Logo
    Search

    The Weight-Loss Drug Revolution, Part 1: Why These Drugs Work So Well

    enDecember 12, 2023

    Podcast Summary

    • Discovering gut hormones like GLP-1 and their impact on weight loss drugsGLP-1 hormone discovery led to weight loss drugs mimicking its activity, helping regulate appetite, reduce blood sugar, and increase feelings of fullness. These drugs, such as semaglutide and Tirzepatide, have the potential to make a significant impact on individuals' lives, lifestyles, and the economy by helping people consume fewer calories.

      The discovery of gut hormones like GLP-1 in animals, such as the Gila monster, has led to a revolution in weight loss drugs. These drugs, including semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy) and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro), mimic the activity of GLP-1 and help regulate appetite, reduce blood sugar, and increase feelings of fullness. With obesity and overweight being major health issues in many countries, these relatively safe drugs have the potential to make a significant impact on individuals' lives, lifestyles, and the economy by helping people consume fewer calories. The discovery of GLP-1 and the development of these drugs represent a long string of breakthroughs in our understanding of gut metabolism.

    • Revolutionizing weight loss with GLP-1 drugsGLP-1 drugs like Ozempic not only aid weight loss but also improve health, reducing heart attack, stroke, and death risks by 20%.

      GLP-1 drugs, such as Ozempic, are revolutionizing weight loss treatment with their ability to not only help people lose weight but also improve overall health. These drugs have been shown to reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke, and heart-related death by 20% in large clinical trials. Moreover, they encourage healthier habits like eating more vegetables, reducing candy consumption, increasing exercise, and even helping people quit smoking, gambling, and biting their nails. According to endocrinologist Beverly Chang, the impact of these drugs on patients has been overwhelmingly positive, with many viewing obesity as a serious medical problem rather than just a lifestyle choice. The excitement around these drugs stems from the realization that there's a real biology behind obesity, and they offer hope to those struggling with weight loss despite their best efforts through diet and exercise.

    • Impact of Semaglutide and GLP-1 Agonists on Obesity and Related Health ConditionsSemaglutide and other GLP-1 agonists lead to substantial weight loss, often reversing related health issues like diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol, through hormone stimulation, blood sugar regulation, and feelings of fullness.

      Semaglutide and other GLP-1 agonists are making a significant impact on the treatment of obesity and related health conditions, such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol. These medications work by stimulating hormones, regulating blood sugar and metabolism, promoting feelings of fullness, and delaying gastric emptying. The excitement around these drugs comes from their ability to provide substantial weight loss, often leading to the reversal of related health issues. For decades, treatments involved multiple medications with limited weight loss, but semaglutide and similar drugs have led to weight loss of up to 15%, a threshold that brings about significant health improvements. The convenience of once-a-week injections also adds to their appeal for patients. As we continue to learn more about the biology of obesity, these medications are shedding light on new mechanisms and potential root causes.

    • Obesity: A condition rooted in fat metabolism and calorie storageGLP-1 receptor agonists aid weight loss by increasing satiety, but may cause side effects and raise concerns about cultural fixation on thinness

      Obesity is not primarily a disease of the gastrointestinal system, but rather a condition rooted in fat metabolism and the body's propensity to store calories. GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide and tirzepatide, play a significant role in weight loss by increasing satiety through central mechanisms. However, these medications can have side effects like nausea, reflux, and constipation, and in some cases, may exacerbate gastroparesis. There are concerns about the intersection between these drugs and the cultural fixation on thinness, as they can be effective in helping people with obesity and type 2 diabetes lose weight but also potentially be abused. Obesity's impact on mental and social wellbeing adds complexity to the use of these medications, as significant weight loss can bring both positive and negative consequences.

    • Understanding the Nuances of Weight Loss Drugs and HealthRecent studies suggest that not all individuals with excess weight are unhealthy, and the Health at Every Size movement emphasizes health and fitness at any size. Weight loss drugs can lead to significant lifestyle changes beyond just weight loss and improved health.

      The ongoing conversation surrounding weight loss drugs and their impact on individuals and society requires a nuanced perspective. While it's true that obesity can lead to health issues for some, not all individuals with higher weights are unhealthy. The Health at Every Size movement offers an alternative narrative, emphasizing that health and fitness are possible at any size. Recent studies suggest that a significant portion of people with excess weight don't develop related health problems. As the scientific understanding of obesity advances, it may lead to less stigma and shame surrounding certain weights. However, the current definition of obesity as a physical characteristic doesn't fully capture this nuance. The most significant way patients change their lives upon taking these drugs goes beyond just weight loss and improved health. It encompasses various aspects of their lives, including their wardrobe choices, job opportunities, social interactions, and weekend plans. Food choices and physical activity are integral parts of this transformation.

    • GLP-1s: Transforming Food Perception and Boosting Overall WellbeingGLP-1s help regulate hunger and fullness, leading to improved food perception, healthier eating habits, and increased physical activity, resulting in significant weight loss and overall mental clarity and energy.

      GLP-1 receptor agonists, or GLP-1s, can bring about significant changes in both the mental and physical aspects of individuals dealing with obesity. These medications help regulate hunger and fullness, leading to a mental shift in how people perceive food, transforming it from a source of comfort to just sustenance. This change, in turn, results in healthier eating habits, reduced consumption of unhealthy foods, and increased physical activity. The impact of GLP-1s is not only noticeable in weight loss but also extends to overall mental clarity and energy levels. The scientific community, including financial institutions like Morgan Stanley, has observed and documented these effects, which seem almost wondrous yet are backed by substantial research. The food industry, aware of these developments, is grappling with the potential consequences of these medications on consumers' eating habits. Essentially, GLP-1s can be considered anti-snack, anti-candy, and anti-salty snack drugs, making them a promising tool in the fight against obesity and related health issues.

    • GLP-1 peptide drugs impact food preferences and addiction-like behaviorsGLP-1 peptide drugs, initially developed for diabetes treatment, influence hunger and fullness through the hypothalamus and reach rewarding areas of the brain, potentially reducing snacking, increasing fruit and vegetable consumption, gym attendance, and even helping with compulsive behaviors like smoking, drinking, shopping, and nail biting.

      GLP-1 peptide drugs, initially developed for diabetes treatment, may have unexpected effects on appetite and food preferences. These drugs act on the hypothalamus, which regulates hunger and fullness, and also reach rewarding areas of the brain, changing the hedonic relationship to food. The drugs' multimodal effects include influencing emotional eating and metabolism, potentially leading to reduced snacking, increased consumption of fruits and vegetables, and increased gym attendance. Recent findings suggest an additional benefit: these drugs might help reduce compulsive behaviors, such as smoking, drinking, shopping, and even nail biting. The exact mechanism behind these effects is still a mystery, but the multifaceted nature of GLP-1 peptides may explain their surprising impact on addiction-like behaviors.

    • GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce dopamine reward from vicesGLP-1 receptor agonists can reduce dopamine reward from vices like alcohol, food, or cigarettes, making them less appealing and potentially helping with weight loss and addictive behaviors.

      GLP-1 receptor agonists, used for weight loss and diabetes management, may also act as anti-compulsion drugs by reducing the dopamine reward associated with various vices. The speaker explains that compulsions, such as shopping for his wife or looking up sports stats for himself, don't provide the same dopamine reward, making it easier to resist the compulsion. Similarly, GLP-1 receptor agonists can reduce the dopamine hit from vices like alcohol, food, or cigarettes, making them less appealing. Additionally, research suggests that the frontal lobe, responsible for executive functioning and stopping signals, may play a role in obesity, and GLP-1 receptor agonists could potentially impact this area as well. Some users report physical nausea when encountering their vices, another mechanism for regulating consumption. Overall, these medications may not only help with weight loss but also address the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of addictive behaviors.

    • Ozempic and happiness: A complex relationshipOzempic may help reduce food compulsions by affecting dopamine and oxytocin levels, but it doesn't eliminate joy from other aspects of life. The balance between appetite and judgment might be influenced by brain chemistry.

      Ozempic and similar drugs, while helping reduce compulsions related to food, may not destroy a person's ability to experience joy from other aspects of life. This is possibly due to the difference between short-term dopamine hits and long-term bonding, with the latter involving hormones like oxytocin in addition to dopamine. The discussion also touched upon the idea of a tug of war between appetite and judgment in the brain, and how a drug like Ozempic might help tip the balance towards judgment. Additionally, the conversation raised the philosophical question of whether willpower is an independent construct or if it's influenced by our brain chemistry, as suggested by the effects of Ozempic on hormones and brain messages.

    • Understanding the Influence of Internal and External Factors on WillpowerRecognize the interplay between internal and external factors in controlling willpower, and make informed choices based on this knowledge for improved health and well-being.

      Our ability to control our actions and desires, often referred to as willpower, is influenced by both internal and external factors. While we have some control over our lifestyle choices, diet, and exercise, there are also hormonal and genetic factors that are beyond our immediate control. Recent research on weight loss drugs raises questions about the concept of free will, as these drugs can change our desires and abilities to achieve our goals by altering our blood chemistry. These drugs act as behavioral modifiers, and the implications of this discovery for our understanding of free will are intriguing and worth further exploration. Overall, it's essential to recognize the interplay between what is within our control and what isn't, and to use this knowledge to make informed choices about our health and well-being.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Pt. 2 of 2 - Taming Weight Gain, Menopause, and Inflammation With Dr. Mary Claire Haver, The Galveston Diet

    Pt. 2 of 2 - Taming Weight Gain, Menopause, and Inflammation With Dr. Mary Claire Haver, The Galveston Diet

    EP 72 Pt. 2 of 2: Menopause can feel like a midlife cluster, especially if you’re trying to navigate it on your own. Are you wondering about the best way to stay in shape during midlife and menopause? Do you find yourself reaching for the sugar-filled treat to satisfy midlife cravings? Ready to learn exactly how much protein you should be eating? And the key to really preventing chronic illness in midlife? Menopause and midlife are not excuses for us to suffer from stubborn weight and inflammation…get ready to learn everything you need to know about taking control of your midlife health. 

    Welcome back to part two of my discussion with “menopause normalizer and problem solver”, Dr. Mary Claire Haver. In this episode, we discuss the third pillar of The Galveston Diet, protein, how the heck to calculate how much you need in midlife, and the importance of exercise, which I learned isn’t just about toning the midlife muffin top. We wrap up part 2 by going over key measurements for midlife body composition, ratios of muscle-to-fat, and how those ratios can give you crucial information about your health. And remember if you haven't heard part 1 then go listen to that first!

    Some Highlights: 

    • What type of exercise should I be incorporating in midlife?

    • What’s Omega three and how do I get more of it?

    • How do I know if I’m getting enough protein?

    • Do yourself a favor and incorporate avocado in your daily snack list because half an avocado a day contains half the daily minimum fiber for a midlife woman. 

    • What is visceral fat and why is it important?

    Looking forward to connecting with you! Here are some ways to connect with me!

    THE FLEXIBLE NEUROTIC SHOW NOTES: https://www.theflexibleneurotic.com/episodes/72

    THE FLEXIBLE NEUROTIC INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/theflexibleneurotic/ 

    THE FLEXIBLE NEUROTIC WEBSITE: https://www.theflexibleneurotic.com/ 

    THE FLEXIBLE NEUROTIC EMAIL: sarah@theflexibleneurotic.com

    #40 Should I try Ozempic - is it worth it to lose weight?

    #40 Should I try Ozempic - is it worth it to lose weight?

    Ozempic has been in the news a lot recently with lots of Hollywood stars claiming it is a wonderdrug that has helepd them lose weight. Have I got an opinion on this? Of course! In today's episode I share my thoughts on using medications for weight loss and some of the questions to ask yourself if you are considering it.

    Just a gentle warning that I am not neutral in this episode - I do share my views on it but I hope some of the points I mentioned give you things to think about!

     

    Also check out:

    Learn more about the Medic Mums Weight Loss Academy coaching program
    Join the facebook group: Weight Loss For Medic Mums
    Follow on social media: InstagramTiktokFacebook

     

     

    Weekend Health Update: Weight Loss Drugs, COVID-19 Hospitalizations, and Vaccines

    Weekend Health Update: Weight Loss Drugs, COVID-19 Hospitalizations, and Vaccines

    In this weekend health update, Fred Bodimerdiscusses the mixed signals regarding the enthusiasm for popular weight loss drugs. A survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation shows that while many people believe health insurance companies should cover these drugs for those who are obese or overweight, interest drops once they realize the drugs are expensive and not always FDA-approved for weight loss.

    COVID-19 hospitalizations are on the rise for the second consecutive week, with a 12% increase reported by the CDC. Despite this, Dr. William Schaffner from Vanderbilt University reassures that a significant surge is not expected, as patterns of increased cases during summers tend to be followed by declines.

     

    #40 Should I try Ozempic - is it worth it to lose weight?

    #40 Should I try Ozempic - is it worth it to lose weight?

    Ozempic has been in the news a lot recently with lots of Hollywood stars claiming it is a wonderdrug that has helepd them lose weight. Have I got an opinion on this? Of course! In today's episode I share my thoughts on using medications for weight loss and some of the questions to ask yourself if you are considering it.

    Just a gentle warning that I am not neutral in this episode - I do share my views on it but I hope some of the points I mentioned give you things to think about!

     

    Also check out:

    Learn more about the Medic Mums Weight Loss Academy coaching program
    Join the facebook group: Weight Loss For Medic Mums
    Follow on social media: InstagramTiktokFacebook

     

     

    Who can and cannot get weight-loss drugs

    Who can and cannot get weight-loss drugs
    Drugs used for weight loss like Wegovy, Ozempic and Mounjaro are nearly everywhere in popular culture, but many patients struggling with obesity are still finding them hard to get. On today's show, what's slowing access to these drugs despite their long-term benefits for the economy and patients, and how social conditioning around obesity and excess weight clouds the conversation.

    Related Episodes:
    New drugs. Cheaper drugs. Why not both? (Apple / Spotify)

    For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.

    Music by
    Drop Electric. Find us: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Newsletter.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy