Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Finding Quality Candidates with IndeedIndeed's 350 million monthly visitors and matching engine help employers efficiently find and hire quality candidates. Features for scheduling, screening, and messaging streamline the hiring process, and 93% of employers agree that Indeed delivers the highest quality matches compared to other job sites.

      The search for the best candidate for hiring doesn't require active searching, but rather relying on platforms like Indeed. With over 350 million monthly visitors and a matching engine, Indeed can help employers find quality candidates quickly and efficiently. The platform offers features for scheduling, screening, and messaging to streamline the hiring process. Moreover, 93% of employers agree that Indeed delivers the highest quality matches compared to other job sites. So, if you need to hire, you need Indeed. Another intriguing topic discussed in the podcast was asexuality. Angela Chen, a science journalist and asexual herself, shed light on this often misunderstood sexual orientation. Asexuality is not about absence of sex but rather a lack of sexual desire or attraction. It's essential to understand that asexuality is a broad spectrum, and people with this orientation can have romantic relationships and even enjoy sexual experiences. The term asexuality adds important vocabulary to our understanding of human sexuality and challenges the societal norm that sex is a central aspect of everyone's lives. Overall, the podcast offered valuable insights into the importance of accepting and understanding different sexual orientations and the role of language in shaping our perspectives.

    • Understanding Asexuality: Beyond the Absence of Sexual AttractionAsexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by the absence of sexual attraction, but it doesn't mean abstinence or celibacy. It exists on a spectrum and can be influenced by emotional and social factors. Asexuals may have sex for reasons other than physical attraction.

      Asexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by the lack of sexual attraction, but it does not necessarily mean abstinence or celibacy. Asexuals may have sex for emotional, social, or other reasons. The experience of asexuality exists on a spectrum, with some individuals being repulsed by sex while others enjoy it when in love. It's essential to understand that sexual attraction and desire are separate concepts, and people's desires and motivations for sex can be influenced by various factors beyond just physical attraction. Additionally, asexuality is not the opposite of sexuality; rather, it is a distinct sexual orientation. People who identify as asexual may be romantically attracted to others and experience romantic relationships without the desire for sexual intimacy. It's crucial to recognize the complexity and diversity of experiences within the asexual community.

    • Understanding Asexuality: Sexual Orientation vs Sexual DesireAsexuality is a sexual orientation characterized by the absence of sexual attraction, while allosexuality is the experience of having free-floating sexual desire.

      Sexual orientation and sexual desire are not the same thing. Asexuality (ace) is a sexual orientation where individuals experience little to no sexual attraction. Allosexuality (allo), on the other hand, is the experience of having free-floating sexual desire. While allosexuals may or may not have a specific target for their sexual desire, aces do not experience sexual attraction towards anyone. Despite growing research, the understanding of asexuality is still limited due to its broad definition and historical biases in psychology and sexology. In popular culture, aces are often underrepresented or stereotyped, perpetuating misconceptions about their experiences.

    • Representation of Asexuality in Pop CultureEfforts are being made to increase accurate representation and understanding of asexuality in pop culture, with examples like Todd Chavez from BoJack Horseman and Zonker Harris from Doonesbury. Explicit labeling is a topic of debate for promoting acceptance.

      Representation of asexuality in pop culture is often relegated to the fringes, with few exceptions like the character Todd Chavez from BoJack Horseman. This lack of mainstream representation can perpetuate the perception that asexuality is a niche or childish orientation, rather than a valid part of everyday life. However, efforts are being made to change this, such as when the creators of BoJack Horseman consulted with an asexuality expert to ensure accurate portrayal. The character Zonker Harris from Doonesbury, who has never expressed interest in sex, is another example of asexual representation in pop culture, although his asexuality has never been explicitly stated. The importance of explicit labeling in representing asexuality is a topic of debate, as it can help challenge assumptions about allosexuality being the default. Ultimately, increasing representation and accurate portrayal of asexuality in pop culture is crucial for promoting understanding and acceptance. Additionally, the discussion touched upon the importance of language learning and the effectiveness of Babbel as a language learning app. The speaker shared their personal experience of using Babbel to reconnect with a language they had learned years ago and the benefits it brought to their upcoming travel plans. A special offer for Mindscape listeners to get up to 60% off Babbel subscriptions was also mentioned.

