Logo
    Search

    How the $500 Billion Attention Industry Really Works

    enFebruary 14, 2023

    Podcast Summary

    • The internet's business model and our attentionThe internet's business model, centered around programmatic advertising, shapes our online experiences and has significant implications for our collective attention as a society, with companies like Google and Facebook generating most of their revenue from ads and influencing internet design.

      The internet's business model, centered around programmatic advertising, fundamentally shapes our online experiences and has significant implications for our collective attention as a society. This model, which relies on the use of algorithms to buy and sell attention online, is deeply embedded in our daily use of the internet. Companies like Google and Facebook, which generate over 80% of their revenue from advertising, depend on this ecosystem. The design of the internet, from free services to features like the like button on social media, is influenced by this advertising-driven model. Understanding this business model and its impact on our attention is crucial for navigating the challenges and opportunities facing our society.

    • The internet's evolution fueled by advertisingInternet's growth was funded by ad revenue, limiting experimentation with alternative business models

      The internet's design and advertising have evolved hand in hand. Initially, companies focused on amassing user attention, even if they weren't profitable. Venture capitalists funded these losses, believing that eventual advertising revenue would make up for it. Google and Facebook's success stories fueled this belief, as they transformed from loss-making companies to industry giants through advertising. This funding model, however, limited experimentation with alternative business models, keeping the internet's monetization heavily reliant on advertising. Despite debates about the inevitability of this business model, it's clear that various alternatives existed and could have shaped the internet differently.

    • The Cultural Norm of Paying for BooksWhile advertising has been a dominant business model, businesses that don't rely on it, like books, can still be successful with the right investment and cultural shift.

      While advertising has been a dominant business model for many industries providing information, such as newspapers, magazines, television, radio, and even social media, there are exceptions like books. The speaker argues that the pervasiveness of advertising is due to its attractive proposition of offering a product for free and having it subsidized by a third party. However, the viability of businesses depends on what people are willing to pay for, and in the case of books, there is a cultural norm for buying them. The speaker also acknowledges that the shift towards digital advertising is different from traditional advertising, and this change can make it difficult for people to pay for content due to the psychological cost of content being zero. Despite this, the speaker believes that with the right investment and cultural shift, it's possible to create sustainable business models that don't rely on advertising. In summary, the speaker's argument is that while advertising has been a prevalent business model, it's not the only option, and there are examples of successful businesses that don't rely on it. The shift towards digital advertising brings new challenges, but with the right approach, it's possible to create sustainable business models.

    • Financialization of AdvertisingAdvertising shifted from traditional methods to programmatic, turning attention into a commodity, enabling large-scale, anonymous targeting, but raising privacy concerns and potential negative impacts on user experience.

      The shift from traditional advertising to programmatic advertising brought about a financialization of the industry. This means that attention, once a highly heterogeneous resource, was commodified and spread out, allowing advertisers to reach specific demographics anonymously and at a large scale. The programmatic advertising model, which resembles high-frequency trading in the capital markets, involves real-time bidding on ad inventory based on user data. The dream was to create advertising as a science through measurability and scalability, but the reality has been more complex, with concerns around privacy and the potential for negative impacts on user experience. Overall, the financialization of advertising represents a significant change in the industry, with implications for both advertisers and consumers.

    • Financialization of AttentionAttention, a valuable digital resource, is bought and sold as a commodity through ad exchanges, where ads are delivered to specific users based on real-time auctions, raising questions about its true value.

      The concept of attention, which can be thought of as the most valuable resource in the digital world, is being financialized and sold as a tradable commodity. This is achieved through the creation of marketplaces where buyers and sellers can transact at scale. Attention is measured and sold based on user activity or engagement with websites or apps, with common definitions including holding an ad in view for a certain amount of time. The buying and selling of attention occurs through ad exchanges, where software acting on behalf of publishers and advertisers compete in real-time auctions to deliver ads to specific users. This process is automated and happens instantaneously, with global servers communicating to facilitate the transactions. The financialization of attention has led to the development of standards for measuring attention and the creation of a market at scale, but raises questions about the true nature of attention and its value.

