Logo
    Search

    Hard Fork: Elon’s Hidden Motives + A Meetup in the Metaverse

    enOctober 11, 2022

    Podcast Summary

    • Understanding the latest twists and turns in the tech industryHard Fork podcast provides in-depth analysis and explanation of the tech industry's latest developments, including the Elon Musk-Twitter saga and the metaverse

      The tech industry is currently experiencing a period of uncertainty and change. Big tech companies are facing challenges from regulators, upstarts, and shifting markets. The tech markets are drying up, leading to layoffs and mergers. Elon Musk's attempted purchase of Twitter, which has been in a state of flux, is just one example of the industry's instability. To make sense of these developments, tech reporters like Kevin Roose and Casey Newton are essential resources. Their new podcast, Hard Fork, will provide in-depth analysis and explanation of the tech industry's latest twists and turns. In this first episode, they discuss the latest developments in the Elon Musk-Twitter saga and explore the metaverse with New York Times reporter Kashmir Hill. The tech industry is in a state of flux, and Hard Fork aims to help listeners navigate these uncertain waters.

    • Musk's last-minute change of heart on Twitter dealDespite unexpected twists, Musk agreed to complete Twitter deal, possibly facing implications if trial had continued

      Elon Musk's attempt to back out of his agreement to buy Twitter for $44 billion has been filled with unexpected twists and turns. After months of accusations, counter-accusations, and public criticism, Musk unexpectedly agreed to complete the deal on Monday, just days before the trial was set to begin. The reasons for this sudden change of heart remain unclear, with theories suggesting Musk may have been advised that his case for getting out of the deal was weak. Despite the last-minute developments, many believe the deal will still close, possibly as soon as next week. However, the outcome of the trial could have potentially significant implications for Musk, as it could have resulted in him being forced to complete the purchase and pay the $44 billion price tag.

    • Elon Musk's Change of Heart on Twitter DealMusk's sudden reversal on the Twitter acquisition deal raises questions about his intentions and the potential financial implications, with billions at stake and his reputation on the line.

      Elon Musk's sudden U-turn on the Twitter acquisition deal, despite his previous criticisms, raises questions about his intentions and the potential financial implications. Some speculate that he may be using this as a ploy to buy time and eventually back out, while others believe he genuinely wants to own Twitter despite his earlier criticisms. Regardless, the stakes are high, with billions of dollars on the line and Musk's reputation at risk. The uncertainty surrounding his decision-making process has left many wondering about the authenticity of his earlier criticisms and the potential consequences for all parties involved.

    • Elon Musk's Twitter Takeover: Changes Ahead for the CompanyElon Musk's potential acquisition of Twitter could lead to CEO Parag Agrawal's firing, mass executive exodus, employee resistance, and numerous challenges for Musk.

      Elon Musk's potential acquisition of Twitter could lead to significant changes at the company, including the firing of CEO Parag Agrawal and a mass exodus of executives. Musk's past criticisms of Twitter's leadership suggest that he plans to overhaul the company's management. Additionally, there could be an employee revolt as some Twitter employees express reluctance to work for Musk. If Musk does become the owner, he will face numerous challenges, including business issues and potential controversies, particularly during election seasons. The vibes around the deal have shifted, and it's widely expected that the deal will close soon. However, the acquisition could be more challenging than Musk anticipates.

    • Potential Changes to Twitter if Elon Musk's Acquisition Goes ThroughElon Musk's acquisition of Twitter could lead to the return of banned users, employee attrition, and a potential shift away from community standards, but the success of heavily moderated platforms like TikTok highlights the importance of maintaining a safe and inclusive online environment.

      If Elon Musk's proposed acquisition of Twitter goes through, there could be significant changes to the platform, including the potential return of banned users and employee attrition. While some may see this as a positive step towards free speech, others argue that the removal of community standards could lead to increased harassment and abuse, causing users to leave. The loss of experienced employees could also pose challenges for Twitter's operations. However, Musk may view this as an opportunity to cut costs and replace them with staff who align with his vision for the platform. Yet, history suggests that social networks that disregard user well-being and moderation may struggle to thrive, as seen with some conservative alternatives to Twitter. The success of heavily moderated platforms like TikTok underscores the importance of maintaining a safe and inclusive online environment.

    • Potential chaos from Twitter acquisitionDespite the deadline, Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter could bring unexpected issues such as data breaches and deal backouts, highlighting the importance of being prepared for the unexpected.

      The acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk could bring unexpected chaos and potential issues, despite the impending deadline. A former Twitter executive warned about the possibility of a data breach due to the departure of key security engineers, and Musk's attempts to back out of the deal. The outcome remains uncertain, with Musk continuing to search for ways to escape the acquisition. Meanwhile, in the metaverse, unexpected glitches and virtual encounters can also lead to unexpected chaos. In both cases, it's important to be prepared for the unexpected.

    • Exploring Meta's Metaverse: Immersive and Social but Unclear FutureJournalist Cash Morcas found Meta's metaverse immersive and social, reminiscent of early internet experiences, but its future impact is uncertain due to challenges maintaining anonymity in the virtual world

      Journalist Cash Morcas spent several dozen hours exploring Meta's metaverse, Horizon, to better understand this emerging technology. He found it immersive and social, reminiscent of early internet experiences like AOL chat rooms but with added dimensions. Despite the time investment, Morcas admits it's unclear if the metaverse is a novelty or the next big thing. He notes that maintaining anonymity, a common practice in early internet days, is more challenging in the metaverse due to the use of voices. Morcas' experience echoes the curiosity and uncertainty surrounding the metaverse's potential future impact on our digital lives.

    • A Growing Community in the MetaversePeople are finding connection, entertainment, and even employment in the metaverse, making it a compelling space that goes beyond a passing trend

      The metaverse, a virtual reality space created by Meta (formerly Facebook), is more compelling than skeptics may believe. Contrary to the notion that there isn't much to keep people engaged for extended periods, the metaverse hosts a diverse community of individuals, including kids, parents, entrepreneurs, and those seeking social connection, particularly during the pandemic. Some users are so devoted that they're willing to invest in external batteries to extend their time in the metaverse. This suggests that people are open to immersive experiences, even if it means wearing a headset for extended periods. The metaverse is not just a passing trend but a growing community where people are finding connection, entertainment, and even employment.

    • Meta Quest 2: A Novelty Instead of a Home BaseDespite sales, Meta Quest 2 feels like a novelty rather than a permanent home base due to barriers to entry and lackluster metaverse offerings. Users, including the speaker, have not found compelling reasons to spend money in the metaverse.

      The Meta Quest 2 VR headset, despite having sold a decent number of units, is not yet becoming a regular part of people's lives for many users. The experience feels more like a novelty than a permanent home base, possibly due to the barriers to entry and the fact that the metaverse offerings do not yet match the quality of other platforms for common activities. While Meta believes the metaverse will eventually make money through headset sales, targeted ads, and user-purchased content, many users, including the speaker, have not yet found compelling reasons to spend money in the metaverse. The speaker's friends, who are in their circles, have also not gravitated towards using the Quest 2, leaving the speaker feeling isolated in the metaverse.

    • Forming deep bonds in the metaverseThe metaverse provides a new way for individuals to form meaningful connections, particularly for those struggling with mental health issues and isolation. However, it's important to consider potential downsides such as privacy concerns and commercialization.

      The metaverse, a virtual world where users can socialize, create, and explore, is providing a new form of connection for some individuals, particularly those who have felt isolated or struggled with mental health issues. For instance, a 25-year-old illustrator shared her experience of forming deep bonds in Horizon Worlds, a popular metaverse platform, which helped her cope with depression, isolation, and the challenges of moving across the country during the pandemic. This woman found comfort and companionship in the metaverse, which she uses as an escape from the real world's small talk and judgments. However, it's essential to consider the potential downsides of this virtual connection, such as privacy concerns and commercialization, as users' actions and interactions are being tracked and monetized. Overall, the metaverse offers a unique space for people to form meaningful connections, but it's crucial to recognize its potential benefits and drawbacks.

    • Virtual Reality: A Double-Edged Sword for ConnectionVirtual Reality offers immersive experiences for connection, but excessive use could lead to isolation

      Technology, particularly virtual reality (VR) through headsets like Meta's Oculus, can both isolate individuals from the real world and provide a solution for those feeling lonely or disconnected. Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's CEO, recognizes the potential downsides of technology and aims to create the metaverse as a more immersive and interactive digital world. During Meta's upcoming Connect event, they are expected to release new tools and possibly a more advanced headset to further develop the metaverse. While some people might spend excessive time in VR environments, others might find it a valuable escape or a way to connect with others when real-life interactions are limited. It's an intriguing balance between technology's ability to bring people together and its potential to further isolate them.

    • Transparency and self-reflection in journalismSpeakers shared their personal beliefs and experiences to promote transparency and trust in journalism, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a critical yet open-minded stance towards technology while acknowledging personal biases.

      Transparency and self-reflection are essential for building trust in journalism, especially when reporting on technology. The speakers, inspired by Jay Rosen's ideas, shared their personal beliefs and experiences to give listeners a sense of their perspectives. The first speaker admitted to being a recovering tech cynic, having grown up in love with technology but later becoming disillusioned by its darker side. Now, as a new father, they are rediscovering the good aspects of tech and being more open-minded. The second speaker expressed their desire for the Internet to be beneficial for everyone, as they have personally experienced its creative and economic opportunities. Both speakers emphasized the importance of maintaining a critical yet open-minded stance towards technology while acknowledging their personal biases. By sharing their "I statements," they aim to provide transparency and foster trust with their audience.

    • Technology's Impact Depends on How It's Used is a Flawed PerspectiveTechnology's design and intended use significantly shape its impact. It's crucial to critically examine these implications as technology advances rapidly.

      Technology is not neutral, and it's important to consider the design, potential consequences, and ethical implications behind the tools we use. The hammer analogy, which suggests technology is just a tool and its impact depends on how it's used, is a flawed perspective. In reality, the design and intended use of technology shape its impact significantly. As the world moves faster and technology advances rapidly, understanding these implications becomes increasingly crucial. It's essential for individuals and journalists to critically examine the non-neutral nature of technology and its potential consequences. This perspective can help us navigate the complexities of the digital age and make informed decisions about the role technology plays in our lives.

    • Approaching complex systems with cautionWhen attempting to address complex systems, consider potential ripple effects and unintended consequences, as simplistic solutions could create new problems or entrench existing players.

      Attempting to "fix" complex systems like technology platforms or emerging technologies like crypto comes with unintended consequences and risks. The speaker emphasizes the importance of considering the potential ripple effects of any proposed solutions, as they could lead to new problems or entrench existing players. Regarding YouTube, the speaker warns against simplistic solutions like banning Chinese-owned apps, as this could inadvertently benefit competitors and create new issues. Similarly, in the case of crypto, despite its recent challenges, the speaker maintains that something valuable may still emerge from it, and it's crucial for journalists to report on it without being accused of shilling or ignoring criticisms. In essence, any regulatory or technological change should be approached with caution and a nuanced understanding of the potential outcomes.

    • Exploring the World of Crypto with Skepticism and OptimismThe Hard Fork podcast delves into the crypto world with a curious and informed perspective, maintaining a balance between skepticism and optimism, and welcoming listener feedback and suggestions.

      The hosts of the Hard Fork podcast are keeping a close eye on the developments in the crypto world out of curiosity and a desire to stay informed. They plan to approach the topic with skepticism but also allow for optimism. They emphasized that they have no financial interest in the outcome of crypto events and encouraged listeners to share their feedback, suggestions for future guests, and topics of interest. The podcast is produced by Davis Land, edited by Paula Schumann and Hannah Engber, fact-checked by Caitlin Love, and engineered by Corey Schreppel. The hosts signed off by thanking several team members and inviting listeners to tune in next time.

    Recent Episodes from The Ezra Klein Show

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    I joined my Times Opinion colleagues Ross Douthat and Michelle Cottle to discuss the debate — and what Democrats might do next.

    Mentioned:

    The Biden and Trump Weaknesses That Don’t Get Enough Attention” by Ross Douthat

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!” with Matthew Yglesias on The Ezra Klein Show

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” on The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” with Elaine Kamarck on The Ezra Klein Show

    Gretchen Whitmer on The Interview

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump” with Sam Rosenfeld and Daniel Schlozman on The Ezra Klein Show

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com. You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 28, 2024

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Donald Trump has made inflation a central part of his campaign message. At his rallies, he rails against “the Biden inflation tax” and “crooked Joe’s inflation nightmare,” and promises that in a second Trump term, “inflation will be in full retreat.”

