Logo

    357. Can an Industrial Giant Become a Tech Darling?

    en-usNovember 08, 2018
    What challenges led to Jim Hackett becoming Ford's CEO?
    How is Ford transitioning to focus on technology?
    What are Ford's recent strategies in response to market shifts?
    How does Hackett connect football evolution to the auto industry?
    What are the implications of Ford's shift from sedans to SUVs?

    Podcast Summary

    • New CEO with Unconventional Background Leads Ford Through AdversityFord's new CEO, Jim Hackett, brought in to lead the company through challenges including foreign competition, ride-sharing, autonomous vehicles, environmental concerns, and car ownership decline, implemented cost cuts, SUV/truck focus, and increased R&D spending.

      Jim Hackett, an unexpected choice, became the CEO of Ford Motor Company during a time of great adversity and change in the automotive industry. With a background in sales, management, and furniture manufacturing, Hackett was not a typical car industry executive. However, when Ford faced challenges such as foreign competition, the rise of ride-sharing and autonomous vehicles, environmental concerns, and the decline of car ownership, Hackett was brought in to lead the company through a major restructuring. This included cutting costs, focusing on SUVs and trucks, and increasing research and development spending. Despite criticism and financial struggles, Hackett's vision for Ford extends beyond vehicles to a transportation operating system, reflecting a growing emphasis on technology and innovation in the industry.

    • Transforming Ford from a traditional automaker to a tech-focused companyFord CEO Jim Hackett aims to innovate the auto industry by drawing parallels between football and car manufacturing, focusing on safety and power, while addressing competition from tech giants.

      Ford CEO Jim Hackett, with his background in football and furniture manufacturing, is working to transform Ford from a traditional automaker to a tech-focused company. He sees parallels between the evolution of football and the auto industry, with mass leading to both increased power and safety. Hackett acknowledges the challenges of this transition, including competition from tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Uber. However, he believes Ford's history of innovation and its focus on safety make it well-positioned to succeed in the future of transportation. The auto industry has brought about significant changes to our lives, with both positive and negative consequences. Hackett sees the need to make vehicles lighter and more fuel-efficient, which can lead to safer structures. Despite advancements, there are still thousands of traffic deaths each year, highlighting the ongoing need for innovation in this field.

    • Transforming Ford from an automaker to a mobility companyFord, under new CEO Jim Hackett's leadership, aims to revolutionize transportation by integrating AI, autonomous vehicles, and the cloud, shifting from a traditional automaker to a mobility technology company.

      Jim Hackett, the former CEO of Steelcase, was appointed as the CEO of Ford Motor Company with a vision to transform Ford from a traditional automaker to a mobility company. He brought insights from his experience in revolutionizing the office space concept to Ford, aiming to create a "living street" and a transportation operating system. The integration of artificial intelligence, autonomous vehicles, and the cloud will lead to a complete disruption of the transportation system, making it more efficient, safer, and human-centered. Ford's higher purpose is to create a smart vehicle-smart world interaction that is much bigger than it was in the past. In essence, Ford's evolution under Hackett's leadership is beyond being just a vehicle manufacturer to becoming a mobility technology company.

    • Embracing Change for Competitive AdvantageCompanies must be open to change and innovation, even if it means letting go of the past to stay competitive in the market

      Companies, like living organisms, need to adapt and evolve to stay competitive in an ever-changing world. Jim Hackett's involvement with Ford's shift towards smart mobility began when he suggested bringing in a new leader to manage the emerging business, as the CEO's role was too large. However, taking on the role of CEO led Hackett to be fully immersed and ultimately disconnected from Mark Fields' situation. The board saw the emergence of competitors like Tesla and new players in the automotive industry and recognized the need to adapt, lest they become the next Kodak. The key lesson is that companies must be willing to embrace change and innovation, even if it means letting go of the past.

    • Adapting to Technological Changes for Long-Term SurvivalFord, as a legacy automaker, needs to adapt quickly to new technologies and business models to remain competitive and profitable. Failure to keep up with Moore's Law and technological advancements can lead to being left behind in the market.

      Companies, even established ones like Ford, need to adapt quickly to technological changes in order to remain competitive. The speaker argues that history shows that most companies don't survive long-term, especially when technology advances significantly. He suggests that Ford, as a legacy automaker, faces a particular challenge in adapting to new technologies and business models. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of Moore's Law, which states that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years, leading to exponential growth in technology. Companies that fail to keep up with this pace of change risk being left behind. Additionally, the speaker notes that stock market psychology can add to the pressure for companies to innovate and adapt quickly. The example of Tesla surpassing Ford in market cap despite producing fewer cars illustrates this point. Overall, the speaker emphasizes the need for Ford to embrace new technologies and business models in order to remain profitable and competitive in the face of disruptive technological change.

