Logo

    464. Will Work-from-Home Work Forever?

    en-usJune 03, 2021
    What impact did the pandemic have on remote work preferences?
    How does remote work influence real estate needs?
    What challenges do open floor plans pose for productivity?
    What are the benefits of work-from-anywhere policies?
    How can older office buildings be repurposed post-pandemic?

    Podcast Summary

    • The Impact of the Pandemic on Remote Work and Real EstateRemote work may not be equally productive for all industries, but it has influenced the need for high-quality office spaces and encouraged virtual meetings. The pandemic has fundamentally changed the employment model, and its lasting impact remains unclear.

      When the pandemic hit, many workers were forced to work from home, and this led to a realization that remote work may be a part of the future. Research conducted by Morris Davis and his co-authors showed that working from home is always less productive than working in the office, but this may not be true for all industries or professions. Remote work may have a significant impact on real estate and the need for high-quality office spaces. However, remote seminars and meetings have become more commonplace in certain industries. The pandemic has caused a shift in the traditional employment model, and it remains to be seen how much of it will stick in the long term.

    • The Pros and Cons of Working from HomeWhile working from home can boost productivity by eliminating commutes, it can also lead to distractions and a lack of social interaction. Its effects on the economy are still unclear, but it has made attending seminars easier and more flexible. Each individual's situation determines the benefits and drawbacks.

      Working from home can increase productivity by eliminating the daily commute, but it also has downsides such as a lack of camaraderie and potential distractions. Studies have shown that working from home can increase productivity by up to 13 percent, but its effects on economic activity are still being studied. The pandemic has brought about a year-long work-from-home experiment, and while saved commuting time is mostly spent on non-work activities like housework and childcare, it has also made it possible for individuals to attend seminars from anywhere in the world and be more productive. Ultimately, the benefits and drawbacks of working from home depend on each individual's situation and personal preferences.

    • The Productivity of Working from Home vs. the OfficeWorking from home has become more productive due to the pandemic, and while face-to-face interaction is beneficial, high-skilled workers can still be productive from home with the right tools.

      Economists have developed a model that suggests that working from the office is more productive than working from home due to the benefits of face-to-face interaction. However, it also suggests that working from home is not as unproductive as it used to be, and productivity has increased since the pandemic. Economists try to select the few things that matter the most, and they have focused on high-skilled workers with a college degree who can do work from anywhere. The model assumes that productivity when working from home is 50% of productivity when working in the office. Despite the overall productivity advantage of working from the office, it is not the case at the margin. The model shows that working from home can be productive when tools are available.

    • The Productivity Benefits of Remote WorkRemote work has significantly increased productivity due to advanced technologies, allowing for better communication and data sharing. It has also led to a shift in the traditional workplace and improved job satisfaction.

      Working from home has increased productivity by 46% in comparison to working in the office. This is because of the technologies that already existed, such as high-speed internet, cloud computing, and video-conferencing technology. These technological advancements have enabled massive instantaneous sharing of data and communication from anywhere. The ability to work remotely has led to a permanent change in the landscape of where we work, how we value housing, and how we think about our commutes. Working from home not only buffered the impact of the pandemic on people's productivity and incomes, but it also has other benefits, such as increased satisfaction and happiness. Employers can now consider how much space they need and where it should be located for their workforces since they are paid their marginal product for labor.

    • The Impact of Work from Home on Wages, Real Estate Prices, and Tax BasesWorking from home increases productivity and leads to better wages. While firms save on office space, the price of commercial real estate falls while housing prices rise. This shift may impact tax bases and result in economic boosts for suburbs.

      As workers invest more in home offices, their productivity increases, leading to higher wages. While firms will pay less for office space, they will have to pay workers more. However, the price of commercial office space will fall by about 20 percent in central business districts, while the price of housing will increase between 11 and 20 percent. There remains uncertainty on how far people can move away to work from home and what productivity levels they will have. The change will affect the tax bases of different areas, with cities suffering from falling property taxes. However, suburbs may see a boost in their economies, resulting in better schools and other infrastructure.

    • Rethinking Office Spaces in a Post-Pandemic WorldThe pandemic has led to a reevaluation of traditional office spaces, with a focus on balancing the need for space with decreased occupancy. Converting older buildings into mixed-use spaces can improve equity and accessibility in urban areas.

      The pandemic has forced a rethinking of traditional office spaces and how they impact productivity and employee satisfaction. Open floor plans, once seen as a way to optimize flow and collaboration, are now being reconsidered due to their noise and intrusiveness, and people's desire for more control over their environment. As companies plan for a return to the office, they must consider how to balance the need for space with the reality of decreased occupancy. Converting older, less desirable office buildings into residential or mixed-use spaces may be a winning solution, freeing up high-performing, quality office space for those who need it most and improving the diversity and equity of urban areas.

    • Rethinking the Traditional Office: The Future of Remote WorkThe pandemic has accelerated the shift towards remote work, leading to the emergence of a hybrid model. The "work from anywhere" approach offers greater flexibility and reduces the need for urban centers while creating new coordination challenges.

      The pandemic has forced businesses to rethink the traditional 'central business district' model and embrace remote work. While density offers advantages, the pandemic has highlighted its downsides and many workers have developed new habits. A hybrid work model of two or three days in the office and two or three at home is predicted to become more common, creating coordination and communication issues to work out. However, the technology that made remote work possible during the pandemic may provide a solution. A researcher focused on changing the geography of work suggests that a 'work from anywhere' model could be the future, offering employees greater flexibility and reducing the need for urban centers.

    • The Benefits and Challenges of Work-from-AnywhereWork-from-anywhere can benefit both employees and employers, but it requires effective communication and management strategies. Lessons can be learned from the experiences of distributed workforces in emerging markets and random experiments can provide insights for economists to study.

      Work-from-anywhere allows employees to work from a location they want to live in, potentially reversing brain drain and benefiting emerging markets in tier-two and tier-three cities. This shift comes with challenges such as managing communication and team coordination, which have solutions through management strategies. A distributed workforce has existed in India for decades, with lessons to be learned from their experiences. Employees can benefit from lower living costs in smaller towns, but employers also see benefits such as a potential increase in talent pool. The US Patent and Trademark Office's experiment with work-from-anywhere showed potential for success, with random timing for eligibility creating a natural experiment for economists to study.

    • Allowing remote work increases productivityGiving employees the choice to work from anywhere can lead to a 4.4% increase in productivity, as demonstrated by patent examiners at the US Patent Office.

      Allowing employees to work from anywhere can increase their productivity, as seen in the case of patent examiners at the US Patent Office who saw a 4.4% increase in productivity when given the option to work from different locations.

    • The benefits of engineering collaboration and social interactions in the virtual world.Virtual water coolers can facilitate knowledge-sharing and allow for limitless interactions. Senior managers should replicate this in physical offices to improve performance.

      Despite the lack of improvement in quality, work from anywhere is not limited to tasks that can be performed independently; engineering collaboration and social interactions in the virtual world can improve overall performance. An experiment using virtual water coolers demonstrated that the ability to connect with others regardless of proximity can facilitate knowledge-sharing, which is not always documented. The physical office only allows for serendipitous interactions with people in close proximity, but the virtual world allows for almost limitless interactions. A key lesson for senior managers is how to replicate the virtual water cooler in the physical office to improve performance rather than returning to the traditional office space.

    • The Benefits of Embracing Work-from-Anywhere PoliciesWork-from-anywhere policies create a larger pool of skilled workers for companies, supporting diversity and inclusivity. They also reduce the frictions of immigration and level the playing field. Companies failing to offer remote work risk losing talent.

      Companies that embrace work-from-anywhere policies will have access to a larger pool of highly skilled workers, allowing for a more inclusive and diverse workforce. Additionally, offering remote work options can help mitigate the frictions of immigration and create a more level playing field for workers to earn higher incomes. The pandemic has shown that remote work is a viable option for many companies, and those that do not offer this flexibility risk losing top talent. While online education may have its challenges, the work-from-anywhere revolution has demonstrated that previously overlooked institutions and individuals can be a valuable resource if given the opportunity.

    • Balancing Remote Work and Face-to-Face Interactions for SuccessRemote work can expand hiring pools, but face-to-face interactions are still important for collaboration and mentoring. Finding a balance between remote and in-person work is crucial for sustainable success.

      The work-from-anywhere revolution is an exciting opportunity to expand the hiring pool and benefit from the diverse talent available from all over the world. Research has shown that lesser-known colleges in India have a higher percentage of top-performing students than elite colleges. However, face-to-face interaction is still essential in certain contexts and can lead to increased collaboration and creativity. The equilibrium lies in finding ways to facilitate face-to-face interactions within the remote-work model. Mentoring and upskilling require personal interactions, and employees want to be part of something bigger than themselves. While remote work can offer flexibility, it is important to maintain a balance between remote and face-to-face work for sustainable success.

    • Tulsa Remote: Reversing Talent Outflow with $10,000 IncentivesTulsa Remote's project incentivizes remote workers to move to smaller towns, creating a win-win situation for both workers and companies. It also proves the effectiveness of work-from-anywhere technology in attracting talent to smaller communities.

      Tulsa Remote, a project funded by the George Kaiser Family Foundation, has successfully reversed talent outflow by incentivizing remote workers to move to Tulsa with a $10,000 bounty. By breaking the vicious cycle of companies not wanting to come to small towns due to lack of talent and workers not wanting to move there because of lack of companies, Tulsa Remote has created a win-win situation for both. The program has not only gained popularity among pro-social workers but has also been financially sustainable with the state of Oklahoma gaining around $2,000-$3,000 a year from each new Tulsa worker. This success has led the government to pass a bill that would reimburse Tulsa Remote and scale up the program. These studies prove the effectiveness of work-from-anywhere technology for eligible workers and can help to attract talent to smaller towns and cities.

    • The Work-From-Home Revolution and Income InequalityAs work-from-home technology becomes more prevalent, income inequality may increase by 7%, primarily benefiting high-skilled workers. While lower-skilled workers may eventually benefit from technology, it remains uncertain. Researchers like Morris Davis and Raj Choudhury are working to uncover more conclusive findings.

      The work-from-home revolution primarily benefits high-skilled and well-compensated employees, leading to an expected increase in income inequality by 7%. The trend of skill-biased technical change over the years has already benefited high-skilled workers, and work-from-home technology perpetuates this unfortunate scenario. While some believe lower-skilled workers may eventually benefit from technology, it remains a moving target. Smart researchers like Morris Davis and Raj Choudhury will continue exploring the relationship between technology and labor to uncover more conclusive findings.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    EXTRA: In Praise of Maintenance (Update)

    EXTRA: In Praise of Maintenance (Update)

    We revisit an episode from 2016 that asks: Has our culture’s obsession with innovation led us to neglect the fact that things also need to be taken care of? 

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Martin Casado, general partner at Andreessen Horowitz.
      • Ruth Schwartz Cowan, professor emerita of history and sociology of science at University of Pennsylvania.
      • Edward Glaeser, professor of economics at Harvard University.
      • Chris Lacinak, founder and president of AVPreserve.
      • Andrew Russell, provost of SUNY Polytechnic Institute.
      • Lawrence Summers, professor and president emeritus of Harvard University; former Secretary of the Treasury and former director of the National Economic Council.
      • Lee Vinsel, professor of science, technology, and society at Virginia Tech.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 16, 2024

    602. Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think?

    602. Is Screen Time as Poisonous as We Think?

    Young people have been reporting a sharp rise in anxiety and depression. This maps neatly onto the global rise of the smartphone. Some researchers are convinced that one is causing the other. But how strong is the evidence?

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 12, 2024

    601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?

    601. Multitasking Doesn’t Work. So Why Do We Keep Trying?

    Only a tiny number of “supertaskers” are capable of doing two things at once. The rest of us are just making ourselves miserable, and less productive. How can we put the — hang on a second, I've just got to get this.


    Come see Stephen Dubner live! 

    “A Questionable Evening: A strategic interrogation from two people who ask questions for a living,” featuring Stephen Dubner and PJ Vogt from Search Engine.

    Thursday, Sept. 26th, at the Bell House in Brooklyn, NY. 

    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/a-questionable-evening-evening-with-stephen-dubner-and-pj-vogt-tickets-1002544747327

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Olivia Grace, senior product manager at Slack.
      • Gloria Mark, professor of computer science at the University of California, Irvine.
      • David Strayer, professor of cognition and neural science at the University of Utah.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usSeptember 05, 2024

    What Is the Future of College — and Does It Have Room for Men? (Update)

    What Is the Future of College — and Does It Have Room for Men? (Update)

    Educators and economists tell us all the reasons college enrollment has been dropping, especially for men, and how to stop the bleeding. (Part 3 of our series from 2022, “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Zachary Bleemer, assistant professor of economics at Princeton University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • D'Wayne Edwards, founder and President of Pensole Lewis College.
      • Catharine Hill, former president of Vassar College; trustee at Yale University; and managing director at Ithaka S+R.
      • Pano Kanelos, founding president of the University of Austin.
      • Amalia Miller, professor of economics at the University of Virginia.
      • Donald Ruff, president and C.E.O. of the Eagle Academy Foundation.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College, Brown University, and Prairie View A&M University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 29, 2024

    EXTRA: Why Quitting Is Usually Worth It

    EXTRA: Why Quitting Is Usually Worth It

    Stephen Dubner appears as a guest on Fail Better, a new podcast hosted by David Duchovny. The two of them trade stories about failure, and ponder the lessons that success could never teach.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 26, 2024