    But if you look at Trump’s actual policies, that wouldn’t be the case at all. Trump has a bold, ambitious agenda to make prices much, much higher. He’s proposing a 10 percent tariff on imported goods, and a 60 percent tariff on products from China. He wants to deport huge numbers of immigrants. And he’s made it clear that he’d like to replace the Federal Reserve chair with someone more willing to take orders from him. It’s almost unimaginable to me that you would run on this agenda at a time when Americans are so mad about high prices. But I don’t think people really know that’s what Trump is vowing to do.

    So to drill into the weeds of Trump’s plans, I decided to call up an old friend. Matt Yglesias is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the author of the Slow Boring newsletter, where he’s been writing a lot about Trump’s proposals. We also used to host a policy podcast together, “The Weeds.”

    In this conversation, we discuss what would happen to the economy, especially in terms of inflation, if Trump actually did what he says he wants to do; what we can learn from how Trump managed the economy in his first term; and why more people aren’t sounding the alarm.

    Mentioned:

    Trump’s new economic plan is terrible” by Matthew Yglesias

    Never mind: Wall Street titans shake off qualms and embrace Trump” by Sam Sutton

    How Far Trump Would Go” by Eric Cortellessa

    Book Recommendations:

    Take Back the Game by Linda Flanagan

    1177 B.C. by Eric H. Cline

    The Rise of the G.I. Army, 1940-1941 by Paul Dickson

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Kate Sinclair and Mary Marge Locker. Mixing by Isaac Jones, with Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero, Adam Posen and Michael Strain.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 21, 2024

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The biggest divide in our politics isn’t between Democrats and Republicans, or even left and right. It’s between people who follow politics closely, and those who pay almost no attention to it. If you’re in the former camp — and if you’re reading this, you probably are — the latter camp can seem inscrutable. These people hardly ever look at political news. They hate discussing politics. But they do care about issues and candidates, and they often vote.

    As the 2024 election takes shape, this bloc appears crucial to determining who wins the presidency. An NBC News poll from April found that 15 percent of voters don’t follow political news, and Donald Trump was winning them by 26 points.

    Yanna Krupnikov studies exactly this kind of voter. She’s a professor of communication and media at the University of Michigan and an author, with John Barry Ryan, of “The Other Divide: Polarization and Disengagement in American Politics.” The book examines how the chasm between the deeply involved and the less involved shapes politics in America. I’ve found it to be a helpful guide for understanding one of the most crucial dynamics emerging in this year’s election: the swing to Trump from President Biden among disengaged voters.

    In this conversation, we discuss how politically disengaged voters relate to politics; where they get their information about politics and how they form opinions; and whether major news events, like Trump’s recent conviction, might sway them.

    Mentioned:

    The ‘Need for Chaos’ and Motivations to Share Hostile Political Rumors” by Michael Bang Petersen, Mathias Osmundsen and Kevin Arceneaux

    Hooked by Markus Prior

    The Political Influence of Lifestyle Influencers? Examining the Relationship Between Aspirational Social Media Use and Anti-Expert Attitudes and Beliefs” by Ariel Hasell and Sedona Chinn

    One explanation for the 2024 election’s biggest mystery” by Eric Levitz

    Book Recommendations:

    What Goes Without Saying by Taylor N. Carlson and Jaime E. Settle

    Through the Grapevine by Taylor N. Carlson

    Sorry I’m Late, I Didn’t Want to Come by Jessica Pan

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 18, 2024

    The View From the Israeli Right

    The View From the Israeli Right

    On Tuesday I got back from an eight-day trip to Israel and the West Bank. I happened to be there on the day that Benny Gantz resigned from the war cabinet and called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to schedule new elections, breaking the unity government that Israel had had since shortly after Oct. 7.

    There is no viable left wing in Israel right now. There is a coalition that Netanyahu leads stretching from right to far right and a coalition that Gantz leads stretching from center to right. In the early months of the war, Gantz appeared ascendant as support for Netanyahu cratered. But now Netanyahu’s poll numbers are ticking back up.

