Logo
    Search

    How Hollywood's Writers Strike Could Change the Future of TV and Movies

    enMay 30, 2023

    Podcast Summary

    • Writer Strikes: A Catalyst for Change in Media IndustryWriter strikes have historically influenced the media landscape by pushing for fair compensation during technological shifts, and the latest strike in 2023 against streaming content could lead to new content formats or revenue streams.

      Writer strikes have played a significant role in shaping the media landscape throughout history. From the early days of television in the 1950s to the rise of cable and home video in the 1980s and beyond, writers have fought for fair compensation as new technologies and markets emerged. The latest strike in 2023, which involved the Writers Guild of America, is no exception. This time, the writers are striking against studios over compensation for streaming content. The outcome of this strike could have a major impact on the future of TV and film production, potentially leading to more unscripted content or new revenue streams for writers. As we've seen throughout history, writer strikes have been a catalyst for change in the media industry. So, stay tuned for more insights on this developing story, and in the meantime, consider using Canva for your presentation needs and Indeed for your hiring needs to stay ahead of the curve.

    • Writers Strike: Fair Compensation and Better Working Conditions in the New Era of TV ProductionWriters are striking for fair compensation and better working conditions amidst the shift towards streaming services, shorter seasons, smaller writer's rooms, and the use of AI in content creation.

      The ongoing writers' strike in the entertainment industry is a response to the changing economics of distribution brought about by the rise of streaming services like Netflix and Disney Plus. The writers are protesting for fair compensation and better working conditions in this new era of television production, which includes shorter seasons, smaller writer's rooms, and the use of AI in content creation. The history of writer strikes reflects the evolution of entertainment distribution, and this current strike could significantly impact the future of the industry. The writers are concerned about their role and financial stability in this new model, where the focus is on producing a large volume of content to attract and retain subscribers. The strike also raises questions about the impact of AI on the creative process and the role of human writers in the industry.

    • Disrupted career growth for writers in the streaming ageThe traditional pathway for writers to advance from staff writer to showrunner is being disrupted by shorter seasons, fewer opportunities, and the need for fewer writers on shows, making financial stability and career growth more challenging.

      The explosion of original scripted shows in the streaming age has led to more competition among writers, resulting in fewer opportunities for career growth and financial stability. The traditional hierarchy of moving up from staff writer to executive producer and showrunner is being disrupted by shorter seasons, mini rooms, and the need for fewer writers on shows. Additionally, the economics of shorter seasons means that even writers making higher per-episode wages may not achieve a middle-class lifestyle. The old system, with its longer seasons and larger number of episodes, provided an effective apprenticeship program for aspiring showrunners, but this model has been dismantled by the current streaming landscape.

    • The Pros and Cons of Long-Running TV ShowsLong-running TV shows provide a consistent revenue stream but may sacrifice quality. Shorter seasons and flexible schedules offer creative freedom but put pressure on writers. The Writers Guild pushes for mandatory writer's rooms, but studios resist due to costs. The Apprentice system's future is uncertain, impacting future show quality and profitability.

      The traditional model of producing long-running television shows with large numbers of episodes has both advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, it allowed for a steady stream of content and revenue, but on the other hand, it may have led to a lower quality of writing and production as compared to today's standards. Additionally, the shift towards shorter seasons and more flexible production schedules has given writers more creative freedom but also puts more pressure on them to deliver high-quality content in a shorter timeframe. The Writers Guild is advocating for a mandatory writer's room when a show is greenlit to ensure a robust creative process, but studios are resisting this due to cost concerns. The Apprentice system, which produced many top-tier writers, could be negatively impacted if this model is dismantled, potentially hurting the quality and profitability of shows in the long run. It's a question of succession and investing in the next generation of brilliant showrunners.

    • Who benefits from the streaming economy?Consumers currently enjoy an abundance of choices at lower prices, but the streaming economy poses economic challenges for content creators

      The ongoing writers' strike raises the question of who is benefiting from the streaming economy. Consumers are currently winning due to the highly subsidized content ecosystem, with an abundance of choices at lower prices. Companies like Netflix, which had a profitable business model from the beginning, are also benefiting in the short term. However, other studios are struggling to make a profit and are losing money on streaming. The digital media landscape of the 21st century has seen more choice and lower prices, often subsidizing consumers, but this can lead to economic challenges for content creators. Examples include the music industry with iTunes and Spotify, where musicians feel undercompensated for streams. Even successful streaming services like Netflix face pressure to raise margins and please Wall Street, leading to changes like cracking down on password sharing.

    • The media industry's business models disrupted by the InternetThe Internet has disrupted traditional media business models, leading to expanded choices and lower prices for consumers but economic challenges for companies. Cable TV bundles and music sales have been impacted, with streaming services and subscription-based models becoming the new norm.

