Logo

    598. Is Overconsolidation a Threat to Democracy?

    en-usJuly 25, 2024
    What factor contributes to high prices in the eyeglass industry?
    How does Luxottica's dominance affect eyeglass pricing?
    What unique challenges does the eyewear industry face?
    Why did Mascot decide to manufacture their own lenses?
    What attributes make the Lemtosh frame appealing to customers?

    Podcast Summary

    • Eyeglass industry consolidationThe eyeglass industry's consolidation by Luxottica, controlling various aspects from retailers to labs, leads to high prices and potential threats to democracy, but the importance of eyeglasses for vision and advancements should be remembered.

      The eyeglass industry, dominated by Luxottica, has high prices due to consolidation and essential need. With a history rooted in art and controversy, the industry's leading player, Luxottica, holds significant market power, controlling various aspects from retailers to labs. This dominance can lead to price hikes, especially in essential industries like eyeglasses. Critics argue that such consolidation can threaten democracy and create widespread anger. Despite the high costs, it's essential to remember the importance of eyeglasses for vision and the advancements they bring. Optometrist Harvey Moscott, a fourth-generation eyeglass business owner, shares his perspective on the industry's pricing and the challenges of maintaining affordability.

    • Mascot Optical's unique charmMascot Optical offers high-end glasses with expert craftsmanship and memorable frame names, including the universally appealing Lemtosh. Its Old World New York aesthetic and commitment to serving customers adds to its charm, despite high prices for complex prescriptions.

      The Mascot Optical brand, with its Old World New York aesthetic and memorable frame names, offers high-end, expertly crafted glasses, including those for complex prescriptions. The Lemtosh frame, in particular, is universally appealing due to its perfect balance of square and round shapes, fitting well on various nose bridges. The brand's history, starting from the late 1800s, and its commitment to serving customers seriously while not taking themselves too seriously, adds to its unique charm. Prices for complex prescriptions can be quite high, but the brand's expertise and dedication to providing accurate lenses justify the investment. For those who are not wearing glasses yet, this conversation highlights the importance of considering not just the look of frames but also their functionality and the expertise of the optician in providing lenses tailored to individual needs.

    • Vertical Integration in Eyeglass IndustryTo ensure quality control and reduce costs, eyeglass companies like Mascot invest in vertical integration and manufacture their own lenses, despite the industry's unique challenges and higher costs compared to traditional retail industries.

      Mascot, a Moscow-based eyeglass company, prioritizes providing the best possible vision for their customers, even if it means investing in vertical integration and manufacturing their own lenses. This decision was driven by a desire for quality control and the rising costs of purchasing lenses from external suppliers. The eyewear industry is unique due to the requirement of licensed personnel and specialized skills, leading to higher costs compared to traditional retail industries. Mascot's expansion and investment in their business is thoughtful and deliberate, not driven solely by hitting targets and numbers. Despite the challenges and costs, Mascot's focus on quality and control has helped them grow into a global brand with over two dozen shops around the world.

    • Expanding US eyewear brands in AsiaTo succeed in expanding US eyewear brands in Asia, consider targeting markets with consumer behaviors similar to the US first. However, entering markets with unique distribution structures and growing demand, like China, requires investment in local infrastructure, such as training opticians and collaborating with local governments.

      Expanding a US eyewear brand internationally, particularly in Asia, requires a strategic approach. Brands like Moscow, which aim to differentiate themselves from competitors, can look to markets with consumer behaviors similar to the US, such as the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. However, entering markets like China, which have unique distribution structures and a growing demand for eyewear, requires investment in local infrastructure. This includes funding the education and training of opticians, as well as collaborating with local governments to establish the optical industry. Essilor and Luxotica, global eyewear giants, have recognized this and have opened schools in China to train opticians, viewing it as a long-term investment for growth.

    • Myopia ControlMyopia Control Clinics use evidence-based practices, including novel spectacles, to slow eyeball elongation and reduce myopia progression, especially important for early onset and faster progression to prevent severe eye conditions.

