Logo
    Search

    The Science of Procrastination—and How to Really Get Stuff Done

    enJune 20, 2023

    Podcast Summary

    • Understanding Procrastination: Beyond Time ManagementProcrastination is driven by mood and self-talk, leading to a cycle of guilt and decreased productivity. Learn strategies to break the cycle and get things done.

      Procrastination is not just about mismanaging time, but also about mood and the stories we tell ourselves. Host Rob Harvilla shares his own experiences of getting swept up in distractions instead of completing tasks, leading to a cycle of guilt and decreased productivity. Scientist Tim Pychyl, a long-time productivity researcher, sheds light on the science and philosophy of procrastination, explaining that it's often driven by a belief that we'll be in a better mood or more focused later. The episode delves into the procrastination doom loop, where putting off tasks leads to anxiety and guilt, making it even harder to start. Listeners can learn strategies to break the cycle and get stuff done. This episode is brought to you by Canva and Indeed. Canva offers AI-powered presentation tools to help users create stunning slides, while Indeed simplifies the hiring process by matching employers with qualified candidates.

    • The link between procrastination and well-beingProcrastination can negatively impact well-being as it hinders personal growth and progress towards goals, leading to negative emotions and decreased productivity.

      The relationship between procrastination and well-being is significant. Dr. Tim Pychyl, a procrastination researcher, initially studied personal projects and their impact on well-being during his doctoral work. He discovered that if someone's goals weren't progressing, particularly when they were procrastinating, it could negatively affect their well-being. This led him to shift his research focus to understanding why people don't follow through on their intentions. Procrastination is defined as the voluntary delay of an intended action despite expecting to be worse off with the delay. While not all instances of delay can be considered procrastination, it is a form of behavior that can hinder personal growth and well-being. One of Dr. Pychyl's influential studies involved using pagers to sample participants' emotional states throughout their day. This unique approach, which was less common during the 1990s, allowed for a more in-depth understanding of the connection between emotions and procrastination. By studying people's experiences in real-time, researchers gained valuable insights into the factors that contribute to procrastination and its impact on well-being. This research has since expanded our understanding of the complex relationship between procrastination and various aspects of life, including productivity, health, and relationships.

    • The 'double overrating' effect of procrastinationPeople tend to overestimate the difficulty of tasks and the positive feelings of avoiding them, but underestimate the negative consequences and the benefits of starting early

      People often overestimate the difficulty of tasks they're procrastinating on and overrate how good task avoidance will make them feel in the future. This is known as the "double overrating" effect. According to a study discussed in the conversation, students tended to put off completing their assignments, believing they would feel better about it later. However, when asked about their feelings during the week, they admitted that they could feel more productive and less stressed if they had more time to work on the tasks. The study also highlighted the importance of getting started, which is a key factor in overcoming procrastination. The research also emphasized that people are not very good at affective forecasting, or predicting how they will feel in the future, and tend to focus on just one or two aspects of a task. It's important to remember that we're not as rational as we think and that procrastination is often an emotional response rather than a logical one.

    • Understanding the Procrastination Doom LoopFocusing solely on current emotions can lead to a cycle of procrastination, causing negative emotions and making it harder to complete tasks. Breaking this cycle requires recognizing the long-term benefits of completing tasks despite initial discomfort.

      Our present emotions and feelings can lead us to procrastinate and create a cycle of delaying important tasks, a phenomenon known as the "procrastination doom loop." At the core of this loop is a form of thinking called focalism or presentism, where we focus solely on our current emotions and neglect the potential future consequences. This can lead to cognitive dissonance, where we experience tension between our intentions and actions, resulting in guilt or shame. Over time, this downward spiral of negative emotions can make it even harder to begin and complete necessary tasks. Understanding this dynamic can help us break the cycle and focus on the long-term benefits of completing tasks despite initial discomfort.

    • Avoiding negative emotions leads to procrastinationProcrastination is a coping mechanism for dealing with negative emotions towards tasks, leading to a 'doom loop' of guilt and shame, and prioritizing less urgent tasks over important ones.

      Procrastination is often an avoidant coping strategy used to deal with negative emotions associated with tasks we find frustrating, boring, or anxiety-provoking. The emotional buildup of guilt and shame can make us want to avoid these tasks even more. This process was described as a "doom loop" in the discussion. Procrastinators try to reduce cognitive dissonance by putting off tasks, but this strategy doesn't work in the long run. Instead, we may engage in "procrastinating down" by focusing on smaller tasks to delay the actual work. This mindset can be studied further, and there are even theories like "structured procrastination" that suggest we may be better at getting things done when we prioritize less urgent tasks over the most important ones. Ultimately, understanding the emotional drivers of procrastination can help us develop more effective strategies for managing our tasks and reducing the negative emotions that fuel our avoidance behavior.

    • Structural Procrastination: Delaying Important Tasks with DistractionsStructural procrastination occurs when we prioritize smaller tasks over important ones, leading to a cycle of distractions and delayed progress. To overcome it, focus on the long-term benefits of completing important tasks and prioritize them accordingly.