      The media industry, particularly cable and music, have undergone significant disruption in the 21st century due to the Internet. While this disruption has led to expanded choices and lower prices for consumers, it has also caused ennui and economic challenges for companies. The cable television bundle, once a lucrative business model, has been dismantled, leaving the industry in a transitional period. Streaming services have not yet proven to be profitable, and only a few companies are expected to survive. The music industry, on the other hand, has pivoted to touring and subscription-based services, such as Spotify and Apple Music, to make up for lost revenue. This shift has allowed the industry to retain customers for longer periods and generate consistent revenue. The media landscape is constantly evolving, and companies must adapt to these changes in order to thrive. The cable bundle was an unprecedented business model that allowed companies to generate revenue from a large customer base, even if they did not consume all the offered content. However, the Internet has disrupted this model, and companies must find new ways to monetize their content in this digital age.

    • ESPN considering direct-to-consumer sales, impacting cable industry revenueESPN may sell access directly to consumers, affecting cable industry's revenue, while studios and streamers face potential disruptions from ongoing writers' strike.

      The traditional cable television model, which has long funded sports and entertainment industries through subscription fees, is showing signs of strain. ESPN, for instance, is considering selling access to its channel directly to consumers, which could mean charging them upwards of $15-$25 a month. This shift could significantly impact the revenue of not just ESPN, but also sports leagues and the entire cable industry. Meanwhile, studios and streamers, with their vast content libraries, may not be as motivated to end the ongoing writers' strike quickly as they have been in the past. However, while they may be able to sustain a short-term strike, longer durations could disrupt their release schedules and impact their businesses significantly. It's a complex situation with far-reaching implications.

    • Importance of Indeed for Hiring and Writers' Strike ImpactUsing Indeed for scheduling, screening, and messaging can help streamline hiring processes. The ongoing writers' strike could lead to fewer shows but higher quality TV.

      When it comes to hiring, instead of relying solely on search engines like Indeed, it's more effective to use their platform for scheduling, screening, and messaging to connect with candidates faster. Meanwhile, in the world of entertainment, the ongoing writers' strike is causing disruptions, and the legacy companies that rely heavily on scripted shows, such as NBC and the networks, could be the most vulnerable to pressure. The potential outcome of the strike could lead to fewer shows with more writers, resulting in a higher average quality of television. This is based on the discussion about the importance of Indeed for hiring and the ongoing writers' strike, with a focus on the potential impact on the television industry.

    • Writers' strike could lead to shift in consumer behavior towards older content and global programmingThe writers' strike could result in viewers turning to older shows and foreign content, as well as further accelerate the transition to digital and social media platforms for entertainment. Additionally, the strike may lead to increased experimentation and innovation in the use of AI in Hollywood.

      The ongoing writers' strike could lead to a significant shift in consumer behavior towards older content and global programming, as well as further accelerate the transition to digital and social media platforms for entertainment. With the saturation of reality TV and the ongoing push for ad-supported streaming services, older shows and foreign content may become more popular alternatives for viewers during the strike. Additionally, the increasing prevalence of AI in various industries, while still speculative in relation to the strike, could potentially play a role in the future of content creation and consumption. The strike's impact on the industry may lead to increased experimentation and innovation in the use of AI in Hollywood, as companies seek new ways to produce and distribute content.

    • AI use in scriptwriting raises concerns for writersAI is generating portions of films, but raises concerns for writers about potential job loss and credit issues

      The use of AI in scriptwriting is a concern for writers and actors due to potential copyright issues and the possibility of studios using AI to generate ideas without giving credit or compensation to human writers. While AI isn't currently being used to write entire scripts, it is being used to generate portions of films, such as extra actors for reshoots. The writers' guild is worried that if studios can use AI to generate ideas for scripts, they may not need human writers, potentially leading to a loss of jobs and income for writers. The credit process for scripts is complex, and it's unclear how a machine could be credited or compensated for its contributions to a script. The issue is not about high-level, Oscar-winning writing, but rather about the large number of quickie scripts produced every year for Christmas movies and other genres, where AI could potentially replace human writers.

    • WGA vs. Studios: Who Gets Credit and Compensation for AI-Generated Scripts?The WGA and studios are in a standoff over AI scriptwriting, with the WGA advocating for human writers' protections. Negotiations are ongoing, but a potential deal from the directors could influence the writers' decision, while an actors' strike authorization vote could lead to a double guild strike, halting productions through September or October.

