Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Decarbonizing the economy: Reaching net zero emissionsThe world aims to reach net zero emissions by 2050 or sooner to prevent climate change, with the US targeting this goal as well. Decarbonization requires industry changes, new technologies, and policies, with the Inflation Reduction Act being a step towards this goal.

      Decarbonizing the economy is a central task of our era to prevent the worst impacts of climate change. Net zero emissions, or the point where human greenhouse gas emissions are balanced by removals, is the goal. The world needs to reach net zero emissions globally as rapidly as possible, ideally by 2050 for a 1.5°C limit or sooner for a 2°C limit. The United States, given its wealth, technological capability, and historical contributions, should aim for net zero emissions by 2050 at the latest. Decarbonization involves changing industries, building new technologies, and implementing policies. The Inflation Reduction Act, recently passed in the US, is a step towards this goal but does not solve all the challenges. Experts like Jesse Jenkins, an energy and climate expert at Princeton University, can provide valuable insights into the path to decarbonization and the role of policies like the Inflation Reduction Act.

    • Expanding the role of clean electricity for a net zero futureTo reach net zero emissions, we need to expand the supply of clean electricity and reduce the demand for fossil fuels through carbon-free alternatives like hydrogen and negative emissions technologies.

      Electricity is a crucial linchpin in achieving net zero emissions due to it being a carbon-free energy carrier. Unlike liquid and gaseous hydrocarbons, which emit CO2 when consumed, electricity itself does not release CO2 when used. Currently, about 40% of electricity is already produced from carbon-free sources. To decarbonize further, we need to expand the supply of clean electricity and reduce the demand for liquid and gaseous fuels. This can be achieved through growing the role of electricity and other carbon-free energy carriers like hydrogen, producing carbon-free liquid fuels from CO2 and hydrogen, and implementing negative emissions technologies like carbon capture and storage. The challenge lies in finding cost-effective and mature solutions for these alternatives, particularly for sectors that are difficult to decarbonize, such as aviation. Overall, the expansion of clean electricity production is essential for a net zero future.

    • Building Two New Power Grids by 2050The US must transform energy production, transportation, and consumption at a massive scale to meet net-zero emissions by 2050, requiring significant investment and ensuring equitable process.

      The United States needs to build nearly two new power grids by 2050 to meet its net-zero emissions goal. This involves eliminating fossil fuels from the grid and increasing overall electricity supply to power various sectors. The challenge is massive, requiring the transformation of energy production, transportation, and consumption at a scale not seen since the nation-building era. This transition will require significant investment in physical infrastructure and may impact people's lives, so it's crucial to ensure that the process is equitable and does not repeat past harms. The good news is that this transformation is affordable and offers public health benefits, making it a worthwhile endeavor for the future.

    • Building renewable energy infrastructure on a national scaleRapidly decreasing costs of solar, wind, and batteries make large-scale renewable energy infrastructure more achievable than ever before, despite the significant construction challenges.

      The transition to renewable energy on a national scale requires building vast amounts of infrastructure, specifically solar and wind farms, which will have significant visual impacts. The most cost-effective scenario for achieving net-zero emissions spans an area equivalent to several states, and installing the necessary utility-scale solar and wind capacity each year would represent a substantial construction challenge. However, the good news is that solar, wind, and battery costs have been decreasing rapidly, making these decarbonization pathways more achievable than ever before. The challenge is to keep breaking records in renewable energy installation year after year. While the scale of this endeavor is intimidating, the fact that it is even a viable option is almost miraculous. The US has already exceeded its 2020 record for renewable energy installation in 2021, and is on track to double that peak by the end of this year.

    • Cost reduction of renewable energy technologies unlocks decarbonization ambitionThe Inflation Reduction Act accelerates decarbonization by offering subsidies and incentives for clean energy, building on cost reduction trends and driving innovation for next-gen technologies.

      The rapid decline in the cost of renewable energy technologies, particularly solar PV and lithium-ion batteries, has been a game-changer in unlocking increased policy ambition and private sector commitments towards decarbonization. This cost reduction has made clean energy the economically viable option, transforming the power and transportation sectors. The Inflation Reduction Act further accelerates this trend by offering subsidies, tax credits, rebates, and financing to make clean energy the preferred choice for businesses and individuals. By subsidizing decarbonization instead of pricing carbon, the U.S. is following the successful model of countries like Germany, Spain, and China, which subsidized the deployment of these technologies when they were expensive and drove innovation and cost declines. This bill aims to kickstart the same process for the next generation of technologies, enabling the U.S. to continue its progress towards a net-zero emissions future.

    • Making energy cheaper and cleaner for all AmericansThe Inflation Reduction Act taxes corporations and tax cheats to fund clean energy subsidies, but addressing other challenges like permitting, land availability, supply chain issues, and capacity planning is also necessary for accelerating the energy transition.