    • Media misrepresentation of asexualityMedia portrayals of asexuality can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and misunderstandings, making it important to use clear language and open dialogue to promote understanding and acceptance.

      The portrayal of asexuality in media, such as the infamous house episode, can be misinformed and stigmatizing. The episode features a woman who identifies as asexual, but the main character, House, dismisses her claim, implying that asexual people are sick, lying, or dead. However, the episode later reveals that her husband, not she, had a medical condition causing his lack of sexual desire. This depiction reinforces harmful stereotypes and misunderstandings about asexuality. The existence of the term asexual, like other labels, can provide clarity and understanding for individuals who may not fit into societal norms. Yet, many people struggle to understand their experiences due to a lack of specific language and conversation around the topic. The use of clear, precise language and open dialogue can help individuals better understand their own experiences and connect with resources and communities.

    • The Challenges of Communication and Understanding Different PerspectivesAphantasia, a condition where individuals can't visualize mental images, illustrates the complexities of communication and misunderstanding, especially regarding sexuality and asexuality, which is still classified as a disorder in the DSM but debated as a valid variation of human sexuality

      Communication and understanding can be challenging when people have different perspectives and experiences, as highlighted by the concept of Aphantasia. Aphantasia is a condition where individuals don't have the ability to visualize mental images, and it shows how language and shared experiences can lead to misunderstandings. This can be particularly relevant for individuals who identify as asexual, as they might not realize that others experience sexual attraction differently. Society's obsession with sexuality and desire can further complicate matters. Historically, deviations from societal norms have been classified as mental disorders or disabilities, and asexuality is still listed as such in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), specifically as hypoactive desire disorder. However, there is ongoing debate about whether asexuality should continue to be considered a disorder, and some argue that it is a valid and normal variation of human sexuality.

    • Historical classification of sexual deviations and asexualityThe historical labeling of certain sexual behaviors as disorders creates confusion, especially regarding asexuality. Society's sexualization should be acknowledged, but more diverse messages and representation are needed.

      The distinction between normal sexual desire and a sexual disorder, particularly in relation to asexuality, raises complex questions. The historical classification of certain sexual deviations as disorders, despite being harmless, creates confusion. The asexual exception, which suggests that identifying as homosexual is fine but experiencing low sexual desire is a disorder, seems semantically inconsistent. The speaker believes in bodily autonomy and questions the motivation behind diagnosing and treating low sexual desire, given the long history of pharmaceutical companies selling libido-boosting drugs. The speaker also acknowledges the cultural valorization of sex and the existence of both sexual repression and slut shaming. The ACE movement advocates for more representation and messages that challenge the dominant narrative around sex, rather than desexualizing everything. Society's sexualization is not a mistake, but there needs to be more diversity in messages and representation.

    • Considering Our Spending and Personal ValuesBe mindful of your spending and ensure it aligns with your values and preferences. This can lead to transformative experiences and help shape your identity.

      It's important to be mindful of the things we spend money on and consider whether they truly align with our preferences and values. This idea resonates with the concept of transformative experiences, where choices we make can shape who we become. For some, this might mean reevaluating unwanted subscriptions or societal pressures to conform to sexual desires. The complexity of these issues is highlighted by the ongoing debate around libido-boosting drugs and personal identity. Ultimately, it's essential to create space for individuals to make their own decisions while acknowledging the societal pressures that can influence us. The number of asexual individuals is difficult to determine due to the complexity of defining and identifying this sexual orientation. The conversation around asexuality, like many other sexual orientations, continues to evolve.