    So one thing I did in Israel was deepen my reporting on Israel’s right. And there, Amit Segal’s name kept coming up. He’s one of Israel’s most influential political analysts and the author of “The Story of Israeli Politics” is coming out in English.

    Segal and I talked about the political differences between Gantz and Netanyahu, the theory of security that’s emerging on the Israeli right, what happened to the Israeli left, the threat from Iran and Hezbollah and how Netanyahu is trying to use President Biden’s criticism to his political advantage.

    Mentioned:

    Biden May Spur Another Netanyahu Comeback” by Amit Segal

    Book Recommendations:

    The Years of Lyndon Johnson Series by Robert A. Caro

    The World of Yesterday by Stefan Zweig

    The Object of Zionism by Zvi Efrat

    The News from Waterloo by Brian Cathcart

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Claire Gordon. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris with Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 14, 2024

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    There’s something weird happening with the economy. On a personal level, most Americans say they’re doing pretty well right now. And according to the data, that’s true. Wages have gone up faster than inflation. Unemployment is low, the stock market is generally up so far this year, and people are buying more stuff.

    And yet in surveys, people keep saying the economy is bad. A recent Harris poll for The Guardian found that around half of Americans think the S. & P. 500 is down this year, and that unemployment is at a 50-year high. Fifty-six percent think we’re in a recession.

    There are many theories about why this gap exists. Maybe political polarization is warping how people see the economy or it’s a failure of President Biden’s messaging, or there’s just something uniquely painful about inflation. And while there’s truth in all of these, it felt like a piece of the story was missing.

    And for me, that missing piece was an article I read right before the pandemic. An Atlantic story from February 2020 called “The Great Affordability Crisis Breaking America.” It described how some of Americans’ biggest-ticket expenses — housing, health care, higher education and child care — which were already pricey, had been getting steadily pricier for decades.

    At the time, prices weren’t the big topic in the economy; the focus was more on jobs and wages. So it was easier for this trend to slip notice, like a frog boiling in water, quietly, putting more and more strain on American budgets. But today, after years of high inflation, prices are the biggest topic in the economy. And I think that explains the anger people feel: They’re noticing the price of things all the time, and getting hammered with the reality of how expensive these things have become.

    The author of that Atlantic piece is Annie Lowrey. She’s an economics reporter, the author of Give People Money, and also my wife. In this conversation, we discuss how the affordability crisis has collided with our post-pandemic inflationary world, the forces that shape our economic perceptions, why people keep spending as if prices aren’t a strain and what this might mean for the presidential election.

    Mentioned:

    It Will Never Be a Good Time to Buy a House” by Annie Lowrey

    Book Recommendations:

    Franchise by Marcia Chatelain

    A Place of Greater Safety by Hilary Mantel

    Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 07, 2024

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    After Donald Trump was convicted last week in his hush-money trial, Republican leaders wasted no time in rallying behind him. There was no chance the Republican Party was going to replace Trump as their nominee at this point. Trump has essentially taken over the G.O.P.; his daughter-in-law is even co-chair of the Republican National Committee.

    How did the Republican Party get so weak that it could fall victim to a hostile takeover?

    Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld are the authors of “The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics,” which traces how both major political parties have been “hollowed out” over the decades, transforming once-powerful gatekeeping institutions into mere vessels for the ideologies of specific candidates. And they argue that this change has been perilous for our democracy.

    In this conversation, we discuss how the power of the parties has been gradually chipped away; why the Republican Party became less ideological and more geared around conflict; the merits of a stronger party system; and more.

    Mentioned:

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” by The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” by The Ezra Klein Show with Elaine Kamarck

    Book Recommendations:

    The Two Faces of American Freedom by Aziz Rana

    Rainbow’s End by Steven P. Erie

    An American Melodrama by Lewis Chester, Godfrey Hodgson, Bruce Page

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show’‘ was produced by Elias Isquith. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker, Kate Sinclair and Rollin Hu. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota and Efim Shapiro. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 04, 2024

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    The steady dings of notifications. The 40 tabs that greet you when you open your computer in the morning. The hundreds of unread emails, most of them spam, with subject lines pleading or screaming for you to click. Our attention is under assault these days, and most of us are familiar with the feeling that gives us — fractured, irritated, overwhelmed.

    D. Graham Burnett calls the attention economy an example of “human fracking”: With our attention in shorter and shorter supply, companies are going to even greater lengths to extract this precious resource from us. And he argues that it’s now reached a point that calls for a kind of revolution. “This is creating conditions that are at odds with human flourishing. We know this,” he tells me. “And we need to mount new forms of resistance.”

    Burnett is a professor of the history of science at Princeton University and is working on a book about the laboratory study of attention. He’s also a co-founder of the Strother School of Radical Attention, which is a kind of grass roots, artistic effort to create a curriculum for studying attention.

    In this conversation, we talk about how the 20th-century study of attention laid the groundwork for today’s attention economy, the connection between changing ideas of attention and changing ideas of the self, how we even define attention (this episode is worth listening to for Burnett’s collection of beautiful metaphors alone), whether the concern over our shrinking attention spans is simply a moral panic, what it means to teach attention and more.

    Mentioned:

    Friends of Attention

    The Battle for Attention” by Nathan Heller

    Powerful Forces Are Fracking Our Attention. We Can Fight Back.” by D. Graham Burnett, Alyssa Loh and Peter Schmidt

    Scenes of Attention edited by D. Graham Burnett and Justin E. H. Smith

    Book Recommendations:

    Addiction by Design by Natasha Dow Schüll

    Objectivity by Lorraine Daston and Peter L. Galison

    The Confidence-Man by Herman Melville

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Elias Isquith. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 31, 2024

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    A.I.-generated art has flooded the internet, and a lot of it is derivative, even boring or offensive. But what could it look like for artists to collaborate with A.I. systems in making art that is actually generative, challenging, transcendent?

    Holly Herndon offered one answer with her 2019 album “PROTO.” Along with Mathew Dryhurst and the programmer Jules LaPlace, she built an A.I. called “Spawn” trained on human voices that adds an uncanny yet oddly personal layer to the music. Beyond her music and visual art, Herndon is trying to solve a problem that many creative people are encountering as A.I. becomes more prominent: How do you encourage experimentation without stealing others’ work to train A.I. models? Along with Dryhurst, Jordan Meyer and Patrick Hoepner, she co-founded Spawning, a company figuring out how to allow artists — and all of us creating content on the internet — to “consent” to our work being used as training data.

    In this conversation, we discuss how Herndon collaborated with a human chorus and her “A.I. baby,” Spawn, on “PROTO”; how A.I. voice imitators grew out of electronic music and other musical genres; why Herndon prefers the term “collective intelligence” to “artificial intelligence”; why an “opt-in” model could help us retain more control of our work as A.I. trawls the internet for data; and much more.

    Mentioned:

    Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt” by Holly Herndon

    xhairymutantx” by Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst, for the Whitney Museum of Art

    Fade” by Holly Herndon

    Swim” by Holly Herndon

    Jolene” by Holly Herndon and Holly+

    Movement” by Holly Herndon

    Chorus” by Holly Herndon

    Godmother” by Holly Herndon

    The Precision of Infinity” by Jlin and Philip Glass

    Holly+

    Book Recommendations:

    Intelligence and Spirit by Reza Negarestani

    Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky

    Plurality by E. Glen Weyl, Audrey Tang and ⿻ Community

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero and Jack Hamilton.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 24, 2024

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    “The Jetsons” premiered in 1962. And based on the internal math of the show, George Jetson, the dad, was born in 2022. He’d be a toddler right now. And we are so far away from the world that show imagined. There were a lot of future-trippers in the 1960s, and most of them would be pretty disappointed by how that future turned out.

    So what happened? Why didn’t we build that future?

    The answer, I think, lies in the 1970s. I’ve been spending a lot of time studying that decade in my work, trying to understand why America is so bad at building today. And James Pethokoukis has also spent a lot of time looking at the 1970s, in his work trying to understand why America is less innovative today than it was in the postwar decades. So Pethokoukis and I are asking similar questions, and circling the same time period, but from very different ideological vantages.

    Pethokoukis is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and author of the book “The Conservative Futurist: How to Create the Sci-Fi World We Were Promised.” He also writes a newsletter called Faster, Please! “The two screamingly obvious things that we stopped doing is we stopped spending on science, research and development the way we did in the 1960s,” he tells me, “and we began to regulate our economy as if regulation would have no impact on innovation.”

    In this conversation, we debate why the ’70s were such an inflection point; whether this slowdown phenomenon is just something that happens as countries get wealthier; and what the government’s role should be in supporting and regulating emerging technologies like A.I.

    Mentioned:

    U.S. Infrastructure: 1929-2017” by Ray C. Fair

    Book Recommendations

    Why Information Grows by Cesar Hidalgo

    The Expanse series by James S.A. Corey

    The American Dream Is Not Dead by Michael R. Strain

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 21, 2024

    The Disastrous Relationship Between Israel, Palestinians and the U.N.

    The Disastrous Relationship Between Israel, Palestinians and the U.N.

    The international legal system was created to prevent the atrocities of World War II from happening again. The United Nations partitioned historic Palestine to create the states of Israel and Palestine, but also left Palestinians with decades of false promises. The war in Gaza — and countless other conflicts, including those in Syria, Yemen and Ethiopia — shows how little power the U.N. and international law have to protect civilians in wartime. So what is international law actually for?

    Aslı Ü. Bâli is a professor at Yale Law School who specializes in international and comparative law. “The fact that people break the law and sometimes get away with it doesn’t mean the law doesn’t exist and doesn’t have force,” she argues.

    In this conversation, Bâli traces the gap between how international law is written on paper and the realpolitik of how countries decide to follow it, the U.N.’s unique role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from its very beginning, how the laws of war have failed Gazans but may be starting to change the conflict’s course, and more.

    Mentioned:

    With Schools in Ruins, Education in Gaza Will Be Hobbled for Years” by Liam Stack and Bilal Shbair

    Book Recommendations:

    Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law by Antony Anghie

    Justice for Some by Noura Erakat

    Worldmaking After Empire by Adom Getachew

    The Constitutional Bind by Aziz Rana

    The United Nations and the Question of Palestine by Ardi Imseis

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota and Isaac Jones. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Carole Sabouraud.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 17, 2024

    Related Episodes

    OMT-User-Session 5: Die richtige Kundschaft, mehr Verlinkungen, Twitter, Meta und TikTok (Mario Jung) | OMT-Podcast #161

    OMT-User-Session 5: Die richtige Kundschaft, mehr Verlinkungen, Twitter, Meta und TikTok (Mario Jung) | OMT-Podcast #161
    Mario Jung hat mehr als 14 Jahre Online-Marketing Erfahrung, seine eigene Agentur und ist Geschäftsführer der OMT GmbH und beantwortet heute Deine Fragen. Du wolltest wissen, wie der perfekte Mix aus großen und kleinen Kunden aussieht, wo Mario gegen den Strich geht, wie er die Zukunft von Meta, TikTok und Twitter sieht und vieles mehr. Spannende Fragen und noch spannendere Antworten warten auf der neusten Folge des OMT-Podcasts auf Dich.

    Peak social media: Trouble at Twitter

    Peak social media: Trouble at Twitter

    Elon Musk took over Twitter with the promise of promoting free speech and making the loss-making platform profitable again. But his critics say he’s destroying Twitter’s culture and driving it to bankruptcy. How much danger is the company really in? In the first episode in a new series of Tech Tonic, Elaine Moore, deputy editor of the FT’s Lex column, asks whether Musk will save Twitter or destroy it.


    In this episode we hear from Evan Henshaw-Plath, one of the original creators of Twitter; Rumman Chowdhury, Twitter’s former head of machine learning, ethics, transparency, and accountability who was laid off by Elon Musk; and FT tech reporter Hannah Murphy.


    Presented by Elaine Moore. Produced by Edwin Lane and Josh Gabert-Doyon, Executive producer is Manuela Saragosa. Sound design by Breen Turner and Samantha Giovinco. Original music by Metaphor Music. The FT’s head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. Special thanks to Hannah Murphy


    Clips: TED Conferences, CBS, Joe Rogan Experience Podcast, MSNBC, CNN


    We're keen to hear more from our listeners about this show and want to know what you'd like to hear more of, so we're running a survey which you can find at ft.com/techtonicsurvey. It takes about 10 minutes to complete and you will be in with a chance to win a pair of Bose QuietComfort earbuds.


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    E76: Elon vs. Twitter

    E76: Elon vs. Twitter

    0:00 Jason's new skincare routine, Sacks' Good Friday portfolio update, Bestie intros

    3:12 Breaking down Elon's offer to buy Twitter and take it private: poison pills, board responsibility and more

    30:50 Core issues of Elon vs. Twitter, analyzing reactions, breaking down Twitter's revenue per employee

    43:10 Free speech and Twitter, predictions for how this saga ends, business film recommendations

    Follow the besties:

    https://twitter.com/chamath

    https://linktr.ee/calacanis

    https://twitter.com/DavidSacks

    https://twitter.com/friedberg

    Follow the pod:

    https://twitter.com/theallinpod

    https://linktr.ee/allinpodcast

    Intro Music Credit:

    https://rb.gy/tppkzl

    https://twitter.com/yung_spielburg

    Intro Video Credit:

    https://twitter.com/TheZachEffect

    Referenced in the show:

    https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1514564966564651008

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/twitter-adopts-limited-duration-shareholder-rights-plan-enabling-all-shareholders-to-realize-full-value-of-company-301526627.html

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revlon,_Inc._v._MacAndrews_%26_Forbes_Holdings,_Inc.

    https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001418091/000110465922045641/tm2212748d1_sc13da.htm

    https://www.google.com/finance/quote/TWTR:NYSE

    https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1514738236207337477

    https://twitter.com/jeffjarvis/status/1514578609754812419

    https://twitter.com/maxboot/status/1514570168730636290

    https://www.google.com/finance/quote/SPY:NYSEARCA

    https://www.google.com/finance/quote/TSLA:NASDAQ

    https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1514738236207337477

    https://twitter.com/auronmacintyre/status/1514653963408318474

    https://www.google.com/finance/quote/ATVI:NASDAQ

    Apple finaliserait son propre métavers

    Apple finaliserait son propre métavers

    Abonnez-vous : c'est gratuit !

    Voici l'épisode 278 de "la quotidienne iWeek" en ce lundi 14 novembre 2022.

    Apple finaliserait son propre métavers.

    Présentation : Benjamin VINCENT (@benjaminvincent) + Gilles DOUNÈS (@gdounes).
    Production : OUATCH Audio.

    Tags : ne l'appelez pas “metavers“ ; tracking, la class action ; 49 cents ; Twitter, trop instable ; pluie de widgets.

    Bonne découverte de "la quotidienne iWeek" si vous nous écoutez pour la première fois, parlez de nous autour de vous, retweetez-nous (@iweeknews), bonne journée, bonne écoute, et à demain !

    Benjamin VINCENT & la team #iweekLQI

    PS1 : rejoignez la communauté iWeek sur Patreon et bénéficiez de bonus exclusifs !

    PS2 : retrouvez-nous aussi, pour iWeek (la semaine Apple), notre podcast hebdo, désormais en ligne chaque mercredi soir.

    PS3 : le nouvel épisode 111 d'iWeek (la semaine Apple), avec une page spéciale consacrée à matter, le nouveau standard de la maison connectée et de la domotique, est toujours disponible ! 

    It's CNN Minus (319)

    It's CNN Minus (319)

    It's breaking news time as Joe and Robert discuss Elon Musk's intent to purchase Twitter.

    CNN+ looks more like CNN minus as the new project begins cutbacks after barely starting.

    Coinbase will partner with BAYC on a film project. Robert is not impressed.

    Meta begins their metaverse project with price gouging, while BeReal is the new social app darling.

    Rants and raves includes true quality content and the dark side of content marketing.

    This week's links:

    Elon Musk to Buy Twitter

    Jack Dorsey's First Tweet Does Nothing

    Big Cuts at CNN+

    Coinbase and BAYC

    Meta Overcharges

    BeReal Growth

    Marketing Dive Sponsored Research

    ---------

    Liked this show? SUBSCRIBE to this podcast on Spotify, Apple, Google and more. Catch past episodes and show notes at ThisOldMarketing.site.