      The Inflation Reduction Act aims to make energy cheaper and cleaner for all Americans by taxing corporations and tax cheats, and using the collected revenue to subsidize clean energy production. However, it's important to note that while money is a necessary condition for accelerating the energy transition, there are other challenges such as permitting, land availability, supply chain issues, and capacity planning that need to be addressed. The bill does not provide a central coordinator or vast new powers to the federal government to decide where things go. Nevertheless, the alignment of financial incentives towards clean energy choices is crucial for making progress at the required pace.

    • Significant financial incentives for clean energy in the Inflation Reduction ActThe Inflation Reduction Act offers billions in profits for companies and savings for consumers, unlocking economic development and addressing challenges in clean energy expansion, transmission, workforce growth, and local economy transitions. However, political resistance may limit its impact in some states.

      The Inflation Reduction Act represents a significant shift in financial incentives for clean energy, offering billions of dollars in profits for companies and savings for regulators, rate payers, and energy consumers. This change could help unlock economic development and solve some of the challenges related to clean energy expansion, transmission, workforce growth, and local economy transitions. However, there's a risk of politicization, as some states may resist participating due to partisan reasons. Unlike Medicaid expansion, which is state-adminaged, the Inflation Reduction Act is primarily implemented through the federal tax code, limiting the role of governors in its implementation. The bill also includes industrial policies designed to bring tangible economic benefits to diverse communities across the country, making the clean energy economy a more direct concern for a broader range of Americans.

    • Revitalizing communities and creating jobs in clean energy sectorThe Inflation Reduction Act focuses on reducing emissions, making clean energy cheaper, revitalizing communities, and creating jobs in the clean energy sector to ensure a sustainable and politically viable clean energy transition

      The Inflation Reduction Act is not just about reducing emissions and making clean energy cheaper, but also about revitalizing communities and creating good jobs in the clean energy sector. This approach is crucial for sustaining the clean energy transition and transforming the politics of the transition. While some argue that adding standards may make the task more challenging, it is essential to build a workforce and expand the political stake of communities in the transition. The bill aims to unlock feedback loops and disrupt current interests that oppose clean energy transitions, ultimately driving the transition towards net zero emissions.

    • Impact of Inflation Reduction Act on Clean Energy PoliticsThe Inflation Reduction Act's focus on domestic supply chains could initially slow down the clean energy transition in some industries, but long-term incentives for battery production could lead to substantial investment and sustain political support for the net-zero emissions transition.

      The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 will have a significant impact on the politics of clean energy in America beyond its direct emissions reductions. While the act includes provisions for apprenticeship programs and good wages, its emphasis on domestic supply chains could slow down the clean energy transition in some cases, particularly in the electric vehicle and battery industries. However, these concerns may be overwrought in the near term as demand for electric vehicles continues to outstrip supply. In the long term, the act's incentives for investing in North American battery production could lead to substantial investment in the sector and help sustain the economic and political coalition needed for the transition to net-zero emissions. The act also acknowledges the need for a diverse energy mix beyond wind and solar, and it's important to explore other promising energy sources to build out the rest of the team.

    • Balancing Renewable Energy with Different Energy SourcesRenewable resources, fast burst resources, and firm resources are essential for a balanced energy system. Renewables save fuel costs and reduce emissions, fast burst resources provide short-term flexibility, and firm resources ensure consistent power.

      Building an effective energy system requires a balance of different energy sources and technologies. The first role is filled by renewable resources like wind and solar, which can save fuel costs and reduce emissions by displacing more dependable resources when available. The second role is filled by fast burst or balancing resources like batteries and demand response programs, which provide short-term flexibility to align supply and demand. The third role is filled by firm resources or clean firm resources, which provide consistent power for long periods of time and replace dirty options. Nuclear power currently plays a significant role in this third category, providing about half of our clean electricity, but its future role is uncertain. Preserving the operation of existing nuclear plants is critical to accelerating emissions reductions, but new clean firm options like advanced geothermal and new nuclear power plants will also be needed to ensure a reliable and clean energy future.

    • Challenges in building large-scale nuclear infrastructure in the USDespite potential benefits, lack of new US nuclear plants since 1970s due to complex infrastructure project challenges. Shift to smaller, modular reactors may revive industry.

      The lack of new civilian nuclear plants in the US since the 1970s, despite the potential benefits of nuclear energy as a clean, stable source, can be attributed to the challenges of building large-scale infrastructure projects in the country. Regulatory conditions have kept existing nuclear plants safe, but the US has lost the ability to construct complex civil works projects efficiently. A shift towards smaller, modular reactors may be a more feasible solution for reviving the nuclear industry in the west, as these reactors require smaller investments and can be built more frequently to develop economies of scale and a skilled workforce.

    • Carbon capture: A crucial part of decarbonization despite challengesCarbon capture technologies are essential for reducing emissions from heavy industries, but their economic viability is a challenge. The Inflation Reduction Act aims to help with tax credits, while critics argue against fossil fuel companies' use of carbon capture to continue production.

      Carbon capture technologies are a crucial part of many decarbonization pathways, despite being controversial. Carbon capture involves taking CO2 from combustion or industrial processes, storing it safely, or using it in industrial processes. The infrastructure required for CO2 transport and storage is massive, equivalent to 1.3 to 2.4 times current US oil production. While we have the physical capacity to build this infrastructure due to our existing oil and gas infrastructure, the challenge lies in making CO2 capture economically viable. The Inflation Reduction Act aims to help by increasing tax credits for capturing and storing CO2. Critics argue that fossil fuel companies are the primary cause of climate change and that carbon capture allows them to continue producing fossil fuels in a cleaner way. However, proponents argue that carbon capture is necessary to eliminate emissions from heavily emitting industries like cement and steel production. While there are technical challenges, the potential economic benefits and the need to address emissions make carbon capture an important part of the decarbonization solution.

    • Carbon capture: Progress or perpetuation?Carbon capture is a complex issue, with potential benefits for decarbonization and environmental justice, but also concerns about perpetuating fossil fuel use. The decision to use it depends on various factors.

      The debate around carbon capture and its role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is complex and multifaceted. On one hand, there are valid concerns about perpetuating fossil fuel use and the associated environmental justice issues. On the other hand, some argue that using carbon capture could help make faster progress towards decarbonization and improve environmental justice outcomes in certain cases. Ultimately, the decision to use carbon capture or not depends on various factors, including political considerations and the feasibility of rapidly expanding renewable energy sources. It's important to acknowledge that every energy technology has its own impacts and challenges, and a diverse energy mix is necessary to address the complex realities of energy production and consumption.

    • A diverse energy mix is crucial for the US energy systemInvesting in a range of energy technologies and supporting their development is important for a reliable, cost-effective, and low-carbon energy future in the US, with advanced hydrogen, geothermal, wind, solar, and nuclear among the key players.

      A diverse energy mix is crucial for a complex energy system like the United States. Renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, are essential, but they are not always reliable or cost-effective. Nuclear power and natural gas, among other resources, also have their place in the energy landscape. The challenge lies in building infrastructure that can effectively utilize various resources and address land use, economic, and transmission issues. Carbon capture technology is one such option, but its reliability and scalability are still uncertain. The success of wind and solar over the past decade serves as a reminder of the importance of investing in a range of technologies and supporting their development through research, demonstration, and deployment. The Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Law aim to do just that, incentivizing the scaling up of various technologies, including carbon capture, nuclear, advanced geothermal, and hydrogen production. These investments could lead to significant emissions reductions in the future. Looking 15 years ahead, advanced hydrogen and geothermal are among the technologies that could become central to our energy future, alongside wind, solar, and other established resources.

    • Clean Energy Revolution: Geothermal, Nuclear, Carbon Capture, and HydrogenThe US is leading the charge in the clean energy revolution with trials and scalings of advanced technologies like geothermal, nuclear, carbon capture, and hydrogen, driven by policies and the oil and gas sector's expertise.

      We are on the brink of a clean energy revolution, with various advanced technologies such as geothermal energy, nuclear power, carbon capture, and clean hydrogen production set to be trialed and scaled up in the coming years. The US, in particular, is poised to make significant strides in this area, leveraging its experience in drilling and innovation from the oil and gas sector. The Inflation Reduction Act and other policies are expected to accelerate the transition to electric vehicles and electrify home heating industries, making them more affordable and accessible to consumers. Geothermal energy, with its modular nature and potential for innovation, is expected to see significant success. Nuclear power and carbon capture projects are also set to move forward, while clean hydrogen production offers a carbon-free alternative as a fuel or energy carrier. Overall, the next decade is expected to see an explosion of investment in clean energy technologies and infrastructure.

    • The Inflation Reduction Act makes EVs more affordable with up to $75,100 tax creditThe Inflation Reduction Act offers tax credits up to $75,100 for consumers buying electric vehicles, making them cheaper than gas-powered cars by mid-2020s. The Act also incentivizes businesses to adopt electric vehicles and install heat pumps for home heating, accelerating the transition to clean energy.

      The Inflation Reduction Act aims to make electric vehicles (EVs) more affordable for consumers by offering up to a $75,100 tax credit. This credit, which can be claimed if automakers meet certain sourcing requirements, is expected to significantly reduce the upfront cost of EVs, making them cheaper than gas-powered vehicles by the mid-2020s. Additionally, the Act includes tax credits for businesses adopting electric vehicles, which could lead to widespread electrification in sectors like shipping, freight, and fleet vehicles. While there are concerns about the potential for corporate welfare, the tax credits are likely to be passed on to consumers as competition increases and more EV models become available. Another important aspect of the Act is the focus on heat pumps for home heating. Heat pumps represent a significant infrastructure upgrade, but they can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and save money on energy bills in the long run. The Act includes incentives for installing heat pumps, making this upgrade more accessible for homeowners. Overall, the Inflation Reduction Act is expected to accelerate the transition to clean energy in various sectors, from transportation to home heating.