    • Old companies struggling to justify stock prices vs new innovative onesFord and other industrial companies need to invest in monetizing customer data to regain investor confidence and justify their stock prices

      Established companies like Ford, despite their long-standing success and vast customer base, face challenges in the market when it comes to justifying their stock prices, especially when compared to newer, seemingly more innovative companies like Tesla. This is due in part to the patience factor – investors want to see believable momentum and they may be more willing to take a chance on a newer company with a novelty premium. However, Ford and other industrial companies have valuable assets and data that can be monetized, but they need to prove it to the investors. The comparison between Ford and Tesla, in terms of market capitalization and data potential, highlights this issue. While some tech companies have already mastered monetizing customer data, Ford and other industrial companies have not yet fully capitalized on this opportunity. To do so, they need to invest in developing the necessary capabilities and show tangible results to regain investor confidence and justify their stock prices.

    • Ford's Role in Developing Smart Transportation SystemsFord uses customer data and vehicle technology to develop smart transportation systems, enabling vehicles to communicate with each other and surroundings for improved efficiency and safety. Potential applications include emergency response prioritization and medical emergency diagnosis.

      Ford Motor Company, with its extensive customer data from credit applications, is well-positioned to play a significant role in the development of smart, connected transportation systems. Through initiatives like the Transportation Mobility Cloud and CV to X technology, Ford aims to enable vehicles to communicate with each other and their surroundings, improving efficiency and safety. An example of this is the collaboration with the Los Angeles Police Department, where Ford vehicles equipped with airbag sensors send location data to responders in case of accidents. The potential applications of this technology extend beyond transportation, with possibilities for prioritizing emergency response in congested areas and even diagnosing medical emergencies. Ford's data and expertise in vehicle technology make it a major player in the reimagining of public spaces and services.

    • Ford's Shift from Cars to Trucks and SUVsFord is focusing on trucks and SUVs, phasing out sedans, and positioning itself as a tech firm, despite a downgrade by Moody's. This shift may confuse investors, but it's a response to changing consumer preferences and higher profit margins in trucks and SUVs.

      Ford, once a dominant player in the automobile industry, is undergoing a major transformation as it focuses on trucks and SUVs, while also positioning itself as a tech firm. Despite a strong economy, Ford's financial situation has deteriorated, leading to a downgrade by Moody's. The company is phasing out most of its sedans and investing in more profitable SUVs and trucks, such as the F-150 and Ranger. This shift, however, may be confusing to investors as Ford also aims to be a tech firm, collaborating with Silicon Valley companies. The company's new ad campaign, "Built Forward Proud," even mocks the tech industry, highlighting the importance of building and manufacturing. Ford's reliance on trucks and SUVs, which have higher profit margins, comes as consumer preferences change and gas prices remain low. The company's restructuring, including the decision to exit the car market except for the Mustang, is a response to these market shifts and challenges.

    • Ford's Multi-Dimensional Vision for Future TransportationFord is investing in autonomous vehicles through Argo AI, focusing on self-driving systems, electric propulsion, and a transportation mobility cloud for a more efficient and human-centered ecosystem, and hiring top talent to gain a competitive edge.

      Ford is investing heavily in autonomous vehicle technology through its subsidiary, Argo AI, and sees itself as a leader in the field despite being later to market than some tech giants. Ford's approach includes a focus on self-driving systems, electric propulsion, and a transportation mobility cloud to create a more efficient and human-centered transportation ecosystem. The company believes that its investment in neural networks and hiring top talent from the industry will give it a competitive edge. Ford's presentation at CES 2018 reflected this multi-dimensional vision of the future of transportation.

    • Revolutionizing urban life with smart transportationSmart transportation systems can reduce congestion, optimize parking, free up space, and lead to personal convenience, efficiency, and environmental benefits, but implementation comes with challenges

      Smart transportation systems have the potential to revolutionize urban life by reducing congestion, optimizing parking, and freeing up space for more human interaction and green spaces. Jim Hackett, the CEO of Ford, believes that focusing on smart transportation is a crucial first step towards creating a "smart city." This transformation can lead to significant improvements in personal convenience and efficiency, as well as environmental benefits. However, the implementation of such systems comes with challenges, such as the impact of trade policies on profits and the uncertainty they bring. Despite these challenges, Hackett remains optimistic about the future and sees a clear path for Ford to contribute to this exciting vision of urban development.

    • The Future of Food and Agriculture: Bringing Fresh Produce Closer to ConsumersTechnological advancements like autonomous vehicles and precision agriculture can bring fresh produce closer to consumers, while open office designs offer pros and cons for productivity and well-being, and the future of work may involve a balance between remote and collaborative spaces.

      The evolution of transportation and agriculture have led to longer distances between food production and consumption, raising questions about the sustainability and human impact of these systems. However, advancements in technology, such as autonomous vehicles and precision agriculture, offer the potential to reverse these trends and bring fresh produce closer to consumers. Ford Motor Company's CEO, Jim Hackett, envisions a future where Ford can leverage these technologies to build a more sustainable and human-centered business. The open office design, another topic explored in the podcast, has its pros and cons, and the latest research sheds light on its impact on productivity and well-being. Ultimately, the future of work may involve a balance between remote work and collaborative office spaces, with technology playing a key role in facilitating effective communication and collaboration.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    EXTRA: In Praise of Maintenance (Update)

    EXTRA: In Praise of Maintenance (Update)

    We revisit an episode from 2016 that asks: Has our culture’s obsession with innovation led us to neglect the fact that things also need to be taken care of? 

