Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • The Importance of Feelings in Understanding Thoughts and BehaviorNeuroscientist Antonio Damasio emphasizes the significance of feelings as our bodies' primal indications for maintaining homeostasis and shaping behavior and cognition, often neglected in explaining human behavior and the origins of complex systems like religion, politics, and law.

      Learning from this conversation with neuroscientist Antonio Damasio is the importance of feelings in understanding how we think, behave, and understand the world around us. Damasio, who is the director of the Brain and Creativity Institute at USC, emphasizes that feelings are not just emotional experiences, but rather, they are our bodies' primal indications that something is not right or that everything is going well in terms of maintaining homeostasis, or the body's ideal state. He argues that feelings have been neglected in explaining human behavior and the origins of things like religion, politics, and law. Damasio also traces the origin and evolution of feelings from bacteria to human beings and beyond, emphasizing their significance in shaping who we are as individuals and as a society. In his new book, "The Strange Order of Things," he summarizes these ideas and encourages us to take feelings more seriously in our thinking. This perspective on the role of feelings in cognition and behavior aligns with the broader themes in Sean Carroll's own work.

    • Understanding Feelings and EmotionsFeelings are the experiences of life's action programs, indicating mental states' quality. Emotions are actions resulting in better or worse adaptation, built on prior feeling states.

      Feelings and emotions are distinct phenomena, both of which play essential roles in the functioning of living organisms. Feelings, which are not synonymous with emotions, refer to the experiences of the action programs that enact life itself. They indicate the quality of mental states in relation to the continuation of life and are characterized by valence, or positivity and negativity. Emotions, on the other hand, are actions that result in better or worse adaptation to the environment. They are collections of actions that produce specific effects on the individual and the environment. While emotions are often thought of as highly organized responses, such as fear, anger, or happiness, they are built upon prior feeling states, which can be described as good or bad, such as hunger, thirst, or nervousness. Our language can be limiting in this regard, as we often use the same words for both the emotive sets and the mental experiences of having those sets. It's important to remember that feelings are the experiences of the action programs that underlie emotions and are fundamental to the continuation of life.

    • Understanding Feelings as Indicators of HomeostasisFeelings are deeply connected to our body's basic functions and serve as an important indicator of our overall health and well-being.

      Feelings follow the body's homeostatic state, which is essential for life to persist. Homeostasis is a set of operations that maintains life by regulating metabolism, acquiring energy, and defending the organism. Feelings are a way for us to recognize when we're deviating from this homeostatic state. Initially, organisms did not have minds or complex experiences, but they did have bodies that acted and responded through movements or internal actions. These primordial actions were crucial for survival. As organisms became more complex, they developed nervous systems and the ability to access "minds" and have complex experiences. But even then, feelings remained a way to recognize deviations from the homeostatic state. So, feelings are deeply connected to our body's basic functions and serve as an important indicator of our overall health and well-being.

    • Maintaining balance requires constant activityBoth homeostasis and financial stability necessitate continuous effort to prevent falling into a state of instability or stasis

      Both homeostasis and maintaining a balanced budget require constant activity to prevent falling into a state of stasis or financial instability. The juggler analogy illustrates this idea, as the juggler must be precise and active to keep the balls in the air and prevent them from falling. Similarly, homeostasis, which is often associated with balance, is actually a range of possibilities and requires constant upkeep to maintain. In the financial world, apps like Rocketmoney help individuals identify and cancel unwanted subscriptions to save money and maintain a balanced budget. In the biological world, organisms, from single cells to mammals, require constant upkeep and energy to maintain homeostasis and flourish. Our language offers various descriptors, such as well-being and flourishing, to describe different levels of homeostasis and the dynamic interactions between organisms and their environments. Ultimately, both homeostasis and financial stability require active effort and upkeep to prevent falling into a state of stasis or instability.

    • Incorporating feelings and vulnerability in AI and roboticsExploring the potential of creating vulnerable, feeling machines to better understand and emulate living organisms, while recognizing the importance of homeostasis and feelings in AI and robotics development.

      The development of artificial intelligence and robotics would greatly benefit from incorporating the concept of vulnerability and feelings, as these are essential aspects of living organisms. Current AI and robots lack the ability to feel or get sick, and while advancements in soft robotics have brought us closer to emulating living organisms, the critical issue of feeling has not been fully addressed. To truly emulate life, it may be necessary to create machines that are vulnerable and able to repair themselves when damage occurs. This idea is still in its infancy, but it is gaining traction within the scientific community as people begin to recognize the importance of homeostasis and feelings in understanding the nature of living beings. Ultimately, it's important to remember that minds and bodies are inextricably linked, and a true understanding of AI and robotics must take this into account.

    • Single-celled organisms exhibited complex social behaviorsEarliest forms of life displayed social structures and complex behaviors, challenging our understanding of consciousness and intelligence

      Complex intelligent behavior and social structures existed long before the development of nervous systems and complex thinking processes. Single-celled organisms, such as bacteria, exhibited social behaviors and formed alliances to survive and thrive in their environments. These behaviors allowed them to adapt to their surroundings and exhibit behaviors that, if observed without knowing their cellular structure, would be attributed to intentions and purposes. This challenges our perception of consciousness and intelligence as purely mechanical or non-materialistic, as their roots can be traced back to the earliest forms of life.

    • From simple cells to complex organisms and mindsThe logic of life has led to the evolution of complex organisms, from single cells to multicellular beings, and the emergence of consciousness, with brains being just one aspect of the mind

      The behaviors of bacteria and other single-celled organisms, which seem simple and without intention, actually contain the seeds of complex strategies and designs that have evolved into multicellular life and, eventually, the emergence of minds. The logic of life has led to the development of complex organisms, from single cells with no nucleus to multicellular beings with nervous systems, and even the ability to create maps of the internal and external world, leading to the emergence of consciousness. While brains are essential for the minds we know, not all aspects of mind come exclusively from nervous systems. The evolution of life is full of beautiful and unexpected developments, constantly unfolding with a logic all its own.

    • The mind is influenced by the body through the interoceptive systemThe mind is not just a product of the nervous system, but is shaped by the interplay between the body and the nervous system through the interoceptive system, which processes signals from the body and can be influenced by various molecules.

      The mind is not just a product of the nervous system, but rather a complex interplay between the body and the nervous system. The emotions and feelings we experience are not generated solely in the nervous system, but originate from the body itself, particularly the muscles and other bodily structures. The interoceptive system, which deals with signals from the body, is mostly made up of unmyelinated neurons that are open to their environment and can be influenced by various molecules. This means that the state of the body significantly impacts the functioning of the nervous system and, consequently, the mind. The common conception of the mind as a brain in a vat, focusing solely on synaptic transmission and insulated neurons, oversimplifies the intricate relationship between the body and the nervous system.

    • The Evolution of Consciousness as a Necessary ResponseConsciousness may have evolved as a response to the need for organisms to maintain homeostasis and have inner experiences, and is closely linked to feeling and reporting it.

      The relationship between consciousness and the nervous system is a complex issue that has been debated extensively in neuroscience, psychology, and cognitive science. Traditional views have often been unfavorable to a clear understanding of consciousness. The speaker argues that the idea of consciousness being a unique problem that cannot be explained by the workings of the nervous system is incorrect. Instead, consciousness may have evolved as a necessary response to the need for organisms to maintain homeostasis and have inner experiences. The speaker also suggests that consciousness and feeling are closely linked, and that consciousness is required in order to report having certain feelings. The speaker's perspective on consciousness is that it is not a separate problem to be solved, but rather a natural outcome of the evolution of organisms with complex nervous systems.

    • Feelings and emotions essential for survival and evolutionFeelings and emotions, which have been dismissed as unnecessary, are essential for survival, goal pursuit, and creating internal maps of the world. They likely co-developed with the nervous system and digestive system, and our feelings are still closely linked to our physical sensations today.

      Feelings and emotions, which have long been dismissed as unnecessary in the pursuit of science, technology, and abstract thinking, are in fact essential. They have played a crucial role in our evolution, helping us protect our lives, pursue goals, and even develop the ability to create internal maps of the world around us. This capability, which involves mapping both the external environment and our internal experiences, required the development of nervous systems, which allowed us to store and process this information. The nervous system likely co-developed with the digestive system, with both systems relying on each other for survival and the ability to sense and respond to the world around us. This interconnectedness of our emotions, thoughts, and physical sensations is still with us today, and it's not by chance that many of our feelings, such as anxiety, are closely linked to our gut. In the past, there was a popular belief that feelings were unnecessary and even useless, but this perspective overlooks their vital role in our lives and evolution.

    • Maintaining internal stability through planning and preparationHomeostasis goes beyond balance, involving future-directedness, resource storage, and past experiences to protect and prepare for potential threats

      Homeostasis, the body's ability to maintain a stable internal environment, is more complex than just maintaining a balanced state. It involves the gut and respiration, both under autonomic control, and a future-directedness that allows for prediction and preparation for potential threats. This means that the body stores resources, such as fat, for future use and uses past experiences to construct a better future. Homeostasis is not just about balance, but about planning for the future and protecting ourselves from potential dangers. Deleuze's "Mana-Machine" emphasized the interconnectedness of mind and body, and homeostasis is a prime example of this connection.

    • Feelings and Reasoning: Intertwined and Necessary for Human ProgressFeelings serve as guides for behavior and are the core information for reasoning, which informs our moral, religious, and social systems. Both are essential for human progress.

      Both feelings and reasoning play essential roles in shaping human behavior, social development, and the creation of cultures. Feelings, such as love, joy, and pain, are stored as memories and serve as guides for correcting behaviors. However, we don't make memories of feelings themselves but rather the commentaries on them. Reasoning, on the other hand, helps us understand the implications of these feelings and informs our moral, religious, and social systems. Hume's idea that reason should be the slave of the passions holds true, as feelings provide the core information that reasoned thinking builds upon. Without both feeling and reasoning, we cannot develop complex moral, religious, economic, diplomatic, or governance systems. In essence, feelings and reasoning are intertwined and necessary for human progress.

    • Understanding the role of emotions in our livesRecognize the importance of emotional balance, distinguish between positive and negative emotions, and use reason and knowledge to guide emotional responses.

      Spinoza, though often overlooked, was a profound thinker who understood the importance of maintaining balance, or homeostasis, in both individuals and society. He recognized that emotions and feelings play a significant role in our lives, but it's essential to distinguish between positive and negative ones. While some emotions, like joy, hope, and compassion, contribute to a good life, others, such as fear, anger, and pride, can lead to conflicts and wars. Spinoza believed that we need to develop rational control over our emotional responses, using reason and knowledge to guide our actions. This idea challenges the common notion that problems arise from being "too emotional." Instead, the real issue is using the wrong emotions at the wrong time. By understanding this, we can harness the power of our emotions and live more effective and fulfilling lives.

    • Bridging Reason and Emotion in Morality and EmpathyRecognize the interconnectedness of reason and emotion in morality and empathy, strive to expand empathy beyond similar groups, and use reasoning to control emotional responses.

      Our understanding of morality and empathy should not be a dichotomy between reason and emotion. Instead, we should recognize that both are interconnected and necessary for effective and intelligent decision-making. We should strive to expand our empathy beyond those similar to us and use our reasoning abilities to control and select the most appropriate emotional responses. This perspective has implications for artificial intelligence, culture, and society. In particular, it's crucial to understand the complexities of human nature in the context of conflicts and social media manipulation. By recognizing the limitations of being purely rational or emotional beings, we can work towards a more harmonious coexistence of reason and emotion. This perspective can also inform how we live our lives, starting with a better understanding of our own minds and approaching the world with humility.

    • The Role of Emotions in Decision-MakingEmotions are integral to decision-making, helping us evaluate situations, make predictions, and choose between options. Damage to the emotional brain can impair decision-making abilities. Listen to emotions while considering rational thoughts for informed choices.

      Key takeaway from this conversation with Antonio Damasio is the importance of emotions in decision-making. Damasio emphasized that emotions are not just add-ons to rational thinking but are integral to it. He explained how emotions help us evaluate situations, make predictions, and choose between options. He also shared how damage to the emotional brain can impair decision-making abilities. This insight is valuable for anyone looking to make informed choices in their personal or professional life. So, the next time you face a complex decision, remember that emotions play a crucial role, and it's essential to listen to them while also considering rational thoughts. Overall, Damasio's perspective offers a new way of thinking about decision-making and highlights the interconnectedness of emotions and rationality.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    The Earth's climate keeps changing, largely due to the effects of human activity, and we haven't been doing enough to slow things down. Indeed, over the past year, global temperatures have been higher than ever, and higher than most climate models have predicted. Many of you have probably seen plots like this. Today's guest, Gavin Schmidt, has been a leader in measuring the variations in Earth's climate, modeling its likely future trajectory, and working to get the word out. We talk about the current state of the art, and what to expect for the future.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/20/276-gavin-schmidt-on-measuring-predicting-and-protecting-our-climate/

    Gavin Schmidt received his Ph.D. in applied mathematics from University College London. He is currently Director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and an affiliate of the Center for Climate Systems Research at Columbia University. His research involves both measuring and modeling climate variability. Among his awards are the inaugural Climate Communications Prize of the American Geophysical Union. He is a cofounder of the RealClimate blog.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    275 | Solo: Quantum Fields, Particles, Forces, and Symmetries

    275 | Solo: Quantum Fields, Particles, Forces, and Symmetries

    Publication week! Say hello to Quanta and Fields, the second volume of the planned three-volume series The Biggest Ideas in the Universe. This volume covers quantum physics generally, but focuses especially on the wonders of quantum field theory. To celebrate, this solo podcast talks about some of the big ideas that make QFT so compelling: how quantized fields produce particles, how gauge symmetries lead to forces of nature, and how those forces can manifest in different phases, including Higgs and confinement.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/13/275-solo-quantum-fields-particles-forces-and-symmetries/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | May 2024

    AMA | May 2024

    Welcome to the May 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/06/ama-may-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Here is the memorial to Dan Dennett at Ars Technica.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    274 | Gizem Gumuskaya on Building Robots from Human Cells

    274 | Gizem Gumuskaya on Building Robots from Human Cells

    Modern biology is advancing by leaps and bounds, not only in understanding how organisms work, but in learning how to modify them in interesting ways. One exciting frontier is the study of tiny "robots" created from living molecules and cells, rather than metal and plastic. Gizem Gumuskaya, who works with previous guest Michael Levin, has created anthrobots, a new kind of structure made from living human cells. We talk about how that works, what they can do, and what future developments might bring.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/29/274-gizem-gumuskaya-on-building-robots-from-human-cells/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Gimez Gumuskaya received her Ph.D. from Tufts University and the Harvard Wyss Institute for Biologically-Inspired Engineering. She is currently a postdoctoral researcher at Tufts University. She previously received a dual master's degree in Architecture and Synthetic Biology from MIT.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    273 | Stefanos Geroulanos on the Invention of Prehistory

    273 | Stefanos Geroulanos on the Invention of Prehistory

    Humanity itself might be the hardest thing for scientists to study fairly and accurately. Not only do we come to the subject with certain inevitable preconceptions, but it's hard to resist the temptation to find scientific justifications for the stories we'd like to tell about ourselves. In his new book, The Invention of Prehistory, Stefanos Geroulanos looks at the ways that we have used -- and continue to use -- supposedly-scientific tales of prehistoric humanity to bolster whatever cultural, social, and political purposes we have at the moment.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/22/273-stefanos-geroulanos-on-the-invention-of-prehistory/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Stefanos Geroulanos received his Ph.D. in humanities from Johns Hopkins. He is currently director of the Remarque Institute and a professor of history at New York University. He is the author and editor of a number of books on European intellectual history. He serves as a Co-Executive Editor of the Journal of the History of Ideas.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    272 | Leslie Valiant on Learning and Educability in Computers and People

    272 | Leslie Valiant on Learning and Educability in Computers and People

    Science is enabled by the fact that the natural world exhibits predictability and regularity, at least to some extent. Scientists collect data about what happens in the world, then try to suggest "laws" that capture many phenomena in simple rules. A small irony is that, while we are looking for nice compact rules, there aren't really nice compact rules about how to go about doing that. Today's guest, Leslie Valiant, has been a pioneer in understanding how computers can and do learn things about the world. And in his new book, The Importance of Being Educable, he pinpoints this ability to learn new things as the crucial feature that distinguishes us as human beings. We talk about where that capability came from and what its role is as artificial intelligence becomes ever more prevalent.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/15/272-leslie-valiant-on-learning-and-educability-in-computers-and-people/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Leslie Valiant received his Ph.D. in computer science from Warwick University. He is currently the T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics at Harvard University. He has been awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship, the Knuth Prize, and the Turing Award, and he is a member of the National Academy of Sciences as well as a Fellow of the Royal Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He is the pioneer of "Probably Approximately Correct" learning, which he wrote about in a book of the same name.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | April 2024

    AMA | April 2024

    Welcome to the April 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/08/ama-april-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    271 | Claudia de Rham on Modifying General Relativity

    271 | Claudia de Rham on Modifying General Relativity

    Einstein's theory of general relativity has been our best understanding of gravity for over a century, withstanding a variety of experimental challenges of ever-increasing precision. But we have to be open to the possibility that general relativity -- even at the classical level, aside from any questions of quantum gravity -- isn't the right theory of gravity. Such speculation is motivated by cosmology, where we have a good model of the universe but one with a number of loose ends. Claudia de Rham has been a leader in exploring how gravity could be modified in cosmologically interesting ways, and we discuss the current state of the art as well as future prospects.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/01/271-claudia-de-rham-on-modifying-general-relativity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Claudia de Rham received her Ph.D. in physics from the University of Cambridge. She is currently a professor of physics and deputy department head at Imperial College, London. She is a Simons Foundation Investigator, winner of the Blavatnik Award, and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Her new book is The Beauty of Falling: A Life in Pursuit of Gravity.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    270 | Solo: The Coming Transition in How Humanity Lives

    270 | Solo: The Coming Transition in How Humanity Lives

    Technology is changing the world, in good and bad ways. Artificial intelligence, internet connectivity, biological engineering, and climate change are dramatically altering the parameters of human life. What can we say about how this will extend into the future? Will the pace of change level off, or smoothly continue, or hit a singularity in a finite time? In this informal solo episode, I think through what I believe will be some of the major forces shaping how human life will change over the decades to come, exploring the very real possibility that we will experience a dramatic phase transition into a new kind of equilibrium.

    Blog post with transcript and links to additional resources: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/25/270-solo-the-coming-transition-in-how-humanity-lives/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    269 | Sahar Heydari Fard on Complexity, Justice, and Social Dynamics

    269 | Sahar Heydari Fard on Complexity, Justice, and Social Dynamics

    When it comes to social change, two questions immediately present themselves: What kind of change do we want to see happen? And, how do we bring it about? These questions are distinct but related; there's not much point in spending all of our time wanting change that won't possibly happen, or working for change that wouldn't actually be good. Addressing such issues lies at the intersection of philosophy, political science, and social dynamics. Sahar Heydari Fard looks at all of these issues through the lens of complex systems theory, to better understand how the world works and how it might be improved.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/18/269-sahar-heydari-fard-on-complexity-justice-and-social-dynamics/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Sahar Heydari Fard received a Masters in applied economics and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Cincinnati. She is currently an assistant professor in philosophy at the Ohio State University. Her research lies at the intersection of social and behavioral sciences, social and political philosophy, and ethics, using tools from complex systems theory.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Related Episodes

    25 | David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem, and Living in a Simulation

    25 | David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem, and Living in a Simulation
    The "Easy Problems" of consciousness have to do with how the brain takes in information, thinks about it, and turns it into action. The "Hard Problem," on the other hand, is the task of explaining our individual, subjective, first-person experiences of the world. What is it like to be me, rather than someone else? Everyone agrees that the Easy Problems are hard; some people think the Hard Problem is almost impossible, while others think it's pretty easy. Today's guest, David Chalmers, is arguably the leading philosopher of consciousness working today, and the one who coined the phrase "the Hard Problem," as well as proposing the philosophical zombie thought experiment. Recently he has been taking seriously the notion of panpsychism. We talk about these knotty issues (about which we deeply disagree), but also spend some time on the possibility that we live in a computer simulation. Would simulated lives be "real"? (There we agree -- yes they would.) David Chalmers got his Ph.D. from Indiana University working under Douglas Hoftstadter. He is currently University Professor of Philosophy and Neural Science at New York University and co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness. He is a fellow of the Australian Academy of Humanities, the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Among his books are The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, The Character of Consciousness, and Constructing the World. He and David Bourget founded the PhilPapers project. Web site NYU Faculty page Wikipedia page PhilPapers page Amazon author page NYU Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness TED talk: How do you explain consciousness? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    21 | Alex Rosenberg on Naturalism, History, and Theory of Mind

    21 | Alex Rosenberg on Naturalism, History, and Theory of Mind
    We humans love to tell ourselves stories about why things happened the way they did; if the stories are sufficiently serious, we label this activity "history." Part of getting history right is simply an accurate recounting of the facts, but part of it is generally taken to be some kind of explanation about why. How much should we trust these explanations? This is a question with philosophical implications as well as historical ones, and philosopher Alex Rosenberg's new book How History Gets Things Wrong claims that we should basically not trust them at all. It's not that we get the facts wrong, it's that we have wrong ideas about causality and how the human mind works, and we can't help but import these wrong ideas to our beliefs about history. Alex and I dig into how this claim arises naturally from a certain way that naturalists should think about the world. Alex Rosenberg is the R. Taylor Cole Professor of Philosophy at Duke University, with secondary appointments in biology and political science. He has been a Guggenheim Fellow and winner of the Lakatos Award for the best book in the philosophy of science. Rosenberg is the author of numerous books and articles on philosophical aspects of various subjects, including biology, cognitive science, economics, history, causation, and atheism. He has also written two novels, The Girl from Krakow and Autumn in Oxford. Web site Duke home page Wikipedia page Amazon author page Interview at 3:AM Interview at What Is It Like to Be a Philosopher? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    28 | Roger Penrose on Spacetime, Consciousness, and the Universe

    28 | Roger Penrose on Spacetime, Consciousness, and the Universe
    Sir Roger Penrose has had a remarkable life. He has contributed an enormous amount to our understanding of general relativity, perhaps more than anyone since Einstein himself -- Penrose diagrams, singularity theorems, the Penrose process, cosmic censorship, and the list goes on. He has made important contributions to mathematics, including such fun ideas as the Penrose triangle and aperiodic tilings. He has also made bold conjectures in the notoriously contentious areas of quantum mechanics and the study of consciousness. In his spare time he's managed to become an extremely successful author, writing such books as The Emperor's New Mind and The Road to Reality. With far too much that we could have talked about, we decided to concentrate in this discussion on spacetime, black holes, and cosmology, but we made sure to reserve some time to dig into quantum mechanics and the brain by the end. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    23 | Lisa Aziz-Zadeh on Embodied Cognition, Mirror Neurons, and Empathy

    23 | Lisa Aziz-Zadeh on Embodied Cognition, Mirror Neurons, and Empathy
    Brains are important things; they're where thinking happens. Or are they? The theory of "embodied cognition" posits that it's better to think of thinking as something that takes place in the body as a whole, not just in the cells of the brain. In some sense this is trivially true; our brains interact with the rest of our bodies, taking in signals and giving back instructions. But it seems bold to situate important elements of cognition itself in the actual non-brain parts of the body. Lisa Aziz-Zadeh is a psychologist and neuroscientist who uses imaging technologies to study how different parts of the brain and body are involved in different cognitive tasks. We talk a lot about mirror neurons, those brain cells that light up both when we perform an action ourselves and when we see someone else performing the action. Understanding how these cells work could be key to a better view of empathy and interpersonal interactions. Lisa Aziz-Zadeh is an Associate Professor in the Brain and Creativity Institute and the Department of Occupational Science at the University of Southern California. She received her Ph.D. in psychology from UCLA, and has also done research at the University of Parma and the University of California, Berkeley. Home page USC profile Lab home page Google Scholar Talk on Brain and Body See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    39 | Malcolm MacIver on Sensing, Consciousness, and Imagination

    39 | Malcolm MacIver on Sensing, Consciousness, and Imagination
    Consciousness has many aspects, from experience to wakefulness to self-awareness. One aspect is imagination: our minds can conjure up multiple hypothetical futures to help us decide which choices we should make. Where did that ability come from? Today’s guest, Malcolm MacIver, pinpoints an important transition in the evolution of consciousness to when fish first climbed on to land, and could suddenly see much farther, which in turn made it advantageous to plan further in advance. If this idea is true, it might help us understand some of the abilities and limitations of our cognitive capacities, with potentially important ramifications for our future as a species.            Support Mindscape on Patreon or Paypal. Malcolm MacIver received his Ph.D. in neuroscience in 2001 from the University of Illinois and the Beckman Institute of Advanced Science and Technology. (This was after an unconventional childhood where he dropped out of school at age 9 and later talked his way into a community college program.) He is currently a professor of Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Neurobiology at Northwestern University. In 2009 he was awarded the Presidential Early Career Award for Science and Engineering. Northwestern Web Page Google Scholar Talk on sensing and planning Paper: “The Shift to Life on Land Selected for Planning” Twitter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.