Logo
    Search

    Best Of: Nikole Hannah-Jones and Ta-Nehisi Coates on the Fight Over U.S. History

    enMay 27, 2022

    Podcast Summary

    • Nicole Hannah Jones and Ta-Nehisi Coates Discuss Importance of Understanding American HistoryTwo renowned journalists and authors, Nicole Hannah Jones and Ta-Nehisi Coates, are joining Howard University to teach future writers and thinkers about American history. They discussed the current debate over critical race theory and its significance in shaping perceptions and power dynamics.

      Nicole Hannah Jones and Ta-Nehisi Coates, two renowned journalists and authors, are joining the faculty at Howard University to teach the next generation of writers and thinkers. But their conversation with Ezra Klein went beyond this news peg, delving into the importance of understanding and teaching American history. They discussed the current battle over critical race theory and why this fight over the past is more electric than debates about the present. The stakes are high, as the story a country tells about itself can change power dynamics and shape perceptions. The conversation touched on topics like the 16/19 project, the role of American exceptionalism, and the relationship between patriotism and realism. For both Jones and Coates, teaching is an essential intellectual exercise that keeps their minds fresh and allows them to engage with the next generation of writers and thinkers. By imparting the importance of immediacy and craft to students, they hope to inspire the next wave of journalists and storytellers.

    • Empowering the next generation of journalists for a healthy democracyThe Journalism and Democracy Center aims to equip the next generation of journalists with the skills to cover politics truthfully and accurately, contributing to a healthy democracy

      Journalism plays a crucial role in maintaining a functional democracy by informing the public and holding powerful people accountable. The current state of journalism is a cause for concern, as it is not living up to its potential in this critical moment for the country. The connection between race and democracy is particularly important, as historically, black people have been marginalized from the political discourse. However, in recent years, there has been a shift towards greater representation and access to the tools of journalism for black journalists and writers. This is an opportunity to bolster the "firewall of our democracy" by training the next generation of journalists to do impactful, honest reporting. The Journalism and Democracy Center, which Nicole is building, reflects this vision of equipping journalists to cover politics truthfully and accurately, ensuring a healthy democracy.

    • Understanding history essential for effective journalismSkepticism and recognizing power's role in shaping narratives, challenging dominant historical narratives, and giving voice to underrepresented communities are crucial for effective journalism.

      Journalism and history are interconnected, and understanding history is crucial for effective journalism. The speakers emphasized the importance of skepticism and recognizing the role of power in shaping narratives. They criticized the current approach to political reporting, which often assumes democratic institutions will hold and fails to consider the historical context of racial inequality and voter suppression. They also highlighted the need to challenge the dominant historical narratives and give voice to underrepresented communities. The speakers used the example of police reporting, where official reports have often been disputed by citizen journalists and social media. They concluded that journalism should not give unquestioned authority to power and instead strive for a more critical and inclusive approach.

    • Journalists' perspective on a country's history influences coverageJournalists' beliefs about a country's history shape their reporting. Acknowledging its complexity and recognizing both good and evil actions leads to fairer reporting.

      The way journalists cover a country's history and its people is significantly influenced by the beliefs and presumptions they hold about that history. If journalists view a country's history as mostly good, they will cover it in a positive light. However, if they recognize that the history is complex and includes both good and evil actions, they will approach the coverage differently. This perspective is crucial because it can impact how journalists report on current events and the people involved in them. The discussion also touched upon the reaction to critiques of the past versus the present. The speaker noted that critiques of the past, such as the 16/19 project, which challenged the mythology of American exceptionalism, elicited a stronger response than critiques of the present. This is because many people, regardless of political affiliation, have a vested interest in the mythology of American greatness and may feel uncomfortable when it is challenged. Therefore, it is essential for journalists to approach their work with a critical and nuanced understanding of history, recognizing that it is complex and includes both good and evil actions. This approach will lead to more accurate and fair reporting on current events and the people involved in them.

    • Challenging the Traditional Narrative of American HistoryThe 1619 Project shifts focus from individual actions to systemic roots, challenging traditional beliefs of American history as a land of freedom and democracy, and forcing us to reconsider our identity as Americans.