    • Heat pumps: Efficient and carbon-free solution for heating and coolingHeat pumps provide up to 3x heat for every electricity unit, are carbon-free, and are encouraged by tax credits, but expanding transmission infrastructure is crucial to meet decarbonization goals.

      Heat pumps are an efficient and carbon-free solution for heating and cooling our homes and water. They work by moving heat instead of generating it, making them much more energy-efficient than traditional heating methods like boilers. Heat pumps can provide up to three units of heat for every unit of electricity consumed. The Inflation Reduction Act aims to encourage heat pump adoption by offering tax credits for installation, but the credits may not cover a significant portion of the upfront cost. To meet our decarbonization goals, we need to significantly expand transmission infrastructure to transport the clean electricity generated by wind and solar power to where it's needed. This requires more than doubling the pace of transmission expansion seen over the last decade, which presents a significant challenge. Heat pumps and electric vehicles are key technologies in the decarbonization challenge as they don't involve burning fossil fuels and are more efficient in converting energy to useful services.

    • Expanding the Transmission Grid for Renewable EnergyThe Inflation Reduction Act's permitting reform bill aims to accelerate the expansion of the transmission grid by streamlining the permitting process and addressing cost allocation issues, enabling the development of renewable energy sources and enhancing grid resilience.

      Expanding the transmission grid to meet growing electricity demand, particularly for renewable energy sources like wind and solar, is crucial. However, the current pace of expansion at about 1% per year is not enough. Historically, during periods of high electricity demand growth, the grid expanded at a rate of 2% per year. To meet the demands of the future, including the increasing use of electric vehicles and heat pumps, we need to double the current pace. The permitting reform bill, which is part of the Inflation Reduction Act, aims to help accelerate this expansion by expanding the federal government's authority to site, plan, and allocate costs for interregional and interstate transmission lines. This would streamline the permitting process, which is currently a major challenge for building out transmission lines. The bill also addresses the issue of who pays for these lines, particularly those that span different grid regions. Expanding the grid is important for several reasons. First, it enables the development of renewable energy sources by addressing the challenges of siting and connecting these facilities to the grid. Second, it allows for the movement of power over long distances, enhancing grid resilience and unlocking competition and lower costs over wider regions. Overall, the expansion of the transmission grid is essential for meeting growing electricity demand and transitioning to a cleaner energy future.

    • Allocating transmission line costs using the beneficiary pays principleThe Inflation Reduction Act's proposal to use the beneficiary pays principle for interregional transmission lines could lead to more efficient infrastructure development and significant health benefits from reduced pollution.

      The Inflation Reduction Act proposes using the beneficiary pays principle to allocate costs for interregional transmission lines, which would help resolve long-standing disputes and accelerate infrastructure projects. This policy change is crucial for efficient infrastructure development in the context of the ongoing energy transition. Moreover, decarbonizing America through the transition from fossil fuels to clean energy could lead to significant health benefits, including the avoidance of tens of thousands of premature deaths due to reduced fine particulate matter and other pollutants. This secondary benefit underscores the importance of expediting the clean energy transition, not only for climate change mitigation but also for public health.

    • Expanding clean energy infrastructure to reduce emissions and improve public healthExpanding clean energy infrastructure can save tens of thousands of lives by reducing air pollution and health impacts on vulnerable communities. Recommended books for policy interventions include 'Making Climate Policy Work', 'Sequencing to Ratchet Up Climate Policy Stringency', and 'How Solar Energy Became Cheap'.

      The Inflation Reduction Act's potential to significantly reduce emissions and improve public health is closely linked to the expansion of clean energy infrastructure. This infrastructure will primarily benefit communities disproportionately affected by fossil fuel pollution. The more transmission lines and renewable energy sources we build, the lower the air pollution and health impacts on vulnerable communities, potentially saving tens of thousands of lives. Additionally, Professor Jesse Jenkins recommends three books for those interested in making strategic policy interventions to accelerate emissions reductions: "Making Climate Policy Work" by Danny Cullenward and David Victor, "Sequencing to Ratchet Up Climate Policy Stringency" by Michael Paley et al., and "How Solar Energy Became Cheap" by Gregory Nemet. These works explore the political economy of carbon pricing, the importance of policy sequencing, and the history of solar energy's cost decline, respectively.

    • The Impact and Importance of the Inflation Reduction ActThe Inflation Reduction Act is a significant climate legislation in the US, addressing carbon emissions, clean energy, healthcare, and taxes, with positive impacts on the economy and environment, and a major victory for climate advocates.

      Learning from this episode of the Ezra Klein Show is the importance and impact of the Inflation Reduction Act, a key piece of climate legislation in the United States. Host Ezra Klein interviewed Jenkins and Leah Stokes in two separate conversations about the Act, with the second discussion delving deeper into its specific provisions. For those seeking a more detailed understanding of the legislation, Klein recommends checking out these conversations. Overall, the Inflation Reduction Act represents a significant step forward in addressing climate change and reducing carbon emissions, with provisions related to clean energy, healthcare, and taxes. The Act is expected to have a positive impact on the economy and the environment, and its passage marks a major victory for climate advocates. The Ezra Klein Show is produced by Andy Galvin and Rochekarma, with fact-checking by Michelle Harris, Mary Marge Locker, and Roland Hu, original music by Isaac Jones, mixing by Carol Saburo and Isaac Jones, audience strategy by Shannon Busta, and special thanks to Kristen Lin and Christina Samilewski.

    Recent Episodes from The Ezra Klein Show

    What Is the Democratic Party For?

    What Is the Democratic Party For?

    Top Democrats have closed ranks around Joe Biden since the debate. Should they? 

    Mentioned:

    This Isn’t All Joe Biden’s Fault” by Ezra Klein

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” by The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” with Elaine Kamarck on The Ezra Klein Show

    The Hollow Parties by Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This audio essay was produced by Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Fact-Checking by Jack McCordick and Michelle Harris. Mixing by Efim Shapiro. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Jeff Geld, Elias Isquith and Aman Sahota. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 30, 2024

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    I joined my Times Opinion colleagues Ross Douthat and Michelle Cottle to discuss the debate — and what Democrats might do next.

    Mentioned:

    The Biden and Trump Weaknesses That Don’t Get Enough Attention” by Ross Douthat

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!” with Matthew Yglesias on The Ezra Klein Show

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” on The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” with Elaine Kamarck on The Ezra Klein Show

    Gretchen Whitmer on The Interview

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump” with Sam Rosenfeld and Daniel Schlozman on The Ezra Klein Show

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com. You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 28, 2024

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Donald Trump has made inflation a central part of his campaign message. At his rallies, he rails against “the Biden inflation tax” and “crooked Joe’s inflation nightmare,” and promises that in a second Trump term, “inflation will be in full retreat.”

    But if you look at Trump’s actual policies, that wouldn’t be the case at all. Trump has a bold, ambitious agenda to make prices much, much higher. He’s proposing a 10 percent tariff on imported goods, and a 60 percent tariff on products from China. He wants to deport huge numbers of immigrants. And he’s made it clear that he’d like to replace the Federal Reserve chair with someone more willing to take orders from him. It’s almost unimaginable to me that you would run on this agenda at a time when Americans are so mad about high prices. But I don’t think people really know that’s what Trump is vowing to do.

    So to drill into the weeds of Trump’s plans, I decided to call up an old friend. Matt Yglesias is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the author of the Slow Boring newsletter, where he’s been writing a lot about Trump’s proposals. We also used to host a policy podcast together, “The Weeds.”

    In this conversation, we discuss what would happen to the economy, especially in terms of inflation, if Trump actually did what he says he wants to do; what we can learn from how Trump managed the economy in his first term; and why more people aren’t sounding the alarm.

    Mentioned:

    Trump’s new economic plan is terrible” by Matthew Yglesias

    Never mind: Wall Street titans shake off qualms and embrace Trump” by Sam Sutton

    How Far Trump Would Go” by Eric Cortellessa

    Book Recommendations:

    Take Back the Game by Linda Flanagan

    1177 B.C. by Eric H. Cline

    The Rise of the G.I. Army, 1940-1941 by Paul Dickson

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Kate Sinclair and Mary Marge Locker. Mixing by Isaac Jones, with Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero, Adam Posen and Michael Strain.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 21, 2024

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The biggest divide in our politics isn’t between Democrats and Republicans, or even left and right. It’s between people who follow politics closely, and those who pay almost no attention to it. If you’re in the former camp — and if you’re reading this, you probably are — the latter camp can seem inscrutable. These people hardly ever look at political news. They hate discussing politics. But they do care about issues and candidates, and they often vote.

    As the 2024 election takes shape, this bloc appears crucial to determining who wins the presidency. An NBC News poll from April found that 15 percent of voters don’t follow political news, and Donald Trump was winning them by 26 points.

    Yanna Krupnikov studies exactly this kind of voter. She’s a professor of communication and media at the University of Michigan and an author, with John Barry Ryan, of “The Other Divide: Polarization and Disengagement in American Politics.” The book examines how the chasm between the deeply involved and the less involved shapes politics in America. I’ve found it to be a helpful guide for understanding one of the most crucial dynamics emerging in this year’s election: the swing to Trump from President Biden among disengaged voters.

    In this conversation, we discuss how politically disengaged voters relate to politics; where they get their information about politics and how they form opinions; and whether major news events, like Trump’s recent conviction, might sway them.

    Mentioned:

    The ‘Need for Chaos’ and Motivations to Share Hostile Political Rumors” by Michael Bang Petersen, Mathias Osmundsen and Kevin Arceneaux

    Hooked by Markus Prior

    The Political Influence of Lifestyle Influencers? Examining the Relationship Between Aspirational Social Media Use and Anti-Expert Attitudes and Beliefs” by Ariel Hasell and Sedona Chinn

    One explanation for the 2024 election’s biggest mystery” by Eric Levitz

    Book Recommendations:

    What Goes Without Saying by Taylor N. Carlson and Jaime E. Settle

    Through the Grapevine by Taylor N. Carlson

    Sorry I’m Late, I Didn’t Want to Come by Jessica Pan

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 18, 2024

    The View From the Israeli Right

    The View From the Israeli Right

    On Tuesday I got back from an eight-day trip to Israel and the West Bank. I happened to be there on the day that Benny Gantz resigned from the war cabinet and called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to schedule new elections, breaking the unity government that Israel had had since shortly after Oct. 7.

    There is no viable left wing in Israel right now. There is a coalition that Netanyahu leads stretching from right to far right and a coalition that Gantz leads stretching from center to right. In the early months of the war, Gantz appeared ascendant as support for Netanyahu cratered. But now Netanyahu’s poll numbers are ticking back up.

    So one thing I did in Israel was deepen my reporting on Israel’s right. And there, Amit Segal’s name kept coming up. He’s one of Israel’s most influential political analysts and the author of “The Story of Israeli Politics” is coming out in English.

    Segal and I talked about the political differences between Gantz and Netanyahu, the theory of security that’s emerging on the Israeli right, what happened to the Israeli left, the threat from Iran and Hezbollah and how Netanyahu is trying to use President Biden’s criticism to his political advantage.

    Mentioned:

    Biden May Spur Another Netanyahu Comeback” by Amit Segal

    Book Recommendations:

    The Years of Lyndon Johnson Series by Robert A. Caro

    The World of Yesterday by Stefan Zweig

    The Object of Zionism by Zvi Efrat

    The News from Waterloo by Brian Cathcart

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Claire Gordon. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris with Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 14, 2024

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    There’s something weird happening with the economy. On a personal level, most Americans say they’re doing pretty well right now. And according to the data, that’s true. Wages have gone up faster than inflation. Unemployment is low, the stock market is generally up so far this year, and people are buying more stuff.

    And yet in surveys, people keep saying the economy is bad. A recent Harris poll for The Guardian found that around half of Americans think the S. & P. 500 is down this year, and that unemployment is at a 50-year high. Fifty-six percent think we’re in a recession.

    There are many theories about why this gap exists. Maybe political polarization is warping how people see the economy or it’s a failure of President Biden’s messaging, or there’s just something uniquely painful about inflation. And while there’s truth in all of these, it felt like a piece of the story was missing.

    And for me, that missing piece was an article I read right before the pandemic. An Atlantic story from February 2020 called “The Great Affordability Crisis Breaking America.” It described how some of Americans’ biggest-ticket expenses — housing, health care, higher education and child care — which were already pricey, had been getting steadily pricier for decades.

    At the time, prices weren’t the big topic in the economy; the focus was more on jobs and wages. So it was easier for this trend to slip notice, like a frog boiling in water, quietly, putting more and more strain on American budgets. But today, after years of high inflation, prices are the biggest topic in the economy. And I think that explains the anger people feel: They’re noticing the price of things all the time, and getting hammered with the reality of how expensive these things have become.

    The author of that Atlantic piece is Annie Lowrey. She’s an economics reporter, the author of Give People Money, and also my wife. In this conversation, we discuss how the affordability crisis has collided with our post-pandemic inflationary world, the forces that shape our economic perceptions, why people keep spending as if prices aren’t a strain and what this might mean for the presidential election.

    Mentioned:

    It Will Never Be a Good Time to Buy a House” by Annie Lowrey

    Book Recommendations:

    Franchise by Marcia Chatelain

    A Place of Greater Safety by Hilary Mantel

    Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 07, 2024

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    After Donald Trump was convicted last week in his hush-money trial, Republican leaders wasted no time in rallying behind him. There was no chance the Republican Party was going to replace Trump as their nominee at this point. Trump has essentially taken over the G.O.P.; his daughter-in-law is even co-chair of the Republican National Committee.

    How did the Republican Party get so weak that it could fall victim to a hostile takeover?

    Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld are the authors of “The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics,” which traces how both major political parties have been “hollowed out” over the decades, transforming once-powerful gatekeeping institutions into mere vessels for the ideologies of specific candidates. And they argue that this change has been perilous for our democracy.

    In this conversation, we discuss how the power of the parties has been gradually chipped away; why the Republican Party became less ideological and more geared around conflict; the merits of a stronger party system; and more.

    Mentioned:

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” by The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” by The Ezra Klein Show with Elaine Kamarck

    Book Recommendations:

    The Two Faces of American Freedom by Aziz Rana

    Rainbow’s End by Steven P. Erie

    An American Melodrama by Lewis Chester, Godfrey Hodgson, Bruce Page

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show’‘ was produced by Elias Isquith. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker, Kate Sinclair and Rollin Hu. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota and Efim Shapiro. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 04, 2024

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    The steady dings of notifications. The 40 tabs that greet you when you open your computer in the morning. The hundreds of unread emails, most of them spam, with subject lines pleading or screaming for you to click. Our attention is under assault these days, and most of us are familiar with the feeling that gives us — fractured, irritated, overwhelmed.

    D. Graham Burnett calls the attention economy an example of “human fracking”: With our attention in shorter and shorter supply, companies are going to even greater lengths to extract this precious resource from us. And he argues that it’s now reached a point that calls for a kind of revolution. “This is creating conditions that are at odds with human flourishing. We know this,” he tells me. “And we need to mount new forms of resistance.”

    Burnett is a professor of the history of science at Princeton University and is working on a book about the laboratory study of attention. He’s also a co-founder of the Strother School of Radical Attention, which is a kind of grass roots, artistic effort to create a curriculum for studying attention.

    In this conversation, we talk about how the 20th-century study of attention laid the groundwork for today’s attention economy, the connection between changing ideas of attention and changing ideas of the self, how we even define attention (this episode is worth listening to for Burnett’s collection of beautiful metaphors alone), whether the concern over our shrinking attention spans is simply a moral panic, what it means to teach attention and more.

    Mentioned:

    Friends of Attention

    The Battle for Attention” by Nathan Heller

    Powerful Forces Are Fracking Our Attention. We Can Fight Back.” by D. Graham Burnett, Alyssa Loh and Peter Schmidt

    Scenes of Attention edited by D. Graham Burnett and Justin E. H. Smith

    Book Recommendations:

    Addiction by Design by Natasha Dow Schüll

    Objectivity by Lorraine Daston and Peter L. Galison

    The Confidence-Man by Herman Melville

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Elias Isquith. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 31, 2024

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    A.I.-generated art has flooded the internet, and a lot of it is derivative, even boring or offensive. But what could it look like for artists to collaborate with A.I. systems in making art that is actually generative, challenging, transcendent?

    Holly Herndon offered one answer with her 2019 album “PROTO.” Along with Mathew Dryhurst and the programmer Jules LaPlace, she built an A.I. called “Spawn” trained on human voices that adds an uncanny yet oddly personal layer to the music. Beyond her music and visual art, Herndon is trying to solve a problem that many creative people are encountering as A.I. becomes more prominent: How do you encourage experimentation without stealing others’ work to train A.I. models? Along with Dryhurst, Jordan Meyer and Patrick Hoepner, she co-founded Spawning, a company figuring out how to allow artists — and all of us creating content on the internet — to “consent” to our work being used as training data.

    In this conversation, we discuss how Herndon collaborated with a human chorus and her “A.I. baby,” Spawn, on “PROTO”; how A.I. voice imitators grew out of electronic music and other musical genres; why Herndon prefers the term “collective intelligence” to “artificial intelligence”; why an “opt-in” model could help us retain more control of our work as A.I. trawls the internet for data; and much more.

    Mentioned:

    Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt” by Holly Herndon

    xhairymutantx” by Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst, for the Whitney Museum of Art

    Fade” by Holly Herndon

    Swim” by Holly Herndon

    Jolene” by Holly Herndon and Holly+

    Movement” by Holly Herndon

    Chorus” by Holly Herndon

    Godmother” by Holly Herndon

    The Precision of Infinity” by Jlin and Philip Glass

    Holly+

    Book Recommendations:

    Intelligence and Spirit by Reza Negarestani

    Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky

    Plurality by E. Glen Weyl, Audrey Tang and ⿻ Community

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero and Jack Hamilton.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 24, 2024

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    “The Jetsons” premiered in 1962. And based on the internal math of the show, George Jetson, the dad, was born in 2022. He’d be a toddler right now. And we are so far away from the world that show imagined. There were a lot of future-trippers in the 1960s, and most of them would be pretty disappointed by how that future turned out.

    So what happened? Why didn’t we build that future?

    The answer, I think, lies in the 1970s. I’ve been spending a lot of time studying that decade in my work, trying to understand why America is so bad at building today. And James Pethokoukis has also spent a lot of time looking at the 1970s, in his work trying to understand why America is less innovative today than it was in the postwar decades. So Pethokoukis and I are asking similar questions, and circling the same time period, but from very different ideological vantages.

    Pethokoukis is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and author of the book “The Conservative Futurist: How to Create the Sci-Fi World We Were Promised.” He also writes a newsletter called Faster, Please! “The two screamingly obvious things that we stopped doing is we stopped spending on science, research and development the way we did in the 1960s,” he tells me, “and we began to regulate our economy as if regulation would have no impact on innovation.”

    In this conversation, we debate why the ’70s were such an inflection point; whether this slowdown phenomenon is just something that happens as countries get wealthier; and what the government’s role should be in supporting and regulating emerging technologies like A.I.