      Myopia, or nearsightedness, is a rapidly increasing global health issue, particularly in countries like China, Singapore, and Japan, where rates reach up to 90%. While genetics play a role, environmental factors such as long hours of close-work or screen time are significant contributors to its development. Myopia Control Clinics, like the one started by Maria Lu at the University of California, Berkeley, are working to address this issue through evidence-based practices, including novel spectacles designed to slow the elongation of the eyeball. Although not yet approved by the US FDA, these spectacles are gaining popularity and becoming the first-line defense for myopia control in China. The earlier the onset and faster the progression of myopia, the higher the risk for severe eye conditions. Therefore, it's crucial to prioritize myopia control and invest in research and treatments to ensure better eye health for future generations.

    • Novel spectacles for myopia controlThe market for novel spectacles, particularly those designed for myopia control, is growing, but not all designs have undergone clinical testing, and concerns exist about their effectiveness. Major players are investing in research to advance our understanding and management of myopia, but high costs may limit access.

      The market for novel spectacles, particularly those designed for myopia control, is booming, both in China and other parts of the world. However, not all of these designs have undergone clinical testing, and some concerns exist about their effectiveness. Major players like SLOR Luxodica are investing heavily in research to advance our understanding and management of myopia. The high cost of these novel spectacles, such as S.L.O.R.'s Stellist model, is justifiable due to the increased time and resources required for accurate evaluation and prescription. In the US, where manufacturers can charge more for services, the first approved designs have gained significant momentum. Esalor Luxodica, in particular, is seen as a positive force in the industry, investing in both commercial and research efforts to combat myopia. Despite this, concerns remain about the profit-driven nature of some manufacturers in the Chinese market, which may lead to confusion rather than advancement. Overall, the novel spectacle industry offers diverse designs based on different principles, providing hope for effective solutions for those who may not respond to one design.

    • Economic power concentrationThe excessive concentration of economic power can lead to political instability and the rise of anti-democratic forces, exploited by populist leaders when people feel their economic interests are not being served.

      The excessive concentration of economic power in the hands of a few corporations, like Estelor Laxarica in the eyeglass industry, can lead to political instability and even the rise of anti-democratic forces. Tim Wu, a legal scholar and former advisor to two presidential administrations, argues that this can create widespread anger and economic discontent, which can be exploited by populist leaders. He points to historical examples, such as the rise of the Nazi Party in Germany during the Great Depression, and warns that similar tendencies could emerge in the present day if democratic governments fail to address economic inequality and inequities. Wu believes that the demand for strong, authoritarian leaders rises when people feel that their economic interests are not being served by the system. The American situation may not be as drastic as Weimar Germany, but the impact of consolidation in the form of corporate capture or crony capitalism has already had a significant cost for American society, both in terms of democracy and economic well-being.

    • Corporate consolidation and democracyCorporate consolidation in industries can threaten democracy by giving corporations excessive market and government control, potentially harming society and democratic values

      The consolidation of industries, such as the eyeglass industry in the case of Essilor-Luxottica, can pose a threat to democracy when corporations gain too much control over the market and the government. This issue, while not as prominent as others like technology giants, can be a potent symbol of the consequences of unchecked corporate consolidation. The speaker, Tim Wu, argues that this dominance can negatively impact society and even threaten democratic values. The conversation also touched upon the idea of time as a commodity and the potential for time dollars to challenge traditional dollars in the future. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of addressing the implications of corporate consolidation on various aspects of society.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?

    601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?

    Only a tiny number of “supertaskers” are capable of doing two things at once. The rest of us are just making ourselves miserable, and less productive. How can we put the — hang on a second, I've just got to get this.


    Come see Stephen Dubner live! 

    “A Questionable Evening: A strategic interrogation from two people who ask questions for a living,” featuring Stephen Dubner and PJ Vogt from Search Engine.

    Thursday, Sept. 26th, at the Bell House in Brooklyn, NY. 

    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/a-questionable-evening-evening-with-stephen-dubner-and-pj-vogt-tickets-1002544747327

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Olivia Grace, senior product manager at Slack.
      • Gloria Mark, professor of computer science at the University of California, Irvine.
      • David Strayer, professor of cognition and neural science at the University of Utah.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 05, 2024

    What Is the Future of College — and Does It Have Room for Men? (Update)

    What Is the Future of College — and Does It Have Room for Men? (Update)

    Educators and economists tell us all the reasons college enrollment has been dropping, especially for men, and how to stop the bleeding. (Part 3 of our series from 2022, “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Zachary Bleemer, assistant professor of economics at Princeton University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • D'Wayne Edwards, founder and President of Pensole Lewis College.
      • Catharine Hill, former president of Vassar College; trustee at Yale University; and managing director at Ithaka S+R.
      • Pano Kanelos, founding president of the University of Austin.
      • Amalia Miller, professor of economics at the University of Virginia.
      • Donald Ruff, president and C.E.O. of the Eagle Academy Foundation.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College, Brown University, and Prairie View A&M University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 29, 2024

    EXTRA: Why Quitting Is Usually Worth It

    EXTRA: Why Quitting Is Usually Worth It

    Stephen Dubner appears as a guest on Fail Better, a new podcast hosted by David Duchovny. The two of them trade stories about failure, and ponder the lessons that success could never teach.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 26, 2024

    The University of Impossible-to-Get-Into (Update)

    The University of Impossible-to-Get-Into (Update)

    America’s top colleges are facing record demand. So why don’t they increase supply? (Part 2 of our series from 2022, “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Peter Blair, professor of education at Harvard University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • Zachary Bleemer, assistant professor of economics at Princeton University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • Amalia Miller, professor of economics at the University of Virginia.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 22, 2024

    What Exactly Is College For? (Update)

    What Exactly Is College For? (Update)

    We think of them as intellectual enclaves and the surest route to a better life. But U.S. colleges also operate like firms, trying to differentiate their products to win market share and prestige points. In the first episode of a special series originally published in 2022, we ask what our chaotic system gets right — and wrong. (Part 1 of “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Peter Blair, faculty research Fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research and professor of education at Harvard University.
      • Catharine Hill, former president of Vassar College; trustee at Yale University; and managing director at Ithaka S+R.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College, Brown University, and Prairie View A&M University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 15, 2024

    EXTRA: Here’s Why You’re Not an Elite Athlete (Update)

    EXTRA: Here’s Why You’re Not an Elite Athlete (Update)

    There are a lot of factors that go into greatness, many of which are not obvious. As the Olympics come to a close, we revisit a 2018 episode in which top athletes from a variety of sports tell us how they made it, and what they sacrificed.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 12, 2024

    600. “If We’re All in It for Ourselves, Who Are We?”

    600. “If We’re All in It for Ourselves, Who Are We?”

    Tania Tetlow, a former federal prosecutor and now the president of Fordham University, thinks the modern campus could use a dose of old-fashioned values.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 08, 2024

    599. The World's Most Valuable Unused Resource

    599. The World's Most Valuable Unused Resource

    It’s not oil or water or plutonium — it’s human hours. We've got an idea for putting them to use, and for building a more human-centered economy. But we need your help.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 01, 2024

    EXTRA: Why Rent Control Doesn’t Work (Update)

    EXTRA: Why Rent Control Doesn’t Work (Update)

    A new proposal from the Biden administration calls for a nationwide cap on rent increases. Economists think that’s a terrible idea. We revisit a 2019 episode to hear why.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Tommy Andersson, professor of economics at Lund University.
      • Vicki Been, professor of law at New York University and former deputy mayor for housing and economic development in New York City.
      • Rebecca Diamond, professor of economics at Stanford Graduate School of Business.
      • David Eisenbach, history lecturer at the Manhattan School of Music and Columbia University.
      • Ed Glaeser, professor of economics at Harvard University.

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 29, 2024

    598. Is Overconsolidation a Threat to Democracy?

    598. Is Overconsolidation a Threat to Democracy?

    That’s the worry. Even the humble eyeglass industry is dominated by a single firm. 

    We look into the global spike in myopia, how the Lemtosh got its name, and what your eye doctor knows that you don’t. (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Maria Liu, professor of clinical optometry at the University of California, Berkeley.
      • Harvey Moscot, C.E.O. of MOSCOT Eyewear and Eyecare.
      • Zachary Moscot, chief design officer of MOSCOT Eyewear and Eyecare.
      • Cédric Rossi, equity research analyst at Bryan Garnier.
      • Tim Wu, professor of law, science and technology at Columbia Law School.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 25, 2024