The Importance of a Strong Why

    Deana and Kira discuss the foundation of their parenting philosophy: the importance of having a strong “why”. Every episode they share their “why behind the how” but in today’s episode they encourage listeners to think about their own overarching why and the benefits of parenting with this core concept.

    Values Episode Referenced:

    http://traffic.libsyn.com/raisingadultspodcast/Kids_and_Family_Values.mp3

    For the full fundamentals course visit:

    https://futurefocusedparenting.com/shop

    Get our free video “Three Strategies for Raising Adults”:

    Bit.ly/FFP_FREEBIE