Logo
    Search

    I Keep Hoping Larry Summers Is Wrong. What if He’s Not?

    enMarch 29, 2022

    Podcast Summary

    • Larry Summers' Warnings on Inflation Prove PrescientEconomist Larry Summers' concerns about excessive stimulus and persistent inflation were dismissed, but now inflation is a major challenge for Democrats and a concern for the Fed. Summers argues faster rate hikes are needed, and new disruptions add to uncertainty.

      Economist and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers' warnings about inflation have proven to be more accurate than many economists and pundits believed over the past year. Summers repeatedly expressed concerns about excessive stimulus and the risk of persistent inflation, even when most dismissed his concerns as overblown. Now, inflation is a central concern for Democrats in the midterms and a major challenge for President Biden's agenda. The Fed is raising interest rates faster than anticipated, but Summers argues it's not nearly enough. New disruptions in energy and commodity markets due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and pandemic lockdowns in China have added to the uncertainty and potential for worsening economic conditions. Summers' pessimistic forecasts have proven to be a stark contrast to more optimistic predictions, and he continues to express significant apprehension about the prospects for a soft landing of the US economy.

    • Understanding Inflation: Demand vs SupplyEconomists debate inflation's root cause, but managing it requires considering both demand-supply imbalances and implementing policies to address excess demand and acknowledge supply constraints.

      The current inflation issue is a complex problem stemming from both demand and supply imbalances. Demand-side pressures come from too much money chasing goods, while supply-side issues include factory disruptions and resource constraints. The debate among economists is whether inflation was primarily caused by demand or supply in 2021, but the current concern is the potential for new supply shocks from geopolitical events. Monetary policy cannot change supply, but it can help manage demand to avoid excess inflation. The Fed's role is to judge the current supply situation and calibrate demand accordingly. While some stimulus measures are draining out, the impact of past stimulus is still being felt due to its long-term effects. The Fed's response to inflation includes signaling rate increases and reducing the size of its balance sheet. In summary, managing inflation requires understanding both demand and supply dynamics and implementing appropriate policies to address excess demand while acknowledging the realities of supply constraints.

    • Considering the long-term consequences of economic policiesEconomic stimulus measures bring relief but could lead to inflation and harm the most vulnerable if policies are excessively expansionary

      While the economic stimulus measures implemented during the pandemic have brought much-needed relief and benefits such as increased hiring, wage increases, and financial assistance to those in need, the potential for inflation and its negative impact on purchasing power could outweigh these gains in the long term. The speaker, an economist, emphasizes the importance of considering the long-term consequences of economic policies and avoiding excessively expansionary measures that may ultimately lead to harmful consequences for the most disadvantaged members of society. The speaker shares a desire to help those in need but also stresses the importance of respecting the basic constraints of economic situations to ensure that policies are effective and sustainable in the long run.

    • Economic Challenges and Their Impact on Real Wage Growth and Employment OpportunitiesEconomic challenges, including wage growth, labor shortages, geopolitical events, and inflation, have led to concerns about a potential economic downturn and could negatively impact real wage growth, employment opportunities, and social trust.

      The current economic situation, as influenced by various factors such as wage growth, inflation, and geopolitical events, has led to concerns about a potential economic downturn. The speaker, who initially held an optimistic view, has since revised his stance due to accelerating wage growth, labor shortages, and unexpected shocks like the Russian invasion of Ukraine and China's Omicron outbreak. He believes that these factors could lead to significantly higher inflation this year, and the key question is whether this inflation will persist in the long term. The speaker's main concern is the potential impact on real wage growth, employment opportunities, and social trust, which he believes could be compromised by these economic challenges. The speaker's initial optimism was based on the assumption that supply chain issues would resolve and fiscal and monetary policies would become less stimulative. However, recent events have changed this outlook, leading to a more cautious perspective.

    • Maintaining Control to Avoid Inflation ExpectationsThe Fed's actions to contain inflation, even if it means higher unemployment, are crucial to prevent inflation expectations from becoming entrenched and leading to a self-fulfilling cycle of price increases.