    • Google's Business Innovation: Creating a Profitable Ad ModelGoogle revolutionized online advertising by creating a profitable marketplace on a keyword-by-keyword basis, using an auction infrastructure for real-time delivery of relevant ads, and focusing on ad quality to maintain a high standard.

      Google's success in the digital world was not just about providing effective search results, but also about creating a profitable business model through online advertising. This achievement involved setting up a marketplace on a keyword-by-keyword basis, using an auction infrastructure to deliver relevant ads in real-time. Google's innovation extended beyond creating the marketplace, as they also focused on rating the quality of winning ads to maintain a high standard and balance scalability with good user experience. The ad business model, which has become the norm for most major online platforms, incentivizes a focus on ads despite the potential downsides. This narrative of the last few decades of the web highlights Google's significant business innovation, which has contributed significantly to the company's ongoing success.

    • Impact of Advertising on Online PlatformsCritics argue that online platforms prioritize ads over user experience, but some believe user engagement and attention-seeking are the main drivers of online culture.

      The advertising-based business model of major online platforms has been a subject of much debate, with concerns raised about its impact on user experience and content creation. Critics argue that once a search engine or social media platform starts relying on third-party advertisers for revenue, it becomes incentivized to shape the user experience to cater to the advertisers, making it harder for users to distinguish ads from legitimate search results or content. However, not everyone agrees with this view. Some argue that the desire for attention and engagement, rather than the ad-buying process, is the primary driver of the "outrage culture" and engagement-based nature of online platforms. Additionally, some argue that advertising might even incentivize the creation of certain types of content that might not otherwise exist. Ultimately, the relationship between advertising and online content is complex, and it's important to consider the various incentives at play and their potential impact on user experience and online discourse.

    • The internet's shift towards scale-based business models and the 'subprime attention crisis'The internet's focus on scale-based advertising models can lead to a shallow experience of content, wasting ad spending and disrupting user experience.

      The business models that have dominated the internet, particularly advertising, are designed for scale, while many of the best and most valuable content often thrive better in a subscription model. The internet moved towards scale-based business models due to the frictionless nature of advertising, but this can lead to a shallower experience of content online. The central metaphor of the book, the "subprime attention crisis," refers to the idea that our attention has become a commodity bought and sold in digital ad markets, much like how subprime mortgages were sold and packaged for profit in the housing market before the 2008 financial crisis. The dream was that these ad markets would create a transparent and effective way to target and deliver ads to consumers, but in reality, much of the money spent on advertising is wasted, and the experience of content online can be shallow and disconnected.

    • Online advertising effectiveness questionedUp to 56% of display ads may never reach a real person due to fraud, 41% of ad campaigns may not reach intended audience due to inaccurate data, and 56% of ads may not be seen by consumers

      The online advertising marketplace, often perceived as a highly effective and valuable tool for reaching consumers, may be less functional than it seems due to various assumptions that don't hold up. These assumptions include the ability to reach real humans, accurate data about those humans, and the effectiveness of the ads once they are delivered. For instance, studies suggest that up to 56% of display ads may never reach a real person due to fraud, and 41% of ad campaigns may not reach the intended audience due to inaccurate data. Additionally, even if an ad is delivered to a real person, there's a good chance it won't be seen, with as many as 56% of ads being never seen by the consumer. These issues call into question the overall effectiveness of online advertising and whether the significant investments made in this market are worth it.

    • Maintaining the health and sustainability of the digital advertising ecosystemExcessive and attention-grabbing ads can negatively impact our ability to focus and engage with valuable information, leading to a tragedy of the commons in the digital world. We must explore ways to improve the quality of attention on the web for the long-term benefit of society.

      The health and sustainability of the digital advertising ecosystem, which funds many free online services and subsidizes advancements in technology and journalism, is crucial for our society. However, if the quality of attention on the web degrades due to excessive and attention-grabbing ads, it could negatively impact our collective ability to focus and engage with valuable information. This could lead to a tragedy of the commons, where everyone is competing for limited attention, resulting in irritation, anger, and inability to focus. The historical click-through rates of early web ads, which were much higher than today's, serve as a reminder of the potential for improvement in the digital advertising landscape. It's essential to consider the long-term implications of the current state of the digital advertising ecosystem and explore ways to collectively manage and improve the quality of attention on the web.