      The Writers Guild of America (WGA) and studios are at an impasse regarding the use of AI in scriptwriting, with the WGA advocating for protections against AI replacing human writers. The issue revolves around who gets credited and compensated for the work. The negotiations are in the early stages, with the directors' and actors' guilds set to begin their own contract talks. A potential deal from the directors could pressure the writers to make their own, but an actors' strike authorization vote could lead to a double guild strike in July, shutting down productions. The strike is currently in its second or third inning, with the situation escalating as key players get involved. The worst-case scenario could see the strike lasting until September or October. The future of the industry hangs in the balance as human creatives grapple with the role of AI in their craft.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    One Hollywood Writer on the Industry’s ‘Dire’ Situation

    One Hollywood Writer on the Industry’s ‘Dire’ Situation
    Thousands of Hollywood writers went on strike this week after failing to reach a new contract with studios. The dispute was caused, in part, by the industry’s shift to streaming, which writers say has left them shortchanged. Michael Schur is co-creator of “Parks and Recreation” and was a writer for “The Office” and “Saturday Night Live.” He tells us what’s behind the first writers strike in over 15 years.  Further Reading and Watching: - Hollywood Writers Strike Might Give Studios Chance to Slash Costs  - Late-Night Shows Go Dark Amid Writers Strike  Further Listening: - Does the Future of Streaming Look More Like Cable?  - Netflix Turns to Ads  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    EP 92: AI in E-commerce - Navigating the Legal Maze

    EP 92: AI in E-commerce - Navigating the Legal Maze

    When you create AI content on the Internet, who owns it? With AI content rising in popularity, countries are scrambling to decide what AI regulations should be implemented. Neil Peretz, Head of Legal for WooCommerce at Automattic, joins us to discuss how to approach AI content, E-commerce, and AI regulations.

    Newsletter: Sign up for our free daily newsletter
    More on this: Episode Page
    Join the discussion: Ask Neil and Jordan questions about AI and legal regulations
    Upcoming Episodes: Check out the upcoming Everyday AI Livestream lineup
    Website: YourEverydayAI.com
    Email The Show: info@youreverydayai.com
    Connect with Jordan on LinkedIn

    Timestamps:
    [00:01:40] Daily AI news

    [00:05:00] Neil's experience with AI and legal
    [00:08:15] Using AI for legal business matters
    [00:12:30] AI content vs. legal battles
    [00:16:15] WooCommmerce's thoughts on AI content
    [00:21:10] Who has rights to outputs of generative AI?
    [00:23:26] Recent example of AI copyright
    [00:29:20] Best practices for using generative AI legally

    Topics Covered in This Episode:
    A. AI and Ownership of Content
    - Questions about who should own and have access to internet content
    - Discussion on content ownership at Automatic (parent company of WooCommerce, WordPress, and Tumblr)
    - Considerations for content scraping and copyright when using AI to generate content
    B. Legal Regulations in AI
    - Importance of legal regulations related to AI
    - Discussion on legal issues in AI, specifically in the context of consumer credit
    - AI technology developed by Leah Financial Technologies for assessing creditworthiness
    - Implementation of AI technology with PNC Bank and other institutions
    C. Copyright and Fair Use
    - Explanation of copyright law and fair use
    - Reference to the Taylor decision regarding machine-generated art and copyright
    - Copyright generally associated with human creations
    - Use of AI for transformative purposes and its relation to copyright and fair use
    E. Unique and Ownable AI-Generated Content
    - Challenge of uniqueness in solely AI-generated content
    - Importance of combining AI with other creative processes for more unique and ownable content
    - Mention of AI copyright battle involving Creativity Machine
    F. Helping Content Creators and Store Owners
    - Importance of helping content creators reach a wider audience
    - Role of automated sources in gathering publicly available content
    - Powering online stores and the desire for store owners to be found and influential
    - Consideration of individuals who do not want to be found

    Keywords:
    AI, content, internet, legal regulations, guest, participate, location, Nvidia chips, ChatGPT competitor, machine learning, creditworthiness, FICO scores, Aliyah score, PNC Bank, institutions, ownership, content scraping, WordPress, copyright law, fair use, Taylor decision, creations, IT, finance, lawyers, salespeople, machine, auto-renewals, bargaining power, parody, factual assertions, AI-generated content, uniqueness, verifiable, copyright, uniqueness, ChatGPT, Google Bard, Thropic Cloud, Creativity Machine, inventor, independent thought, indexed, search engines, web crawlers, HTML code, online stores, store owners, influential, fintech, Leah, legal compliance, Contract Wrangler, key terms, responsibilities, rights, cont

    How Streaming Hurt Hollywood Writers

    How Streaming Hurt Hollywood Writers

    This week, thousands of writers went on strike against Hollywood studios over what they say is an existential threat to their livelihoods.

    John Koblin, a media reporter for The New York Times, explains how streaming turned the most prolific era in American entertainment into an industry-changing labor dispute.

    Guest: John Koblin, a media reporter for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    CNN+, Investing Platforms, and the Return to Fundamentals — with Leif Abraham

    CNN+, Investing Platforms, and the Return to Fundamentals — with Leif Abraham
    Leif Abraham, the co-CEO of Public.com, joins Scott to discuss the state of play regarding the fintech investment space and Public’s overall business strategy.  Scott opens with his thoughts on how the state of the IPO market is a forward-looking indicator of what’s about to happen to the streaming industry. He also shares his thoughts on CNN’s new subscription product, CNN+. Algebra of Happiness: knowing when to deescalate.   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices