Podcast Summary
Discussing CDC, COVID vaccines, and the importance of natural light: The Dark Horse Podcast is hosting two live streams before the end of the year, discussing various topics including the CDC, COVID vaccines, a White House Summit on Equity and Inclusion in STEM, and the importance of natural light. The speaker announced his resignation and shared thoughts on adjusting our senses with natural light.
The Dark Horse Podcast is hosting two more live streams before the end of the year, on December 23rd and New Year's Eve. They discussed various topics including the CDC, COVID vaccines, a White House Summit on Equity and Inclusion in STEM, and an unexpected topic about snake genitalia. The hosts also shared personal experiences, such as Brett being in Florida and the speaker being in Mexico, and the loss of natural light due to excessive artificial lighting. The speaker also announced his resignation from the board of trustees at the University of Austin and shared his thoughts on the importance of natural light in adjusting our senses. Additionally, they mentioned a holiday gift episode and encouraged listeners to check out their Substack pages for more content.
Using power responsibly: High influence or bright lights require careful use, and supporting creators and sponsors can enhance experiences.
The responsibility that comes with high lumens or influence should be used wisely. The speaker expressed their discomfort with overly bright lights and lamented that not everyone using such power understands the importance of using it responsibly. They also encouraged support for their channel and Patreon, where they hold live Q&A sessions and offer exclusive access to a Discord server. Additionally, they highlighted their sponsors, Allform, whose custom sofas they highly recommend for their comfort and aesthetics. The speaker's enthusiasm for Allform sofas led them to continue livestreaming from one, promising to do so until they set up a permanent studio.
Upgrade your sofa and stay hydrated: Allform offers customizable sofas with free delivery and easy assembly, while LMNT provides sugar-free electrolyte drink mixes for hydration and relief from discomforts like nausea
Allform offers customizable, high-quality all foam sofas at an affordable price. With various size, layout, fabric, and color options, these sofas are beautiful, comfortable, and adaptable. Delivered free and fast to your home with easy assembly, they're roomy and perfect for relaxing. Allform sofas are available in both leather and durable fabrics, and they come with a forever warranty. For electrolyte needs, LMNT offers an electrolyte drink mix with no sugar, no artificial ingredients, and a range of flavors. Suitable for anyone being active or following specific diets, LMNT can help prevent and eliminate headaches, muscle cramps, and sleeplessness. Lastly, Reliefband is a product designed to help with nausea, providing relief for various causes including travel sickness. By staying attuned to our bodily sensations and addressing discomforts like nausea, we can improve our overall wellbeing. To upgrade your sofa, try Allform at allform.com/darkhorse and use the code DARKHORSE20 for a 20% discount. For electrolytes, order a free sample pack with any Element purchase at drinkelement.com/darkhorse. And for nausea relief, visit reliefband.com.
A friend's life-changing experience with the Reliefband anti-nausea wristband: The Reliefband is a clinically proven, drug-free solution for nausea, effective in minutes for conditions like motion sickness, anxiety, migraines, and chemotherapy, with zero side effects. New features include the waterproof Reliefband Sport and extended battery life.
The Reliefband is a clinically proven, drug-free anti-nausea wristband that can be used for various conditions including motion sickness, anxiety, migraines, and chemotherapy. It has been used in hospitals and oncology clinics for over 20 years with zero side effects. A friend testified that it effectively relieved her anxiety-induced nausea within 3 minutes, changing her life for the better. The Reliefband Sport is now available, which is waterproof, features interchangeable bands, and has extended battery life. The Shadow CDC is a group of experts empaneled by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to discuss COVID policies and address harms caused by them. Many believe that COVID policies emerged earlier than officially acknowledged, with significant consequences. The Shadow CDC includes notable figures like Jay Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff, and Christine Stabell Ben. Governor DeSantis and his team are pursuing a grand jury investigation into malfeasance during COVID.
Mismanagement of COVID-19 response and vaccine injuries: The top-down, coercive approach to handling the COVID-19 pandemic, including the mishandling of vaccine injuries, has led to mistrust and the rise of anti-vaxxers.
The response to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the handling of vaccine injuries, has been callous and mismanaged, leading to mistrust and the creation of anti-vaxxers. The speaker argues that decision-making around the virus, from its discovery to the implementation of lockdowns and vaccines, was top-down and coercive, bypassing the expertise of medical professionals. This approach created a sense of urgency that was no longer effective once it was clear the virus had been circulating for months. The mishandling of vaccine injuries, with governmental bureaucrats denying their existence and refusing to acknowledge the harm caused, only worsened the situation. This callousness and lack of transparency have created a significant backlash against vaccines and public health measures.
Disagreement on the role of vaccines in responding to COVID-19: The delay in identifying and responding to COVID-19 may have been motivated by economic gains, and disagreement over vaccine use stems from a misguided context, as their emergency use authorization made no sense given their actual efficacy and negative consequences.
The delay in identifying and responding to the novel COVID-19 virus may have led to significant time and resources wasted, as doctors lacked the necessary knowledge to effectively treat the disease. This delay may have been motivated by economic gains for those who withheld information, as the time traveling money printer hypothesis suggests. During a panel discussion, there was disagreement on the role of vaccines in a rational response to COVID-19. While some believed they were justified for certain vulnerable individuals, others, including Dr. Weinstein, argued they should never have been administered due to their novel and potentially dangerous nature. The disagreement stems from a well-intentioned but misguided context, as emergency use authorization of these vaccines, given their actual efficacy and negative consequences, made no sense.