    The University of Impossible-to-Get-Into (Update)

    The University of Impossible-to-Get-Into (Update)

    America’s top colleges are facing record demand. So why don’t they increase supply? (Part 2 of our series from 2022, “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Peter Blair, professor of education at Harvard University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • Zachary Bleemer, assistant professor of economics at Princeton University and faculty research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
      • Amalia Miller, professor of economics at the University of Virginia.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 22, 2024

    What Exactly Is College For? (Update)

    What Exactly Is College For? (Update)

    We think of them as intellectual enclaves and the surest route to a better life. But U.S. colleges also operate like firms, trying to differentiate their products to win market share and prestige points. In the first episode of a special series originally published in 2022, we ask what our chaotic system gets right — and wrong. (Part 1 of “Freakonomics Radio Goes Back to School.”)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Peter Blair, faculty research Fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research and professor of education at Harvard University.
      • Catharine Hill, former president of Vassar College; trustee at Yale University; and managing director at Ithaka S+R.
      • Morton Schapiro, professor of economics and former president of Northwestern University.
      • Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College, Brown University, and Prairie View A&M University.
      • Miguel Urquiola, professor of economics at Columbia University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 15, 2024

    EXTRA: Here’s Why You’re Not an Elite Athlete (Update)

    EXTRA: Here’s Why You’re Not an Elite Athlete (Update)

    There are a lot of factors that go into greatness, many of which are not obvious. As the Olympics come to a close, we revisit a 2018 episode in which top athletes from a variety of sports tell us how they made it, and what they sacrificed.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 12, 2024

    600. “If We’re All in It for Ourselves, Who Are We?”

    600. “If We’re All in It for Ourselves, Who Are We?”

    Tania Tetlow, a former federal prosecutor and now the president of Fordham University, thinks the modern campus could use a dose of old-fashioned values.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 08, 2024

    599. The World's Most Valuable Unused Resource

    599. The World's Most Valuable Unused Resource

    It’s not oil or water or plutonium — it’s human hours. We've got an idea for putting them to use, and for building a more human-centered economy. But we need your help.

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usAugust 01, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Hybrid intelligence: Working with AI instead of against it

    Hybrid intelligence: Working with AI instead of against it

    Future-focused consultant and entrepreneur Scott Klososky admits he doesn’t know exactly what the future holds as it relates to artificial intelligence. But he is definitely more upbeat about the productivity possibilities AI offers than down about the jobs AI might eliminate

    He believes AI will cut out parts of jobs, not entire ones. Klososky will talk more on this topic in September at the AICPA & CIMA Conference on Banks and Savings Institutions.

    About AI, Klososky says: “Instead of fearing it, we need to get better at embracing it and loving and appreciating what it can do.”

    What you’ll learn from this episode:

    ·         How the past 10 months have transformed the adoption of generative AI such as ChatGPT.

    ·         What Klososky means by the phrase “consumerized AI” – and how what’s happening now compares to the launch of the iPhone.

    ·         Why Klososky prefers “machine intelligence” over “artificial intelligence.”

    ·         How technology could play a role in helping to close the U.S. labor gap.

    ·         A new take on the 80-20 rule, applicable to AI.

    ·         What Klososky is looking forward to from this year’s banking conference.

    Productivity, Technology and ADD / ADHD

    Productivity, Technology and ADD / ADHD
    Tara McGillicuddy welcomes back Jay Carter to ADHD Support Talk Radio. Tara and Jay will be talking about  Productivity, Technology and ADD / ADHD. Jay will be sharing some of his favorite Apps for being productive. ADHD Support Talk Radio host Tara McGillicuddy is an internationally recognised ADD / ADHD expert.. She is also a top ADHD Coach and the founder of ADDClasses.com.

    015 - You can't pay the bills with a byline

    015 - You can't pay the bills with a byline

    There’s a lot going on this week as we continue to wait to find out the results of the election. So, we’re going to talk about other stuff. Like, for example, why the gig economy is going to be so important in the future, and why Proposition 22 is a good thing. Jason and Jess also talk about their own experience freelancing, and describe some practical steps you can use to get started. 

    We also talk about Apple’s announcement that it’s holding an event next week to launch new laptops powered by Apple Silicon. We’ve known these were coming, but now we get to see if Apple can actually pull off what we all expect - a fast, lightweight, powerful laptop with all-day battery life. We’ll know soon.

    Uber’s win over California is a big win for the gig economy.

    MuckRack

    10 Best iOS 14 Apps for the iPhone 12

    Apple Event “One more thing.”