      The 1619 Project challenges the traditional narrative of American history by placing black people at the center and displacing white people from the position of American greatness. This perspective, as the speaker explains, is a difficult pill to swallow for many people as it challenges the long-held belief of America as a land of freedom and democracy. The project goes beyond critiquing individual actions and instead focuses on the systemic roots of American history, including the role of slavery and its impact on the founding fathers and the deadliest war in American history. This new perspective forces us to reconsider our identity as Americans and question what makes us special if not our unique democratic history. The political opposition to the project is not based on factual inaccuracies but rather the discomfort of this new perspective that decentralizes individual goodness and highlights the larger system at work.

    • Preserving American exceptionalism and maintaining power structuresOpposition to teaching children about America's racist past stems from a desire to preserve a narrative of American exceptionalism and maintain power structures, often leading to efforts to suppress voter rights and justify discriminatory policies.

      The opposition to teaching children about the true history of racism in America stems from a desire to preserve a narrative of American exceptionalism and maintain power structures. This pushback, fueled by the fear of acknowledging America's racist past, is often accompanied by efforts to suppress voter rights and justify discriminatory policies. The conversation around the 1619 Project and critical race theory highlights the importance of acknowledging and confronting America's history, rather than obscuring or hiding it. The fear is that children will learn that their nation is deeply rooted in racism and that they are complicit in its legacy. However, it's essential to recognize that this conversation opens up opportunities for growth and understanding, rather than closing doors. It's a constant struggle to address the complexities of America's history and its ongoing impact, but a necessary one for creating a more equitable society.

    • Acknowledging complexities and shaping the futureUnderstand history's complexities, acknowledge past's impact, strive for progress, and recognize diverse roles in pushing for change.

      Understanding history requires acknowledging its complexities and recognizing that individuals and groups, including African Americans, have both noble and problematic aspects. The future lies in teaching a more balanced and honest history, acknowledging the past's impact on the present, and striving to live up to our highest ideals. No one is responsible for the actions of their ancestors, but we are responsible for shaping the future. By acknowledging our past, we can work towards creating a country that truly embodies its majestic ideals. The discussion also emphasized the importance of recognizing the role of diverse groups, including biracial and multiracial citizens, in pushing for progress throughout history.

    • Recognizing America's Unfinished DemocracyAmerica's history as a multiethnic democracy is inconsistent and unfinished, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging the humanity of all people and addressing political challenges to create a more just and equitable society

      America, as portrayed in the media during the late 1990s, was often viewed as a finished product with a great economy and a stable democracy. However, the speaker argues that there's an invigorating aspect to recognizing that America still faces significant political challenges and that its history as a multiethnic democracy is inconsistent and unfinished. The speaker emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the humanity of all people, even in the face of difficult histories and complex power dynamics. Additionally, the speaker highlights the role of Barack Obama's presidency in illuminating the anti-democratic strain within American politics, which has historically been present but has shifted between the two major parties. Overall, the speaker encourages embracing the ongoing work of creating a more just and equitable society, rather than viewing America as a finished product.

    • The election of Barack Obama brought racial progress to the forefront but the struggle for basic rights has been ongoing for centuriesThe 1619 Project gained relevance during Trump's presidency due to his divisive and exclusionary vision of America, highlighting the importance of an inclusive and truthful understanding of history.

      The election of Barack Obama marked a pivotal moment in American history, bringing the issue of democracy and racial progress to the forefront. However, the struggle for basic rights and recognition as citizens has been the defining experience for Black Americans for centuries, making the idea of "exciting struggles" a luxury. The predictable backlash after Obama's presidency, with the rise of Donald Trump, sent a chilling message about the country's values and who can ascend to power. Trump's presidency, in many ways, forced a confrontation with America's troubled racial past, making it easier for arguments challenging traditional narratives to gain traction. The 1619 Project, which began before Trump, highlights this critical period in American history and the ongoing impact of slavery and systemic racism. The project's relevance and resonance during Trump's presidency can be attributed to his embodiment of a divisive and exclusionary vision of America, making the need for a more inclusive and truthful understanding of history more pressing.

    • The intersection of cultural and political powerThe Obama presidency showcased how symbolism and representation can be as impactful as policies or rhetoric in shaping societal perceptions

      The intersection of cultural and political power has become increasingly evident in recent years, with the left wielding cultural influence and the right using political power to counteract it. This dynamic was highlighted during the presidency of Donald Trump, whose explicit racist rhetoric challenged societal norms and forced people to confront their own biases. The symbol of a black president, such as Barack Obama, held immense significance for African Americans, but the meaning of his presidency was also shaped by the line of white male presidents that preceded him. The discussion also touched upon the role of iconic figures, like superheroes, in shaping societal perceptions of who is human and who is not. The Obama presidency brought to the forefront the idea that the symbolism of a leader can be just as, if not more, significant than their policies or rhetoric.

    • Exploring Identity, Privilege, and RepresentationExploring identity, privilege, and representation helps us understand complex constructs and foster a more equitable society.

      Identity and privilege are complex constructs. While birthright may grant eligibility to certain privileges, it doesn't guarantee membership or belonging. This is particularly relevant in the context of race and representation, where historical narratives and cultural power play significant roles. Trump's election, for instance, was not solely based on policy but also his ability to tap into cultural anxieties and desires. Some white voters saw Obama's election as a resolution to racial issues, making them less interested in discussing racial inequality. However, this perspective ignores the ongoing struggles faced by marginalized communities. In response, artists like Ta-Nehisi Coates are using various mediums to challenge limiting narratives and broaden the imaginarium. By exploring the intricacies of identity, privilege, and representation, we can foster a deeper understanding of our world and work towards creating a more equitable society.

    • Impact of Imagination on the Younger GenerationRecognizing the power of imagination in shaping policies and societal norms, we should focus on storytelling to influence the next generation's perception of the world and what's possible.

      The formation of imagination in the younger generation plays a crucial role in shaping policies and societal norms. The symbols and narratives we expose them to significantly impact their understanding of the world and what's possible. The example given was the influence of the Black Panther movie on white kids dressing up as the character. While symbols can be co-opted, their power lies in their ability to communicate ideas and shape perceptions. The speaker emphasized the importance of acknowledging the role of imagination in politics and journalism, and advocated for a focus on storytelling to influence the ongoing battle for shaping the next generation's imagination. A favorite piece of nonfiction journalism mentioned was Ta-Nehisi Coates' "Fear of a Black President," which was praised for its impactful content and structure.

    • The Power of Exceptional JournalismExceptional journalism leaves a lasting impact on readers, with gripping stories that inspire urgency and fear. Talent, intelligence, and constant learning are crucial for success.

      Exceptional journalism can leave a lasting impact on readers. Catherine Schulz's piece in The New Yorker about the impending tsunami in the Pacific Northwest is a prime example. The story, which includes detailed reporting and investigative work, is so gripping that it leaves readers with a sense of urgency and fear. Schulz's ability to describe the potential disaster in a step-by-step manner, while also highlighting the reasons for our inaction, is truly remarkable. Another piece that changed the speaker's perspective as a journalist is Sherry Fink's "Five Days at Memorial," which investigates what happened in hospitals during Hurricane Katrina. Fink's unique background as both a medical doctor and a journalist allowed her to provide sensitive and insightful reporting. The speaker emphasizes that talent and intelligence are important, but not the only factors for success in journalism. The challenges and complexities of the field are significant, and constant learning and adaptation are necessary.

    • The importance of questioning and persisting in journalismPerseverance, critical thinking, and context-building are essential skills for journalists to uncover the truth and challenge deeply rooted systems.

      Intelligence and talent alone are not enough to excel in journalism. The ability to persist and question deeply rooted systems is crucial. The speaker, a journalist and professor, emphasizes the importance of going beyond imagination and intellect to actually do the work, even when it feels challenging or dark. She also shares how her daughter has taught her the power of questioning and explaining complex systems in journalism, rather than just accepting them as they are. The speaker's experiences highlight the importance of perseverance, critical thinking, and context-building in journalism.

    • Staying open in journalism: Humility and acknowledging value of criticismMaintaining openness to new ideas and reasonable critique is crucial for strong journalism. Humility and acknowledging the value of criticism while separating truth from lies are essential qualities for journalists.

      Humility and openness are essential qualities for journalists. As a journalist, it's important to admit when we don't know the answer and to remain open to new information and ideas. However, in today's digital age, staying open can be challenging with the constant flood of information and criticism. Nicole and Tom shared their experiences of managing this challenge. Tom shared how he had to shut off social media to avoid being overwhelmed by the noise. Nicole emphasized the importance of acknowledging the value of criticism while separating truth from lies. Both agreed that maintaining an openness to new ideas and reasonable critique is crucial for strong journalism.

    • Navigating authenticity on social media with a large followingMaintaining authenticity on social media requires self-reflection, openness to criticism, and prioritizing trusted communities for constructive dialogue. Reading widely and understanding opposing arguments are essential for staying sharp and having great arguments.

      Maintaining an authentic and open presence on social media, particularly when one has a large following, can be challenging and lead to a distorted perception of one's personality. Nicole Hannah Jones shares her experience of how the Twitter platform has changed over the years, making it harder to have meaningful conversations and be vulnerable. She found that she needed to return to a smaller, trusted community for constructive criticism and dialogue. Jones also emphasizes the importance of being self-reflective and open to criticism while maintaining a balance between engaging on social media and focusing on her work. She believes that reading widely and understanding opposing arguments are essential for staying sharp and having great arguments. Ultimately, she recognizes the need to prioritize her core group of friends and colleagues for honest feedback and maintaining her authentic self.

    • Expanding knowledge and fostering constructive discussionsRead widely, engage in thoughtful discussions, and learn from diverse perspectives to reconcile with complexities in history and the world

      Engaging in arguments with people who don't share the same good faith can bring out the worst in us. To avoid this, it's essential to have friends who provide constructive criticism and to read widely, even if the perspectives don't align with our own. Two recommended books that can help in understanding American history and its complexities are W.E.B. Du Bois' "Black Reconstruction" and Laurent Dubois' "Avengers of the New World: The History of the Haitian Revolution." Additionally, Neil Gaiman's "Sandman Overture" is a graphic novel recommendation, and a correction was made regarding the number of early presidents who owned enslaved people (12 out of the first 18, not 12 out of the first 15). Engaging in thoughtful and open-minded discussions, as well as expanding our knowledge through reading, can help us reconcile with the complexities of history and the world around us.

    Recent Episodes from The Ezra Klein Show

    What Is the Democratic Party For?

    What Is the Democratic Party For?

    Top Democrats have closed ranks around Joe Biden since the debate. Should they? 

    Mentioned:

    This Isn’t All Joe Biden’s Fault” by Ezra Klein

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” by The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” with Elaine Kamarck on The Ezra Klein Show

    The Hollow Parties by Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This audio essay was produced by Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Fact-Checking by Jack McCordick and Michelle Harris. Mixing by Efim Shapiro. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Jeff Geld, Elias Isquith and Aman Sahota. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 30, 2024

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    I joined my Times Opinion colleagues Ross Douthat and Michelle Cottle to discuss the debate — and what Democrats might do next.

    Mentioned:

    The Biden and Trump Weaknesses That Don’t Get Enough Attention” by Ross Douthat

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!” with Matthew Yglesias on The Ezra Klein Show

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” on The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” with Elaine Kamarck on The Ezra Klein Show

    Gretchen Whitmer on The Interview

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump” with Sam Rosenfeld and Daniel Schlozman on The Ezra Klein Show

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com. You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 28, 2024

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Donald Trump has made inflation a central part of his campaign message. At his rallies, he rails against “the Biden inflation tax” and “crooked Joe’s inflation nightmare,” and promises that in a second Trump term, “inflation will be in full retreat.”

    But if you look at Trump’s actual policies, that wouldn’t be the case at all. Trump has a bold, ambitious agenda to make prices much, much higher. He’s proposing a 10 percent tariff on imported goods, and a 60 percent tariff on products from China. He wants to deport huge numbers of immigrants. And he’s made it clear that he’d like to replace the Federal Reserve chair with someone more willing to take orders from him. It’s almost unimaginable to me that you would run on this agenda at a time when Americans are so mad about high prices. But I don’t think people really know that’s what Trump is vowing to do.

    So to drill into the weeds of Trump’s plans, I decided to call up an old friend. Matt Yglesias is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the author of the Slow Boring newsletter, where he’s been writing a lot about Trump’s proposals. We also used to host a policy podcast together, “The Weeds.”

    In this conversation, we discuss what would happen to the economy, especially in terms of inflation, if Trump actually did what he says he wants to do; what we can learn from how Trump managed the economy in his first term; and why more people aren’t sounding the alarm.

    Mentioned:

    Trump’s new economic plan is terrible” by Matthew Yglesias

    Never mind: Wall Street titans shake off qualms and embrace Trump” by Sam Sutton

    How Far Trump Would Go” by Eric Cortellessa

    Book Recommendations:

    Take Back the Game by Linda Flanagan

    1177 B.C. by Eric H. Cline

    The Rise of the G.I. Army, 1940-1941 by Paul Dickson

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Kate Sinclair and Mary Marge Locker. Mixing by Isaac Jones, with Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero, Adam Posen and Michael Strain.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 21, 2024

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The biggest divide in our politics isn’t between Democrats and Republicans, or even left and right. It’s between people who follow politics closely, and those who pay almost no attention to it. If you’re in the former camp — and if you’re reading this, you probably are — the latter camp can seem inscrutable. These people hardly ever look at political news. They hate discussing politics. But they do care about issues and candidates, and they often vote.

    As the 2024 election takes shape, this bloc appears crucial to determining who wins the presidency. An NBC News poll from April found that 15 percent of voters don’t follow political news, and Donald Trump was winning them by 26 points.

    Yanna Krupnikov studies exactly this kind of voter. She’s a professor of communication and media at the University of Michigan and an author, with John Barry Ryan, of “The Other Divide: Polarization and Disengagement in American Politics.” The book examines how the chasm between the deeply involved and the less involved shapes politics in America. I’ve found it to be a helpful guide for understanding one of the most crucial dynamics emerging in this year’s election: the swing to Trump from President Biden among disengaged voters.

    In this conversation, we discuss how politically disengaged voters relate to politics; where they get their information about politics and how they form opinions; and whether major news events, like Trump’s recent conviction, might sway them.

    Mentioned:

    The ‘Need for Chaos’ and Motivations to Share Hostile Political Rumors” by Michael Bang Petersen, Mathias Osmundsen and Kevin Arceneaux

    Hooked by Markus Prior

    The Political Influence of Lifestyle Influencers? Examining the Relationship Between Aspirational Social Media Use and Anti-Expert Attitudes and Beliefs” by Ariel Hasell and Sedona Chinn

    One explanation for the 2024 election’s biggest mystery” by Eric Levitz

    Book Recommendations:

    What Goes Without Saying by Taylor N. Carlson and Jaime E. Settle

    Through the Grapevine by Taylor N. Carlson

    Sorry I’m Late, I Didn’t Want to Come by Jessica Pan

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 18, 2024

    The View From the Israeli Right

    The View From the Israeli Right

    On Tuesday I got back from an eight-day trip to Israel and the West Bank. I happened to be there on the day that Benny Gantz resigned from the war cabinet and called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to schedule new elections, breaking the unity government that Israel had had since shortly after Oct. 7.

    There is no viable left wing in Israel right now. There is a coalition that Netanyahu leads stretching from right to far right and a coalition that Gantz leads stretching from center to right. In the early months of the war, Gantz appeared ascendant as support for Netanyahu cratered. But now Netanyahu’s poll numbers are ticking back up.

    So one thing I did in Israel was deepen my reporting on Israel’s right. And there, Amit Segal’s name kept coming up. He’s one of Israel’s most influential political analysts and the author of “The Story of Israeli Politics” is coming out in English.

    Segal and I talked about the political differences between Gantz and Netanyahu, the theory of security that’s emerging on the Israeli right, what happened to the Israeli left, the threat from Iran and Hezbollah and how Netanyahu is trying to use President Biden’s criticism to his political advantage.

    Mentioned:

    Biden May Spur Another Netanyahu Comeback” by Amit Segal

    Book Recommendations:

    The Years of Lyndon Johnson Series by Robert A. Caro

    The World of Yesterday by Stefan Zweig

    The Object of Zionism by Zvi Efrat

    The News from Waterloo by Brian Cathcart

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Claire Gordon. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris with Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 14, 2024

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    There’s something weird happening with the economy. On a personal level, most Americans say they’re doing pretty well right now. And according to the data, that’s true. Wages have gone up faster than inflation. Unemployment is low, the stock market is generally up so far this year, and people are buying more stuff.

    And yet in surveys, people keep saying the economy is bad. A recent Harris poll for The Guardian found that around half of Americans think the S. & P. 500 is down this year, and that unemployment is at a 50-year high. Fifty-six percent think we’re in a recession.

    There are many theories about why this gap exists. Maybe political polarization is warping how people see the economy or it’s a failure of President Biden’s messaging, or there’s just something uniquely painful about inflation. And while there’s truth in all of these, it felt like a piece of the story was missing.

    And for me, that missing piece was an article I read right before the pandemic. An Atlantic story from February 2020 called “The Great Affordability Crisis Breaking America.” It described how some of Americans’ biggest-ticket expenses — housing, health care, higher education and child care — which were already pricey, had been getting steadily pricier for decades.

    At the time, prices weren’t the big topic in the economy; the focus was more on jobs and wages. So it was easier for this trend to slip notice, like a frog boiling in water, quietly, putting more and more strain on American budgets. But today, after years of high inflation, prices are the biggest topic in the economy. And I think that explains the anger people feel: They’re noticing the price of things all the time, and getting hammered with the reality of how expensive these things have become.

    The author of that Atlantic piece is Annie Lowrey. She’s an economics reporter, the author of Give People Money, and also my wife. In this conversation, we discuss how the affordability crisis has collided with our post-pandemic inflationary world, the forces that shape our economic perceptions, why people keep spending as if prices aren’t a strain and what this might mean for the presidential election.

    Mentioned:

    It Will Never Be a Good Time to Buy a House” by Annie Lowrey

    Book Recommendations:

    Franchise by Marcia Chatelain

    A Place of Greater Safety by Hilary Mantel

    Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 07, 2024

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    After Donald Trump was convicted last week in his hush-money trial, Republican leaders wasted no time in rallying behind him. There was no chance the Republican Party was going to replace Trump as their nominee at this point. Trump has essentially taken over the G.O.P.; his daughter-in-law is even co-chair of the Republican National Committee.

    How did the Republican Party get so weak that it could fall victim to a hostile takeover?

    Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld are the authors of “The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics,” which traces how both major political parties have been “hollowed out” over the decades, transforming once-powerful gatekeeping institutions into mere vessels for the ideologies of specific candidates. And they argue that this change has been perilous for our democracy.

    In this conversation, we discuss how the power of the parties has been gradually chipped away; why the Republican Party became less ideological and more geared around conflict; the merits of a stronger party system; and more.

    Mentioned:

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” by The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” by The Ezra Klein Show with Elaine Kamarck

    Book Recommendations:

    The Two Faces of American Freedom by Aziz Rana

    Rainbow’s End by Steven P. Erie

    An American Melodrama by Lewis Chester, Godfrey Hodgson, Bruce Page

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show’‘ was produced by Elias Isquith. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker, Kate Sinclair and Rollin Hu. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota and Efim Shapiro. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 04, 2024

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    The steady dings of notifications. The 40 tabs that greet you when you open your computer in the morning. The hundreds of unread emails, most of them spam, with subject lines pleading or screaming for you to click. Our attention is under assault these days, and most of us are familiar with the feeling that gives us — fractured, irritated, overwhelmed.

