Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • The Evolution of Sensing and ImaginationThe way we sense the world influences our thinking and imagination, which impacts our evolution and cognitive development. Fish transitioning from water to land led to new ways of sensing, enabling better planning and competition.

      Learning from this podcast episode is that the way we sense the world plays a significant role in how we think and imagine, which in turn influences our evolution and cognitive development. Malcolm MacGyver, a professor at Northwestern University, discusses how the transition of fish from water to land led to new ways of sensing and thinking, enabling them to plan ahead and compete more effectively. This evolutionary pressure for imagination is a crucial step on the path to consciousness. The podcast also explores the relationship between sensing, thinking, and planning for the future, raising questions about how we can improve our cognitive capacities as individuals and as a species. The episode offers valuable insights into the scientific and philosophical aspects of consciousness and its development, with practical implications for how we live in the world. Don't miss the opportunity to engage in this fascinating conversation by visiting preposterousuniverse.com/podcast and leaving your thoughts on the episode. If you're looking to hire, consider using Indeed to streamline the process and find high-quality candidates. Use the link indeed.com/mindscape to get a $75 sponsored job credit.

    • From philosophy to neuroscience: A curiosity-driven interdisciplinary journeyA curiosity-driven academic path, even if unconventional, can lead to a successful interdisciplinary career. Explore various disciplines and embrace interdisciplinary learning.

      A successful interdisciplinary career can stem from a curiosity-driven academic path, even if it's unconventional. The guest speaker, sharing their story, began as a self-taught individual who eventually attended community college and university with a philosophy degree. Feeling uncertain about employment prospects, they added a major in computer science. An intriguing intersection of philosophy and computer science classes sparked their interest in cognitive science and artificial intelligence. However, they soon became frustrated with theoretical studies and decided to pursue neuroscience. This led them to neuroethology, the study of the neural basis of natural behaviors, where they found a unique blend of animal behavior, computational modeling, and highly quantitative neurophysiology. Although engineering wasn't a significant part of their academic journey until the final years of their PhD, it played a crucial role in their research on electric fish and building robots that mimicked their sensory capabilities. This diverse educational background demonstrates the potential for a fulfilling career by exploring various disciplines and embracing interdisciplinary learning.

    • Studying Neural Circuitry and Cognition with Electric FishElectric fish offer a unique chance to examine neural organization and cognition due to their conserved neural structure and the ability to manipulate their electric fields. They navigate and hunt using electric signals, and their survival involves complex electrical warfare.

      Electric fish provide a unique opportunity to study neural circuitry and cognition due to their highly conserved neural organization and the ease of manipulating their electric fields. These fish, which can be found in various sizes in the tropical fish market, use electricity both as a weapon and a sense. They primarily rely on their electric signals for navigation and hunting, although they also have eyes that they seldom use. Researchers can manipulate their electric fields with precision, making electric fish a great subject for virtual reality experiments. Despite their reliance on electric signals, they can still be prey for other electric fish, making their survival a complex interplay of electrical warfare.

    • Underwater creatures' electric senses and ribbon fin locomotion are linkedUnderwater species with advanced electric sensing abilities for hunting have unique ribbon fin locomotion systems, enhancing their agility and bidirectional motion.

      Certain underwater species have evolved both highly advanced electric sensing abilities and unique ribbon fin locomotion systems, which are closely linked. These electric senses, which function as the primary sense organ for hunting, are short-range and require the animal to scan objects by moving backwards. The ribbon fin locomotion system, which allows for bidirectional motion and agility, facilitates this hunting behavior. Researchers at Caltech replicated this locomotion system in robots to better understand its properties. This electric sense and ribbon fin locomotion are not only unusual traits for underwater creatures but are also intimately connected, with the electric sense providing a significant advantage during hunting by allowing the animal to identify prey before it reaches their mouth. These adaptations have been of great interest due to the significance of spinal cord regeneration in vertebrates. This intriguing "arms race" between various underwater species dates back approximately 100 million years.

    • Exploring the relationship between electric fish's sensory system and locomotion abilitiesResearch on electric fish reveals the intricate connection between sensory systems, mathematics, and an animal's movement abilities, shedding light on the origins and functions of complex biological systems.

      The black ghost knifefish, a species of electric fish, use both locomotion and an electric field for hunting millimeter-sized water fleas. This raises the question of whether this complex mechanism is evidence for intelligent design or if it evolved over time. The origins of active electro-sense in electric fish are not clear from the fossil record, but it may have coevolved with passive electro-sense. The speaker, a researcher who studied the locomotion of electric fish during her postdoc at Caltech, became interested in the relationship between the fish's sensory system and their movement abilities. She also explored the mathematical concept of the small time reachable set, which describes the animal's reachable area given feasible control inputs, and its relationship to the fish's sensory system. The speaker's work on electric fish led her to an interest in the relationship between sensory spaces and an animal's locomotion abilities, which has opened up new avenues of research. The discussion highlights the intricate relationship between the physical world, mathematics, and biology, and the ongoing scientific quest to understand the origins and functions of complex biological systems.

    • Similar sensory volumes for electric and visually guided fishBoth electric and visually guided fish have surprisingly similar sensory volumes due to the attenuation length of light and water.

      Despite the vast differences in how electric and visually guided fish navigate their environments, they have surprisingly similar sensory volumes. This similarity is not a coincidence, but rather due to the attenuation length of light and water. Water absorbs light and reduces visibility significantly, forcing electric fish to rely on their electrical senses and visually guided fish to rely on their limited visual range. However, the calculations revealed that both types of fish have nearly identical sensory volumes, which is a remarkable adaptation to their respective environments. This discovery challenges our assumptions about the evolution of sensory systems and highlights the importance of considering the unique challenges posed by different environments.

    • The evolution of vision in land animals led to larger eyes and more complex brains for better sensing and planningLand animals evolved larger eyes and more complex brains to navigate and plan ahead in their new environment, as opposed to fish which don't require the same level of advanced planning due to their limited sensory range.

      The evolution of vision in vertebrates underwent significant changes during the water-to-land transition in the upper Devonian period. This shift led to the development of larger eyes to better navigate the less attenuating medium of air. And while fish have eyes that are roughly the size they should be for their visual needs in water, the evolution of land animals brought about the need for more complex cognition to navigate and plan ahead in their new environment. Underwater creatures, like fish, don't require the same level of advanced planning due to their limited sensory range. However, the ability to sense objects from a distance became crucial for land animals, leading to the evolution of more complex brains. Whales and dolphins, as examples of aquatic animals that adapted to this broad sensory experience, use echolocation to regain the sense of distance and imaging that they lost when they gave up their reliance on sight in water. Overall, the ability to sense objects from a distance became a critical factor in the evolution of more complex cognition in land animals.

    • The Evolution of Imagination and PlanningOur ability to plan and imagine different scenarios is a complex cognitive function that evolved with the hippocampus and frontal lobes, allowing us to make informed decisions based on potential outcomes, and is critical for problem solving and creativity.

      Our ability to plan ahead and imagine different scenarios is a complex cognitive function that has evolved over time, particularly with the development of the hippocampus and frontal lobes in mammals. This capability allows us to make informed decisions based on potential outcomes, rather than just reacting to our environment. Before the advent of personal finance apps like Rocket Money, many people were unaware of the extent of their subscriptions and the money they were wasting. This discussion also touched on the idea that our understanding of memory is not as simple as a random access store, but rather a multimodal structure like the hippocampus that binds information and does relationships well, playing a key role in imagination. The evolution of this capability can be traced back to animals like rodents, which have been observed to engage in "vicarious trial and error" in mazes, indicating they are thinking about different paths before making a decision. While there is evidence of primitive infrastructure for this in fish, there is no evidence they are capable of planning or imagining like mammals. The hippocampus, in particular, is a critical part of the imagination circuit, as it binds information across different modalities and does relationships well. The use of language to describe complex cognitive functions, such as imagination, can be limiting, as our understanding of these functions continues to evolve.

    • The role of eyesight in the transition of fish to landAn increase in eye size preceded the development of digits and other adaptations for living on land in some fish, providing a selective advantage and enabling the exploitation of new food sources and encounters with new predators and prey.

      The evolution of eyesight played a more significant role in the transition of fish from water to land than previously thought. While it was believed that limbs were the most useful body part for this transition, research suggests that an increase in eye size preceded the development of digits and other adaptations for living on land. This increase in eyesight provided a selective advantage, allowing some fish to see further and exploit new food sources on land before their rivals. Additionally, during this period, there was a bloom of invertebrate life on land, and the emergence of chemical defense systems in the fossil record suggests that vertebrates were encountering new predators and prey. The combination of these advantages likely made the move onto land worthwhile for some fish, leading to further adaptations such as rib cages and separated digits. In summary, the evolution of eyesight may have been a key factor in the successful transition of fish from water to land.

    • The benefits of mid-level clutter for planning behaviorsMid-level clutter enhances planning by increasing the diversity of values and outcomes in an environment

      The presence of mid-level clutter in an environment significantly enhances the usefulness of planning behaviors. This was discovered through modeling the interactions between a predator and prey, where it was found that planning became most effective in environments with a moderate amount of clutter. This complexity in the space of possibilities allows for a diversity of values and outcomes, which in turn is exploited by planning. The emergence of planning and imagination in animals, particularly on land, is a compelling case for the evolutionary advantage of these abilities. The study of the origins and constraints of planning and imagination, including their relationship to consciousness, remains an intriguing area of research.

    • The practical aspect of consciousness from an ecological perspectiveFrom an ecological standpoint, consciousness evolved as a response to the challenges of long-range sensing and dynamic contexts, enabling animals to adapt and survive through self-examination and problem-solving skills, like in the case of the octopus.

      Consciousness, from an ecological perspective, can be seen as a response to the challenges of long-range sensing and dynamic contexts, leading to the evolution of the ability for animals to examine their own thoughts. This is a practical aspect of consciousness, known as the "easy problem," which allows animals to adapt and survive in their environments. The octopus, as an example of an unarmored, intelligent marine creature, provides an interesting case study in the evolution of cognition. Octopuses have had to survive in harsh environments with predators that possess superior sensory abilities, leading to the development of their intelligence and problem-solving skills. While some aspects of consciousness, such as subjective experience, may remain beyond the reach of science, this discussion focuses on the practical, adaptive aspects of consciousness that have driven the evolution of self-awareness.

    • The Evolution of Brains: A Complex and Ongoing Area of ResearchDespite the difficulty of studying brain evolution due to lack of fossil records, researchers can make educated guesses by comparing living organisms and studying structures like the pallium. Brain evolution is a complex process that may have been linked to the ability to live on land.

      Nature is incredibly adaptive and capable of evolving solutions, regardless of the starting point. This was discussed in relation to the octopus brain, which has a different structure than vertebrate brains but seems to have a hippocampus-like feature. The hypothesis was that the evolution of brains, like the evolution of eyes, may have been linked to the ability to climb out of water and live on land. However, it's difficult to know for sure based on the fossil record, as brains don't fossilize easily. Instead, researchers can look at similarities between living organisms to make educated guesses. The pallium, a structure thought to be the ancestor of the hippocampus, was mentioned as a possible area of study. However, it's important to note that extant creatures have been evolving independently for millions of years, so comparisons need to be made carefully. While it may eventually be possible to learn more about the evolution of brains through advanced imaging techniques, for now, we can only make educated guesses based on the evidence we have. Ultimately, the study of the evolution of brains and their structures is a complex and ongoing area of research.

    • The reach of our planning abilities is rooted in biology but limited in scopeOur planning abilities, influenced by biology and affective valence, have a finite reach that is carefully tuned to our local environment

      Our ability to plan and think ahead is rooted in our biology, but it has limitations in terms of spatial and temporal reach. While animals like fish may only plan seconds in advance, humans can plan further, but not indefinitely. Our capacity to care about things in the future, or affective valence, plays a role in how far we can plan. The evolutionary reason for these limitations is that our planning horizon is carefully tuned to our local environment. Extending our planning horizon through technology or neuroprosthetics is an intriguing idea, but we don't yet fully understand the biological mechanisms that underpin our planning abilities. Some animals may exhibit more advanced planning behaviors, but these are often instinctual and genetically hard-wired. Further research is needed to identify the constraints on our planning abilities and potentially develop ways to extend them.

    • Understanding Human Planning and Long-Term GoalsHumans struggle to prioritize long-term goals due to our natural care system and cognitive biases, including being 'hyperbolic discounters' and having difficulty bridging the gap between our instincts and abstract thought.

      While animals like squirrels and birds may exhibit some form of planning for caching purposes, the ability for humans to conceptualize and plan for the future on a larger scale is linked to our capacity for abstract thought, language, and community. However, there's a gap between our natural care system and our cognitive system that can make it challenging to motivate ourselves to regulate behavior for long-term goals, especially when faced with existential threats. Additionally, humans are "hyperbolic discounters," meaning we value future benefits and harms less than those that are immediate, which can hinder our ability to prioritize long-term survival. While some argue we should care equally about people in the future and those close to us, others suggest it's mathematically ill-defined and impractical. Overall, recognizing these challenges and finding ways to bridge the gap between our natural care system and our cognitive system may be crucial for addressing long-term issues like climate change.

    • Making abstract issues more tangible through cultural technologyBetting on climate-related outcomes can increase engagement and participation, making abstract issues like climate change more real and actionable.

      Engaging people financially in issues that are important but not immediately perceptible, such as climate change, can lead to increased awareness and action. The speaker discussed the limitations of philosophical approaches that suggest giving away all of one's possessions or focusing solely on one's own timeframe. Instead, he proposed using cultural technology, like a climate prediction market, to make abstract concepts more tangible and increase people's investment in addressing these issues. Research suggests that betting on an outcome can significantly increase engagement and participation. The speaker's study, which involved having participants bet on climate-related outcomes, showed promising results, with potential for increased climate knowledge and attention. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of finding practical ways to make abstract issues more real and engaging for people.

    • The impact of financial incentives on beliefs and actionsFinancial incentives can significantly influence people's beliefs and actions, even when facts are clear-cut. Prediction markets can help bridge the gap between immediate concerns and long-term effects by allowing individuals to invest based on their knowledge, encouraging more rational decision-making.

      Adding a small financial incentive, or "skin in the game," can significantly impact people's beliefs and actions, even when the facts are clear-cut. This was illustrated in a study where participants were asked about factual differences between Democrats and Republicans regarding budget deficits during the Clinton presidency. When given no incentive, there was a notable difference in opinions. However, when a dollar was offered for the correct answer, the gap between the groups almost disappeared. This effect, known as the expressive component, shows that people's opinions are influenced by more than just the monetary value. Prediction markets, like the one proposed for climate change, can help bridge the gap between immediate concerns and long-term effects. By creating a market where individuals can invest based on their knowledge, we can better understand and respond to the impacts of climate change. This could be achieved through a small carbon tax that goes into everyone's pocket, allowing them to either keep the money or invest it in the market. This approach could help bring the consequences of climate change into our native planning range and encourage more rational decision-making.

    • Limited preparation for long-term risks due to human evolutionPrediction markets and popular culture engagement can help us better understand and prepare for long-term risks like solar flares and climate change.

      Our ability to plan and prepare for long-term risks, such as solar flares or climate change, is limited due to human evolution and our natural tendency to focus on the present. However, tools like prediction markets and engagement with popular culture through scientific advisors can help us better understand and prepare for these risks. The example of solar flares illustrates the challenge: while they occur frequently, the likelihood of a catastrophic event is rare and difficult to quantify. Prediction markets could help us make more informed decisions about preparing for such events. Additionally, scientists engaging with popular culture through shows like Caprica can add nuance and accuracy to portrayals of scientific concepts, inspiring viewers and encouraging more thoughtful and accurate depictions.

    • The intersection of science fiction and technology explorationSci-fi shows like Battlestar Galactica and Caprica inspire deep thought on AI's risks and moral implications, while also informing creators' perspectives.

      The intersection of science fiction and technology exploration, as depicted in shows like Battlestar Galactica and Caprica, can provoke deep thought and introspection on pressing issues, such as the potential risks and moral implications of artificial intelligence. The influence went both ways, with the creation of these shows inspiring viewers to ponder the ethical dilemmas surrounding AI, while also informing the creators' own perspectives. For example, the idea of AI challenging humanity's existence and moral compass was beautifully portrayed through characters like Boomer, who questioned whether humans had the right to continue existing. This thought-provoking arc serves as a reminder of the importance of considering the potential consequences of technological advancements and the role of storytelling in shaping our collective understanding and response to these issues.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    The Earth's climate keeps changing, largely due to the effects of human activity, and we haven't been doing enough to slow things down. Indeed, over the past year, global temperatures have been higher than ever, and higher than most climate models have predicted. Many of you have probably seen plots like this. Today's guest, Gavin Schmidt, has been a leader in measuring the variations in Earth's climate, modeling its likely future trajectory, and working to get the word out. We talk about the current state of the art, and what to expect for the future.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/20/276-gavin-schmidt-on-measuring-predicting-and-protecting-our-climate/

    Gavin Schmidt received his Ph.D. in applied mathematics from University College London. He is currently Director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and an affiliate of the Center for Climate Systems Research at Columbia University. His research involves both measuring and modeling climate variability. Among his awards are the inaugural Climate Communications Prize of the American Geophysical Union. He is a cofounder of the RealClimate blog.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    275 | Solo: Quantum Fields, Particles, Forces, and Symmetries

    275 | Solo: Quantum Fields, Particles, Forces, and Symmetries

    Publication week! Say hello to Quanta and Fields, the second volume of the planned three-volume series The Biggest Ideas in the Universe. This volume covers quantum physics generally, but focuses especially on the wonders of quantum field theory. To celebrate, this solo podcast talks about some of the big ideas that make QFT so compelling: how quantized fields produce particles, how gauge symmetries lead to forces of nature, and how those forces can manifest in different phases, including Higgs and confinement.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/13/275-solo-quantum-fields-particles-forces-and-symmetries/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | May 2024

    AMA | May 2024

    Welcome to the May 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/06/ama-may-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Here is the memorial to Dan Dennett at Ars Technica.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    274 | Gizem Gumuskaya on Building Robots from Human Cells

    274 | Gizem Gumuskaya on Building Robots from Human Cells

    Modern biology is advancing by leaps and bounds, not only in understanding how organisms work, but in learning how to modify them in interesting ways. One exciting frontier is the study of tiny "robots" created from living molecules and cells, rather than metal and plastic. Gizem Gumuskaya, who works with previous guest Michael Levin, has created anthrobots, a new kind of structure made from living human cells. We talk about how that works, what they can do, and what future developments might bring.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/29/274-gizem-gumuskaya-on-building-robots-from-human-cells/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Gimez Gumuskaya received her Ph.D. from Tufts University and the Harvard Wyss Institute for Biologically-Inspired Engineering. She is currently a postdoctoral researcher at Tufts University. She previously received a dual master's degree in Architecture and Synthetic Biology from MIT.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    273 | Stefanos Geroulanos on the Invention of Prehistory

    273 | Stefanos Geroulanos on the Invention of Prehistory

    Humanity itself might be the hardest thing for scientists to study fairly and accurately. Not only do we come to the subject with certain inevitable preconceptions, but it's hard to resist the temptation to find scientific justifications for the stories we'd like to tell about ourselves. In his new book, The Invention of Prehistory, Stefanos Geroulanos looks at the ways that we have used -- and continue to use -- supposedly-scientific tales of prehistoric humanity to bolster whatever cultural, social, and political purposes we have at the moment.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/22/273-stefanos-geroulanos-on-the-invention-of-prehistory/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Stefanos Geroulanos received his Ph.D. in humanities from Johns Hopkins. He is currently director of the Remarque Institute and a professor of history at New York University. He is the author and editor of a number of books on European intellectual history. He serves as a Co-Executive Editor of the Journal of the History of Ideas.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    272 | Leslie Valiant on Learning and Educability in Computers and People

    272 | Leslie Valiant on Learning and Educability in Computers and People

    Science is enabled by the fact that the natural world exhibits predictability and regularity, at least to some extent. Scientists collect data about what happens in the world, then try to suggest "laws" that capture many phenomena in simple rules. A small irony is that, while we are looking for nice compact rules, there aren't really nice compact rules about how to go about doing that. Today's guest, Leslie Valiant, has been a pioneer in understanding how computers can and do learn things about the world. And in his new book, The Importance of Being Educable, he pinpoints this ability to learn new things as the crucial feature that distinguishes us as human beings. We talk about where that capability came from and what its role is as artificial intelligence becomes ever more prevalent.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/15/272-leslie-valiant-on-learning-and-educability-in-computers-and-people/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Leslie Valiant received his Ph.D. in computer science from Warwick University. He is currently the T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics at Harvard University. He has been awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship, the Knuth Prize, and the Turing Award, and he is a member of the National Academy of Sciences as well as a Fellow of the Royal Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He is the pioneer of "Probably Approximately Correct" learning, which he wrote about in a book of the same name.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | April 2024

    AMA | April 2024

    Welcome to the April 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/08/ama-april-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    271 | Claudia de Rham on Modifying General Relativity

    271 | Claudia de Rham on Modifying General Relativity

    Einstein's theory of general relativity has been our best understanding of gravity for over a century, withstanding a variety of experimental challenges of ever-increasing precision. But we have to be open to the possibility that general relativity -- even at the classical level, aside from any questions of quantum gravity -- isn't the right theory of gravity. Such speculation is motivated by cosmology, where we have a good model of the universe but one with a number of loose ends. Claudia de Rham has been a leader in exploring how gravity could be modified in cosmologically interesting ways, and we discuss the current state of the art as well as future prospects.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/01/271-claudia-de-rham-on-modifying-general-relativity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Claudia de Rham received her Ph.D. in physics from the University of Cambridge. She is currently a professor of physics and deputy department head at Imperial College, London. She is a Simons Foundation Investigator, winner of the Blavatnik Award, and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Her new book is The Beauty of Falling: A Life in Pursuit of Gravity.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    270 | Solo: The Coming Transition in How Humanity Lives

    270 | Solo: The Coming Transition in How Humanity Lives

    Technology is changing the world, in good and bad ways. Artificial intelligence, internet connectivity, biological engineering, and climate change are dramatically altering the parameters of human life. What can we say about how this will extend into the future? Will the pace of change level off, or smoothly continue, or hit a singularity in a finite time? In this informal solo episode, I think through what I believe will be some of the major forces shaping how human life will change over the decades to come, exploring the very real possibility that we will experience a dramatic phase transition into a new kind of equilibrium.

    Blog post with transcript and links to additional resources: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/25/270-solo-the-coming-transition-in-how-humanity-lives/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    269 | Sahar Heydari Fard on Complexity, Justice, and Social Dynamics

    269 | Sahar Heydari Fard on Complexity, Justice, and Social Dynamics

    When it comes to social change, two questions immediately present themselves: What kind of change do we want to see happen? And, how do we bring it about? These questions are distinct but related; there's not much point in spending all of our time wanting change that won't possibly happen, or working for change that wouldn't actually be good. Addressing such issues lies at the intersection of philosophy, political science, and social dynamics. Sahar Heydari Fard looks at all of these issues through the lens of complex systems theory, to better understand how the world works and how it might be improved.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/18/269-sahar-heydari-fard-on-complexity-justice-and-social-dynamics/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Sahar Heydari Fard received a Masters in applied economics and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Cincinnati. She is currently an assistant professor in philosophy at the Ohio State University. Her research lies at the intersection of social and behavioral sciences, social and political philosophy, and ethics, using tools from complex systems theory.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Related Episodes

    28 | Roger Penrose on Spacetime, Consciousness, and the Universe

    28 | Roger Penrose on Spacetime, Consciousness, and the Universe
    Sir Roger Penrose has had a remarkable life. He has contributed an enormous amount to our understanding of general relativity, perhaps more than anyone since Einstein himself -- Penrose diagrams, singularity theorems, the Penrose process, cosmic censorship, and the list goes on. He has made important contributions to mathematics, including such fun ideas as the Penrose triangle and aperiodic tilings. He has also made bold conjectures in the notoriously contentious areas of quantum mechanics and the study of consciousness. In his spare time he's managed to become an extremely successful author, writing such books as The Emperor's New Mind and The Road to Reality. With far too much that we could have talked about, we decided to concentrate in this discussion on spacetime, black holes, and cosmology, but we made sure to reserve some time to dig into quantum mechanics and the brain by the end. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    44 | Antonio Damasio on Feelings, Thoughts, and the Evolution of Humanity

    44 | Antonio Damasio on Feelings, Thoughts, and the Evolution of Humanity
    When we talk about the mind, we are constantly talking about consciousness and cognition. Antonio Damasio wants us to talk about our feelings. But it’s not in an effort to be more touchy-feely; Damasio, one of the world’s leading neuroscientists, believes that feelings generated by the body are a crucial part of how we achieve and maintain homeostasis, which in turn is a key driver in understanding who we are. His most recent book, The Strange Order of Things: Life, Feeling, and the Making of Cultures, is an ambitious attempt to trace the role of feelings and our biological impulses in the origin of life, the nature of consciousness, and our flourishing as social, cultural beings. Support Mindscape on Patreon or Paypal. Antonio Damasio received his M.D. and Ph.D. from the University of Lisbon, Portugal. He is currently University Professor, David Dornsife Professor of Neuroscience, Professor of Psychology, Professor of Philosophy, and (along with his wife and frequent collaborator, Prof. Hannah Damasio) Director of the Brain and Creativity Institute at the University of Southern California. He is also an adjunct professor at the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Academy of Medicine, and the European Academy of Sciences and Arts. Among his numerous awards are the Grawemeyer Award, the Honda Prize, the Prince of Asturias Award in Science and Technology, and the Beaumont Medal from the American Medical Association. USC web page Brain and Creativity Institute Google Scholar page Amazon.com author page Wikipedia TED talk on The Quest to Understand Consciousness Twitter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    25 | David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem, and Living in a Simulation