    Mentioned:

    U.S. Infrastructure: 1929-2017” by Ray C. Fair

    Book Recommendations

    Why Information Grows by Cesar Hidalgo

    The Expanse series by James S.A. Corey

    The American Dream Is Not Dead by Michael R. Strain

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 21, 2024

    Related Episodes

    08/14/2023: Dirty Green Energy: How the Promise Became a Problem

    08/14/2023: Dirty Green Energy: How the Promise Became a Problem

    In this special episode of The Wright Report, Bryan Dean Wright dives into the controversial topic of green energy in America, focusing on the promises and actualities of Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, signed one year ago. Despite the $369B spent to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy, Wright unravels the myth that green energy is entirely green, clean, or renewable. Over a five-part series, he promises to expose the "dirty secrets" of this energy revolution, challenging conventional wisdom and sparking a critical conversation about the future of energy in America. Check out more insights and join the conversation at The Wright Report on Substack.

    How to solve climate change and make life more awesome

    How to solve climate change and make life more awesome
    The climate series is back! The reason for the delay is that I wanted to make sure that this episode was next up in the series. Once you start listening, you’ll understand why.  So far, we’ve spent the series talking about the problem we're facing and what the world will ultimately look like if we fail. Today’s conversation is different: It is about what it will take to solve climate change and what kind of world we can build if we succeed.  Saul Griffith is an inventor, a MacArthur genius fellow, and the founder and CEO of Otherlab, a high-tech research and development company on the frontlines of trying to imagine our clean energy future. Griffith and his team were contracted by the Department of Energy to track and visualize the entirety of America’s energy flows — and as a result, he knows the US energy system better than just about anyone on this planet. Griffith is also clearer than anyone else I’ve found on the paths to decarbonization, and how to navigate them. Most conversations about climate change are pretty depressing. This conversation is not. We have the tools we need to decarbonize. What’s more, decarbonizing doesn’t mean accepting a future of less — it can mean a more awesome, humane, technologically rich, and socially inspiring future for us all. This conversation is about a vision of decarbonization that is genuinely awesome, and how we can actually get there. References: Otherlab's diagram of US energy flows Griffith's piece on paths to decarbonization Book recommendations: Debt: The First 5,000 Years by David Graeber Freedom's Forge by Arthur Herman The Extinction Rebellion Handbook Silent Spring by Rachel Carson My book is available for pre-order! You can find it at www.EzraKlein.com. The first batch of stops for my book tour is up! Get tickets at http://www.whywerepolarized.com Submit questions for our upcoming "Ask Me Anything" at ezrakleinshow@vox.com You can subscribe to Ezra's new podcast Impeachment, explained on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, Overcast, Pocket Casts, or your favorite podcast app. Credits: Producer and Editor - Jeff Geld Researcher - Roge Karma Engineer - Cynthia Gil Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    HIBT Lab! Quaise Energy: Carlos Araque

    HIBT Lab! Quaise Energy: Carlos Araque

    Growing up in Colombia, Carlos Araque and his father liked to take apart bicycles and motorcycles then put them back together. This love of tinkering led Carlos to study engineering at MIT and eventually launch a career in the oil and gas industry. After 15 years of this work, Carlos realized he was uniquely suited to be a part of the global energy transition away from fossil fuels. He returned to his alma mater to help run a startup accelerator, and soon, Quaise Energy was born.

    This week on How I Built This Lab, Carlos shares how his company plans to drill the deepest holes ever to unlock the nearly limitless potential of geothermal energy. Carlos explains why he sees such promise with this energy source and how he spread his optimism to investors to raise more than $70 million and counting. 

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Energy Minute: Untangling 100% Renewable vs. 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Goals

    Energy Minute: Untangling 100% Renewable vs. 24/7 Carbon-Free Energy Goals

    Why do are forward-leaning companies centering their decarbonization strategy around 24/7 carbon-free energy? How is it different from a 100% renewable energy target? This episode revisits fundamental concepts on renewable energy (including RECs), looks at the difference in these two models, and explains why hourly data is critical to meeting 100% decarbonization goals.

    HIBT Lab! BlocPower: Donnel Baird

    HIBT Lab! BlocPower: Donnel Baird

    When Donnel Baird was a child, his parents would regularly use the oven to heat their Brooklyn apartment ⁠— a dangerous and energy-inefficient practice that’s unfortunately not unique to New York City. As an adult traveling the country with the Obama for America campaign, Donnel saw countless homes and apartments wasting power and jeopardizing resident safety because of dated infrastructure. He founded BlocPower in 2014 to address this precise problem, focusing on low-income communities so often overlooked by innovative startups. 

    This week on How I Built This Lab, Donnel talks with Guy about BlocPower’s work to modernize buildings nationwide and transition them to clean energy sources. BlocPower has raised more than $100 million from Wall Street and Silicon Valley investors, and has partnered with cities across the country to create greener, safer spaces for their residents.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.