    D. Graham Burnett calls the attention economy an example of “human fracking”: With our attention in shorter and shorter supply, companies are going to even greater lengths to extract this precious resource from us. And he argues that it’s now reached a point that calls for a kind of revolution. “This is creating conditions that are at odds with human flourishing. We know this,” he tells me. “And we need to mount new forms of resistance.”

    Burnett is a professor of the history of science at Princeton University and is working on a book about the laboratory study of attention. He’s also a co-founder of the Strother School of Radical Attention, which is a kind of grass roots, artistic effort to create a curriculum for studying attention.

    In this conversation, we talk about how the 20th-century study of attention laid the groundwork for today’s attention economy, the connection between changing ideas of attention and changing ideas of the self, how we even define attention (this episode is worth listening to for Burnett’s collection of beautiful metaphors alone), whether the concern over our shrinking attention spans is simply a moral panic, what it means to teach attention and more.

    Mentioned:

    Friends of Attention

    The Battle for Attention” by Nathan Heller

    Powerful Forces Are Fracking Our Attention. We Can Fight Back.” by D. Graham Burnett, Alyssa Loh and Peter Schmidt

    Scenes of Attention edited by D. Graham Burnett and Justin E. H. Smith

    Book Recommendations:

    Addiction by Design by Natasha Dow Schüll

    Objectivity by Lorraine Daston and Peter L. Galison

    The Confidence-Man by Herman Melville

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Elias Isquith. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 31, 2024

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    A.I.-generated art has flooded the internet, and a lot of it is derivative, even boring or offensive. But what could it look like for artists to collaborate with A.I. systems in making art that is actually generative, challenging, transcendent?

    Holly Herndon offered one answer with her 2019 album “PROTO.” Along with Mathew Dryhurst and the programmer Jules LaPlace, she built an A.I. called “Spawn” trained on human voices that adds an uncanny yet oddly personal layer to the music. Beyond her music and visual art, Herndon is trying to solve a problem that many creative people are encountering as A.I. becomes more prominent: How do you encourage experimentation without stealing others’ work to train A.I. models? Along with Dryhurst, Jordan Meyer and Patrick Hoepner, she co-founded Spawning, a company figuring out how to allow artists — and all of us creating content on the internet — to “consent” to our work being used as training data.

    In this conversation, we discuss how Herndon collaborated with a human chorus and her “A.I. baby,” Spawn, on “PROTO”; how A.I. voice imitators grew out of electronic music and other musical genres; why Herndon prefers the term “collective intelligence” to “artificial intelligence”; why an “opt-in” model could help us retain more control of our work as A.I. trawls the internet for data; and much more.

    Mentioned:

    Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt” by Holly Herndon

    xhairymutantx” by Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst, for the Whitney Museum of Art

    Fade” by Holly Herndon

    Swim” by Holly Herndon

    Jolene” by Holly Herndon and Holly+

    Movement” by Holly Herndon

    Chorus” by Holly Herndon

    Godmother” by Holly Herndon

    The Precision of Infinity” by Jlin and Philip Glass

    Holly+

    Book Recommendations:

    Intelligence and Spirit by Reza Negarestani

    Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky

    Plurality by E. Glen Weyl, Audrey Tang and ⿻ Community

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero and Jack Hamilton.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 24, 2024

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    “The Jetsons” premiered in 1962. And based on the internal math of the show, George Jetson, the dad, was born in 2022. He’d be a toddler right now. And we are so far away from the world that show imagined. There were a lot of future-trippers in the 1960s, and most of them would be pretty disappointed by how that future turned out.

    So what happened? Why didn’t we build that future?

    The answer, I think, lies in the 1970s. I’ve been spending a lot of time studying that decade in my work, trying to understand why America is so bad at building today. And James Pethokoukis has also spent a lot of time looking at the 1970s, in his work trying to understand why America is less innovative today than it was in the postwar decades. So Pethokoukis and I are asking similar questions, and circling the same time period, but from very different ideological vantages.