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Martin Casado, general partner at Andreessen Horowitz.
      • Ruth Schwartz Cowan, professor emerita of history and sociology of science at University of Pennsylvania.
      • Edward Glaeser, professor of economics at Harvard University.
      • Chris Lacinak, founder and president of AVPreserve.
      • Andrew Russell, provost of SUNY Polytechnic Institute.
      • Lawrence Summers, professor and president emeritus of Harvard University; former Secretary of the Treasury and former director of the National Economic Council.
      • Lee Vinsel, professor of science, technology, and society at Virginia Tech.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 16, 2024

    602. Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think?

    602. Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think?

    Young people have been reporting a sharp rise in anxiety and depression. This maps neatly onto the global rise of the smartphone. Some researchers are convinced that one is causing the other. But how strong is the evidence?

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 12, 2024

    601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?

    601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?

    Only a tiny number of “supertaskers” are capable of doing two things at once. The rest of us are just making ourselves miserable, and less productive. How can we put the — hang on a second, I've just got to get this.


    Come see Stephen Dubner live! 

    “A Questionable Evening: A strategic interrogation from two people who ask questions for a living,” featuring Stephen Dubner and PJ Vogt from Search Engine.

    Thursday, Sept. 26th, at the Bell House in Brooklyn, NY. 

    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/a-questionable-evening-evening-with-stephen-dubner-and-pj-vogt-tickets-1002544747327

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Olivia Grace, senior product manager at Slack.
      • Gloria Mark, professor of computer science at the University of California, Irvine.
      • David Strayer, professor of cognition and neural science at the University of Utah.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 05, 2024

    What Is the Future of College — and Does It Have Room for Men? (Update)

    What Is the Future of College — and Does It Have Room for Men? (Update)

    Educators and economists tell us all the reasons college enrollment has been dropping, especially for men, and how to stop the bleeding. (Part 3 of our series from 2022, “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Zachary Bleemer, assistant professor of economics at Princeton University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • D'Wayne Edwards, founder and President of Pensole Lewis College.
      • Catharine Hill, former president of Vassar College; trustee at Yale University; and managing director at Ithaka S+R.
      • Pano Kanelos, founding president of the University of Austin.
      • Amalia Miller, professor of economics at the University of Virginia.
      • Donald Ruff, president and C.E.O. of the Eagle Academy Foundation.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College, Brown University, and Prairie View A&M University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 29, 2024

    EXTRA: Why Quitting Is Usually Worth It

    EXTRA: Why Quitting Is Usually Worth It

    Stephen Dubner appears as a guest on Fail Better, a new podcast hosted by David Duchovny. The two of them trade stories about failure, and ponder the lessons that success could never teach.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 26, 2024

    The University of Impossible-to-Get-Into (Update)

    The University of Impossible-to-Get-Into (Update)

    America’s top colleges are facing record demand. So why don’t they increase supply? (Part 2 of our series from 2022, “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Peter Blair, professor of education at Harvard University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • Zachary Bleemer, assistant professor of economics at Princeton University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • Amalia Miller, professor of economics at the University of Virginia.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 22, 2024

    What Exactly Is College For? (Update)

    What Exactly Is College For? (Update)

    We think of them as intellectual enclaves and the surest route to a better life. But U.S. colleges also operate like firms, trying to differentiate their products to win market share and prestige points. In the first episode of a special series originally published in 2022, we ask what our chaotic system gets right — and wrong. (Part 1 of “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Peter Blair, faculty research Fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research and professor of education at Harvard University.
      • Catharine Hill, former president of Vassar College; trustee at Yale University; and managing director at Ithaka S+R.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College, Brown University, and Prairie View A&M University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 15, 2024

    EXTRA: Here’s Why You’re Not an Elite Athlete (Update)

    EXTRA: Here’s Why You’re Not an Elite Athlete (Update)

    There are a lot of factors that go into greatness, many of which are not obvious. As the Olympics come to a close, we revisit a 2018 episode in which top athletes from a variety of sports tell us how they made it, and what they sacrificed.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 12, 2024

    600. “If We’re All in It for Ourselves, Who Are We?”

    600. “If We’re All in It for Ourselves, Who Are We?”

    Tania Tetlow, a former federal prosecutor and now the president of Fordham University, thinks the modern campus could use a dose of old-fashioned values.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 08, 2024

    599. The World's Most Valuable Unused Resource

    599. The World's Most Valuable Unused Resource

    It’s not oil or water or plutonium — it’s human hours. We've got an idea for putting them to use, and for building a more human-centered economy. But we need your help.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 01, 2024

    Related Episodes

    392. The Prime Minister Who Cried Brexit

    392. The Prime Minister Who Cried Brexit

    In 2016, David Cameron held a referendum on whether the U.K. should stay in the European Union. A longtime Euroskeptic, he nevertheless led the Remain campaign. So what did Cameron really want? We ask him that and much more — including why he left office as soon as his side lost and what he’d do differently if given another chance. (Hint: not much.)

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io