Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Pressure to succeed in academics linked to teen anxiety and depressionWealthy countries' teens face increased anxiety and depression despite overall happiness, linked to high test scores and academic pressure

      The pressure to succeed in academics, particularly in competitive educational systems, may be contributing to increased anxiety and depression among adolescents in wealthy countries. This counterintuitive finding was uncovered by professors Dirk Bethmann and Robert Rudolph in their analysis of international happiness data. Despite the general trend of higher subjective well-being among adults in richer countries, they found that teenagers in these countries often experience sadness and anxiety. The strongest correlation was between high standardized test scores and teen anxiety. While some may argue that this is a necessary part of a complex economy, others suggest that the current culture of success may be causing unnecessary stress among young people. With the rise in teen anxiety and depression, it's worth considering whether we need to reevaluate our educational priorities and reduce the pressure on students to perform at all costs.

    • School Anxiety Among Teenagers: Pressure to Succeed and Catch UpThe pandemic intensified school anxiety among teenagers, particularly in upper middle and high income families, due to pressure to attend selective colleges and the competition for admissions, leading to stress, truancy, and a sense of falling behind.

      The rise of school anxiety among teenagers, particularly in upper middle and high income families, has been a gradual process that gained momentum in recent years. The pressure to attend selective colleges and universities has reached unprecedented levels, leading to anxiety, truancy, and a sense of falling behind. This trend was already prevalent before the pandemic, but the pandemic has intensified it, with students feeling the need to make up for lost time and catch up with their peers. The competition for college admissions has become more intense, with test scores gaining even more significance due to the increasing number of test-optional policies. The result is that students who previously felt they had an advantage now feel at a disadvantage, adding to their stress and anxiety. The conversation with Dr. Lisa Damour highlights the need for a shift in mindset around success and the role of parents, teachers, and colleges in addressing this issue.

    • Anxiety over elite college admissionsParents' increased involvement and competition for limited college seats fuel anxiety, making college attendance a defining factor in future success, despite its limitations.

      The intense competition for elite college admissions, driven by awareness of rankings and the desire to maintain or increase social status, has led to an unprecedented level of anxiety among students and their parents. This anxiety stems from the scarcity of college seats relative to the growing number of applicants, leaving many students feeling uncertain about their future prospects. Parents, in particular, have become increasingly involved in the college application process as they seek to ensure their children's success in a world that feels less predictable. The complexities of the application process, which has evolved significantly since previous generations, also contributes to this anxiety. Ultimately, this competition and anxiety surrounding college admissions has created a culture where the college attended becomes a defining factor in one's future success, despite the limitations of this belief.

    • College application process puts pressure on students and familiesThe college application process can lead to excessive pressure, compel students to excel in multiple areas, and result in a disillusioning experience for some, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to education and preparation.

      The college application process places immense pressure on both students and their families, creating a significant workload and potential for disappointment. Colleges aim to assess the "full person" through various talents and accomplishments, but this can lead to students feeling compelled to excel in multiple areas and parents spending countless hours helping them apply. The shift away from standardized tests, while beneficial for increasing accessibility, can also result in students feeling pressured to expand their accomplishments beyond what is necessary for college admission. This can lead to a disillusioning experience for students who have oriented their lives around college admissions, only to find out that the process is largely random. It's essential to recognize the potential psychological impact on students and encourage a balanced approach to education and college preparation.

    • Girls vs Boys: Different Approaches to LearningParents and teachers should shift focus from praising just good grades to recognizing efficient effort, helping girls build confidence in their skills and potential, reducing gender imbalance in leadership positions.

      While girls outperform boys academically, they often rely too heavily on their work ethic and don't learn to gauge their skills and potential for underperformance. Boys, on the other hand, learn to game the system and figure out the minimum effort required to achieve good grades, building confidence in their abilities. This essay by Lisa Strohman suggests that parents and teachers need to shift their focus and praise both boys and girls for efficient effort rather than just good grades. By doing so, we can help girls build confidence in their skills and potential, making them more competitive in the workforce. The current system, where girls are praised for their diligence and boys for their efficiency, perpetuates the gender imbalance in leadership positions. It's essential to recognize and address this issue to promote gender equality in education and beyond.

    • Encourage students to find balance and avoid overworkingHelp students assess workload, prioritize tasks, and ensure they get enough sleep to maintain academic success and well-being

      While it's important for students to develop a strong work ethic and strive for excellence, it's equally important for adults to help them become strategic and avoid overworking. This means encouraging students to assess their workload, prioritize their efforts, and find balance. One crucial aspect of this balance is ensuring students get enough sleep, ideally 9 hours a night. Lack of sleep can significantly contribute to student stress and anxiety, and addressing the root causes of sleep deprivation is essential. These causes can range from excessive workload to excessive screen time or even external pressures like having to work multiple jobs. By focusing on minimum viability excellence and prioritizing sleep, we can help students achieve their academic goals without sacrificing their well-being.

    • Optimal sleep for academic performance and well-beingAim for 7.5 hours for academic success and 9 hours for overall well-being, prioritize sleep, and manage workload effectively.

      Just as strength training requires a balance of pushing yourself to the limit and allowing for rest and recovery, intellectual and emotional growth also necessitates a balance between challenging work and downtime. A 2017 study on adolescent sleep duration and academic achievement and mental health found that the optimal amount of sleep for peak academic performance is 7 hours and 30 minutes, while the optimal amount for peak well-being is 9 hours. While sacrificing some academic performance for an extra hour and a half of sleep may seem daunting, it ultimately leads to greater overall well-being. When working with clients, it's essential to acknowledge the trade-offs and help them find a balance that works for their individual circumstances. Encourage students to prioritize sleep, but also to make a plan for managing their workload effectively, such as breaking tasks into smaller chunks or seeking help when needed. By recognizing the importance of both growth and recovery, we can help young people thrive in all areas of their lives.

    • Managing Academics and SleepPrioritize schoolwork during the day, minimize distractions, and maintain a healthy sleep schedule to excel academically.

      The pressure to perform academically in high schools often leads to a "stress Olympics" culture, where students compete over who gets the least sleep. However, there are students who manage to excel academically while maintaining a healthy sleep schedule. These students often prioritize their schoolwork during the day, focusing intently during homework time, and minimizing distractions such as social media. Schools and educators can help by highlighting these students and encouraging healthier habits. Additionally, students often face tough choices between sleep, school, social life, and social media, and social media's displacement effect can have significant consequences, impacting not only their academic performance but also their relationships and overall well-being.

    • Setting healthy boundaries for children's technology usePrioritize sleep, socialization, physical activity, meaningful contributions, and focused study. Avoid tech in bedrooms, especially overnight, and educate families about realistic college expectations.

      In the complex issue of smartphones, social media, and teenage anxiety, it's crucial to establish healthy boundaries for children's technology use. Prioritize essential activities like sleep, in-person socialization, physical activity, meaningful contributions, and focused study. Avoid having tech in bedrooms, especially overnight, as it negatively impacts sleep. Schools can help by educating families about realistic college expectations and reducing the pressure to consume all academic offerings. Encouraging authentic engagement with learning can also alleviate the need for students to feign enjoyment of every subject.

    • Emphasize individual learning styles and reduce pressure on unrealistic goalsFocus on fostering resilience and growth mindset, rather than fixating on college admissions. Encourage students to focus on their own progress and control the controllables.

      Teachers and parents should aim to reduce the pressure on students to conform to specific academic expectations and instead focus on what is controllable. The metaphor of serving "broccoli" in the classroom emphasizes the importance of accommodating individual learning styles and reducing the stress of meeting unrealistic goals. Additionally, research suggests that the colleges students ultimately attend have less impact on their future success than the habits they develop during their high school years. Therefore, parents and teachers should prioritize fostering resilience and a growth mindset, rather than fixating on college admissions. The key is to encourage students to focus on their own progress and control the controllables, while acknowledging that much of their future success is beyond their immediate control.

    • Reframing the importance of college choiceColleges and students should focus on finding a college that fits their needs and serves their growth, rather than solely on prestige or branding.

      Colleges and students need to reframe the importance of college choice beyond the pressure of branding and prestige. According to Dr. Lisa Damour, colleges are grappling with the mental health concerns of students who arrive on campus with insufficient self-care skills due to the intense competition to become stellar applicants. To help alleviate this issue, Dr. Damour suggests that colleges and teenagers acknowledge that college choice does not define one's future as irrevocably as they may believe. Instead, students should focus on finding a college that fits their needs and serves their growth. By reducing the stress around college selection, students can focus on their emotional and psychological well-being, which will ultimately benefit them in their academic and personal lives.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Bloopers, Early College Programs, Learn to Live Like a Student

    Bloopers, Early College Programs, Learn to Live Like a Student
    Love watching blooper reels for your favorite TV shows? We’re offering our own blooper reel of mistakes we saw students and parents making when we were admissions officers. Don’t be them! We’re also welcoming the associate director of admissions for Bard College at Simon’s Rock to share more information about early college programs, including what they are and who would most benefit from these opportunities. Finally in Learning to Live Like a Student, we’ll focus on how small and large financial choices that students make while they are in college can and will impact their financial future after graduation.

    Episode 178: Cybersecurity Fundamentals, Gender Equity in Tech, Amazon maps your home

    Episode 178: Cybersecurity Fundamentals, Gender Equity in Tech, Amazon maps your home

    Topic 1: It’s time for cybersecurity to focus on the fundamentals instead of the “glory” case

    https://www.pcmag.com/news/ex-cisa-chiefs-advice-at-black-hat-make-security-valuable-and-attacks-costly

    In a world where we are addicted to having every possible device connected to the internet, the attack surface for cybersecurity threats gets bigger every day. But despite the dire prognosis for current cybersecurity capabilities, it can indeed get better, says former CISA head in Black Hat keynote.


    Topic 2: Why Can’t Tech Fix Its Gender Problem?

    https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/08/11/1056917/tech-fix-gender-problem/

    Everyone can admit it: the tech industry has a massive problem with gender equity. But it’s one thing to acknowledge the problem, and another to actually do something about it. The questions that matter are: why does the problem exist…and what can we do to fix it? Hint: it’s always about the money.


    Topic 3: Will Amazon Map the Inside of Your House?

    https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-irobot-roomba-acquisition-data-privacy/ 

    “AFTER DECADES OF creating war machines and home cleaning appliances, iRobot agreed to be acquired by Amazon for $1.7 billion, according to a joint statement by the two companies. If the deal goes through, it would give Amazon access to yet another wellspring of personal data: interior maps of Roomba owners’ homes.” - Wired Magazine


    Sponsor Memo: Huntress

    In the fight against today’s cybercriminals, we are much stronger as a community. That’s why Huntress is proud to launch the Huntress Neighborhood Watch Program: a collection of resources designed to help elevate the broader security community.

    To kick off the Neighborhood Watch Program, Huntress is offering "internal use" licenses. These licenses will be available to the entire MSP community—regardless of if you are a Huntress partner or not—and will give you unrestricted access to the Huntress Managed Security Platform and their team of 24/7 threat hunters.

    Harden your defenses, protect your own backyard, and better serve your customers by joining the Neighborhood Watch Program.

    Join the neighborhood or learn more at http://huntress.com/neighborhood

    All Things Letters of Recommendation with Ann Fleming Brown, Union College

    All Things Letters of Recommendation with Ann Fleming Brown, Union College

    Scoir strategic advisor, Peter Van Buskirk, is joined by Ann Fleming Brown, Director of Admissions at Union College, to discuss all things related to letters of recommendation.

    Our conversation covers topics such as: the importance of letters of recommendation, how to acquire good letters, and much more. This episode was recorded on May 4, 2021.

    Follow us on Instagram!
    Learn more about Scoir

    The Supreme Court Rules Against Affirmative Action

    The Supreme Court Rules Against Affirmative Action
    The Supreme Court has ruled that affirmative action is unconstitutional in college admissions. We talk with WSJ's Douglas Belkin about how the decision upends decades of admissions policies at the nation's most selective schools. And WSJ's Lauren Weber describes how this ruling could impact corporate America. Further Reading: - Supreme Court Rules Against Affirmative Action  - The Man Behind the Case Seeking to End Affirmative Action  - Companies Brace for Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Leading lasting changes in international athletics, with Jim Bunting

    Leading lasting changes in international athletics, with Jim Bunting

    CBA President, Stephen Rotstein speaks with James Bunting, founding partner of Tyr LLP. They talk about his atypical career path, his work in gender equity and sports regulations, and his various volunteer roles. 

    James has acted for athletes, coaches and agents in a variety of different matters, including contractual claims, doping infractions, carding disputes, gender equity complaints, team selection appeals and disciplinary appeals. He is ranked in The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory as a repeatedly recommended practitioner in Corporate Commercial Litigation and Securities Litigation. He earned a BA from the University of Western Ontario in 1999 and an LLB from the same university in 2002. 

    To contact us (please include in the subject line ''Podcast''): podcasts@cba.org

    Please subscribe, rate and review our podcast if you are enjoying it on Apple Podcasts.

    Check out Policy Options Podcast