    • The declining value of attention in the digital ageThe oversaturation of online content and advertising is leading to disattention, making it harder for valuable content and ads to stand out. This trend is causing user discontent and poses a major vulnerability for advertising-supported platforms.

      The declining value of attention as a result of the oversaturation of online content and advertising is a societal issue with potential consequences for democracy and the effectiveness of online advertising itself. The market's incentives have been driving an increase in disattention, making it harder for valuable content and ads to stand out. This situation can be compared to the subprime mortgage crisis, where the underlying assets were deteriorating while the market continued to behave as if nothing had changed. The effect of this is that people are paying less attention to ads and are increasingly using ad-blocking technology. This trend is causing significant user discontent and could pose a major vulnerability for advertising-supported platforms. Despite this, advertisers may not realize the problem and continue to invest in advertising, hoping to find the effective channels. However, the growing use of ad-blockers and privacy-focused technologies poses a significant threat to the advertising industry as a whole.

    • The ad-driven model of the internet is leading to a deteriorating user experienceThe increasing use of ad-blocking software and the fact that a small percentage of users generate most ad clicks indicate concerns over the sustainability and toxicity of the ad-driven business model. Potential solutions include a shift towards subscription-based models and prioritizing user experience over ad revenue.

      The current ad-driven model of the internet, particularly on social media platforms, is leading to a deteriorating user experience. This issue is highlighted by the increasing use of ad-blocking software and the fact that a small percentage of users are responsible for the majority of clicks on ads. The potential outcomes of this trend include a shift towards subscription-based models and a decrease in the importance of social media as a primary means of online interaction due to its toxicity and unsustainability. Additionally, Elon Musk's criticisms of Twitter and its potential to become a "hellscape" for advertisers highlight the growing concerns over the ad-driven business model. The future of the internet may lie in a more balanced business model that prioritizes user experience and engagement over ad revenue.

    • Shift to subscription-based business models in media industryPeople are willing to pay for high-quality content online, normalizing subscription models and creating new opportunities, but concerns include accessibility and potential impact of AI technology

      We're witnessing a shift towards subscription-based business models in the media industry. This trend, pioneered by companies like The New York Times, has proven that people are willing to pay for high-quality content online. This normalization of subscription models sets the stage for other businesses to build on this audience and create new opportunities. However, it's important to remember that there are trade-offs. Accessibility and the availability of low-quality content are potential concerns in a subscription-driven media landscape. Furthermore, the rise of AI technology is another significant development, with many major AI projects being driven by ad-based businesses. This raises questions about the potential impact on the industry and the importance of having open and transparent conversations about the value and accessibility of content. Overall, these trends highlight the evolving nature of media consumption and the ongoing need for thoughtful dialogue and innovation.

    • The integration of AI into the internet could change how we interact with information onlineAI could lead to a more monolithic narrative experience, potentially reducing friction and improving results, but also changing our perception of the internet and our desire for assistant-driven experiences.

      The integration of AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), into the internet could significantly alter the way we interact with information online. Instead of searching for information through various options, we might rely on a single voice or agent that synthesizes and offers opinions, potentially leading to a more monolithic narrative experience. This shift could result in less friction and potentially better results, but it might also change our perception of the internet and our desire for a more assistant-driven experience rather than directly accessing websites. This change could have significant implications for business models and the overall product landscape of the internet. Previously, there were similar fears about Quora replacing Google as a search engine, but that did not come to pass. However, the current trend towards AI-driven information synthesis could represent a more viable alternative to traditional search methods.

    • AI in Advertising: Game-Changer or Concerns?AI's ability to generate high-quality ads in real-time is seen as a game-changer in online advertising, but concerns about accuracy and trustworthiness persist, especially in areas of search and persuasion. The impact on creative agencies and the role of human creativity remains to be seen.

      The use of large language models like ChatGPT in online advertising is seen as a game-changer due to their ability to generate high-quality ads in real-time and enter into a constant feedback loop with users. However, there are concerns about the accuracy and trustworthiness of these models, especially when it comes to search and persuasion. The speaker believes that while AI may be able to create effective ads, it doesn't necessarily mean it has cracked the code on persuasion or eliminated the need for human creativity and marketing infrastructure. The potential benefits include the ability to create and distribute high-quality ads at scale, but the impact on persuasion and the role of creative agencies remains to be seen. Ultimately, the speaker raises the question of whether we have reached the "Wanamaker threshold" where AI can deliver truly persuasive ads automatically. While there are valid concerns, there is also excitement about the potential for AI to revolutionize the advertising industry.

    • The Future of AI and AdvertisingAI and advertising are becoming more personalized and experimental, using data and machine learning for targeted ads. This could lead to effective advertising but raises concerns about privacy, manipulation, and the potential for a 'Skinner box' internet.

      The future of AI and advertising is headed towards a more personalized and experimental approach, using tracking data and machine learning to generate targeted ads with minimal human intervention. This could lead to a more effective advertising industry, but also raises concerns about privacy, manipulation, and the potential for a "Skinner box" internet where systems have too much power to influence our behavior. The line between what's normal and what's creepy will be blurred, and it will be important to consider the potential impact on trust and our relationship with these technologies. As for book recommendations, I'd suggest "Weapons of Math Destruction" by Cathy O'Neil for insights into the dangers of data-driven decision making, "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" by Shoshana Zuboff for a deeper understanding of the current state of digital marketing, and "The Sentient Machine" by Amar Bhidé for a thoughtful exploration of the intersection of AI and economics.

    • Lessons from the Past: Insights into Current Trends and TechnologiesExploring historical texts provides valuable insights into current trends and technologies, revealing both successes and failures in their development.

      The past can provide valuable insights into current trends and technologies. The first book, "Here Comes Everybody" by Clay Shirky, takes us back to the early 21st century when social media was a new and exciting prospect. Revisiting this text now offers lessons on both successes and failures in the social web's development. Secondly, understanding the history of major companies like Bechtel, as detailed in Sally Denton's "The Profiteers," can provide context for modern infrastructure projects and industries like nuclear power. Lastly, a seemingly unrelated book, "Jim Ravel's Theatrical Pickpocketing," offers an intriguing perspective on the history of clothing and magic illusions, shedding light on the art of performance and audience interaction. These diverse reads highlight the importance of exploring various historical texts to gain a deeper understanding of current events and trends.

    Recent Episodes from The Ezra Klein Show

    What Is the Democratic Party For?

    What Is the Democratic Party For?

    Top Democrats have closed ranks around Joe Biden since the debate. Should they? 

    Mentioned:

    This Isn’t All Joe Biden’s Fault” by Ezra Klein

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” by The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” with Elaine Kamarck on The Ezra Klein Show

    The Hollow Parties by Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This audio essay was produced by Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Fact-Checking by Jack McCordick and Michelle Harris. Mixing by Efim Shapiro. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Jeff Geld, Elias Isquith and Aman Sahota. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 30, 2024

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    After That Debate, the Risk of Biden Is Clear

    I joined my Times Opinion colleagues Ross Douthat and Michelle Cottle to discuss the debate — and what Democrats might do next.

    Mentioned:

    The Biden and Trump Weaknesses That Don’t Get Enough Attention” by Ross Douthat

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!” with Matthew Yglesias on The Ezra Klein Show

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” on The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” with Elaine Kamarck on The Ezra Klein Show

    Gretchen Whitmer on The Interview

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump” with Sam Rosenfeld and Daniel Schlozman on The Ezra Klein Show

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com. You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 28, 2024

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Trump’s Bold Vision for America: Higher Prices!

    Donald Trump has made inflation a central part of his campaign message. At his rallies, he rails against “the Biden inflation tax” and “crooked Joe’s inflation nightmare,” and promises that in a second Trump term, “inflation will be in full retreat.”

    But if you look at Trump’s actual policies, that wouldn’t be the case at all. Trump has a bold, ambitious agenda to make prices much, much higher. He’s proposing a 10 percent tariff on imported goods, and a 60 percent tariff on products from China. He wants to deport huge numbers of immigrants. And he’s made it clear that he’d like to replace the Federal Reserve chair with someone more willing to take orders from him. It’s almost unimaginable to me that you would run on this agenda at a time when Americans are so mad about high prices. But I don’t think people really know that’s what Trump is vowing to do.

    So to drill into the weeds of Trump’s plans, I decided to call up an old friend. Matt Yglesias is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the author of the Slow Boring newsletter, where he’s been writing a lot about Trump’s proposals. We also used to host a policy podcast together, “The Weeds.”

    In this conversation, we discuss what would happen to the economy, especially in terms of inflation, if Trump actually did what he says he wants to do; what we can learn from how Trump managed the economy in his first term; and why more people aren’t sounding the alarm.

    Mentioned:

    Trump’s new economic plan is terrible” by Matthew Yglesias

    Never mind: Wall Street titans shake off qualms and embrace Trump” by Sam Sutton

    How Far Trump Would Go” by Eric Cortellessa

    Book Recommendations:

    Take Back the Game by Linda Flanagan

    1177 B.C. by Eric H. Cline

    The Rise of the G.I. Army, 1940-1941 by Paul Dickson

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Kate Sinclair and Mary Marge Locker. Mixing by Isaac Jones, with Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero, Adam Posen and Michael Strain.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 21, 2024

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The Biggest Political Divide Is Not Left vs. Right

    The biggest divide in our politics isn’t between Democrats and Republicans, or even left and right. It’s between people who follow politics closely, and those who pay almost no attention to it. If you’re in the former camp — and if you’re reading this, you probably are — the latter camp can seem inscrutable. These people hardly ever look at political news. They hate discussing politics. But they do care about issues and candidates, and they often vote.

    As the 2024 election takes shape, this bloc appears crucial to determining who wins the presidency. An NBC News poll from April found that 15 percent of voters don’t follow political news, and Donald Trump was winning them by 26 points.

    Yanna Krupnikov studies exactly this kind of voter. She’s a professor of communication and media at the University of Michigan and an author, with John Barry Ryan, of “The Other Divide: Polarization and Disengagement in American Politics.” The book examines how the chasm between the deeply involved and the less involved shapes politics in America. I’ve found it to be a helpful guide for understanding one of the most crucial dynamics emerging in this year’s election: the swing to Trump from President Biden among disengaged voters.

    In this conversation, we discuss how politically disengaged voters relate to politics; where they get their information about politics and how they form opinions; and whether major news events, like Trump’s recent conviction, might sway them.

    Mentioned:

    The ‘Need for Chaos’ and Motivations to Share Hostile Political Rumors” by Michael Bang Petersen, Mathias Osmundsen and Kevin Arceneaux

    Hooked by Markus Prior

    The Political Influence of Lifestyle Influencers? Examining the Relationship Between Aspirational Social Media Use and Anti-Expert Attitudes and Beliefs” by Ariel Hasell and Sedona Chinn

    One explanation for the 2024 election’s biggest mystery” by Eric Levitz

    Book Recommendations:

    What Goes Without Saying by Taylor N. Carlson and Jaime E. Settle

    Through the Grapevine by Taylor N. Carlson

    Sorry I’m Late, I Didn’t Want to Come by Jessica Pan

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 18, 2024

    The View From the Israeli Right

    The View From the Israeli Right

    On Tuesday I got back from an eight-day trip to Israel and the West Bank. I happened to be there on the day that Benny Gantz resigned from the war cabinet and called on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to schedule new elections, breaking the unity government that Israel had had since shortly after Oct. 7.

    There is no viable left wing in Israel right now. There is a coalition that Netanyahu leads stretching from right to far right and a coalition that Gantz leads stretching from center to right. In the early months of the war, Gantz appeared ascendant as support for Netanyahu cratered. But now Netanyahu’s poll numbers are ticking back up.

    So one thing I did in Israel was deepen my reporting on Israel’s right. And there, Amit Segal’s name kept coming up. He’s one of Israel’s most influential political analysts and the author of “The Story of Israeli Politics” is coming out in English.

