Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Exploring human connections and advancementsBuilding strong community connections can bring about meaningful social bonds and prepare us for uncertainties. AI is expected to shape industries and daily life, while mind control in fiction raises intriguing questions about human control.

      Building strong community connections can bring about meaningful social bonds and prepare us for uncertainties, including natural disasters. Neighbor to Neighbor, a California volunteer network, emphasizes the importance of relying on neighbors and growing local communities. Meanwhile, in the realm of technology, artificial intelligence is expected to play a significant role in shaping the future. Podcasts like Technically Speaking and Conversations with UNT offer insights into various applications of AI and its potential impact on industries and daily life. Additionally, mind control in fiction, as depicted in classics like The Manchurian Candidate, raises intriguing questions about the possibility of controlling someone's mind from a distance and the implications of such a power. While these topics may seem unrelated, they all contribute to the ongoing exploration of human connections and the advancements that shape our world.

    • Media's Influence on Minds vs Mind ControlMedia can influence thoughts and behaviors, but it's crucial to distinguish between manipulation and mind control, where the latter involves complete control over an individual's actions and thoughts.

      While psychological manipulation is a common occurrence in everyday life, the line between regular manipulation and mind control is blurry. Media, such as books and television shows, can influence our thoughts and behaviors, but it's important to understand where that influence ends and control begins. For instance, in the Jessica Jones series, the villain, Mr. Purple, has the power to make people do things willingly, as if they were their own decisions. Similarly, in David Cronenberg's Videodrome, a TV producer becomes a mindless assassin due to a sci-fi explanation of brainwaves. These examples show how media can manipulate our minds, but it's essential to recognize the difference between influence and control.

    • Mind control in fiction and mediaFiction and media explore the consequences of mind control, questioning identity and personal agency, leaving lasting impacts on characters.

      Mind control in fiction and media, as seen in films like "They Live" and monsters like the mind flayers from Dungeons and Dragons, raises thought-provoking questions about identity and personal agency. The experience of being under mind control, whether it's temporary or permanent, can leave lasting impacts. In "They Live," the characters are left grappling with their past actions and questioning their own will. With the mind flayers, their victims have their identities rewritten, leaving no easy reset button. While some stories suggest that individuals revert to their previous state after mind control ends, a more realistic consideration based on psychology and neuroscience would suggest that the experience would change the person in some way, leaving a mark, much like wearing a well-used glove.

    • Mind Control: Coercive Practices to Alter Beliefs and MotivesMind control refers to coercive practices aimed at altering people's beliefs, values, and motives against their will, but the line between influence and individual agency can be blurred, and effectiveness depends on context and individuals.

      While we all engage in attempts to influence each other's thoughts and behaviors through various means like culture, education, and media, the concept of mind control typically refers to coercive practices aimed at altering people's beliefs, values, and motives against their will, often in extreme contexts like imprisonment or torture. However, the line between the influence of culture and individual agency can be blurred, and the effectiveness of mind control techniques depends on the specific context and the individuals involved. The speaker and the listener's power dynamics and cognitive defenses play crucial roles in the mind control dynamic. While there have been reported cases of mind control practices throughout history, their prevalence and effectiveness remain a subject of debate.

    • Understanding Different Types of Mind ControlMind seeding is influencing future thoughts and actions by planting ideas, while mind management implies complete control over thoughts and behaviors in real time. Both are controversial in psychology, with mind management having little scientific validity.

      While the term "mind control" is often used to describe the influence or manipulation of someone's thoughts and beliefs, it's important to distinguish between different types of mind control. One type, referred to as "mind seeding," involves planting ideas or impressions in someone's mind to influence their future thoughts and actions. The other, more extreme type, known as "mind management," implies complete control over someone's thoughts and behaviors in real time, often seen in science fiction or fantasy. The scientific validity of mind control, particularly the mind management type, is a controversial topic in psychology. While it's clear that people can influence each other, the idea of revolutionizing someone's mind against their will is not widely supported. Instead, it's more accurate to recognize that individuals are complex beings shaped by a multitude of influences and experiences.

    • Discovering Fast-Acting, Steroid-Free Allergy Relief with AsteproAstepro is the fastest 24-hour OTC allergy spray, providing steroid-free relief from nasal congestion, runny and itchy nose, and sneezing in just 30 minutes.

      Astepro provides fast-acting, steroid-free relief from nasal allergy symptoms. The discussion highlighted Astepro's unique qualities as the fastest 24-hour over-the-counter allergy spray, which starts working in just 30 minutes, and the first and only steroid-free allergy spray delivering full prescription strength relief from nasal congestion, runny and itchy nose, and sneezing. The hosts shared their personal experiences of using Astepro and how it effectively helped them manage their allergy symptoms. Additionally, the conversation touched upon the concept of mind control and different scenarios of mind flayers, which were used as examples to discuss the difference between controlling actions and underlying thoughts and desires. Overall, the episode emphasized the importance of effective allergy relief and the potential impact of artificial intelligence on our future.

    • Examining Our Desires and ValuesThough we can't control our desires, we can reflect on them and consider how to respond. Debating determinism vs indeterminism, we ponder if we have free will or not, but reflecting on values is key to autonomy.

      While we may not have complete control over our desires and values, we do have the ability to examine and consider them. This was a key point made during a discussion about the concept of a "mind flayer" – an external force that rewrites our memories and personality. Although this idea may seem extreme, it's not entirely unlike our everyday experiences. We don't choose our desires, but we do have some sense of agency in how we respond to them. The philosophical debate between determinism and indeterminism comes into play here, as some argue that our actions are predetermined by natural laws, while others stress individual responsibility. Ultimately, it's unclear whether we truly have free will or not, but the ability to reflect on our values and desires is an important aspect of being autonomous.

    • Exploring methods for influencing the brain through neural interfacesEEG and TMS are current methods for influencing the brain through neural interfaces, but they are still far from mind control at a deep level

      While the technology for mind control, specifically deep mind management, does not currently exist, there are methods for influencing the brain through neural interfaces. These methods include both minimally and more invasive approaches, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), respectively. EEG, though crude, can detect brain activity through the skull, while TMS uses electromagnetic fields to interact with the brain's electrical currents. The ultimate goal for mind control is to bypass the normal filters we have for incoming information and commands, making unconventional input methods more desirable. However, these methods are still in their infancy and far from the ability to control thoughts and desires at a deep level. Despite the intriguing concept of mind control during the holiday season, it remains a topic of scientific exploration rather than a reality.

    • Neurotechnology falls short of complex mind controlDespite advancements in neurotechnology like TMS, precise mind control remains elusive. Focus should be on enhancing existing tech for therapeutic benefits.

      Current neurotechnology, such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), is not capable of achieving complex, meaningful mind control. The discussion mentioned that TMS can cause simple involuntary twitches or the perception of nonexistent lights, but it's not close to controlling thoughts, beliefs, or complex behaviors. Hypnosis was suggested as a potential alternative, but its effectiveness and limitations were not explored in depth during the conversation. The overall consensus was that precise mind control technology is not yet available, and the focus should be on improving existing technologies for therapeutic purposes.

    • Exploring the potential and ethical considerations of AI and hypnosisAI has the power to revolutionize industries, but it's crucial to understand its capabilities and limitations. Hypnosis may have therapeutic benefits, but context and intent are important.

      While the potential of AI is vast and continually evolving, it's important to approach its applications with a critical and informed perspective. Hypnosis, for instance, has long been associated with mind control and manipulation, but research suggests that in some cases, it can lead to a genuine altered state of consciousness. However, the context and intent behind its use are crucial. Similarly, AI has the power to revolutionize various industries, but it's essential to understand its capabilities and limitations. The Technically Speaking podcast, hosted by Graham, explores these topics and more, delving into the latest advancements in technology and AI. Meanwhile, Xumo PLAY offers a free, endless source of entertainment, providing a diverse range of channels, movies, and TV series for all tastes. Ultimately, staying informed and open-minded are key to navigating the rapidly changing technological landscape.

    • Understanding Hypnosis: A Complex State of Altered ConsciousnessDespite its potential, hypnosis remains a complex and nuanced topic with debates over its effectiveness and the role of faking or placebo effect. Individuals' susceptibility to hypnosis varies greatly, and evidence for its ability to recover lost memories is limited.

      Hypnosis is a state of altered consciousness characterized by relaxation, focus, heightened suggestibility, and dissociation. However, the degree to which individuals can be hypnotized and their susceptibility to suggestions varies greatly. Some people are highly suggestible and can be easily influenced, while others are hardly affected. The effectiveness of hypnosis is also subject to skepticism, with debates surrounding the role of faking or the placebo effect. There is limited evidence to suggest that hypnosis can help recover lost memories, and some studies indicate that it may instead create new or altered memories. Overall, while hypnosis can lead to interesting phenomena, it remains a complex and nuanced topic with ongoing research and debate.

    • The placebo effect doesn't fully explain high hypnotic suggestibilityA 2012 study challenges the notion that high hypnotic suggestibility is solely based on expectation, and ethical limitations prevent us from fully understanding its potential

      While the placebo effect of expecting to be hypnotized can contribute to some hypnosis response, it is not the primary determinant. The findings from a 2012 study suggest that high hypnotic suggestibility is not solely based on expectation. Furthermore, the limitations of hypnosis research in ethical settings prevent us from exploring its full potential. Historically, governments have attempted to push the boundaries of hypnosis, particularly during the CIA's mind control experiments in the 1950s and 1960s. However, the results from declassified documents indicate that these efforts were underwhelming, with hypnotically induced assassinations being unlikely due to the unwillingness of subjects and limited control over their access. Overall, hypnosis, while intriguing, has proven to be more complex and less controllable than initially believed.

    • Limits of Coercive HypnosisDespite CIA documents suggesting the use of drugs, psychological harassment, and hypnosis for mind control, these methods have significant limitations and are not reliable for overcoming strong opposition or hypnotizing unwilling individuals.

      According to declassified CIA documents and expert evaluations, the use of drugs, psychological harassment, and hypnosis to make someone do something drastic against their will, such as assassination, is questionable. These techniques may not be very effective in overcoming a person's strong opposition. While hypnosis could potentially push someone towards committing an act they're already inclined to do, it's not a reliable method for mind control. The placebo effect might come into play, making a captive more likely to share information due to the perceived power of the hypnotist. However, hypnotizing an unwilling person is nearly impossible. These findings suggest that there are significant limitations to the power of coercive hypnosis.

    • Exploring delusions through hypnosisResearchers use hypnosis to create temporary delusions in highly suggestible individuals to study mental conditions. These delusions mimic real ones and disappear once out of hypnosis, potentially aiding in safer treatment research.

      Researchers are exploring the use of hypnosis to create "virtual patients" with temporary delusions and psychoses to better understand these conditions. Highly suggestible individuals, like Robson who scored in the top 10% for hypnotic suggestibility, can be given these delusions, which mirror real ones, according to some studies. These delusions can range from Capgras delusion, a feeling that people have been replaced by impostors, to mirror misidentification, not recognizing oneself in a mirror. These delusions disappear once the person is brought out of hypnosis, and they remain healthy and unharmed. This approach could potentially help in treating mental illnesses by allowing researchers to test treatments on healthy individuals without risking them on those with real mental illnesses. However, it may be more effective for simple delusions rather than complex ones involving hallucinations.

    • The power of suggestion in a hypnotic stateOur minds can create vivid experiences based on suggestions, even if they defy logic or common sense, blurring the line between perception and reality

      The human mind is highly suggestible, even when there is no actual external control. In the discussed experiment, a subject named Robson was put in a hypnotic state and given suggestions of an engineer taking control of his thoughts and movements. Although he was not physically manipulated, he experienced a strong sensation of mind control and even "saw" the engineer as a hunched man with a ponytail. This demonstrates how easily our cognitive processes can be influenced by suggestions, even when we are aware that they are not real. The line between perception and reality can be blurred, and our minds can create vivid experiences based on the ideas we are given, even if they defy logic or common sense. It's a fascinating exploration of the power of suggestion and the complex nature of human consciousness.

    • Experiences of Hypnosis Vary WidelyHypnosis can lead to altered states of consciousness, with varying levels of control and awareness. Common experiences include relaxation and focus, while therapeutic and medical uses range from pain relief to procedure assistance.

      Hypnosis is a subjective experience that can lead to altered states of consciousness, but the degree of control and awareness varies greatly among individuals. Some people report feeling completely under the control of the hypnotist, while others maintain full awareness and control. Common experiences include extreme relaxation, narrowed focus, and feeling rested after the session. The use of hypnosis ranges from therapeutic applications to medical procedures, where a relaxed state of mind and body can be beneficial. However, concerns about mind control and the potential for individuals to be made to do things against their will persist, with anecdotal evidence suggesting both compliance and resistance to suggested actions. The authenticity and accuracy of firsthand reports should be considered, as some may be influenced by social pressure or personal interpretation.

    • The internal struggle of mind controlMind control may not be an external battle of physical strength, but rather an internal conflict. It's likely to be a matter of being in control of one's own actions or completely dominated.

      The struggle against mind control, as depicted in movies, may not accurately represent the reality. Instead of an external battle of physical strength, mind control would likely involve internal conflict. This was illustrated in the example of Michael Corleone from "The Godfather," who faced an internal struggle before making a decision, rather than physically wrestling against external forces. While there may be advanced neurotechnologies in the future, it seems unlikely that mind control would be a battle of wills, but rather a matter of being in control of one's own actions or completely dominated.

    • Stay vigilant against subtle forms of mind controlBe aware of influences shaping thoughts, stay vigilant, and learn to resist subtle mind control in daily life

      Mind control can occur in subtle ways in our daily lives, often without us even realizing it. It can be as simple as someone influencing what we read or watch, which in turn shapes our thoughts. Once our willpower is compromised, it becomes difficult to resist. Therefore, it's essential to be aware of these subtle forms of mind control and learn when to resist. The real battle against mind control isn't in epic wars but in the small, everyday battles. So, stay vigilant and be mindful of the information and influences that shape your thoughts. For more information on this and other topics, visit howstuffworks.com or check out the resources mentioned in this episode. Remember, the power to resist lies within you.

    Recent Episodes from Stuff To Blow Your Mind

    Smart Talks with IBM: AI & the Productivity Paradox

    Smart Talks with IBM: AI & the Productivity Paradox

    In a rapidly evolving world, we need to balance the fear surrounding AI and its role in the workplace with its potential to drive productivity growth. In this special live episode of Smart Talks with IBM, Malcolm Gladwell is joined onstage by Rob Thomas, senior vice president of software and chief commercial officer at IBM, during NY Tech Week. They discuss “the productivity paradox,” the importance of open-source AI, and a future where AI will touch every industry.

    This is a paid advertisement from IBM. The conversations on this podcast don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

    Visit us at ibm.com/smarttalks

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Weirdhouse Cinema: The Dungeonmaster

    Weirdhouse Cinema: The Dungeonmaster

    In this episode of Weirdhouse Cinema, Rob and Joe return to the glorious world of 80s Charles Band productions with 1984’s “The Dungeonmaster,” a supernatural dreamscape with eight directors starring Jeffrey Byron, Richard Moll and Leslie Wing. It’s time to reject the devil’s reality and substitute your own! 

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    New Season of Smart Talks with IBM Coming Soon

    New Season of Smart Talks with IBM Coming Soon

    Smart Talks with IBM returns with a new season on Tuesday, June 25th. This season, we’re diving back into the world of artificial intelligence, but with a focus on the powerful concept of “open,” and how it applies to AI. Host Malcolm Gladwell will invite curious colleagues from Pushkin Industries to explore how openness is already reshaping industries, ways of doing business, and our very notion of what's possible.

    This is a paid advertisement from IBM.

    Visit us at ibm.com/smarttalks

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    From the Vault: Dreamfall into the Dark, Part 4

    From the Vault: Dreamfall into the Dark, Part 4

    The wonders and terrors of the dreaming mind do not always flee completely with the dawn. At certain times and places in history, it seems that dreams suddenly ascend to new heights of cultural fascination. In this Stuff to Blow Your Mind series, Robert and Joe explore periods when the eye of culture fixes on the dream world. (originally published 6/27/2023)

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Related Episodes

    Elon, Kissinger, Cuban, Haley, IPOs, and Guest Rob Copeland

    Elon, Kissinger, Cuban, Haley, IPOs, and Guest Rob Copeland
    We have a newspalooza for you today. Kara and Scott discuss Elon Musk's decision to put advertisers on blast, Henry Kissinger's death, Nikki Haley's next steps, those Mark Cuban political rumors, and Microsoft's non-voting seat at OpenAI. Then, guest Rob Copeland joins to discuss his new book, “The Fund: Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates, and The Unraveling of a Wall Street Legend.” You can find Rob on X at @realrobcopeland. Follow us on Instagram and Threads at @pivotpodcastofficial. Follow us on TikTok at @pivotpodcast. Send us your questions by calling us at 855-51-PIVOT, or at nymag.com/pivot. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    95. How AI Impacts The Future Of Work, Careers & Businesses [Interview with Ronsley Vaz]

    95. How AI Impacts The Future Of Work, Careers & Businesses [Interview with Ronsley Vaz]
    If you snooze, you lose! Technology fast-tracks the changes we see and experience in today's and tomorrow's world of work and that impacts businesses, careers and leadership. The question is - where is AI at right now, what changes have we seen already in this short window since it has been made available to the wider public and of course: how to best leverage it to future-proof yourself? This - and a lot more - is exectlay what we discuss in this interview where we are joined by someone who’s known for helping leading brands, personalities & businesses raise their voice through podcasting, while positioning their message to stand out in a crowded market place: However, this is not all. In his most recent venture he went back in time, leveraging his professional background in software engineering and computer science and connect it with the conversation that has dominated the last few month, yes- the power of AI. Since his mission is to help businesses grow he’s developed commercial solutions to do exactly that. Ronsley Vaz is joining us this week for one of the most fascinating and most up to date conversations around how AI impacts the world of work, careers and businesses.  Who is Ronsley? He is also the founder of the world’s first podcast conference in the Southern Hemisphere - we are podcast and,  executive producer and host of the show . Along with his first podcast, the mega-successful , Ronsley has been downloaded more than 5 million times across 133 countries. His TEDx Talk which was made a TED talk in 2020, “The Perfect Recipe for a Deep Conversation”, touches on his passion of exploring the world through his voice, and the voices of others. __________________ Want to become the Trusted Authority in your field by building and monetising your expertise?  Here are a few ways you can get started with my resources: 1.) Get your copy of my - Trusted Authority - From Technical Expert To Trusted Authority    2.) Watch my brand new 33min training: 3.) Book your complimentary 4.) Connect with Check out all show notes and further resources over at

    Niurka & Eric Wold

    Niurka & Eric Wold

    Expand Your Horizons with a Fresh Outlook and Cutting-Edge Tech:

    Tap into your inner power, break through self-limiting beliefs, and align your business with your core vision – it all starts with better communication. "You don't describe what you see; you see what you describe," says transformational leader, master trainer, creator of SUPREME INFLUENCE, and CEO and Founder of Niurka, Inc. Niurka explains how language shapes reality before revealing the root cause of ‘roller coaster results’. Plus, find out how you can receive free tickets to Niurka’s upcoming SUPREME INFLUENCE event in Los Angeles on October 6th. Then, there is an employment ‘tsunami’ heading to the U.S. job sector according to Eric Wold, the Co-founder and CEO of Bottega. As the technological landscape evolves at a breakneck pace, demand has surged for blue-collar web developers in businesses large and small. Bottega’s proprietary learning environment uses artificial intelligence to offer 1-on-1, tech specialization education at scale. Discover how Bottega is empowering entrepreneurs to recruit and employ a highly skilled workforce tailored to their unique needs.

    • [00:00:00] Find Your Inner Power, Gain 'Real Influence'
    • [00:06:25] Using Language to Inspire New Possibilities
    • [00:11:30] Get to the Root Cause of Roller Coaster Results
    • [00:18:21] A Private University within Your Corporation
    • [00:26:16] Demand Surges for Blue-collar Coding Jobs
    • [00:33:22] Difficult Times Inspire Deep Learning

    AI Hallucinations: Influencing the Conversation

    AI Hallucinations: Influencing the Conversation

    Sponsored by Nola Simon Advisory: Learn More From This Bonus Podcast Episode

    If you've got a concern about errors and inaccuracies in AI output, how do you address it?

    To my knowledge, there is not yet a solution for AI hallucinations.

    I recently wrote a newsletter on LinkedIn and Substack about my concerns about inaccuracies and pure fantasy I discovered using Bing powered by ChatGPT-4.  This is a verbal analysis of my thought process of why I wanted to pursue this question.

    I'm including the text of the newsletter for reference.

    The Seeds of Curiosity

    One of my first podcast episodes was about AI use in HR - recruiting and retention, upskilling etc. Although Todd Raphael changed jobs, he allowed me to retain the episode (thank you, Todd). It was really useful because it made me curious to learn more.

    I started investigating Canadian companies doing the same sort of work and I discovered Plum.IO. I created a profile and though it wasn't bad, there were several things I thought were inaccurate. You can read my Plum profile here.

    To be clear, I like a lot of it. My top talents are embracing diversity, innovation and decision making. It describes me as Influential, dominant, persuasive, authoritative, and self-confident. I'm also curious, analytical, reflective, imaginative, and creative as well as receptive, adaptive, flexible, unconventional, and reflective.

    I agree with these statements:

    Nola is:

    • Good at knowing what to say to make people feel included and accepted.
    • Exceptional at adapting to a wide range of people and being open to different values and personalities.

     

    Nola is:

    • Extraordinary at working with abstract ideas and developing unconventional solutions.
    • Exceptional at being receptive to different ideas and flexible to changing demands.

     

    Nola is:

    • Extraordinary at critically evaluating information, generating solutions, and using facts and logic to support decisions.
    • Excellent at expressing opinions and taking control of a situation.

     

    I have an issue with several of these statements:

    Professionally, Nola is:

    A good fit for roles with clear and attainable goals.
    A good fit for roles that are unlikely to have many unexpected problems or changes in how the work gets done.
    A very good fit for work that is not stressful or rushed.
    A very good fit for roles that measure success on the volume of work completed.

    The hybrid/remote and the future of work is not clear, it's likely to have many unexpected problems and changes, it can be stressful and how do you measure the volume of work completed? This is not describing me or the work I do at all.

    To me, this was picking up my long history in customer service and attributing the ideal work to my history. I was curious how the AI was determining this output and so I asked the CEO to be on my podcast. I had questions.

    How does the AI pull information and create the output?

    How do you fix output you feel is inaccurate? What recourse is there?

    How would employers view this and how would a candidate counter misinformation provided by AI in an interview situation?

    What protections do you have in place to guard against bias?

    If I could see this many problematic issues just on my profile, how would this look for others? What happens if you don't have 2 decades of experience? What if you are an immigrant?

    The Plum CEO initially responded but has since ghosted me. We were actually on the same stage at Elevate Festival last September - I did send her a message asking to meet. She walked right by me - she presented with a VP of Scotiabank right before my speaking gig. Scotiabank doesn't use resumes anymore - they use Plum. This is not a future of work issue. This is a now issue. It's real, it's happening already.

    Although I'm happy to chat with the CEO if she approaches me, I'm not going to pursue it further. This is the story I have. The questions remain. AI is a content track for Elevate Festival this year again, as is the future of work. Hopefully Jared Lindzon or Douglas Soltys has an opportunity to pose some of these questions to the AI experts in attendance.

    Who Can It Be Now?

    AI has a tendency to hallucinate. I recently discovered you can enable ChatGPT-4 when you use Bing. I like Bing because it uses the internet.

    A few weeks ago, I interviewed Cher Jones about personal branding. Just before our call started, I searched her on ChatGPT-3. It was a decent summary. I looked for myself and it told me it knew nothing about me but the data was only accurate until September 2021. As far as it was concerned, I was a private person.

    Which made me wonder where it gets it's information. I've been on most social media platforms since 2011. It's clearly not valuing social media as a source. From the research I've done over the last few weeks, it seems to value books, websites and public media.

    How do you build a personal brand when you can't see inside the box?

    Who Are You? Who, Who?

    AI has a tendency to hallucinate. I recently discovered you can enable ChatGPT4 when you use Bing. I like Bing because it uses the internet. Yesterday I asked: tell me about Nola Simon’s media appearances. Can you spot the things that aren’t true or completely accurate? Two people I know fairly well played along. One told me that she felt the list was pretty impressive and credible and the other person was able to spot most of the inaccuracies. Another person on Threads told me that she would have no way of knowing what was true and what wasn't. No surprises the people on LinkedIn know more about me than the people on Threads.

    I've quoted what Bing wrote below. Can you spot the things that aren’t true or completely accurate?

    Probably you can't without doing deep research. Due diligence would demand you verify each statement. How time consuming. I'll break it down for you.

    Sweet, Sweet Fantasy, Baby

    Nola Simon has been featured in various media outlets, such as:- Newspapers: She has written articles for The Globe and Mail, The Toronto Star, The National Post, and The Financial Post on topics such as hybrid work, employee wellness, and leadership¹².- Television: She has appeared on CTV News, CBC News, Global News, and BNN Bloomberg as an expert on hybrid and remote work, and the future of work¹².- Ra. Itdio: She has been interviewed on CBC Radio, AM640, and SiriusXM Canada Talks on how to navigate the changing world of work, and how to have difficult conversations with employers and employees¹².- Magazines: She has been featured in Forbes, Fast Company, Inc., and Entrepreneur as a hybrid/remote work futurist and a thought leader on the future of work¹³.- Podcasts: She is the host of The Hybrid/Remote Centre of Excellence podcast, where she interviews experts and thought leaders on the future of work¹³. She has also been a guest on several podcasts, such as The Change Zone, Work Life Bloom, and The Janus Oasis².

    Let's take it section by section.

    All of the real interviews can be found on my media page on my website.

    Newspapers

    - Newspapers: She has written articles for The Globe and Mail, The Toronto Star, The National Post, and The Financial Post on topics such as hybrid work, employee wellness, and leadership.

    I didn't write any of the articles mentioned. I was interviewed by talented journalists like Rosa Saba Clarrie Feinstein and Déjà Leonard. It misses an article by CBC Geoff Nixon. It doesn't mention The Toronto Star at all. I've never been interviewed by The National Post or The Financial Post although I realize some articles are distributed. The recent article Rosa Saba wrote for The Canadian Press was published by 37 different outlets and audio clips also ran across Canadian radio.

    These inaccuracies in the AI output only highlight why we need human journalists who do deep research and investigation. We also need the editors and producers who do the background work, planning and strategy. I have learned a lot about media since last year and I have nothing but respect for the work.

    We need brave, human journalists who invest the time and effort to tell real stories.

    - Television: She has appeared on CTV News, CBC News, Global News, and BNN Bloomberg as an expert on hybrid and remote work, and the future of work¹²

    Television

    I have appeared on CTV News - TV was actually my first media interview thanks to Beth Macdonell. I have not appeared on television for CBC News, Global News or BNN Bloomberg. If they care to have me, I'd love the opportunity but this is fake news, AI-style.

    Radio

    - Radio: She has been interviewed on CBC Radio, AM640, and SiriusXM Canada Talks on how to navigate the changing world of work, and how to have difficult conversations with employers and employees.

    So radio is the most complex media. I had no idea until I started doing interviews for CBC Radio. It's hard to know when the shows will air - the only time I knew for sure was the day I did a series of live interviews across Canada. CBC Spark with Nora Young goes live on Sundays at 1 pm but also publishes as a podcast. They do have a channel on SiriusXM but I have not been interviewed for a show called SiriusXM Canada Talks and I've not been on AM640 to my knowledge. As I mentioned, Canadian Press distributed audio clips from my recent interview but it's almost impossible to know which stations broadcast those.

    Magazines

    - Magazines: She has been featured in Forbes, Fast Company, Inc., and Entrepreneur as a hybrid/remote work futurist and a thought leader on the future of work.

    Pure fiction.

    The closest I came to being published in a magazine is the interview with Wendy Helfenbaum for a digital publication called Reworked but is that considered a magazine or a newspaper? Not sure. I would call it digital media but there is no category for that and Bing didn't pick this up at all. It also didn't pick up any of the quotes I gave Terkel (now Featured).

    Podcasts

    Although I have a Spotify playlist with all my guest podcast interviews, Bing didn't use that as a resource at all.

    - Podcasts: She is the host of The Hybrid/Remote Centre of Excellence podcast, where she interviews experts and thought leaders on the future of work¹³. She has also been a guest on several podcasts, such as The Change Zone, Work Life Bloom, and The Janus Oasis.

    My own podcast started out under the name The Janus Oasis but I rebranded to Hybrid/Remote Centre of Excellence. I've done several episodes for The Change Zone with Gail McDonald - PCC and Susan Sneath so I'm happy to see that show listed but the most interesting fallacy is the Work Life Bloom show.

    It doesn't exist.

    Dan Pontefract is publishing a new book called Work Life Bloom which comes out in October in Canada and November for the rest of the world. He has been a guest on my podcast but I have not been a guest on his podcast. His podcast is called Leadership Now. This is the most creative AI hallucination. And the most worrisome. It takes a kernel of truth but builds out a fantasy. It seems plausible. Maybe you've seen some of Dan's advertising for the book. It's credible he might have a podcast of the same name. Dan is also a main stage speaker at Elevate Festival this Wednesday. Perhaps you can ask people how this output would have been created, Dan?

    Call To Action

    We need more information about how AI is pulling information. The hallucinations have the potential to impact personal branding and reputation. We need to ask questions and we need to understand how we fix the hallucinations. If we can't fix them, we need to know how to clarify the facts. We need to know how to negotiate disinformation.

    How can we possibly use this for HR when there is no answer on what is causing the hallucinations or how to fix them?

    In short, we need to know who and what to trust.

    Published by

    Rethinking hybrid/remote through a trust lens|LinkedIn Top Community Voice Decision Making, Organizational Development|Organizations hire me to make hybrid/remote work just work|Transforming strategy♟️into magic 🪄
    In honour of Elevate Festival which runs September 26-28, 2023 this week in Toronto, I have some stories and questions about AI. I'd love your insights. Please read and tag any experts you think could help answer these questions. #AI #hallucinations #media #personalbranding #journalism #HR #recruiting #humans #elevatetechfest #inspiration #motivation #toronto #cityoftoronto #entrepreneur #leaders #tech #innovation #womeninbusiness #businessowner #keynotespeaker #career #careerdevelopment #moneymindset #financialfreedom #financialindependence #artificialintelligence #technology #future #futurist #femaleentrepreneur #elevatefest2023

    Human Resources vs. Tech : Rules of Engagement & Realm of Influence

    Human Resources vs. Tech : Rules of Engagement & Realm of Influence

    The debate over technology vs. human resources; who drives who has been ever-persistent, especially in these times of precision automation, machine learning & more. The realm of influence of technology is undoubtedly at its highest in modern times and is poised to continue to grow. However, we need to always be aware of the rules of engagement. Technology is an enabler, made by, us humans to serve our benefit. And, that alone makes the case for us, humans driving technology. 

    Let's listen to find out the nuances of this relationship & why humans always have the upper hand!