Logo
    Search

    The Science of How Music Hits Have Changed in the Last 60 Years

    enFebruary 24, 2023

    Podcast Summary

    • The inflection point of 1991 in music historyThe introduction of Nielsen's SoundScan in 1991 revolutionized music charts by using point-of-sales data, leading to a more balanced and accurate representation of the music industry and diverse genres.

      The way we consume and understand music has dramatically changed over the past 60 years, as highlighted by the release of R.E.M.'s "Losing My Religion" in 1991. Prior to this, Billboard's music charts were influenced by label preferences and record store inventories, leading to an inaccurate representation of the music landscape. However, with the introduction of Nielsen's SoundScan in 1991, which used point-of-sales data from cash registers, the charts became more truthful and representative of the actual music consumption. This shift led to a more balanced representation of various genres, allowing for a more diverse and accurate understanding of the music industry. So, when you're feeling lost in the world of music history, remember to look for the inflection point of 1991 and the release of "Losing My Religion."

    • Billboard's chart measurement change impacted music industry's genresThe 1991 Billboard chart change revealed a more diverse and persistent musical landscape, leading to country's resurgence, rap's rise, and longer chart stays for songs.

      The shift in Billboard's chart measurement methodology in 1991 led to a more accurate reflection of the music Americans were truly listening to. This change brought about significant shifts in musical genres' popularity. For instance, country music saw a surge with Garth Brooks' "Rope in the Wind" becoming the longest-running number one album on the Billboard 200, surpassing Nirvana's "Nevermind." Additionally, NWA's "Appetite for Destruction" marked the first rap album to hit number one, paving the way for rap and hip hop's dominance in the music industry for the following decades. This accounting change also revealed that America's musical tastes were more diverse and persistent than previously thought, with songs staying at the top of the charts for longer periods.

    • From Melody to Rhythm: The Evolution of Music ChartsThe Billboard Hot 100's focus shift from melody to rhythm marked the rise of hip hop, representing the most rhythmic music we've ever had. Melodic memes dominated the 20th century, but rhythmic memes rule the 21st.

      The evolution of music charts, specifically the Billboard Hot 100, significantly influenced the popular music landscape by shifting the focus from melody to rhythm, marking the rise of hip hop. This change can be seen as the culmination of a long journey in American popular music, where the obsession shifted from melody to rhythm. Paul Simon's observation about the decline of melody in music is significant, as hip hop is characterized by its rhythmic nature. This trend began decades earlier with genres like ragtime, rock and roll, funk, and disco. Hip hop, with its various incarnations, represents the most rhythmic music we've ever had. This doesn't mean that melodically focused music is inferior; it's just different. The 20th century was dominated by melodic memes, with hit songs sharing similar chord progressions. However, in the 21st century, rhythmic memes have taken over. For instance, Vox's analysis of triplet flow as a meme in rap music illustrates this shift. Cardi B's "Bodak Yellow" and Desiigner's "Panda" are examples of this trend. This doesn't mean melody is dead; it's just that rhythmic memes have become more prominent.

    • The focus of musical memes and music genres has shifted from melody to rhythm in the 21st century.Music listening in the 21st century emphasizes rhythm over melody, but melody remains important. Repetition and familiarity continue to play a significant role in music.

      The focus of musical memes or defining elements of music genres has shifted from melody in the 20th century to rhythm in the 21st. This doesn't mean that melody or harmony are no longer important, but they have taken a backseat to rhythmic elements. Adele's popularity is a testament to the continued importance of melody. Another example of this shift is the prevalence of certain rhythmic samples in hip hop music, such as "Amen Brother" by The Winstons and "Funky Drummer" by James Brown. The charts also reflect this trend, with the biggest hits spending more time on the charts since 1991. This doesn't necessarily mean that the best songs were released after 1991, but it does indicate a preference for familiarity. The discontinuity in the data between the sales-based charts of the past and the streaming-based charts of today may give the impression that our musical tastes have changed radically, but in reality, repetition and familiarity have always been a significant part of music listening. Musicologist David Huron notes that we spend 90% of our time listening to music that we've already heard. Repetition is built into the very structure of music, with verses and choruses being repeated within songs, and songs being repeated within playlists. With the advent of streaming services, every spin is now publicly recorded, making the repetition of songs even more transparent.

    • Impact of Technology on Music: Shorter Songs and Quick IntrosTechnology's influence on music has led to shorter songs and quicker introductions to capture listeners' attention in a crowded media landscape, resulting in a decline of average song length and introduction length over the last decade.

      Technology significantly influences both music consumption and music production. In the past, physical constraints, such as vinyl size, determined the length of songs. However, with the rise of streaming, financial incentives have led to shorter songs and quicker introductions to capture listeners' attention in a crowded media landscape. This trend can be observed in the decline of average song length and introduction length over the last decade. Additionally, the most popular songs, whether it's "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" by The Beatles or Brahms' Lullaby, may not always be accurately represented in charts due to the limitations of the technology available at the time. Today, technology allows us to access a vast amount of music, and artists aim to hook listeners quickly to maximize engagement and potential revenue.

    • Changes in song intros throughout music historySong intros have varied in length and popularity throughout history, influenced by external factors and artist adaptations to their environments

      The length of song intros and the popularity of beginning songs with choruses have undergone significant changes throughout music history, reflecting artists' reactions to external circumstances. The 1960s saw shorter songs with quick intros, while longer intros became common in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s. In recent years, songs starting with the chorus have resurfaced, possibly due to the streaming era favoring faster-paced content. David Byrne's perspective, as mentioned in his book "How Music Works," emphasizes that context largely determines what is created, and artists often adapt to their environments to produce the most fitting music. This evolution of song structures is a testament to the dynamic interplay between art and external influences.

    • The Evolution of Music Creation and PopularityMusic creation has evolved with changing times, influencing the types of voices and genres we hear today. The number of collaborators per song has increased, but the essence of music remains constant.

      The role and number of people involved in creating music have evolved significantly over time. The minds of musical geniuses like Puccini and Beethoven, if they were alive today, might have produced music in different genres or styles. The absence of certain types of voices in today's music scene could be due to various reasons, including changing audience preferences and the rise of technology. Context plays a crucial role in determining what we perceive as popular music. For instance, a song that doesn't resonate with us in one context might sound great in another. The trend of having more writers per song is a recent development, with the average number tripling since 1991. This shift could be attributed to various factors, including collaboration and the democratization of music production. However, despite these changes, the essence of music and the inspiration behind it remains constant.

    • Factors contributing to the rise in co-writers on songsSampling, litigious culture, expanded definition of songwriting, and democratization of recording technology have led to more co-writers on songs, impacting finances and creativity.

      The music industry has seen a significant increase in the number of songwriters credited on a single song due to several factors. Sampling and interpolating elements of older songs have led to an influx of additional writers, as well as a more litigious culture that encourages defensive crediting. Additionally, the definition of songwriting has expanded to include production elements, allowing more people to claim a piece of the royalty pie. This shift began in the late 20th century and has continued into the present day, with the democratization of recording technology further blurring the lines between writing and producing. This trend not only impacts the financial incentives for artists and writers but also alters the creative process itself.

    • The evolution of music creation and consumptionSongwriting and production roles overlap, digital tools encourage vertical songwriting, and key changes decline in popular music

      The way music is created and consumed has evolved significantly in recent decades. The separation between songs and recordings is no longer distinct, leading to overlapping roles for songwriters and producers. Additionally, the rise of digital production tools has influenced the writing process, incentivizing "vertical songwriting" where elements are stacked and unstacked rather than written section by section. This trend, in turn, has led to a decline in the use of key changes in popular music. As an example, consider the song "Break Your Heart" by Kyle Crews. While the chord progression remains consistent, the production adds and removes synthesizers to create intrigue and variation throughout the song. This vertical approach to songwriting is a result of the digital audio workstation layout, which encourages the stacking of elements rather than a linear verse-chorus-verse structure.

    • A vertical approach to pop music productionPop music production in the 21st century is more visual, involving adding and removing elements vertically to create interest and anticipation, like layers in a sandwich.

      The evolution of pop music production in the 21st century has shifted towards a more vertical approach, which is more visual and involves adding and removing elements vertically to create interest and anticipation. This can be compared to a sandwich, where each layer represents a different part of the song with distinct textures and instruments. The use of digital audio workstations has made this process more subtle but also more visual. The shorter length of hits, faster trip to the chorus, emphasis on rhythm over melody, and the increased number of songwriters are all part of this trend. The visual nature of modern music production is a keen observation, and it's a stark contrast to the linear approach of composing music decades ago.

    • The even distribution of keys in popular music due to digital toolsDigital music production tools have led to a more equal use of keys in popular music, allowing musicians to explore new sounds and adapt to their skill level.

