Logo

    amos tversky

    Explore " amos tversky" with insightful episodes like "282 - They Thought We Were Ridiculous - Andy Luttrell", "The Psychology Behind Poor Investments and Other Important Decisions", "(Bonus) Do Super Bowl Wins Diminish in Value?", "60 Seconds for Thoughts on Thursday: What Might You Do When You’re Underly Busy?" and "48: A Joyous Journey from Black-and-White to Grey (with Tom Gilovich)" from podcasts like ""You Are Not So Smart", "Clipping Chains Podcast", "Financial Decoder", "Stories From Women Who Walk" and "On Wisdom"" and more!

    Episodes (10)

    282 - They Thought We Were Ridiculous - Andy Luttrell

    282 - They Thought We Were Ridiculous - Andy Luttrell

    In 1974, two psychologists, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, as the New Yorker once put it, "changed the way we think about the way we think." The prevailing wisdom, before their landmark research went viral (in the way things went viral in the 1970s), was that human beings were, for the most part, rational optimizers always making the kinds of judgments and decisions that best maximized the potential of the outcomes under their control. This was especially true in economics at the time. The story of how they generated a paradigm shift so powerful that it reached far outside economics and psychology to change they way all of us see ourselves is a fascinating tale, one that required the invention of something this episode is all about: The Psychology of Single Questions.

    They Thought We Were Ridiculous

    Opinion Science

    Behavioral Grooves

    How Minds Change

    David McRaney’s Twitter

    YANSS Twitter

    Show Notes

    Newsletter

    Patreon

    The Psychology Behind Poor Investments and Other Important Decisions

    The Psychology Behind Poor Investments and Other Important Decisions

    When we make important decisions, we are often not as rational or objective as we’d like to believe. The base rate fallacy is the tendency to misjudge the probability of a situation by not accounting for all relevant information. This cognitive bias affects everything from first impressions to voting preferences to broad market behavior.

     

    Support this project: Buy Me a Coffee

    Subscribe to the newsletter: SUBSCRIBE ME!

    Show Notes and Links at Clippingchains.com

    (Bonus) Do Super Bowl Wins Diminish in Value?

    (Bonus) Do Super Bowl Wins Diminish in Value?

    The Kansas City Chiefs won last year's Super Bowl (LVII) and another just a few years before in 2020. The San Francisco 49ers last won a championship in 1995. In this short bonus episode, Mark Riepe shares his insights on how a concept from 18th-century mathematician Daniel Bernoulli might speak to our perceptions of utility, or emotional benefit, even regarding a team's preparation for a championship game.

    Financial Decoder is an original podcast from Charles Schwab. For more on the series, visit schwab.com/FinancialDecoder.

    If you enjoy the show, please leave us a rating or review on Apple Podcasts.

    Important Disclosures

    The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.  

    All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness, or reliability cannot be guaranteed.  

    Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.

    Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

    All corporate names and market data shown above are for illustrative purposes only and are not a recommendation, offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.

    Please note that this content was created as of the specific date indicated and reflects the author’s views as of that date. It will be kept solely for historical purposes, and the author’s opinions may change, without notice, in reaction to shifting economic, business, and other conditions.

    The Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co.

    (0224-JN9Y)

    60 Seconds for Thoughts on Thursday: What Might You Do When You’re Underly Busy?

    60 Seconds for Thoughts on Thursday: What Might You Do When You’re Underly Busy?

    Hello to you listening in Kelseyville, California!

    Coming to you from Whidbey Island, Washington this is Stories From Women Who Walk with 60 Seconds for Thoughts on Thursday and your host, Diane Wyzga.

    Maybe like me you have spaces in the year when you are not overly busy. In fact, you might even be underly busy. Perhaps your reaction is to scramble to be productive. But productivity is not always related to action.  

    What if there’s another valuable way to use the underly busy times?  Amos Tversky, an expert of decision making, wrote, “The secret to doing good research is always to be a little underemployed. You waste years by not being able to waste hours.” [Amos Tversky — An Amazing Man]

    Practical Tip: What’s the rush? Give yourself permission to experience letting go, to devote time to quietly day-dreaming while giving your wonderfully creative imagination time to be in stillness, show up, and like mmmagic! solve a problem (or 3) when you least expect it!  

    You’re invited: “Come for the stories - stay for the magic!” Speaking of magic, I hope you’ll subscribe, follow, share a 5-star rating and nice review on your social media or podcast channel of choice, and join us next time! Remember to stop by the website, check out the Services, arrange a Discovery Call, and Opt In to stay current with Diane and Quarter Moon Story Arts and on LinkedIn.

    Stories From Women Who Walk Production Team

    Podcaster: Diane F Wyzga & Quarter Moon Story Arts

    Music: Mer’s Waltz from Crossing the Waters by Steve Schuch & Night Heron Music

    All content and image © 2019 to Present: for credit & attribution Quarter Moon Story Arts

    48: A Joyous Journey from Black-and-White to Grey (with Tom Gilovich)

    48: A Joyous Journey from Black-and-White to Grey (with Tom Gilovich)
    Is "the spectrum" a more helpful way to think about the world than "categories"? Tom Gilovich joins Igor and Charles to discuss the perils of black-and-white thinking, the evolving data on the hot hand phenomenon, the science of regret, why foxes are wiser than hedgehogs, and the freedom that comes from learning that we are of less interest to other people than we think. Igor considers the limits of psychological nudging in tackling society’s structural problems, Tom shares the perspective that leads him to be so unrelentingly joyful, and Charles learns that even scientists have to work hard to avoid being typecast. Welcome to Episode 48. Special Guest: Tom Gilovich.

    24: אפקט המסגור - האם חצי הכוס היא מלאה או ריקה?

    24: אפקט המסגור - האם חצי הכוס היא מלאה או ריקה?

    הפרק מוקדש ל"אפקט המסגור" - הטייה ידועה לפיה אופן הצגת המידע משפיע על קבלת ההחלטה. 
    כלומר, מסגור המסר ישפיע על ההתנהגות שלנו. 

    לדוגמה: כנראה נעדיף שמפו ש"מכיל 97% חומרים טבעיים" ולא סבון ש "3% ממרכיביו הם כימיקלים או חומרים סינתטיים" (המסר השני כנראה יגרום לפיטוריו המיידיים של הקופירייטר שהגה אותו). 

    מלבד מחקר אקדמי נרחב סביב התופעה, אפקט המסגור הפך לכלי פופולרי ושימושי בעולמות השיווק, המכירות, יחסי הציבור ובקרב כל מי שמעוניינ.ת להניע א.נשים לפעולה.

    כמה שאלות שענינו עליהן במהלך הפרק:

    • מהם שלושת סוגי המסגור?
    • מה זה "חוק ה- 100"?
    • איך מעודדים סטודנטים להימנע מדחיינות?
    • ו… האם חצי הכוס היא מלאה או ריקה?

    ~~~

    👋 מי אנחנו?

    תום אבן - מעצב חווית משתמש שאוהב מאוד פסיכולוגיה. 
    מנחה סדנאות ליישום תובנות התנהגותיות, מלווה ומייעץ לסטארטאפים ומרצה לעיצוב ממשקים דיגיטליים בשנקר.

    http://bit.ly/tomeven

    ~~~

    רועי בן-דור כהן - בעל תואר שני בפסיכולוגיה קוגניטיבית ומנחה תהליכי חשיבה יצירתית. 
    מייסד חברת מחקר וייעוץ בתחום של תובנות התנהגותיות. 

    www.roybendor.com

    https://www.q-bt.co/

    ~~~

    📝 על מה דיברנו הפעם? ארגנו פירוט של הפרק במיוחד בשבילכם:

    00:00 | אינטרו

    --

    02:57 | מבנה הפרק

    --

    04:35 | הגדרה של "מסגור"

    --

    05:15 | שלושה סוגי מסגור

    --

    36:10 | סיום

    ~~~

    📌 לינקים למיטיבי לכת:

    🔗 Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1985). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. In Behavioral decision making (pp. 25-41). Springer, Boston, MA.‏ 

    https://www.unipa.it/dipartimenti/dems/.content/documenti/corsi/aprile2020/decision_making/1981-Tversky-and-Kahneman---The-framing-of-decisions-and-the-psychology-of-choice.pdf

    🔗 Maule, J., & Villejoubert, G. (2007). What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(1), 25-44.‏

    http://www.communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8/10887248/what_lies_beneath-_reframing_framing_effects..pdf

    🔗 Gächter, S., Orzen, H., Renner, E., & Starmer, C. (2009). Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 443-446.‏ 

    https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/28311/ssoar-jebo-2009-3-gachter_et_al-are_experimental_economists_prone_to.pdf?sequence=1

    🔗 Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 76(2), 149-188.‏ 

    http://www.communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8/10887248/all_frames_are_not_created_equal-_a_typology_and_critical_analysis_of_framing_effects.pdf

    🔗 הניוזלטר שלנו

    www.mindesign.club

    💌  רוצה להירשם לניוזלטר שלנו? כל מה שנשאר לך לעשות זה ללחוץ ממש כאן

    43: Invisible to Ourselves: A Life of a Psychological Scientist (with Richard Nisbett)

    43: Invisible to Ourselves: A Life of a Psychological Scientist (with Richard Nisbett)
    A disturbing thought - might it be impossible for us to directly observe the workings of our minds? Richard Nisbett joins Igor and Charles to discuss a life lived on the cutting edge of behavioral sciences in the second part of the 20th Century. He shares tales from his groundbreaking research into our faulty mindware, discussing various biases, cultural differences in cognitive processes, our inability to directly observe our mental processes, and why job interviews are not only unhelpful but potentially harmful to our ability to hire the best person for the job. Igor is keen to learn about the human beings behind some of the 20th Century’s academic idols in social psychology like Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky and Lee Ross, Richard explains why important work and interesting work are not necessarily the same thing, and Charles struggles to make sense of when we do and don’t intervene to help strangers in peril. Welcome to Episode 43. Special Guest: Richard Nisbett.

    How streaming services really get you to sign up | Persuasion through loss aversion

    How streaming services really get you to sign up | Persuasion through loss aversion

    On today's episode, I unpack the psychological principle of loss aversion and share a major mistake that many of us make when trying to persuade. Enjoy!

    Have a question you want answered on the show? If so, check out our "Members Only Q&A" podcast segment via: patreon.com/persuasionschool . There you can register and submit a question and I'll provide an answer via podcast episode. You'll also have access to all of the other questions and answers from other subscribers.

    Want to improve your ability to positively influence and persuade others? Need some help working on it? If so, I'm available for coaching. I've worked one-on-one with Persuasion School listeners who want to improve and I'd love to work with you too. Click here to book a power hour with me or message me on Instagram if you're interested in ongoing coaching: @itsjakesavage.

    Take the Deal! With Guests Daniel Kahneman, Colin Camerer & Luis Green

    Take the Deal! With Guests Daniel Kahneman, Colin Camerer & Luis Green

    In this episode of Choiceology with Katy Milkman, we look at how framing a decision based on what you stand to lose versus what you stand to gain affects your tolerance of risk.

    Luis Green was a contestant on the popular TV game show Deal or No Deal. The game is largely one of chance, but there are moments during play where the contestant has an option to accept a cash offer to quit. At one point in the game, Luis was offered $333,000 to simply walk away. A guaranteed win! It seems like an obvious choice. But as you’ll hear from the story, there are other factors that influenced his decision.

    Katy illustrates these factors with a version of a famous experiment. Volunteers are presented with two differently worded but mathematically identical scenarios. A simple shift from framing the scenario as a potential gain to one of potential loss results in starkly different choices from the volunteers.

    Next, Katy speaks with special guest Daniel Kahneman about the underlying theory that explains human behavior in these types of situations.

    Daniel Kahneman is a professor of psychology and public affairs emeritus at the Woodrow Wilson School and the Eugene Higgins Professor of Psychology Emeritus at Princeton University. He was awarded the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics for his pioneering research with Amos Tversky. Their work helped establish the field of behavioral economics. Kahneman is also the author of the bestselling book Thinking, Fast and Slow.

    Finally, Katy speaks with Colin Camerer about some of his favorite studies on risk seeking in the domain of losses, as well as practical approaches for avoiding this less-than-ideal behavior.

    Colin Camerer is the Robert Kirby Professor of Behavioral Finance and Economics at the California Institute of Technology, where he teaches cognitive psychology and economics. You can read his paper “Prospect Theory in the Wild: Evidence from the Field” here.

    Choiceology is an original podcast from Charles Schwab. For more on the series, visit schwab.com/podcast.

    If you enjoy the show, please leave a ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ rating or review on Apple Podcasts.

    Important Disclosures:

    All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions.

    The comments, views, and opinions expressed in the presentation are those of the speakers and do not necessarily represent the views of Charles Schwab.

    Data contained herein from third-party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

    (0919-9CT3)

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io