      Our attempts to avoid unpleasant tasks can lead us into a cycle of procrastination, as we keep choosing to do smaller tasks instead. This behavior, known as structural procrastination, can be more insidious than we realize, as we may even convince ourselves that we're making progress by completing other tasks. However, these distractions often serve only to delay the inevitable, keeping us from tackling the important work that we've been putting off. It's essential to recognize this pattern and make a conscious effort to prioritize the tasks that truly matter, even if they're uncomfortable or challenging. By focusing on the long-term benefits of completing the task at hand, we can break free from the procrastination trap and make significant progress towards our goals.

    • Factors influencing aversiveness towards tasksDuring project initiation, lack of meaning causes aversiveness. Later, manageability becomes a concern. Anxiety, boredom, frustration, and resentment are common features. The mismatch between outcome and time can worsen aversiveness. To overcome procrastination, break tasks into smaller steps and focus on immediate goals.

      The experience of aversiveness towards tasks can be influenced by various factors, including meaning, manageability, and time pressure. During the initiation stage of a project, tasks lacking meaning can be aversive. However, as we delve deeper into the project, manageability becomes a more significant concern. Anxiety, boredom, frustration, and resentment are common features of aversive tasks, but their impact can change over the course of a project. Additionally, the mismatch between the desired outcome and the available time can exacerbate aversiveness. To overcome procrastination, it can be helpful to break tasks down into smaller, manageable steps and focus on the concrete, immediate goals rather than abstract, long-term objectives. This approach can make the task seem less daunting and more achievable, thereby reducing aversiveness.

    • Setting false deadlines can hinder productivityInstead of relying on false deadlines, use subtle nudges, specific goals, and understand your mindset for effective productivity

      Setting false deadlines for yourself to kickstart productivity can actually make it less likely for you to get the task done at all. This is because when procrastination becomes a habit, setting deadlines that you know are not real can lead to feelings of shame and self-deprecation, making it harder for you to start and complete the task. Instead, it's more effective to use subtle nudges and specific goals to guide your productivity. Our brains are wired to prioritize the present, so making goals that are achievable within a certain timeframe can help you focus and avoid the doom loop of procrastination. Additionally, being specific and clear about what you want to accomplish can help you make the most of tools like AI text generators and collaborate effectively with your team. Ultimately, the key to productivity and success is understanding your mindset and using strategies that work for you, rather than relying on false deadlines that can ultimately hinder your progress.

    • Focusing on Implementation Intentions for Overcoming ProcrastinationTo overcome procrastination, focus on setting specific plans for when and how to take action towards a goal in a given situation, and put the cue for action into the environment to hold yourself accountable.

      While time management is essential for productivity, it's not enough to overcome procrastination. The speaker shares his personal experience of meticulously managing his time but still struggling with procrastination. He mentions that popular strategies like time blocking and the Pomodoro technique may not be effective in the long run. Instead, he suggests focusing on setting implementation intentions, which involve making specific plans for when and how to take action towards a goal in a given situation. By putting the cue for action into the environment, we can hold ourselves more accountable and make our intentions more powerful. Additionally, minimizing distractions, such as turning off our phones, can help us stay focused and make progress on our goals.

    • Effective emotion regulation is crucial when dealing with procrastinationDeep breaths help calm the amygdala, allowing the prefrontal cortex to regain control for effective task completion. Accept emotions as natural, focus on actions.

      Effective emotion regulation is crucial when dealing with procrastination. The amygdala, the emotional part of the brain, can take control during stressful situations, shutting down the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for planning and inhibiting impulsive actions. To regain control, take deep breaths to calm down and acknowledge the emotions, recognizing that they are a natural part of the human experience. Quotes from mindfulness teachers Joseph Goldstein and Parker Palmer emphasize the importance of accepting these emotions and standing within other parts of your inner landscape to continue with the task at hand. Remember, it's not just about getting started, but focusing on the actions needed to complete a project.

    • Managing Emotions and Eliminating Distractions for ProductivityEffective productivity requires emotional regulation to tackle anxiety and fear, and eliminating distractions to focus on tasks. Mindfulness, self-compassion, intentions, and preempting distractions are essential strategies.

      Overcoming procrastination requires a combination of emotional regulation and eliminating distractions. Emotional regulation helps us identify and let go of anxious thoughts that prevent us from starting tasks, while eliminating distractions allows us to focus on the task at hand. These two strategies should not be seen as mutually exclusive but rather complementary. Emotional regulation skills, such as mindfulness and self-compassion, are essential for dealing with the fear and anxiety that can arise when facing a blank screen or a daunting project. On the other hand, distractions can derail our focus and make it difficult to make progress. By implementing intentions and preempting distractions, we can create a conducive environment for productivity. However, it's important to remember that even with these strategies in place, we will still encounter challenges and setbacks. Celebrating our successes and acknowledging our emotions are crucial parts of the process. In the words of the speaker, "the whole person has to show up."

    • Understanding Procrastination from a Buddhist PerspectiveProcrastination is an escape from the present moment, causing guilt and sadness. Practice emotion regulation to manage it effectively.

      While procrastination may seem like living in the moment, it's actually an escape from the present moment and the task at hand. From a Buddhist perspective, being present means being aware of our desires to escape, not giving in to them. Procrastination involves voluntarily delaying an intended action, despite expecting to be worse off with the delay. The shadow of guilt or worry that comes with procrastination can make us sad and lead to stewing in our own emotions. To effectively manage procrastination, we need to practice emotion regulation, including calming down, allowing emotions, and recognizing their temporary and tolerable nature.

    • The transient nature of emotions and thoughtsEmotions and thoughts can hinder us if we dwell on them. Focus on what truly matters and move forward.

      Our emotions and thoughts are transient, but if we choose to dwell on them, they can linger and hinder us from living the life we truly want. The speaker, Professor Tim Pinchilli, emphasized this idea, drawing attention to the inner turmoil that can result when we don't let go of negative feelings. This existential concept touches on our identity and the recognition that we may not be living up to our desired selves. While it's natural for challenges to arise and cause emotional responses, the key is not to let these responses consume us. Instead, we should focus on the things that truly matter to us and move forward. This profound perspective was captured beautifully in the conversation between Derek Thompson and Professor Pinchilli. The episode was produced by Devin Mansi and brought to you by "Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes," where an ape fights for the future of apes and humans alike. The film opens in IMAX on May 10th and in theaters everywhere. Get your tickets now.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    procrastination [video]

    procrastination [video]
    [video available on spotify] i got the idea for this episode because i was quite literally procrastinating writing an outline for a podcast episode. i didn't have an idea for a topic, or the mental energy to sit down and brainstorm. and i realized, everyone struggles with this. at times the human condition can feel like this constant fight against procrastination. we always have things that we need to do, and simultaneously we have so many things that we'd rather be doing that are more fun, lighthearted, and enjoyable. and the thing about procrastination is that not only does it cause stress, but it can also impact our self-esteem. it’s something that a lot of us only vaguely understand. we know we do it, but we don't fully understand why we do it or how we can stop doing it. so let’s talk about it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Unlock Your Productivity in Two Simple Steps

    Unlock Your Productivity in Two Simple Steps
    Do you often put off import tasks until the last minute? I have the solution!
     
    In today's show, I share a simple strategy that will increase your productivity. Also, it has several other benefits. Here is a full list:
     
    • increase productivity
    • overcome procrastination
    • lower stress
    • provide a sense of accomplishment
    • improve self-confidence and self-esteem
    • improve mood
     
    All this is only 2 steps away. Click the play button above and listen to the show.
     
     
    Find me on Facebook:
    Friend me: https://www.facebook.com/ChrisStefanick 
    Like and follow my Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ChoiceConversationsPodcast 
    Join my Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1741413262765523 
     
     

    Get my new free ebook, "My Eight Most Influential Books," here:
    http://books.choiceconversations.com

     

    #356: How to Finally Beat Procrastination

    #356: How to Finally Beat Procrastination

    Procrastination. We’ve all done it and we tell ourselves we’ll never do it again. So we come up with an elaborate time management system to get us on track only to find ourselves continuing to put things off. While some procrastination can be mildly infuriating, chronic procrastination can be financially, professionally, and personally devastating — overdue bills result in calls from collection agencies, late reports result in getting fired, and undone chores turn your house into a dump. 
    Why do we procrastinate despite our best intentions not to?
    My guests today are clinical psychologists who have spent their career working with procrastinators. Their names are Jane Burka and Lenora Yuen. They’re the co-authors of the book "Procrastination: Why You Do It, What to Do About It Now." We begin our conversation discussing the difference between procrastination and strategically postponing things. They then take us through the cycle of procrastination that we’ve all been through and explain why it’s such a vicious loop. 
    We then transition to talk about why we procrastinate and why faulty time management isn’t the real root cause of it. Jane and Lenora argue that if you don’t tackle the true origins of procrastination — which range from the fear of failure to the fear of success — no amount of time management or planning will help you. We finally dig into how to tackle these roots so you can exit the procrastinator’s cycle and get stuff done.
    This podcast is filled with great insights and actionable advice. Don’t put off listening to it!

    Encore: Why boredom is surprisingly interesting, with Erin Westgate, PhD

    Encore: Why boredom is surprisingly interesting, with Erin Westgate, PhD

    We’re taking a holiday break, so we’re revisiting one of our favorite episodes from this past year. Back in the spring we talked to University of Florida psychologist Erin Westgate about the surprisingly fascinating topic of boredom. What is boredom? Is it always bad to be bored? What can we do to infuse even boring times with meaning? 

    Links

    Erin Westgate, PhD

    Music

    "Emotional Piano" by tictac9 via freesound.org.