    25 | David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem, and Living in a Simulation
    The "Easy Problems" of consciousness have to do with how the brain takes in information, thinks about it, and turns it into action. The "Hard Problem," on the other hand, is the task of explaining our individual, subjective, first-person experiences of the world. What is it like to be me, rather than someone else? Everyone agrees that the Easy Problems are hard; some people think the Hard Problem is almost impossible, while others think it's pretty easy. Today's guest, David Chalmers, is arguably the leading philosopher of consciousness working today, and the one who coined the phrase "the Hard Problem," as well as proposing the philosophical zombie thought experiment. Recently he has been taking seriously the notion of panpsychism. We talk about these knotty issues (about which we deeply disagree), but also spend some time on the possibility that we live in a computer simulation. Would simulated lives be "real"? (There we agree -- yes they would.) David Chalmers got his Ph.D. from Indiana University working under Douglas Hoftstadter. He is currently University Professor of Philosophy and Neural Science at New York University and co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness. He is a fellow of the Australian Academy of Humanities, the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Among his books are The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, The Character of Consciousness, and Constructing the World. He and David Bourget founded the PhilPapers project. Web site NYU Faculty page Wikipedia page PhilPapers page Amazon author page NYU Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness TED talk: How do you explain consciousness? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    43 | Matthew Luczy on the Pleasures of Wine

    43 | Matthew Luczy on the Pleasures of Wine
    Some people never drink wine; for others, it’s an indispensable part of an enjoyable meal. Whatever your personal feelings might be, wine seems to exhibit a degree of complexity and nuance that can be intimidating to the non-expert. Where does that complexity come from, and how can we best approach wine? To answer these questions, we talk to Matthew Luczy, sommelier and wine director at Mélisse, one of the top fine-dining restaurants in the Los Angeles area. Matthew insisted that we actually drink wine rather than just talking about it, so drink we do. Therefore, in a Mindscape first, I recruited a third party to join us and add her own impressions of the tasting: science writer Jennifer Ouellette, who I knew would be available because we’re married to each other. We talk about what makes different wines distinct, the effects of aging, and what’s the right bottle to have with pizza. You are free to drink along at home, with exactly these wines or some other choices, but I think the podcast will be enjoyable whether you do or not. Support Mindscape on Patreon or Paypal. Mattew Luczy is a Certified Sommelier as judged by the Court of Master Sommeliers. He currently works as the Wine Director at Mélisse in Santa Monica, California. He is also active in photography and music. Mélisse home page Personal/photography page Instagram Ask a Somm: When Should I Decant Wine? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    18 | Clifford Johnson on What's So Great About Superstring Theory

    18 | Clifford Johnson on What's So Great About Superstring Theory
    String theory is a speculative and highly technical proposal for uniting the known forces of nature, including gravity, under a single quantum-mechanical framework. This doesn't seem like a recipe for creating a lightning rod of controversy, but somehow string theory has become just that. To get to the bottom of why anyone (indeed, a substantial majority of experts in the field) would think that replacing particles with little loops of string was a promising way forward for theoretical physics, I spoke with expert string theorist Clifford Johnson. We talk about the road string theory has taken from a tentative proposal dealing with the strong interactions, through a number of revolutions, to the point it's at today. Also, where all those extra dimensions might have gone. At the end we touch on Clifford's latest project, a graphic novel that he wrote and illustrated about how science is done. Clifford Johnson is a Professor of Physics at the University of Southern California. He received his Ph.D. in mathematics and physics from the University of Southampton. His research area is theoretical physics, focusing on string theory and quantum field theory. He was awarded the Maxwell Medal from the Institute of Physics. Johnson is the author of the technical monograph D-Branes, as well as the graphic novel The Dialogues. Home page Wikipedia page Publications A talk on The Dialogues Asymptotia blog Twitter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.