    Pethokoukis is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and author of the book “The Conservative Futurist: How to Create the Sci-Fi World We Were Promised.” He also writes a newsletter called Faster, Please! “The two screamingly obvious things that we stopped doing is we stopped spending on science, research and development the way we did in the 1960s,” he tells me, “and we began to regulate our economy as if regulation would have no impact on innovation.”

    In this conversation, we debate why the ’70s were such an inflection point; whether this slowdown phenomenon is just something that happens as countries get wealthier; and what the government’s role should be in supporting and regulating emerging technologies like A.I.

    Mentioned:

    U.S. Infrastructure: 1929-2017” by Ray C. Fair

    Book Recommendations

    Why Information Grows by Cesar Hidalgo

    The Expanse series by James S.A. Corey

    The American Dream Is Not Dead by Michael R. Strain

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 21, 2024

    Related Episodes

    From Opinion: Nikole Hannah-Jones and Ta-Nehisi Coates on the Story We Tell About America

    From Opinion: Nikole Hannah-Jones and Ta-Nehisi Coates on the Story We Tell About America

    You’ve heard the 1619 podcast right here on The Daily. And we’ve covered the backlash to the 1619 Project and the battle over critical race theory that followed. In this interview, Ezra Klein, an Opinion columnist at The New York Times and host of The Ezra Klein Show, speaks with Nikole Hannah-Jones and Ta-Nehisi Coates about these skirmishes, and how they have gripped our national discourse. At the heart of the conversation in this episode is the question: How do we understand American history?

    Each Tuesday and Friday for New York Times Opinion, Ezra Klein invites you into a conversation on something that matters. Subscribe to the show wherever you listen to podcasts. 

    The Revolt Against Differentiation and the Normalization of Violence - A Neighbor's Choice

    The Revolt Against Differentiation and the Normalization of Violence - A Neighbor's Choice

    David Gornoski addresses the prevalent postmodern critique of traditional values such as the family, gender roles, and chivalry. "It's a rebellion against nature, against boundaries. Differentiation becomes evil and violence becomes passé." David argues that political correctness is not just an "idea" but also a religious movement that has, in some sense, rightly identified social imbalances. The question is: what are those imbalances and how do we address them? Listen to the full episode to find out and more.

    Email A Neighbor's Choice with a guest suggestion, story tip or question at hello@aneighborschoice.com
    Visit the A Neighbor's Choice website at aneighborschoice.com

    What We Get Wrong About Race - Kenan Malik

    What We Get Wrong About Race - Kenan Malik
    Kenan Malik is an Indian-born British writer, lecturer and broadcaster, trained in neurobiology and the history of science. As an academic author, his focus is on the philosophy of biology, and contemporary theories of multiculturalism, pluralism, and race. He is the author of many books, the latest of which is ‘Not So Black and White: A History of Race from White Supremacy to Identity Politics’- available here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1787387763/ SPONSORED BY: AG1. Go to https://www.drinkAG1.com/triggernometry/ to get 5 free AG1 Travel Packs and a FREE 1 year supply of Vitamin D with your first purchase! Join our exclusive TRIGGERnometry community on Locals! https://triggernometry.locals.com/ OR Support TRIGGERnometry Here: Bitcoin: bc1qm6vvhduc6s3rvy8u76sllmrfpynfv94qw8p8d5 Music by: Music by: Xentric | info@xentricapc.com | https://www.xentricapc.com/ YouTube:  @xentricapc   Buy Merch Here: https://www.triggerpod.co.uk/shop/ Advertise on TRIGGERnometry: marketing@triggerpod.co.uk Join the Mailing List: https://www.triggerpod.co.uk/sign-up/ Find TRIGGERnometry on Social Media:  https://twitter.com/triggerpod https://www.facebook.com/triggerpod/ https://www.instagram.com/triggerpod/ About TRIGGERnometry:  Stand-up comedians Konstantin Kisin (@konstantinkisin) and Francis Foster (@francisjfoster) make sense of politics, economics, free speech, AI, drug policy and WW3 with the help of presidential advisors, renowned economists, award-winning journalists, controversial writers, leading scientists and notorious comedians. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices