Logo

    249 | Peter Godfrey-Smith on Sentience and Octopus Minds

    enSeptember 11, 2023
    What is the primary purpose of the Indeed platform?
    How many users does Rocket Money have?
    What significant event occurred around 540 million years ago?
    What type of creatures characterized the Ediacaran period?
    What are the two processes happening in the brain, according to Van Swinderen?

    Podcast Summary

    • Find the right platforms for hiring and managing financesIndeed streamlines hiring with features for scheduling, screening, and messaging. Rocket Money helps identify and cancel unwanted subscriptions, monitor spending, and lower bills. FedEx offers fast, reliable delivery, simple returns, and weekend delivery.

      When it comes to hiring or managing your personal finances, relying on the right platforms can save you time, money, and effort. For hiring, Indeed is a powerful tool with over 350 million monthly visitors and a matching engine that helps you find high-quality candidates quickly. It also streamlines the hiring process with features for scheduling, screening, and messaging. For managing your personal finances, Rocket Money is an app that helps you identify and cancel unwanted subscriptions, monitor your spending, and lower your bills. With over 5 million users and an average savings of $720 per year, it's a must-have for anyone looking to optimize their budget. And for businesses, FedEx offers fast and reliable delivery, simple returns, and weekend delivery to a large portion of the US population. These platforms can help you streamline your processes, save time and money, and focus on what truly matters. So whether you're looking to hire, manage your finances, or run a business, consider leveraging the power of these platforms to make your life easier.

    • Discovering the complexities of octopuses and giant cuttlefishExploring these creatures' behaviors and advanced nervous systems led a philosopher to reconsider consciousness and self-awareness in non-human species.

      Exploring the complexities of different species, like octopuses, can provide valuable insights into higher-level thinking, consciousness, and self-awareness. Peter Godfrey Smith, a philosopher and author, discovered this firsthand while spending time in Australia, where he became fascinated by the giant cuttlefish and octopuses. Their complex nervous systems and inquisitive behaviors, despite their evolutionary distance from humans, inspired him to change the focus of his philosophical work. This exploration led him to write books like "Other Minds" and "Metazoa," which delve into the minds of these animals and their implications for our understanding of consciousness. By studying different species, we can broaden our perspective and deepen our knowledge of the natural world.

    • The Definition of Consciousness EvolvesThe definition of consciousness has expanded to include felt experience in all organisms, challenging the notion of it as a fixed, natural kind, and recognizing its evolution with new knowledge.

      The meaning of the term "consciousness" has evolved over time, and now refers to the presence of any form of felt experience, even in non-human organisms. This broad definition, as discussed, was influenced by Thomas Nagel's work, and while some resist this usage, the speaker acknowledges the natural evolution of language and its mutability with new knowledge. The speaker also challenges the notion that consciousness is a fixed, natural kind, and instead suggests that the framework for understanding it will continue to shift and change. Additionally, the speaker argues that consciousness, even in its broad definition, is not necessarily incompatible with a physical or biological understanding, as points of view are themselves a product of evolution.

    • Exploring Consciousness Beyond Humans and PrimatesRecognizing the importance of studying diverse organisms, like octopuses, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of consciousness and its evolution.

      When studying consciousness and sentience, it's essential to consider a wide range of organisms, not just humans or even primates. According to the speaker, there are two clusters of organisms: those that are closely related to us, like chimps and birds, and those that are more distantly related, such as octopuses. The latter are just as important for understanding the evolutionary experiment of consciousness, despite being "miles away" in terms of shared history. Octopuses, for instance, have large nervous systems and can solve puzzles, navigate well, and learn effectively. However, the speaker suggests that the term "smart" may not fully capture the complexity of octopus behavior, as they exhibit a different kind of intelligence compared to humans and other reflective animals. The speaker's journey involves recognizing the importance of studying diverse organisms to gain a more comprehensive understanding of consciousness.

    • Octopuses and humans have unique problem-solving stylesOctopuses rely on body complexity, humans on cognitive abilities; Bees show remarkable cognitive skills despite smaller brains, challenging the brain size-intelligence link.

      Octopuses and humans have complex nervous systems, but they have evolved independently and approach problem-solving differently. Octopuses, with around 500 million neurons, rely more on their body's complexity and adeptness, while humans, with billions more neurons, employ a more reflective, cognitive problem-solving style. Despite their smaller brain size, animals like bees have shown remarkable cognitive abilities, challenging the notion that larger brains equate to greater intelligence. The discussion also touched upon the estimated 600 million-year-old divergence between the evolutionary lines of octopuses and humans, emphasizing the complexity and diversity in the natural world.

    • The Ediacaran Period: Before the Cambrian ExplosionThe Ediacaran period, before the Cambrian explosion, was marked by simple creatures with little interaction or predation. The common ancestor of humans and octopuses might have been a small, worm-like creature living around 565 million years ago.

      The number 550 million years ago marks a significant point in Earth's history, before the Cambrian explosion around 540 million years ago. This period, known as the Ediacaran, was characterized by simple, mostly flat-bottom dwelling creatures, with little evidence of interaction or predation. However, there's a possibility of jellyfish-like beings engaging in unknown behaviors in the water column. The common ancestor of humans and octopuses was likely a small, worm-like creature with a nervous system and simple behaviors. Experts believe this common ancestor might have lived even earlier, around 565 million years ago. The Cambrian explosion saw the divergence of various present-day animal groups, indicating that this event must have occurred before the Cambrian. All these organisms belong to the bilaterally symmetrical group, which evolved a body plan with left and right symmetry, enabling complex behaviors and movements.

    • The Cambrian explosion led to the development of complex behaviors and nervous systems in various animal lineages.The Cambrian explosion drove the evolution of complex behaviors and nervous systems in animals to help them survive in complex environments

      The Cambrian explosion, around 540 million years ago, marked a significant shift in evolution, leading to the development of complex behaviors and nervous systems in various animal lineages. Before the Cambrian, there were distinct evolutionary branches with established body plans. However, when the Cambrian began, a new regime of interaction emerged, with animals needing to track each other to survive. This context drove the evolution of complex behaviors and nervous systems in different groups, such as arthropods, vertebrates, and cephalopods. While complex nervous systems are resource-intensive, they became necessary for animals to respond effectively to their complex environments. The octopus, with its hard-to-control body, is an example of an animal that evolved a large nervous system to manage its many degrees of freedom and make precise choices for action.

    • The Octopus's Complex Nervous System for Agile Body ControlThe octopus's soft body led to a large, complex nervous system for managing its agile and shape-shifting body, enabling behavioral complexity and some degree of limb autonomy.

      The unique anatomy of the octopus, with its soft body and lack of hard parts, led to the evolution of a large and complex nervous system to manage its agile and shape-shifting body. This nervous system enabled the octopus to become behaviorally complex, with some degree of autonomy in its limbs for exploration. However, the octopus can also coordinate its limbs for cohesive movements when needed. The relationship between the central brain and the limbs is still a puzzle, with some evidence suggesting that the arms can act independently but also respond to central control. The octopus can be seen as an "unruly family" where the central nervous system exerts control when necessary but allows for autonomy in other situations. The demands of the octopus's body, with its many neurons and sensors, set it up for complex behaviors.

    • Exploring Consciousness in Octopuses: Unique ChallengesOctopuses present complex challenges to understanding consciousness due to their decentralized nervous system, semi-autonomous body parts, and ability to feel pain.

      Understanding the nature of consciousness in an organism as complex as an octopus poses unique challenges due to its decentralized nervous system and semi-autonomous body parts. While we can make some progress in imagining its sensory world, which includes good eyes, enormous chemical sensitivity, and light sensitivity in the skin, the differences in the loops between sensing and acting, and the potential question of where the locus of experience lies, make it difficult for our imaginative capacity to fully grasp. Octopuses have been shown to feel pain based on behavioral and physiological evidence, adding another layer of complexity to the study of consciousness in such a unique creature.

    • New findings suggest octopuses might have feelings and individualityOctopuses may feel something like pain and exhibit individuality, but their social behavior is limited and their mental capabilities for complex tasks like time travel or understanding others' knowledge are unclear.

      The octopus, a creature once thought to be completely asocial, may have the ability to feel something akin to pain and exhibit individual personality traits. However, their social behavior is limited, and it's unclear if they possess the mental capabilities for time travel or the ability to understand other creatures' knowledge, which are crucial aspects of human cognition. Recent research, such as Alexandra Schnell's work on self-control in cuttlefish, is beginning to explore these complexities in cephalopods. Despite these advancements, much remains unknown about the inner workings of octopus minds.

    • Octopuses' complex behaviors and abilities suggest their sentienceOctopuses' capacity to recognize humans, respond to novelty, and have complex nervous systems with pain responses indicate their potential sentience, expanding our understanding of consciousness and challenging us to reconsider various species' sensory abilities and behaviors.

      Octopuses, with their unique abilities and behaviors, provide strong evidence for their sentience. Octopuses' capacity to recognize individual humans and respond to novelty suggests they have complex experiences. Their large nervous systems and the presence of pain responses further support this notion. Despite their vastly different nervous systems from humans, these indicators provide insights into the potential features of a nervous system that could lead to sentience. The expanding list of likely sentient animals, including octopuses and bees, challenges us to reconsider the scope of consciousness and consider the remarkable sensory abilities and behaviors of various species.

    • Large-scale brain rhythms challenge traditional view of the nervous systemLarge-scale brain rhythms, like oscillatory patterns detected in EEG readings, play important roles in cognitive processes, challenging the traditional view of the nervous system as a simple network.

      While the brain can be seen as a complex network of neurons and connections, there are also large-scale dynamic patterns that cannot be reduced to these network properties alone. These patterns, such as oscillatory rhythms detected in EEG readings, have long been dismissed as epiphenomena, but there is evidence suggesting they play an important role in cognitive processes. For instance, both humans and flies exhibit associations between certain large-scale brain rhythms and selective attention. This discovery challenges the traditional view of the nervous system as a simple network and opens up new avenues for understanding the role of brain rhythms in consciousness and cognition.

    • Two processes in the brain: neuronal interactions and electrical ion movementsThe brain functions through both local neuronal interactions and more diffuse electrical ion movements, which are interconnected and influence each other, challenging a purely network-based view

      The nervous system functions with a complex interplay between point-to-point interactions and more diffuse, electrical rhythm type properties. These electrical properties, which involve the movement of ions across membranes, are not straightforwardly reducible to network properties. They are present in various animals, including those with simpler nervous systems, and may influence experience as a phenomenon. The relationship between these complex levels of the nervous system is not entirely local, and ignoring holistic aspects is a form of reductionism that may not fully capture the complexity of the brain. Van Swinderen's view suggests that there are two important processes in the brain occurring simultaneously: neurons making other neurons fire through synapses, and electrical movements of ions across membranes that affect the temporal properties of neuronal firings. These subthreshold ion movements are more diffuse and interconnected, influencing the neural system in a complex and interdependent manner. This perspective challenges a purely network-based view of the brain and highlights the importance of considering both local and holistic aspects in understanding the brain's electrical profile.

    • Understanding Consciousness: The Holistic Integration of Brain's Computational Interactions and Electrical OscillationsResearch suggests that consciousness arises from the brain's unique ability to integrate computational interactions and electrical oscillations, leading to a gestalt-like experience. This property is shared by various conscious beings, including vertebrates, octopuses, and some arthropods.

      The brain's complex combination of computational interactions and electrical oscillatory activities results in a holistic, whole brain response to sensory events. This integration for free, as described by researchers, gives rise to the gestalt-like nature of everyday experiences. The view of brain activity as having this unique property lends itself to explaining the natural fitting together of various experiential facets. Animals with nervous systems exhibiting these properties, including vertebrates, octopuses, and some arthropods, are likely to be conscious beings. The evolution of perspective and the unique properties of nervous systems form a two-part explanation for the biology of experience. This perspective suggests that many animals, including those often considered less complex, may possess consciousness in varying degrees.

    • The Evolution of Consciousness: Gradual or Sudden?The speaker proposes that consciousness might evolve gradually with potential sudden shifts, nervous systems and oscillatory dynamics play a role, keeping an open mind about consciousness in different species, and the diversity of nervous systems argues against a definitive answer.

      The nature of consciousness and its emergence in different species is a complex issue with no clear-cut answers. The speaker suggests that gradual change is likely in the evolution of consciousness, but there might also be sudden shifts. Nervous systems, including their oscillatory dynamics, are crucial in this process, but they could potentially undergo phase transitions leading to sudden changes. The speaker acknowledges the importance of keeping an open mind about the issue and the possibility that some animals, such as octopuses, might exhibit subjectivity. The diversity of nervous systems across different species argues against the idea of a sharp line between those who have consciousness and those who don't. However, some philosophers argue for a more definitive yes or no answer to the question of consciousness, but the speaker believes that the gradualist view is more in line with the available evidence. The conversation also touches upon the influence of language and symbolic communication on human consciousness.

    • Understanding consciousness as a cluster of propertiesThe concept of consciousness may be better grasped as a complex set of characteristics rather than a singular defining trait. Gradual and sudden changes in complex systems are possible.

      The question of what constitutes consciousness or the boundary between living and non-living beings may not have a simple yes or no answer. The speakers in this discussion suggest that the concept of consciousness, like the concept of life, may be better understood as a cluster of properties rather than a single defining characteristic. They also acknowledge the possibility of both gradual and sudden changes in complex systems. The analogy with the origin of life and its gradual emergence from chemical cycles to self-sustaining organisms further supports this perspective. Additionally, the speakers emphasize the importance of considering the external context and our relationship to the world when understanding consciousness.

    • The External World Shapes Our ConsciousnessOur consciousness is influenced not only by biology but also by social interactions and external cognitive tools like language.

      Our internal experiences and consciousness are not solely determined by our biology, but are shaped by our interactions with the external world. The example of octopuses, with their unique way of living and consciousness, reminds us of this. However, human consciousness has been significantly influenced by social interactions and the internalization of external cognitive tools, such as language. These tools, which originated from the public sphere, have made our individual minds more powerful. The upcoming book "Living on Earth" by Peter Godfrey-Smith further explores these ideas, focusing on the forest ecosystem and the influence of the external world on our consciousness. While the octopus teaches us about the existence of consciousness in seemingly solitary animals, it also highlights the importance of social life in shaping our internal landscapes.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    AMA | September 2024

    AMA | September 2024

    Welcome to the September 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with AMA questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/09/02/ama-september-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    287 | Jean-Paul Faguet on Institutions and the Legacy of History

    287 | Jean-Paul Faguet on Institutions and the Legacy of History

    One common feature of complex systems is sensitive dependence on initial conditions: a small change in how systems begin evolving can lead to large differences in their later behavior. In the social sphere, this is a way of saying that history matters. But it can be hard to quantify how much certain specific historical events have affected contemporary conditions, because the number of variables is so large and their impacts are so interdependent. Political economist Jean-Paul Faguet and collaborators have examined one case where we can closely measure the impact today of events from centuries ago: how Colombian communities are still affected by 16th-century encomienda, a colonial forced-labor institution. We talk about this and other examples of the legacy of history.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/26/287-jean-paul-faguet-on-institutions-and-the-legacy-of-history/

    Jean-Paul Faguet received a Ph.D. in Political Economy and an M.Sc. in Economics from the London School of Economics, and an Master of Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. He is currently Professor of the Political Economy of Development at LSE. He serves as the Chair of the Decentralization Task Force for the Initiative for Policy Dialogue. Among his awards are the W.J.M. Mackenzie Prize for best political science book.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    286 | Blaise Agüera y Arcas on the Emergence of Replication and Computation

    286 | Blaise Agüera y Arcas on the Emergence of Replication and Computation

    Understanding how life began on Earth involves questions of chemistry, geology, planetary science, physics, and more. But the question of how random processes lead to organized, self-replicating, information-bearing systems is a more general one. That question can be addressed in an idealized world of computer code, initialized with random sequences and left to run. Starting with many such random systems, and allowing them to mutate and interact, will we end up with "lifelike," self-replicating programs? A new paper by Blaise Agüera y Arcas and collaborators suggests that the answer is yes. This raises interesting questions about whether computation is an attractor in the space of relevant dynamical processes, with implications for the origin and ubiquity of life.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/19/286-blaise-aguera-y-arcas-on-the-emergence-of-replication-and-computation/

    Blaise Agüera y Arcas received a B.A. in physics from Princeton University. He is currently a vice-president of engineering at Google, leader of the Cerebra team, and a member of the Paradigms of Intelligence team. He is the author of the books Ubi Sunt and Who Are We Now?, and the upcoming What Is Intelligence?


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality

    285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality

    Being rational necessarily involves engagement with probability. Given two possible courses of action, it can be rational to prefer the one that could possibly result in a worse outcome, if there's also a substantial probability for an even better outcome. But one's attitude toward risk -- averse, tolerant, or even seeking -- also matters. Do we work to avoid the worse possible outcome, even if there is potential for enormous reward? Nate Silver has long thought about probability and prediction, from sports to politics to professional poker. In his his new book On The Edge: The Art of Risking Everything, Silver examines a set of traits characterizing people who welcome risks.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/12/285-nate-silver-on-prediction-risk-and-rationality/

    Nate Silver received a B.A. in economics from the University of Chicago. He worked as a baseball analyst, developing the PECOTA statistical system (Player Empirical Comparison and Optimization Test Algorithm). He later founded the FiveThirtyEight political polling analysis site. His first book, The Signal and the Noise, was awarded the Phi Beta Kappa Society Book Award in Science. He is the co-host (with Maria Konnikova) of the Risky Business podcast.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | August 2024

    AMA | August 2024

    Welcome to the August 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/05/ama-august-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/seanmcarroll

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    284 | Doris Tsao on How the Brain Turns Vision Into the World

    284 | Doris Tsao on How the Brain Turns Vision Into the World

    The human brain does a pretty amazing job of taking in a huge amount of data from multiple sensory modalities -- vision, hearing, smell, etc. -- and constructing a coherent picture of the world, constantly being updated in real time. (Although perhaps in discrete moments, rather than continuously, as we learn in this podcast...) We're a long way from completely understanding how that works, but amazing progress has been made in identifying specific parts of the brain with specific functions in this process. Today we talk to leading neuroscientist Doris Tsao about the specific workings of vision, from how we recognize faces to how we construct a model of the world around us.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/29/284-doris-tsao-on-how-the-brain-turns-vision-into-the-world/

    Doris Tsao received her Ph.D. in neurobiology from Harvard University. She is currently a professor of molecular and cell biology, and a member of the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, at the University of California, Berkeley. Among her awards are a MacArthur Fellowship, membership in the National Academy of Sciences, the Eppendorf and Science International Prize in Neurobiology, the National Institutes of Health Director’s Pioneer Award, the Golden Brain Award from the Minerva Foundation, the Perl-UNC Neuroscience Prize, and the Kavli Prize in Neuroscience.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    Change is scary. But sometimes it can all work out for the best. There's no guarantee of that, however, even when the change in question involves the introduction of a powerful new technology. Today's guest, Daron Acemoglu, is a political economist who has long thought about the relationship between economics and political institutions. In his most recent book (with Simon Johnson), Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity, he looks at how technological innovations affect the economic lives of ordinary people. We talk about how such effects are often for the worse, at least to start out, until better institutions are able to eventually spread the benefits more broadly.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/22/283-daron-acemoglu-on-technology-inequality-and-power/

    Daron Acemoglu received a Ph.D. in economics from the London School of Economics. He is currently Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a fellow of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Econometric Society. Among his awards are the John Bates Clark Medal and the Nemmers Prize in Economics. In 2015, he was named the most cited economist of the past 10 years.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    The philosophy of mathematics would be so much easier if it weren't for infinity. The concept seems natural, but taking it seriously opens the door to counterintuitive results. As mathematician and philosopher Joel David Hamkins says in this conversation, when we say that the natural numbers are "0, 1, 2, 3, and so on," that "and so on" is hopelessly vague. We talk about different ways to think about the puzzles of infinity, how they might be resolved, and implications for mathematical realism.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/15/282-joel-david-hamkins-on-puzzles-of-reality-and-infinity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Joel David Hamkins received his Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley. He is currently the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Logic at the University of Notre Dame. He is a pioneer of the idea of the set theory multiverse. He is the top-rated user by reputation score on MathOverflow. He is currently working on The Book of Infinity, to be published by MIT Press.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Welcome to the July 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/08/ama-july-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    281 | Samir Okasha on the Philosophy of Agency and Evolution

    281 | Samir Okasha on the Philosophy of Agency and Evolution

    Just like with physics, in biology it is perfectly possible to do most respectable work without thinking much about philosophy, but there are unmistakably foundational questions where philosophy becomes crucial. When do we say that a collection of matter (or bits) is alive? When does it become an agent, capable of making decisions? What are the origins of morality and altruistic behavior? We talk with one of the world's leading experts, Samir Okasha, about the biggest issues in modern philosophy of biology.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/01/281-samir-okasha-on-the-philosophy-of-agency-and-evolution/

    Samir Okasha received his D.Phil. in Philosophy from the University of Oxford. He is currently Professor of the Philosophy of Science at the University of Bristol. He is a winner of the Lakatos Award for his book Evolution and the Levels of Selection, and is a Fellow of the British Academy.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Related Episodes

    28 | Roger Penrose on Spacetime, Consciousness, and the Universe

    28 | Roger Penrose on Spacetime, Consciousness, and the Universe
    Sir Roger Penrose has had a remarkable life. He has contributed an enormous amount to our understanding of general relativity, perhaps more than anyone since Einstein himself -- Penrose diagrams, singularity theorems, the Penrose process, cosmic censorship, and the list goes on. He has made important contributions to mathematics, including such fun ideas as the Penrose triangle and aperiodic tilings. He has also made bold conjectures in the notoriously contentious areas of quantum mechanics and the study of consciousness. In his spare time he's managed to become an extremely successful author, writing such books as The Emperor's New Mind and The Road to Reality. With far too much that we could have talked about, we decided to concentrate in this discussion on spacetime, black holes, and cosmology, but we made sure to reserve some time to dig into quantum mechanics and the brain by the end. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    39 | Malcolm MacIver on Sensing, Consciousness, and Imagination

    39 | Malcolm MacIver on Sensing, Consciousness, and Imagination
    Consciousness has many aspects, from experience to wakefulness to self-awareness. One aspect is imagination: our minds can conjure up multiple hypothetical futures to help us decide which choices we should make. Where did that ability come from? Today’s guest, Malcolm MacIver, pinpoints an important transition in the evolution of consciousness to when fish first climbed on to land, and could suddenly see much farther, which in turn made it advantageous to plan further in advance. If this idea is true, it might help us understand some of the abilities and limitations of our cognitive capacities, with potentially important ramifications for our future as a species.            Support Mindscape on Patreon or Paypal. Malcolm MacIver received his Ph.D. in neuroscience in 2001 from the University of Illinois and the Beckman Institute of Advanced Science and Technology. (This was after an unconventional childhood where he dropped out of school at age 9 and later talked his way into a community college program.) He is currently a professor of Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Neurobiology at Northwestern University. In 2009 he was awarded the Presidential Early Career Award for Science and Engineering. Northwestern Web Page Google Scholar Talk on sensing and planning Paper: “The Shift to Life on Land Selected for Planning” Twitter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    25 | David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem, and Living in a Simulation

    25 | David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem, and Living in a Simulation
    The "Easy Problems" of consciousness have to do with how the brain takes in information, thinks about it, and turns it into action. The "Hard Problem," on the other hand, is the task of explaining our individual, subjective, first-person experiences of the world. What is it like to be me, rather than someone else? Everyone agrees that the Easy Problems are hard; some people think the Hard Problem is almost impossible, while others think it's pretty easy. Today's guest, David Chalmers, is arguably the leading philosopher of consciousness working today, and the one who coined the phrase "the Hard Problem," as well as proposing the philosophical zombie thought experiment. Recently he has been taking seriously the notion of panpsychism. We talk about these knotty issues (about which we deeply disagree), but also spend some time on the possibility that we live in a computer simulation. Would simulated lives be "real"? (There we agree -- yes they would.) David Chalmers got his Ph.D. from Indiana University working under Douglas Hoftstadter. He is currently University Professor of Philosophy and Neural Science at New York University and co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness. He is a fellow of the Australian Academy of Humanities, the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Among his books are The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, The Character of Consciousness, and Constructing the World. He and David Bourget founded the PhilPapers project. Web site NYU Faculty page Wikipedia page PhilPapers page Amazon author page NYU Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness TED talk: How do you explain consciousness? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    44 | Antonio Damasio on Feelings, Thoughts, and the Evolution of Humanity

    44 | Antonio Damasio on Feelings, Thoughts, and the Evolution of Humanity
    When we talk about the mind, we are constantly talking about consciousness and cognition. Antonio Damasio wants us to talk about our feelings. But it’s not in an effort to be more touchy-feely; Damasio, one of the world’s leading neuroscientists, believes that feelings generated by the body are a crucial part of how we achieve and maintain homeostasis, which in turn is a key driver in understanding who we are. His most recent book, The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures, is an ambitious attempt to trace the role of feelings and our biological impulses in the origin of life, the nature of consciousness, and our flourishing as social, cultural beings. Support Mindscape on Patreon or Paypal. Antonio Damasio received his M.D. and Ph.D. from the University of Lisbon, Portugal. He is currently University Professor, David Dornsife Professor of Neuroscience, Professor of Psychology, Professor of Philosophy, and (along with his wife and frequent collaborator, Prof. Hannah Damasio) Director of the Brain and Creativity Institute at the University of Southern California. He is also an adjunct professor at the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Academy of Medicine, and the European Academy of Sciences and Arts. Among his numerous awards are the Grawemeyer Award, the Honda Prize, the Prince of Asturias Award in Science and Technology, and the Beaumont Medal from the American Medical Association. USC web page Brain and Creativity Institute Google Scholar page Amazon.com author page Wikipedia TED talk on The Quest to Understand Consciousness Twitter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    255 | Michael Muthukrishna on Developing a Theory of Everyone

    255 | Michael Muthukrishna on Developing a Theory of Everyone

    A "Theory of Everything" is physicists' somewhat tongue-in-cheek phrase for a hypothetical model of all the fundamental physical interactions. Of course, even if we had such a theory, it would tell us nothing new about higher-level emergent phenomena, all the way up to human behavior and society. Can we even imagine a "Theory of Everyone," providing basic organizing principles for society? Michael Muthukrishna believes we can, and indeed that we can see the outlines of such a theory emerging, based on the relationships of people to each other and to the physical resources available.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/10/30/255-michael-muthukrishna-on-developing-a-theory-of-everyone/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Michael Muthukrishna received his Ph.D. in psychology from the University of British Columbia. He is currently Associate Professor of Economic Psychology at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Among his awards are an Emerging Scholar Award from the Society for Personality and Social Psychology and a Dissertation Excellence Award from the Canadian Psychological Association. His new book is A Theory of Everyone: The New Science of Who We Are, How We Got Here, and Where We're Going.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.