    Segal and I talked about the political differences between Gantz and Netanyahu, the theory of security that’s emerging on the Israeli right, what happened to the Israeli left, the threat from Iran and Hezbollah and how Netanyahu is trying to use President Biden’s criticism to his political advantage.

    Mentioned:

    Biden May Spur Another Netanyahu Comeback” by Amit Segal

    Book Recommendations:

    The Years of Lyndon Johnson Series by Robert A. Caro

    The World of Yesterday by Stefan Zweig

    The Object of Zionism by Zvi Efrat

    The News from Waterloo by Brian Cathcart

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Claire Gordon. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris with Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 14, 2024

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    The Economic Theory That Explains Why Americans Are So Mad

    There’s something weird happening with the economy. On a personal level, most Americans say they’re doing pretty well right now. And according to the data, that’s true. Wages have gone up faster than inflation. Unemployment is low, the stock market is generally up so far this year, and people are buying more stuff.

    And yet in surveys, people keep saying the economy is bad. A recent Harris poll for The Guardian found that around half of Americans think the S. & P. 500 is down this year, and that unemployment is at a 50-year high. Fifty-six percent think we’re in a recession.

    There are many theories about why this gap exists. Maybe political polarization is warping how people see the economy or it’s a failure of President Biden’s messaging, or there’s just something uniquely painful about inflation. And while there’s truth in all of these, it felt like a piece of the story was missing.

    And for me, that missing piece was an article I read right before the pandemic. An Atlantic story from February 2020 called “The Great Affordability Crisis Breaking America.” It described how some of Americans’ biggest-ticket expenses — housing, health care, higher education and child care — which were already pricey, had been getting steadily pricier for decades.

    At the time, prices weren’t the big topic in the economy; the focus was more on jobs and wages. So it was easier for this trend to slip notice, like a frog boiling in water, quietly, putting more and more strain on American budgets. But today, after years of high inflation, prices are the biggest topic in the economy. And I think that explains the anger people feel: They’re noticing the price of things all the time, and getting hammered with the reality of how expensive these things have become.

    The author of that Atlantic piece is Annie Lowrey. She’s an economics reporter, the author of Give People Money, and also my wife. In this conversation, we discuss how the affordability crisis has collided with our post-pandemic inflationary world, the forces that shape our economic perceptions, why people keep spending as if prices aren’t a strain and what this might mean for the presidential election.

    Mentioned:

    It Will Never Be a Good Time to Buy a House” by Annie Lowrey

    Book Recommendations:

    Franchise by Marcia Chatelain

    A Place of Greater Safety by Hilary Mantel

    Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Efim Shapiro and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 07, 2024

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    The Republican Party’s Decay Began Long Before Trump

    After Donald Trump was convicted last week in his hush-money trial, Republican leaders wasted no time in rallying behind him. There was no chance the Republican Party was going to replace Trump as their nominee at this point. Trump has essentially taken over the G.O.P.; his daughter-in-law is even co-chair of the Republican National Committee.

    How did the Republican Party get so weak that it could fall victim to a hostile takeover?

    Daniel Schlozman and Sam Rosenfeld are the authors of “The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics,” which traces how both major political parties have been “hollowed out” over the decades, transforming once-powerful gatekeeping institutions into mere vessels for the ideologies of specific candidates. And they argue that this change has been perilous for our democracy.

    In this conversation, we discuss how the power of the parties has been gradually chipped away; why the Republican Party became less ideological and more geared around conflict; the merits of a stronger party system; and more.

    Mentioned:

    Democrats Have a Better Option Than Biden” by The Ezra Klein Show

    Here’s How an Open Democratic Convention Would Work” by The Ezra Klein Show with Elaine Kamarck

    Book Recommendations:

    The Two Faces of American Freedom by Aziz Rana

    Rainbow’s End by Steven P. Erie

    An American Melodrama by Lewis Chester, Godfrey Hodgson, Bruce Page

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show’‘ was produced by Elias Isquith. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker, Kate Sinclair and Rollin Hu. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota and Efim Shapiro. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enJune 04, 2024

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    Your Mind Is Being Fracked

    The steady dings of notifications. The 40 tabs that greet you when you open your computer in the morning. The hundreds of unread emails, most of them spam, with subject lines pleading or screaming for you to click. Our attention is under assault these days, and most of us are familiar with the feeling that gives us — fractured, irritated, overwhelmed.

    D. Graham Burnett calls the attention economy an example of “human fracking”: With our attention in shorter and shorter supply, companies are going to even greater lengths to extract this precious resource from us. And he argues that it’s now reached a point that calls for a kind of revolution. “This is creating conditions that are at odds with human flourishing. We know this,” he tells me. “And we need to mount new forms of resistance.”

    Burnett is a professor of the history of science at Princeton University and is working on a book about the laboratory study of attention. He’s also a co-founder of the Strother School of Radical Attention, which is a kind of grass roots, artistic effort to create a curriculum for studying attention.

    In this conversation, we talk about how the 20th-century study of attention laid the groundwork for today’s attention economy, the connection between changing ideas of attention and changing ideas of the self, how we even define attention (this episode is worth listening to for Burnett’s collection of beautiful metaphors alone), whether the concern over our shrinking attention spans is simply a moral panic, what it means to teach attention and more.

    Mentioned:

    Friends of Attention

    The Battle for Attention” by Nathan Heller

    Powerful Forces Are Fracking Our Attention. We Can Fight Back.” by D. Graham Burnett, Alyssa Loh and Peter Schmidt

    Scenes of Attention edited by D. Graham Burnett and Justin E. H. Smith

    Book Recommendations:

    Addiction by Design by Natasha Dow Schüll

    Objectivity by Lorraine Daston and Peter L. Galison

    The Confidence-Man by Herman Melville

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu and Kristin Lin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin and Elias Isquith. Original music by Isaac Jones and Aman Sahota. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 31, 2024

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    ‘Artificial Intelligence?’ No, Collective Intelligence.

    A.I.-generated art has flooded the internet, and a lot of it is derivative, even boring or offensive. But what could it look like for artists to collaborate with A.I. systems in making art that is actually generative, challenging, transcendent?

    Holly Herndon offered one answer with her 2019 album “PROTO.” Along with Mathew Dryhurst and the programmer Jules LaPlace, she built an A.I. called “Spawn” trained on human voices that adds an uncanny yet oddly personal layer to the music. Beyond her music and visual art, Herndon is trying to solve a problem that many creative people are encountering as A.I. becomes more prominent: How do you encourage experimentation without stealing others’ work to train A.I. models? Along with Dryhurst, Jordan Meyer and Patrick Hoepner, she co-founded Spawning, a company figuring out how to allow artists — and all of us creating content on the internet — to “consent” to our work being used as training data.

    In this conversation, we discuss how Herndon collaborated with a human chorus and her “A.I. baby,” Spawn, on “PROTO”; how A.I. voice imitators grew out of electronic music and other musical genres; why Herndon prefers the term “collective intelligence” to “artificial intelligence”; why an “opt-in” model could help us retain more control of our work as A.I. trawls the internet for data; and much more.

    Mentioned:

    Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt” by Holly Herndon

    xhairymutantx” by Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst, for the Whitney Museum of Art

    Fade” by Holly Herndon

    Swim” by Holly Herndon

    Jolene” by Holly Herndon and Holly+

    Movement” by Holly Herndon

    Chorus” by Holly Herndon

    Godmother” by Holly Herndon

    The Precision of Infinity” by Jlin and Philip Glass

    Holly+

    Book Recommendations:

    Intelligence and Spirit by Reza Negarestani

    Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky

    Plurality by E. Glen Weyl, Audrey Tang and ⿻ Community

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Annie Galvin. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Rollin Hu, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero and Jack Hamilton.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 24, 2024

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    A Conservative Futurist and a Supply-Side Liberal Walk Into a Podcast …

    “The Jetsons” premiered in 1962. And based on the internal math of the show, George Jetson, the dad, was born in 2022. He’d be a toddler right now. And we are so far away from the world that show imagined. There were a lot of future-trippers in the 1960s, and most of them would be pretty disappointed by how that future turned out.

    So what happened? Why didn’t we build that future?

    The answer, I think, lies in the 1970s. I’ve been spending a lot of time studying that decade in my work, trying to understand why America is so bad at building today. And James Pethokoukis has also spent a lot of time looking at the 1970s, in his work trying to understand why America is less innovative today than it was in the postwar decades. So Pethokoukis and I are asking similar questions, and circling the same time period, but from very different ideological vantages.

    Pethokoukis is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and author of the book “The Conservative Futurist: How to Create the Sci-Fi World We Were Promised.” He also writes a newsletter called Faster, Please! “The two screamingly obvious things that we stopped doing is we stopped spending on science, research and development the way we did in the 1960s,” he tells me, “and we began to regulate our economy as if regulation would have no impact on innovation.”

    In this conversation, we debate why the ’70s were such an inflection point; whether this slowdown phenomenon is just something that happens as countries get wealthier; and what the government’s role should be in supporting and regulating emerging technologies like A.I.

    Mentioned:

    U.S. Infrastructure: 1929-2017” by Ray C. Fair

    Book Recommendations

    Why Information Grows by Cesar Hidalgo

    The Expanse series by James S.A. Corey

    The American Dream Is Not Dead by Michael R. Strain

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” was produced by Rollin Hu. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris, with Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair. Our senior engineer is Jeff Geld, with additional mixing by Aman Sahota. Our senior editor is Claire Gordon. The show’s production team also includes Annie Galvin, Elias Isquith and Kristin Lin. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Kristina Samulewski and Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. And special thanks to Sonia Herrero.

    The Ezra Klein Show
    enMay 21, 2024

    Related Episodes

    This Is What Happened to the Meme Stock Mania

    This Is What Happened to the Meme Stock Mania

    Spring of 2021 was peak meme mania. GameStop was going nuts. AMC was going nuts. And in general, the big cohort of traders that entered the market in early 2020 was riding high. Since then, though, things have turned south. Volumes have dipped significantly. The memes came back to Earth, and a lot of the growth stocks that were riding high have gotten absolutely killed. So where do things stand now, and what happened to all the new traders? On this episode, we speak to Lily Francus, director of quantitative research at Moody's Analytics, as well as Kyla Scanlon, a popular financial commentator across social media (as well as the founder of a new financial education company) to understand what happened, what's changed, and how the last two years have permanently altered financial markets as we know them. 

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Dive into Cybersecurity: Zero Trust Privacy

    Dive into Cybersecurity: Zero Trust Privacy

    🔒 Listen to Dr. Lisa McKee, Founding Partner at American Security & Privacy and Aaron Stillman, Tresorit’s Head of Product Marketing as they unravel the intricate relationship between zero trust and privacy. 🛡️

    In this episode you’ll learn:

    • Steps to take when reviewing your data strategies
    • Common mistakes to avoid while working with data
    • How to implement Zero Trust Privacy strategies

    Liberals, Or Nazis? Is There A Difference? (Ep 2235)

    Liberals, Or Nazis? Is There A Difference? (Ep 2235)
    The left likes to accuse the right of what they're actually doing. In this episode, I discuss how liberals are blurring the lines between democracy and fascism. Inside Garland’s Effort to Prosecute Trump Intruder arrested for break-in at Getty House, official residence of Mayor Bass Nolte: Climate ‘Experts’ Are 0-41 with Their Doomsday Predictions *UPDATE 0-53* Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #6 Mission Possible: Von Agentur zum Inhousing mit Sven Stühmeier

    #6 Mission Possible: Von Agentur zum Inhousing mit Sven Stühmeier
    Spielst du gerade auch mit dem Gedanken deine Digital Marketing Aktivitäten komplett zu insourcen und dir fehlt die methodische Herangehensweise und vielleicht ein Stückhen Mut? Dann ist diese Folge genau richtig für dich, denn Sven Stühmeier von Vodafone erzählt über seine Erfahrung im Bereich Digital Marketing Inhousing und teilt einige Tipps warum und wie du den Prozess strukturiert angehen sollst.