      The current market forecast is for inflation around 6%, but the real concern is the potential for inflation expectations to become entrenched, leading to a self-fulfilling cycle of price increases. This is why the Fed's actions to contain inflation, even if it means higher unemployment, are crucial. Inflation becomes an expectation when people observe recent trends and assume they will continue into the future. This can lead to corporations and individuals building price increases into their planning, creating a spiral. The consequences of allowing inflation expectations to become entrenched can be severe, as seen in the stagflation of the 1970s, which led to high inflation and unemployment. The current economic situation calls for maintaining control to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.

    • Global economic instability fuels inflation challengesThe ongoing global economic instability, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict and pandemic aftermath, is making it difficult to contain inflation, potentially leading to higher oil and commodity prices, prolonged supply chain disruptions, and entrenched wage and price increases.

      The ongoing global economic instability, as evidenced by the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the lingering effects of the pandemic, particularly in Asia, is making the containment of inflation increasingly challenging. The belief that these issues are temporary and the world will return to normalcy may lead to expectations of transient inflation, but the possibility of a continuously different world could make this a persistent problem. The near-term impact of the conflict is expected to be higher oil and commodity prices, contributing approximately 1-1.5 percentage points to inflation. The ongoing disruptions in China's supply chain could prolong this trend for another year. The uncertainty surrounding the future of these issues may lead to workers and consumers demanding higher wages and prices, making inflation a more deeply entrenched problem. However, some argue that the lack of movement in long-term market expectations may suggest that the inflationary pressures are temporary, but the counterargument is that these expectations may not fully capture the potential long-term implications of the current global economic climate.

    • Fed's Inflation Expectations Detached from TargetThe Fed's inflation expectations are currently below target due to economists' beliefs in secular stagnation and the Fed's tightening policy. Historical data and market expectations suggest a gradual increase in interest rates towards 4-5% by 2024.

      Despite some economists' beliefs in secular stagnation and the need for more demand, current inflation expectations are detached from the Federal Reserve's target levels. The Fed's recent signaling of tightening monetary policy has kept inflation expectations in check, but the Fed has not gone far enough in addressing the new economic reality. As a result, inflation expectations are likely to rise, and the Fed will continue to tighten. The Fed's economic forecasts, predicting a sustained low unemployment rate and declining inflation, are not supported by historical data or market expectations. The combination of these circumstances is not consistent with economic history or current market conditions. The suggestion of 4-5% interest rates by some economists does not imply an immediate jump to such levels, but rather a gradual increase towards that range by the end of 2024.

    • Fed may need to raise interest rates to combat inflationTo prevent high inflation, the Fed might increase interest rates to 4-5%, possibly causing a mild recession due to significant labor market imbalances and excess demand

      The current economic environment, with real interest rates remaining substantially negative, encourages spending and borrowing, potentially leading to higher inflation. To combat this, it's likely that the Federal Reserve will need to raise interest rates to the 4-5% range over the next couple of years. This could result in a mild recession, but avoiding one might not be possible given the significant imbalances and excess demand in the labor market. Historically, when the unemployment rate is below 4% and the inflation rate is above 4%, there's a high probability of a recession within the next year or two. The Biden administration's focus on increasing supply is important, but the Fed's role in controlling inflation is crucial as well.

    • Government approaches to addressing inflationThe Biden administration has considered various tools to address inflation, including supply-side measures and interest rate hikes. However, a comprehensive approach that balances supply and demand and addresses distributional impacts is necessary.

      While there are various tools the government could use to address inflation by increasing supply, such as reducing tariffs, easing regulations, and public procurement, these measures have limitations and the Biden administration has been reluctant to adopt them. Another approach is to raise interest rates, which can help reduce inflation but disproportionately affects the wealthy. A more progressive tax system and extending unemployment insurance during downturns are also important for countercyclical management. However, fiscal policy as a tool for quick spending changes may not be as effective as some might think. Ultimately, a comprehensive approach to managing inflation that considers both supply and demand, and addresses the distributional impacts of economic policies, is necessary.

    • Economic conditions causing inflation, not corporations' market powerExcess demand in economy causing inflation, not corporations taking advantage. Wage inflation parallel phenomenon. Fed has limited short-term tools, can make long-term investments to expand supply.

      The current inflation is driven by excess demand in the economy, and businesses having pricing power is a result of these economic conditions rather than corporations taking advantage of consumers. The speaker argues that it's unreasonable to blame inflation solely on corporations' market power and that wage inflation is a parallel phenomenon. Additionally, the federal government has limited tools to address supply issues in the short term but can make long-term investments to expand it. The inflation risk is one reason why some legislative packages, like Build Back Better, have faced opposition.

    • Investing in the economy despite inflationFocus on efficiency, pay for investments, and consider additional policies like immigration reform and place-based policies to increase supply and demand balance. Underinvestment in technology research is a concern, and dispersing government agencies could generate activity in different regions.

      While some may argue against investing in the economy due to current inflation, there are ways to increase supply and make essential investments that are non-contradictory. The endorser of Build Back Better strongly supports this approach, emphasizing the need for infrastructure and human investments. They suggest focusing on efficiency, paying for investments, and considering additional policies such as immigration reform and place-based policies to increase supply and demand balance. The underinvestment in technology research is also highlighted as an area of concern. Regarding the idea of dispersing government agencies across the country, the speaker sees potential benefits in generating activity in different regions, but acknowledges that the defense department already serves this function to some extent.

    • Emphasizing national unity and public investmentA renewed focus on national unity and public investment could lead to cooperation between business and government, a call for citizens to do their part, and a shift away from divisive agendas, recognizing the economic consequences of policies and making informed political evaluations.

      While there are challenges to implementing policies that promote isolation and self-sufficiency, such as difficulties in attracting talent and the difficulty of reversing decisions once made, there are potential benefits to be gained from a renewed emphasis on national unity and public investment in the face of global challenges. This approach, reminiscent of a Kennedy-esque tradition, could lead to cooperation between business and government, a call for people to do their part, and a shift away from divisive agendas. The speaker also emphasized the importance of recognizing the economic consequences of policies and making informed political evaluations. As for influential books, the speaker mentioned being impacted by works that explore the importance of unity and public investment, such as "Profiles in Courage" by John F. Kennedy and "The Great Transformation" by Karl Polanyi.

    • Understanding the long-term impacts of ideas and economic modelsRecognizing the far-reaching consequences of ideas, even as we navigate the intricacies of the present, is crucial.

      Learning from this episode of The Ezra Klein Show is the importance of understanding the long-term impacts of ideas and economic models, even when the immediate machinations of small rooms may seem more significant. Larry Summers discussed how well-intentioned but overconfident individuals, as depicted in David Halberstam's "The Best and the Brightest," can lead to disastrous outcomes. He also highlighted the enduring influence of Keynes' ideas, as shown in Zachary Carter's biography, and looked forward to Brad DeLong's upcoming book, "Slouching towards Utopia," which promises to provide a profound perspective on economic history and the combined power of science and markets to shape the world. Summarizing, it's crucial to recognize the far-reaching consequences of ideas, even as we navigate the intricacies of the present.

    Recent Episodes from The Ezra Klein Show

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    I joined my Times Opinion colleagues Ross Douthat and Michelle Cottle to discuss the debate — and what Democrats might do next.

    Mentioned:

    The Biden and Trump Weaknesses That Don’t Get Enough Attention” by Ross Douthat

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!” with Matthew Yglesias on The Ezra Klein Show

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” on The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” with Elaine Kamarck on The Ezra Klein Show

    Gretchen Whitmer on The Interview

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump” with Sam Rosenfeld and Daniel Schlozman on The Ezra Klein Show

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com. You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 28, 2024

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Donald Trump has made inflation a central part of his campaign message. At his rallies, he rails against “the Biden inflation tax” and “crooked Joe’s inflation nightmare,” and promises that in a second Trump term, “inflation will be in full retreat.”

    But if you look at Trump’s actual policies, that wouldn’t be the case at all. Trump has a bold, ambitious agenda to make prices much, much higher. He’s proposing a 10 percent tariff on imported goods, and a 60 percent tariff on products from China. He wants to deport huge numbers of immigrants. And he’s made it clear that he’d like to replace the Federal Reserve chair with someone more willing to take orders from him. It’s almost unimaginable to me that you would run on this agenda at a time when Americans are so mad about high prices. But I don’t think people really know that’s what Trump is vowing to do.

    So to drill into the weeds of Trump’s plans, I decided to call up an old friend. Matt Yglesias is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the author of the Slow Boring newsletter, where he’s been writing a lot about Trump’s proposals. We also used to host a policy podcast together, “The Weeds.”

    In this conversation, we discuss what would happen to the economy, especially in terms of inflation, if Trump actually did what he says he wants to do; what we can learn from how Trump managed the economy in his first term; and why more people aren’t sounding the alarm.

    Mentioned:

    Trump’s new economic plan is terrible” by Matthew Yglesias

    Never mind: Wall Street titans shake off qualms and embrace Trump” by Sam Sutton

    How Far Trump Would Go” by Eric Cortellessa

    Book Recommendations:

    Take Back the Game by Linda Flanagan

    1177 B.C. by Eric H. Cline

    The Rise of the G.I. Army, 1940-1941 by Paul Dickson

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Kate Sinclair and Mary Marge Locker. Mixing by Isaac Jones, with Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero, Adam Posen and Michael Strain.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 21, 2024

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The biggest divide in our politics isn’t between Democrats and Republicans, or even left and right. It’s between people who follow politics closely, and those who pay almost no attention to it. If you’re in the former camp — and if you’re reading this, you probably are — the latter camp can seem inscrutable. These people hardly ever look at political news. They hate discussing politics. But they do care about issues and candidates, and they often vote.

    As the 2024 election takes shape, this bloc appears crucial to determining who wins the presidency. An NBC News poll from April found that 15 percent of voters don’t follow political news, and Donald Trump was winning them by 26 points.

    Yanna Krupnikov studies exactly this kind of voter. She’s a professor of communication and media at the University of Michigan and an author, with John Barry Ryan, of “The Other Divide: Polarization and Disengagement in American Politics.” The book examines how the chasm between the deeply involved and the less involved shapes politics in America. I’ve found it to be a helpful guide for understanding one of the most crucial dynamics emerging in this year’s election: the swing to Trump from President Biden among disengaged voters.

    In this conversation, we discuss how politically disengaged voters relate to politics; where they get their information about politics and how they form opinions; and whether major news events, like Trump’s recent conviction, might sway them.

    Mentioned:

    The ‘Need for Chaos’ and Motivations to Share Hostile Political Rumors” by Michael Bang Petersen, Mathias Osmundsen and Kevin Arceneaux

    Hooked by Markus Prior

    The Political Influence of Lifestyle Influencers? Examining the Relationship Between Aspirational Social Media Use and Anti-Expert Attitudes and Beliefs” by Ariel Hasell and Sedona Chinn

    One explanation for the 2024 election’s biggest mystery” by Eric Levitz

    Book Recommendations:

    What Goes Without Saying by Taylor N. Carlson and Jaime E. Settle

    Through the Grapevine by Taylor N. Carlson

    Sorry I’m Late, I Didn’t Want to Come by Jessica Pan

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 18, 2024

    The View From the Israeli Right

    The View From the Israeli Right

    On Tuesday I got back from an eight-day trip to Israel and the West Bank. I happened to be there on the day that Benny Gantz resigned from the war cabinet and called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to schedule new elections, breaking the unity government that Israel had had since shortly after Oct. 7.

    There is no viable left wing in Israel right now. There is a coalition that Netanyahu leads stretching from right to far right and a coalition that Gantz leads stretching from center to right. In the early months of the war, Gantz appeared ascendant as support for Netanyahu cratered. But now Netanyahu’s poll numbers are ticking back up.

    So one thing I did in Israel was deepen my reporting on Israel’s right. And there, Amit Segal’s name kept coming up. He’s one of Israel’s most influential political analysts and the author of “The Story of Israeli Politics” is coming out in English.

    Segal and I talked about the political differences between Gantz and Netanyahu, the theory of security that’s emerging on the Israeli right, what happened to the Israeli left, the threat from Iran and Hezbollah and how Netanyahu is trying to use President Biden’s criticism to his political advantage.

    Mentioned:

    Biden May Spur Another Netanyahu Comeback” by Amit Segal

    Book Recommendations:

    The Years of Lyndon Johnson Series by Robert A. Caro

    The World of Yesterday by Stefan Zweig

    The Object of Zionism by Zvi Efrat

    The News from Waterloo by Brian Cathcart

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Claire Gordon. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris with Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 14, 2024

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    There’s something weird happening with the economy. On a personal level, most Americans say they’re doing pretty well right now. And according to the data, that’s true. Wages have gone up faster than inflation. Unemployment is low, the stock market is generally up so far this year, and people are buying more stuff.

    And yet in surveys, people keep saying the economy is bad. A recent Harris poll for The Guardian found that around half of Americans think the S. & P. 500 is down this year, and that unemployment is at a 50-year high. Fifty-six percent think we’re in a recession.

    There are many theories about why this gap exists. Maybe political polarization is warping how people see the economy or it’s a failure of President Biden’s messaging, or there’s just something uniquely painful about inflation. And while there’s truth in all of these, it felt like a piece of the story was missing.

    And for me, that missing piece was an article I read right before the pandemic. An Atlantic story from February 2020 called “The Great Affordability Crisis Breaking America.” It described how some of Americans’ biggest-ticket expenses — housing, health care, higher education and child care — which were already pricey, had been getting steadily pricier for decades.

    At the time, prices weren’t the big topic in the economy; the focus was more on jobs and wages. So it was easier for this trend to slip notice, like a frog boiling in water, quietly, putting more and more strain on American budgets. But today, after years of high inflation, prices are the biggest topic in the economy. And I think that explains the anger people feel: They’re noticing the price of things all the time, and getting hammered with the reality of how expensive these things have become.

    The author of that Atlantic piece is Annie Lowrey. She’s an economics reporter, the author of Give People Money, and also my wife. In this conversation, we discuss how the affordability crisis has collided with our post-pandemic inflationary world, the forces that shape our economic perceptions, why people keep spending as if prices aren’t a strain and what this might mean for the presidential election.

    Mentioned:

    It Will Never Be a Good Time to Buy a House” by Annie Lowrey

    Book Recommendations:

    Franchise by Marcia Chatelain

    A Place of Greater Safety by Hilary Mantel

    Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 07, 2024

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    After Donald Trump was convicted last week in his hush-money trial, Republican leaders wasted no time in rallying behind him. There was no chance the Republican Party was going to replace Trump as their nominee at this point. Trump has essentially taken over the G.O.P.; his daughter-in-law is even co-chair of the Republican National Committee.

    How did the Republican Party get so weak that it could fall victim to a hostile takeover?

    Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld are the authors of “The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics,” which traces how both major political parties have been “hollowed out” over the decades, transforming once-powerful gatekeeping institutions into mere vessels for the ideologies of specific candidates. And they argue that this change has been perilous for our democracy.

    In this conversation, we discuss how the power of the parties has been gradually chipped away; why the Republican Party became less ideological and more geared around conflict; the merits of a stronger party system; and more.

    Mentioned:

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” by The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” by The Ezra Klein Show with Elaine Kamarck

    Book Recommendations:

    The Two Faces of American Freedom by Aziz Rana

    Rainbow’s End by Steven P. Erie

    An American Melodrama by Lewis Chester, Godfrey Hodgson, Bruce Page

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show’‘ was produced by Elias Isquith. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker, Kate Sinclair and Rollin Hu. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota and Efim Shapiro. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 04, 2024

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    The steady dings of notifications. The 40 tabs that greet you when you open your computer in the morning. The hundreds of unread emails, most of them spam, with subject lines pleading or screaming for you to click. Our attention is under assault these days, and most of us are familiar with the feeling that gives us — fractured, irritated, overwhelmed.

    D. Graham Burnett calls the attention economy an example of “human fracking”: With our attention in shorter and shorter supply, companies are going to even greater lengths to extract this precious resource from us. And he argues that it’s now reached a point that calls for a kind of revolution. “This is creating conditions that are at odds with human flourishing. We know this,” he tells me. “And we need to mount new forms of resistance.”

    Burnett is a professor of the history of science at Princeton University and is working on a book about the laboratory study of attention. He’s also a co-founder of the Strother School of Radical Attention, which is a kind of grass roots, artistic effort to create a curriculum for studying attention.

    In this conversation, we talk about how the 20th-century study of attention laid the groundwork for today’s attention economy, the connection between changing ideas of attention and changing ideas of the self, how we even define attention (this episode is worth listening to for Burnett’s collection of beautiful metaphors alone), whether the concern over our shrinking attention spans is simply a moral panic, what it means to teach attention and more.

    Mentioned:

    Friends of Attention

    The Battle for Attention” by Nathan Heller

    Powerful Forces Are Fracking Our Attention. We Can Fight Back.” by D. Graham Burnett, Alyssa Loh and Peter Schmidt

    Scenes of Attention edited by D. Graham Burnett and Justin E. H. Smith

    Book Recommendations:

    Addiction by Design by Natasha Dow Schüll

    Objectivity by Lorraine Daston and Peter L. Galison

    The Confidence-Man by Herman Melville

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Elias Isquith. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 31, 2024

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    A.I.-generated art has flooded the internet, and a lot of it is derivative, even boring or offensive. But what could it look like for artists to collaborate with A.I. systems in making art that is actually generative, challenging, transcendent?

    Holly Herndon offered one answer with her 2019 album “PROTO.” Along with Mathew Dryhurst and the programmer Jules LaPlace, she built an A.I. called “Spawn” trained on human voices that adds an uncanny yet oddly personal layer to the music. Beyond her music and visual art, Herndon is trying to solve a problem that many creative people are encountering as A.I. becomes more prominent: How do you encourage experimentation without stealing others’ work to train A.I. models? Along with Dryhurst, Jordan Meyer and Patrick Hoepner, she co-founded Spawning, a company figuring out how to allow artists — and all of us creating content on the internet — to “consent” to our work being used as training data.

    In this conversation, we discuss how Herndon collaborated with a human chorus and her “A.I. baby,” Spawn, on “PROTO”; how A.I. voice imitators grew out of electronic music and other musical genres; why Herndon prefers the term “collective intelligence” to “artificial intelligence”; why an “opt-in” model could help us retain more control of our work as A.I. trawls the internet for data; and much more.

    Mentioned:

    Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt” by Holly Herndon

    xhairymutantx” by Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst, for the Whitney Museum of Art

    Fade” by Holly Herndon

    Swim” by Holly Herndon

    Jolene” by Holly Herndon and Holly+

    Movement” by Holly Herndon

    Chorus” by Holly Herndon

    Godmother” by Holly Herndon

    The Precision of Infinity” by Jlin and Philip Glass

    Holly+

    Book Recommendations:

    Intelligence and Spirit by Reza Negarestani

    Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky

    Plurality by E. Glen Weyl, Audrey Tang and ⿻ Community

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero and Jack Hamilton.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 24, 2024

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    “The Jetsons” premiered in 1962. And based on the internal math of the show, George Jetson, the dad, was born in 2022. He’d be a toddler right now. And we are so far away from the world that show imagined. There were a lot of future-trippers in the 1960s, and most of them would be pretty disappointed by how that future turned out.

    So what happened? Why didn’t we build that future?

    The answer, I think, lies in the 1970s. I’ve been spending a lot of time studying that decade in my work, trying to understand why America is so bad at building today. And James Pethokoukis has also spent a lot of time looking at the 1970s, in his work trying to understand why America is less innovative today than it was in the postwar decades. So Pethokoukis and I are asking similar questions, and circling the same time period, but from very different ideological vantages.

    Pethokoukis is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and author of the book “The Conservative Futurist: How to Create the Sci-Fi World We Were Promised.” He also writes a newsletter called Faster, Please! “The two screamingly obvious things that we stopped doing is we stopped spending on science, research and development the way we did in the 1960s,” he tells me, “and we began to regulate our economy as if regulation would have no impact on innovation.”

    In this conversation, we debate why the ’70s were such an inflection point; whether this slowdown phenomenon is just something that happens as countries get wealthier; and what the government’s role should be in supporting and regulating emerging technologies like A.I.

    Mentioned:

    U.S. Infrastructure: 1929-2017” by Ray C. Fair

    Book Recommendations

    Why Information Grows by Cesar Hidalgo

    The Expanse series by James S.A. Corey

    The American Dream Is Not Dead by Michael R. Strain

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 21, 2024

    The Disastrous Relationship Between Israel, Palestinians and the U.N.

    The Disastrous Relationship Between Israel, Palestinians and the U.N.

    The international legal system was created to prevent the atrocities of World War II from happening again. The United Nations partitioned historic Palestine to create the states of Israel and Palestine, but also left Palestinians with decades of false promises. The war in Gaza — and countless other conflicts, including those in Syria, Yemen and Ethiopia — shows how little power the U.N. and international law have to protect civilians in wartime. So what is international law actually for?

    Aslı Ü. Bâli is a professor at Yale Law School who specializes in international and comparative law. “The fact that people break the law and sometimes get away with it doesn’t mean the law doesn’t exist and doesn’t have force,” she argues.

    In this conversation, Bâli traces the gap between how international law is written on paper and the realpolitik of how countries decide to follow it, the U.N.’s unique role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from its very beginning, how the laws of war have failed Gazans but may be starting to change the conflict’s course, and more.

    Mentioned:

    With Schools in Ruins, Education in Gaza Will Be Hobbled for Years” by Liam Stack and Bilal Shbair

    Book Recommendations:

    Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law by Antony Anghie

    Justice for Some by Noura Erakat

    Worldmaking After Empire by Adom Getachew

    The Constitutional Bind by Aziz Rana

    The United Nations and the Question of Palestine by Ardi Imseis

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota and Isaac Jones. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Carole Sabouraud.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 17, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Josh Younger on the Origin Story of the Shadow Banking System

    Josh Younger on the Origin Story of the Shadow Banking System

    There are a bunch of historical analogies that people like to reach for in order to describe some of the economic trends we're seeing today. There's obviously the period of high inflation in the 1970s and early 1980s, or the disruptions caused by the Spanish Flu pandemic around 1918. But there's also a single year -- 1953 -- which not only contains some eerie similarities to today's economic environment, but also ended up having far-reaching consequences that reverberate all the way to 2022. On this episode, Josh Younger, JPMorgan's global head of asset and liability management research and strategy, tells the origin story of the decisions made in 1953 that helped create the vast repurchase or repo market. At a time when there are plenty of concerns over the stability of the market for US bonds, we go back in time to explore the reasons why repo exist at all.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Preparing for Economic Turbulence: The Fed's Q2 Danger Zone and Russian Oil Cuts

    Preparing for Economic Turbulence: The Fed's Q2 Danger Zone and Russian Oil Cuts

    Invest and trade better with CI Futures. Check your options: http://completeintel.com/pricing 

    In this episode of “The Week Ahead,” host Tony Nash is joined by Brent Johnson, CEO of Santiago Capital, and Tracy Shuchart, a commodities trader at Hilltower Resource Advisors, to discuss the most pressing economic themes for the upcoming week.

    One of the key topics of discussion is the Federal Reserve’s “Q2 Danger Zone,” which Brent believes could be a potentially scary time for the economy. He notes that we are still less than a year away from the first rate hike, and it often takes 12-18 months for rate hikes to show up in the economy. By the summer of 2022, we will be right in the heart of that time period, coinciding with YoY inflation numbers that should come down due to the crazy comparisons from the previous year. Brent warns that even if inflation remains somewhat sticky, we could see a bunch of disinflationary prints at the same time, which will make it challenging for the Fed. Moreover, by that time, Owner Equivalent Rents are expected to fall, adding to the Fed’s challenges.

    Tracy then delves into the topic of oil production and cuts, specifically Russia’s decision to cut 500k barrels. She explains what this means for the market, how it could impact crude prices, and who will be hurt the most – Asia or the West. Tracy also raises an interesting point about Russia’s decision to smuggle oil through Albania despite the cuts, leaving us with questions about their motivations.

    Finally, the discussion turns to commercial and industrial loan growth, which saw a sharp rise after rate hikes started. Tracy explores why this is happening, and what it means for the economy. She believes that companies are taking out loans to fund capital expenditures, which is good news for the economy as it indicates that businesses are investing in themselves and their future growth.

    Key themes:
    1. The Fed’s Q2 Danger Zone
    2. Capex & C&I Loan Growth
    3. 500k fewer Russian barrels

    This is the 55th episode of The Week Ahead, where experts talk about the week that just happened and what will most likely happen in the coming week.

    Follow The Week Ahead panel on Twitter:
    Tony: https://twitter.com/TonyNashNerd
    Brent: https://twitter.com/SantiagoAuFund
    Tracy: https://twitter.com/chigrl

    Watch this episode on Youtube: https://youtu.be/6I8vJ0ghm4g

    TIP568: Current Market Conditions, Alternative Assets, & AI w/ David Stein

    TIP568: Current Market Conditions, Alternative Assets, & AI w/ David Stein
    Clay Finck chats with David Stein about current market conditions, the role of international stocks in a portfolio, whether investors should get exposure to AI stocks or not, if GDP is an outdated metric, the role of alternative assets in a portfolio, and David’s guide to living a richer, wiser, and happier life. David Stein is the Host of Money For the Rest of Us, a weekly personal finance podcast with over 20 million downloads. He’s also the co-founder of Asset Camp, a fintech platform of dynamic data-driven research tools focused on asset classes. IN THIS EPISODE, YOU’LL LEARN: 00:00 - Intro. 02:10 - Why we should care about current market conditions as long-term investors. 09:27 - David’s assessment of current market conditions and the Fed’s job in managing inflation. 13:08 - How long it takes for interest rates to flow through to the broader economy. 16:49 - The role international stocks can play in a portfolio. 26:47 - If investors should care if the US has the reserve currency or not. 33:28 - Ways in which investors can get exposure to AI. 38:41 - The potential long-term impacts of AI on our financial system. 42:09 - Whether GDP is an outdated and misleading metric or not. 46:42 - The role that crowdfunding platforms and alternative assets can play in a portfolio. 55:51 - How the venture capital playbook works. 58:28 - How David thinks about the expected returns for alternative assets. 75:00 - David’s thoughts around aligning his finances with living a good life. Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, and the other community members. Check out our recent episode covering The Passionate Pursuit of Lifelong Learning w/ Gautam Baid or watch the video here. David’s investing tool: Asset Camp. David’s website: Money for the Rest of Us. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: River Toyota Linkedin Marketing Solutions Fidelity Efani Shopify NDTCO Fundrise Wise NetSuite TurboTax Vacasa NerdWallet Babbel Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    How Layoff News Is Hiding a Hot Job Market

    How Layoff News Is Hiding a Hot Job Market

     Companies like Meta and Twitter have said that they will be cutting jobs. Google and Amazon have announced that they are putting a freeze on any new hiring.

    Are tech layoffs a sign of things to come across other sectors? Is this the opening bell for the bad news on the economy that many have been bracing for?

    Guest: Jeanna Smialek, a correspondent covering the Federal Reserve and economy for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit 

    nytimes.com/thedaily

    . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.