    • Understanding Sexual Orientations as FluidPeople's sexual orientations can change throughout their lives, and societal pressures can influence these identities. Respecting individual differences and reducing the need for labels can lead to greater acceptance and understanding.

      Sexual orientations, including asexuality, are better understood as fluid rather than fixed. The speaker argues that people can go through different sexual phases throughout their lives, and identities should be respected regardless of whether they remain consistent or change. The speaker also emphasizes that societal pressures can influence people's sexuality and that the need for labels like asexuality may decrease as society becomes more accepting of individual differences. Discovering an identity like asexuality can be a significant and liberating experience for some people, but it can also come with challenges in a society that may not fully understand or accept it.

    • Understanding Asexuality: Complex Emotions and ConsiderationsAsexuality brings complex emotions and societal stigmas, unique coming out experiences, and challenges in relationships with allosexual individuals. Open dialogue and understanding are key to acceptance and navigating individual identities.

      The discussion around asexuality brings up complex emotions and considerations for individuals who identify as asexual or question their sexual orientation. While some people find relief and recognition in the concept, others experience ambivalence and the added complications of societal perceptions and stigmas. The process of coming out as asexual can also be unique, as it may not feel necessary or appropriate for some, and relationships between asexual and allosexual individuals can present their own challenges. It's important to remember that all relationships have difficulties, and sexual compatibility should not be framed as a failure or settling, but rather as an aspect of a partnership that requires communication and understanding. Overall, the conversation around asexuality highlights the importance of acceptance, understanding, and open dialogue in navigating individual identities and relationships.

    • Navigating Relationships as an Asexual PersonDespite societal pressures and challenges, aces can find fulfilling relationships with allos and prioritize compatibility beyond sexual orientation. Finding an ace partner may be difficult due to their scarcity, leading some to consider allos. Aromantic aces face additional complexities due to societal judgment.

      Being asexual in a relationship with allosexual individuals can present unique challenges. Aces may face pressure and feelings of guilt or shame due to societal expectations and misunderstandings about sexual orientation. However, it's important to remember that compatibility goes beyond sexual orientation, and many aces still try to make relationships with allos work. The scarcity of aces and their dispersed population can make finding an ace partner difficult, leading many to consider dating allos. Additionally, some aces may identify as aromantic, meaning they don't desire romantic relationships, while others may be sex-positive and happy being solitary. Society's judgment can add an extra layer of complexity for aromantic aces. Understanding and accepting diverse sexual orientations and relationship preferences is crucial to fostering inclusive and healthy relationships.

    • Historical and Modern Forms of Non-Romantic Intimate PartnershipsRecognizing and respecting various forms of intimate partnerships beyond romantic relationships, like historical Boston marriages and modern asexual communities, is essential for individual happiness and societal understanding.

      There are various forms of intimate partnerships beyond romantic relationships that deserve recognition and respect. The Boston marriage, for instance, was a historical phenomenon where women lived together in committed, non-romantic partnerships. Aromantic individuals, specifically, have expressed a desire for the normalization of these types of relationships due to societal pressure and fear of being alone in old age. The internet and social media communities have played a significant role in the self-recognition and growth of the asexual community, which includes individuals who experience little to no sexual attraction. While there are ongoing debates and challenges within the community, the internet has also facilitated important connections and activism. Ultimately, it's crucial to acknowledge and celebrate the diverse ways people form deep, devoted bonds with one another.

    • Historical gatekeeping in the asexuality communityDespite past exclusion, questioning the definition and nature of sexuality and attraction benefits everyone. Respect asexual identities, acknowledge power dynamics, and promote inclusivity.

      The asexuality community, like many others, has faced and continues to face gatekeeping and exclusion. In the past, this gatekeeping led to the marginalization of individuals with disabilities, survivors of sexual assault, and those questioning their sexuality. However, it's important to note that gatekeeping is not unique to the asexuality community, and questioning the definition and nature of sexuality and attraction benefits everyone. It's crucial to avoid making assumptions about asexual individuals and respect their identities. Additionally, it's essential to acknowledge and address the power dynamics and inequalities in relationships, particularly regarding consent and the division between romantic and platonic relationships. Overall, the asexuality community's experiences offer valuable lessons about the importance of inclusivity, respect, and understanding different identities and experiences.

    • Recognizing the importance of recognizing beyond sex and romanceQuestion societal norms, value diverse experiences, and broaden perspectives on sources of excitement and fulfillment.

      Our society places a heavy emphasis on romantic and sexual relationships, often making it seem compulsory in stories and everyday life. The book on asexuality highlights the importance of recognizing that sex and romance are not the only sources of excitement and fulfillment. It's essential to question whether we truly desire these aspects or if we're just conforming to societal norms. Additionally, representation and diverse role models can significantly impact individuals, particularly young people, by broadening their perspectives and challenging limiting expectations. It's crucial to recognize that there's a wide range of experiences and identities beyond the conventional norms.

    • Representation for Asexual Community: Complexities and ChallengesEnsure accurate and nuanced representation of the asexual community to avoid reinforcing stereotypes or misunderstandings. Create safe spaces for individuals to explore their identities without anxiety or shame, intersecting identities add complexity, and representation should foster understanding, acceptance, and inclusion.

      Representation matters, especially for marginalized communities like the asexual community. However, representation comes with challenges. For instance, it's essential to ensure accurate and nuanced portrayals to avoid reinforcing stereotypes or creating misunderstandings. The asexual community, which is predominantly white, intersects with other identities like race, gender, and sexuality, adding complexity to the representation issue. Moreover, individuals may question their sexual orientation, especially if they belong to underrepresented groups, leading to additional layers of confusion. It's crucial to create safe spaces for people to explore their identities without anxiety or shame. Ultimately, representation should foster understanding, acceptance, and inclusion.

    • Exploring Sexuality with Respect and UnderstandingRespect individuals' identities and allow freedom to explore sexuality without judgment. Questioning is a two-way street and assumptions about sexual orientation can be harmful.

      The discussion highlighted the importance of respecting individuals' identities and allowing them the freedom to explore and question their sexuality without judgment. The speaker expressed concerns about the asymmetry in questioning, as there is often less scrutiny of allosexual individuals and an assumption that asexual individuals may be mistaken. The speaker also shared their personal experience of writing a book about asexuality and the pressure and vulnerability that came with it. Ultimately, the conversation emphasized the need for open-mindedness and understanding towards all sexual orientations.

    • Exploring asexuality through an intersectional lensAngela Chen emphasizes the importance of addressing race and disability in discussions about asexuality to accurately represent diverse experiences and promote a nuanced understanding.

      Key takeaway from Angela Chen's conversation on The Windscape Podcast is the importance of intersectionality in exploring and understanding the experiences of asexual individuals. Chen emphasized that her book on asexuality couldn't be limited to just that topic, but needed to address race and disability as well due to the lack of representation in existing literature. She felt a responsibility to accurately represent the people she interviewed and present a diverse landscape of experiences. Despite facing pressure to be a champion for asexuality, Chen believes it's important to be critical and ask questions. She hopes that her work will be recognized for its intelligence and discernment, and that it will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of asexuality and its intersections with other identities.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    The Earth's climate keeps changing, largely due to the effects of human activity, and we haven't been doing enough to slow things down. Indeed, over the past year, global temperatures have been higher than ever, and higher than most climate models have predicted. Many of you have probably seen plots like this. Today's guest, Gavin Schmidt, has been a leader in measuring the variations in Earth's climate, modeling its likely future trajectory, and working to get the word out. We talk about the current state of the art, and what to expect for the future.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/20/276-gavin-schmidt-on-measuring-predicting-and-protecting-our-climate/

    Gavin Schmidt received his Ph.D. in applied mathematics from University College London. He is currently Director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and an affiliate of the Center for Climate Systems Research at Columbia University. His research involves both measuring and modeling climate variability. Among his awards are the inaugural Climate Communications Prize of the American Geophysical Union. He is a cofounder of the RealClimate blog.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    275 | Solo: Quantum Fields, Particles, Forces, and Symmetries

    275 | Solo: Quantum Fields, Particles, Forces, and Symmetries

    Publication week! Say hello to Quanta and Fields, the second volume of the planned three-volume series The Biggest Ideas in the Universe. This volume covers quantum physics generally, but focuses especially on the wonders of quantum field theory. To celebrate, this solo podcast talks about some of the big ideas that make QFT so compelling: how quantized fields produce particles, how gauge symmetries lead to forces of nature, and how those forces can manifest in different phases, including Higgs and confinement.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/13/275-solo-quantum-fields-particles-forces-and-symmetries/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | May 2024

    AMA | May 2024

    Welcome to the May 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/06/ama-may-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Here is the memorial to Dan Dennett at Ars Technica.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    274 | Gizem Gumuskaya on Building Robots from Human Cells

    274 | Gizem Gumuskaya on Building Robots from Human Cells

    Modern biology is advancing by leaps and bounds, not only in understanding how organisms work, but in learning how to modify them in interesting ways. One exciting frontier is the study of tiny "robots" created from living molecules and cells, rather than metal and plastic. Gizem Gumuskaya, who works with previous guest Michael Levin, has created anthrobots, a new kind of structure made from living human cells. We talk about how that works, what they can do, and what future developments might bring.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/29/274-gizem-gumuskaya-on-building-robots-from-human-cells/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Gimez Gumuskaya received her Ph.D. from Tufts University and the Harvard Wyss Institute for Biologically-Inspired Engineering. She is currently a postdoctoral researcher at Tufts University. She previously received a dual master's degree in Architecture and Synthetic Biology from MIT.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    273 | Stefanos Geroulanos on the Invention of Prehistory

    273 | Stefanos Geroulanos on the Invention of Prehistory

    Humanity itself might be the hardest thing for scientists to study fairly and accurately. Not only do we come to the subject with certain inevitable preconceptions, but it's hard to resist the temptation to find scientific justifications for the stories we'd like to tell about ourselves. In his new book, The Invention of Prehistory, Stefanos Geroulanos looks at the ways that we have used -- and continue to use -- supposedly-scientific tales of prehistoric humanity to bolster whatever cultural, social, and political purposes we have at the moment.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/22/273-stefanos-geroulanos-on-the-invention-of-prehistory/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Stefanos Geroulanos received his Ph.D. in humanities from Johns Hopkins. He is currently director of the Remarque Institute and a professor of history at New York University. He is the author and editor of a number of books on European intellectual history. He serves as a Co-Executive Editor of the Journal of the History of Ideas.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    272 | Leslie Valiant on Learning and Educability in Computers and People

    272 | Leslie Valiant on Learning and Educability in Computers and People

    Science is enabled by the fact that the natural world exhibits predictability and regularity, at least to some extent. Scientists collect data about what happens in the world, then try to suggest "laws" that capture many phenomena in simple rules. A small irony is that, while we are looking for nice compact rules, there aren't really nice compact rules about how to go about doing that. Today's guest, Leslie Valiant, has been a pioneer in understanding how computers can and do learn things about the world. And in his new book, The Importance of Being Educable, he pinpoints this ability to learn new things as the crucial feature that distinguishes us as human beings. We talk about where that capability came from and what its role is as artificial intelligence becomes ever more prevalent.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/15/272-leslie-valiant-on-learning-and-educability-in-computers-and-people/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Leslie Valiant received his Ph.D. in computer science from Warwick University. He is currently the T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics at Harvard University. He has been awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship, the Knuth Prize, and the Turing Award, and he is a member of the National Academy of Sciences as well as a Fellow of the Royal Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He is the pioneer of "Probably Approximately Correct" learning, which he wrote about in a book of the same name.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | April 2024

    AMA | April 2024

    Welcome to the April 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/08/ama-april-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    271 | Claudia de Rham on Modifying General Relativity

    271 | Claudia de Rham on Modifying General Relativity

    Einstein's theory of general relativity has been our best understanding of gravity for over a century, withstanding a variety of experimental challenges of ever-increasing precision. But we have to be open to the possibility that general relativity -- even at the classical level, aside from any questions of quantum gravity -- isn't the right theory of gravity. Such speculation is motivated by cosmology, where we have a good model of the universe but one with a number of loose ends. Claudia de Rham has been a leader in exploring how gravity could be modified in cosmologically interesting ways, and we discuss the current state of the art as well as future prospects.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/01/271-claudia-de-rham-on-modifying-general-relativity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Claudia de Rham received her Ph.D. in physics from the University of Cambridge. She is currently a professor of physics and deputy department head at Imperial College, London. She is a Simons Foundation Investigator, winner of the Blavatnik Award, and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Her new book is The Beauty of Falling: A Life in Pursuit of Gravity.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    270 | Solo: The Coming Transition in How Humanity Lives

    270 | Solo: The Coming Transition in How Humanity Lives

    Technology is changing the world, in good and bad ways. Artificial intelligence, internet connectivity, biological engineering, and climate change are dramatically altering the parameters of human life. What can we say about how this will extend into the future? Will the pace of change level off, or smoothly continue, or hit a singularity in a finite time? In this informal solo episode, I think through what I believe will be some of the major forces shaping how human life will change over the decades to come, exploring the very real possibility that we will experience a dramatic phase transition into a new kind of equilibrium.

    Blog post with transcript and links to additional resources: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/25/270-solo-the-coming-transition-in-how-humanity-lives/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    269 | Sahar Heydari Fard on Complexity, Justice, and Social Dynamics

    269 | Sahar Heydari Fard on Complexity, Justice, and Social Dynamics

    When it comes to social change, two questions immediately present themselves: What kind of change do we want to see happen? And, how do we bring it about? These questions are distinct but related; there's not much point in spending all of our time wanting change that won't possibly happen, or working for change that wouldn't actually be good. Addressing such issues lies at the intersection of philosophy, political science, and social dynamics. Sahar Heydari Fard looks at all of these issues through the lens of complex systems theory, to better understand how the world works and how it might be improved.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/18/269-sahar-heydari-fard-on-complexity-justice-and-social-dynamics/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Sahar Heydari Fard received a Masters in applied economics and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Cincinnati. She is currently an assistant professor in philosophy at the Ohio State University. Her research lies at the intersection of social and behavioral sciences, social and political philosophy, and ethics, using tools from complex systems theory.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Related Episodes

    3 | Alice Dreger on Sexuality, Truth, and Justice

    3 | Alice Dreger on Sexuality, Truth, and Justice
    The human mind loves nothing more than to build mental boxes -- categories -- and put things into them, then refuse to accept it when something doesn't fit. Nowhere is this more clear than in the idea that there are men, and there are women, and that's it. Alice Dreger is an historian of science, specializing in intersexuality and the relationship between bodies and identities. She is also a successful activist, working to change the way that doctors deal with newborn children who are born intersex. We talk about human sexuality and a number of other hot-button topics, and ruminate on the challenges of being both an intellectual (devoted to truth) and an activist (seeking justice). [smart_track_player url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/seancarroll/alice-dreger.mp3" social_gplus="false" social_email="true" hashtag="mindscapepodcast" ] Alice Dreger received her Ph.D. in the History and Philosophy of Science from Indiana University. She has worked as a faculty member at Michigan State University and Northwestern University. She has been a Guggenheim Fellow, and was the Founding Board Chair of the Intersex Society of North America. She is the author of a number of books, including Galileo's Middle Finger: Heretics, Activists, and One Scholar's Search for Justice, and most recently The Talk: Helping Your Kids Navigate Sex in the Real World. Home page Wikipedia page Publications TED Talk: Is Anatomy Destiny? Twitter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    18 | Clifford Johnson on What's So Great About Superstring Theory

    18 | Clifford Johnson on What's So Great About Superstring Theory
    String theory is a speculative and highly technical proposal for uniting the known forces of nature, including gravity, under a single quantum-mechanical framework. This doesn't seem like a recipe for creating a lightning rod of controversy, but somehow string theory has become just that. To get to the bottom of why anyone (indeed, a substantial majority of experts in the field) would think that replacing particles with little loops of string was a promising way forward for theoretical physics, I spoke with expert string theorist Clifford Johnson. We talk about the road string theory has taken from a tentative proposal dealing with the strong interactions, through a number of revolutions, to the point it's at today. Also, where all those extra dimensions might have gone. At the end we touch on Clifford's latest project, a graphic novel that he wrote and illustrated about how science is done. Clifford Johnson is a Professor of Physics at the University of Southern California. He received his Ph.D. in mathematics and physics from the University of Southampton. His research area is theoretical physics, focusing on string theory and quantum field theory. He was awarded the Maxwell Medal from the Institute of Physics. Johnson is the author of the technical monograph D-Branes, as well as the graphic novel The Dialogues. Home page Wikipedia page Publications A talk on The Dialogues Asymptotia blog Twitter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | November 2021

    AMA | November 2021

    Welcome to the November 2021 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). I take the large number of questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable size — based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good — and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    43 | Matthew Luczy on the Pleasures of Wine

    43 | Matthew Luczy on the Pleasures of Wine
    Some people never drink wine; for others, it’s an indispensable part of an enjoyable meal. Whatever your personal feelings might be, wine seems to exhibit a degree of complexity and nuance that can be intimidating to the non-expert. Where does that complexity come from, and how can we best approach wine? To answer these questions, we talk to Matthew Luczy, sommelier and wine director at Mélisse, one of the top fine-dining restaurants in the Los Angeles area. Matthew insisted that we actually drink wine rather than just talking about it, so drink we do. Therefore, in a Mindscape first, I recruited a third party to join us and add her own impressions of the tasting: science writer Jennifer Ouellette, who I knew would be available because we’re married to each other. We talk about what makes different wines distinct, the effects of aging, and what’s the right bottle to have with pizza. You are free to drink along at home, with exactly these wines or some other choices, but I think the podcast will be enjoyable whether you do or not. Support Mindscape on Patreon or Paypal. Mattew Luczy is a Certified Sommelier as judged by the Court of Master Sommeliers. He currently works as the Wine Director at Mélisse in Santa Monica, California. He is also active in photography and music. Mélisse home page Personal/photography page Instagram Ask a Somm: When Should I Decant Wine? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    203 | N.J. Enfield on Why Language is Good for Lawyers and Not Scientists

    203 | N.J. Enfield on Why Language is Good for Lawyers and Not Scientists

    We describe the world using language — we can’t help it. And we all know that ordinary language is an imperfect way of communicating rigorous scientific statements, but sometimes it’s the best we can do. Linguist N.J. Enfield argues that the difficulties run more deeply than we might ordinarily suppose. We use language as a descriptive tool, but its origins are found in more social practices — communicating with others to express our feelings and persuade them to agree with us. As such, the very structure of language itself reflects these social purposes, and we have to be careful not to think it provides an unfiltered picture of reality.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    N.J. Enfield received his Ph.D. in linguistics from the University of Melbourne. He is currently a professor of linguistics and Director of the Sydney Social Sciences and Humanities Advanced Research Centre at the University of Sydney. His recent book is Language vs. Reality: Why Language Is Good for Lawyers and Bad for Scientists.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.