      The ease of use and versatility of digital music production tools have led to a more even distribution of keys in popular music, compared to the past when certain keys, like C and G, were favored due to their ease of play on traditional instruments. This shift in key selection is a result of the same technological advancements that have contributed to the decline in key changes. For musicians who are not highly skilled on the keyboard, this development might mean having to transpose songs into more familiar keys for performance. However, it's important to note that not all musicians are bound by this trend, and facility with piano or other instruments is not a requirement for success in music. The increased key agnosticism in music production is an intriguing evolution in the music industry, and it's a fascinating topic that often goes overlooked in discussions about the impact of technology on music.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    #239: Pushing Music Tech Forward with Adam McHeffey of Artiphon

    #239: Pushing Music Tech Forward with Adam McHeffey of Artiphon

    Adam McHeffey is Director of Marketing at Artiphon. Artiphon is using cutting-edge technology to create intuitive musical instruments anyone can play. Their latest instrument, the Orba, resembles a sliced-in-half grapefruit that musical newcomers will be making music with within minutes while giving seasoned musicians new levels of expression and flexibility.

    Adam and I spoke about making music more accessible and demystifying it for new musicians. He shared the philosophies and principles Artiphon brings to their instruments. We discussed the possibilities new tech like Orba brings to musicians.

    Listeners of this podcast can save 10% at Artiphon.com with the code: musicproduction

    Listen on Apple or Stitcher or Google or Spotify; watch on YouTube

    Show Notes:

    Brian Funk Links:

    Thank you for listening. 

    Please review the Music Production Podcast on your favorite podcast provider!

    And don’t forget to visit my site https://BrianFunk.com for music production tutorials, videos, and sound packs.

    Brian Funk

    #232: Matt Ramsey -Vocal Teacher

    #232: Matt Ramsey -Vocal Teacher

    Matt Ramsey teaches singing lessons using mixed voice technique. Matt founded Ramsey Voice Studio in 2012 and is a songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, and YouTuber. His YouTube channel has amassed a huge following and helped singers all over the world.

    Matt and I had a great conversation about vocal technique. We discussed things singers can do to help improve their voice and vocal range. Matt shared some of his favorite tips and approaches to singing. There's lots of helpful information for both singers and producers who are working with singers.

    Listen on Apple or Stitcher or Google or Spotify; watch on YouTube

    Support the Podcast on Patreon and get exclusive mini-episodes - https://www.patreon.com/brianfunk

    Show Notes:

    Brian Funk Links:

    Thank you for listening. 

    Please review the Music Production Podcast on your favorite podcast provider!

    And don’t forget to visit my site https://BrianFunk.com for music production tutorials, videos, and sound packs.

    Brian Funk

    Gustavo Celis - Mixer To The Divas

    Gustavo Celis - Mixer To The Divas

    Joe & Mike talk with 9 time Grammy Award winning mixer & engineer Gustavo Celis!

     

    Topics include: Mixing records for Eric Clapton, Beyoncé, Ricky Martin, Roger Waters, Celine Dion, Shakira, and others. + Much More!! Taking 3 days to mix and finding your clients that appreciate that. His studio in Miami, mixing in 5.1 surround, vocals without headphones for Shakira + Much more!

     

    "From The West Barn" is a weekly podcast hosted by Joe West & Mike Shimshack shot at The West Barn in Nashville, TN. It's available anywhere podcasts are available. 

     

    West/Shimshack are both music industry veterans that have seen the peaks and valleys of the business over the past 30 years. Their careers have been punctuated with Grammy wins, hit songs, platinum records, tens of millions of units sold and more than their share of failure. 

     

    Tune into "From The West Barn" for their take on the lifestyle and engaging conversations with some of the industries most interesting people! Nothing is off the table ~ FTWB 

     

     

    GUSTAVO CELIS —} 

    Instagram: @guscelis

     

    MIKE SHIMSHACK ---} 

    Instagram: @shackjonz 

     

    JOE WEST ---} 

    Website: https://joe-west.com 

    School: https://www.apprenticeacademy.net 

    Instagram: @west_joe 

    Facebook: https://facebook.com/westjoe 

     

    SPONSORS ---} 

    HERCULES STANDS: 

    http://herculesstands.com/us/ 

     

    SLINGSTUDIO: 

    https://www.myslingstudio.com/ 

     

    APPRENTICE ACADEMY: 

    http://www.apprenticeacademy.net 

     

    FROM THE WEST BARN copyright 2020