EUAs for COVID-19 vaccines questioned due to safety and efficacy concerns, lack of peer-reviewed evidence: Claims of lives saved and hospitalizations prevented by COVID-19 vaccines lack transparency and raise concerns about data reliability
The EUAs for COVID-19 vaccines were questionable given the availability of effective treatments at the time. The EUAs were based on clinical trials with questionable safety and efficacy data. Furthermore, a blog post often cited as evidence of the vaccines' life-saving impact is actually just a report, not peer-reviewed research. The author argues that the EUAs and their widespread administration, disregarding age stratification, were illegitimate. Despite claims of millions of lives saved and hospitalizations prevented, the evidence supporting these claims is not transparent and raises concerns about the reliability of such data.
Yale Study on COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Faces Criticism: The Yale School of Public Health study on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness faced criticism for presenting assumptions as facts and lacking transparency in research methods, emphasizing the importance of rigorous scientific research and transparency in reporting.
The Yale School of Public Health study, which was widely referenced in discussions about COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, was criticized for presenting assumptions as facts and lacking transparency in research methods. This issue highlights the importance of rigorous scientific research and transparency in reporting. Additionally, the politicization of science during the pandemic has made it a divisive topic, causing harm to public health. The vaccines, which have been proven to save millions of lives, have become a contentious issue. The latest development in this context is Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' call for an investigation into COVID-19 vaccine-related wrongdoing in Florida. However, without more information, it is unclear what the governor is asking for. Overall, it is crucial to promote scientific literacy and evidence-based decision-making to combat the politicization of science and protect public health.
Study on COVID-19 vaccine savings raises concerns of lack of transparency and circular reasoning: The Yale School of Public Health study on COVID-19 vaccine savings is questionable due to unrealistic assumptions, potential circular reasoning, and lack of assessment on actual lives saved.
A blog post from the Yale School of Public Health claiming that COVID-19 vaccines have saved lives based on published estimates has raised serious concerns due to the lack of transparency and potential circular reasoning in the study. Critics argue that the model used in the research requires unrealistic assumptions, and the estimates themselves may not be accurate. Moreover, the study did not assess whether the vaccines actually saved lives, only that they were effective based on the estimates. Some experts believe this is a knowing lie, as it was promoted to the highest levels despite its questionable validity. The lack of transparency and potential circular reasoning in the study undermines the credibility of the findings and highlights the importance of rigorous scientific inquiry and transparency in communicating research results.
Editor thanks Fauci for science commitment, pushing back against misinformation: Fauci's commitment to scientific truth and pushing back against misinformation is crucial in today's world where misinformation creates a fictional scientific reality, but his dedication to science has saved millions of lives through vaccines.
Despite the ongoing controversy surrounding COVID-19 vaccinations and interventions, Dr. Anthony Fauci's unwavering commitment to scientific truth and his ability to push back against misinformation continues to be recognized and celebrated. The editor in chief of Science Magazine recently published an editorial thanking Fauci for his contributions to science and his unyielding stance against misinformation. Fauci's dedication to conveying that science is a process and not a collection of facts set in stone is crucial in the face of the increasing prevalence of misinformation. The absurdity of the situation, where misinformation has created a fictional scientific reality, is both unfortunate and amusing. Regardless, it's important to remember the real-world impact of vaccines, as they have saved millions of lives and prevented countless hospitalizations.
Understanding the controversy over COVID-19 mortality data and the role of vaccines: The importance of accurate data and critical thinking in understanding the impact of the pandemic and related public health measures is emphasized, with concerns raised over the misrepresentation of information and the need for proper scientific investigation into excess mortality.
The discussion revolves around the controversy surrounding the data on COVID-19 mortality and the role of vaccines. The speaker expresses concern over the misrepresentation of information and the dehumanizing effects of tribalism in politics. The Yale School of Public Health blog post, which has gained significant attention, is criticized for its inaccuracies and the subsequent dismissive reaction from the audience. The speaker also references the need for proper scientific investigation into excess mortality and the importance of considering all possible factors contributing to spikes in death counts. The WHO report published in Nature this week, which shows both reported COVID-19 deaths and excess mortality, is highlighted as evidence supporting this perspective. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate data and critical thinking in understanding the impact of the pandemic and related public health measures.
The Issue of Cherry-Picking Scientific Information: Cherry-picking scientific information to support preconceived beliefs can lead to a 'phony world' where important data is overlooked or misrepresented. It's crucial to approach scientific information critically and ensure we're not being misled by sensational claims or missing essential data.
There's a significant issue with people cherry-picking scientific information to support their preconceived beliefs, even if the data beneath the surface is questionable or missing. This phenomenon, referred to as the "phony world," is prevalent in various fields, including science. People often cite studies based on their titles or abstracts without delving deeper, creating a demand for "laugh lines" or sensational findings. The speaker argues that excess mortality data, which simply measures the number of deaths during a given timeframe and compares it to historical data, is a simpler and more straightforward approach to understanding the impact of COVID-19. However, the burden of proof has been reversed in many debates, with those advocating for more careful analysis being accused of being dismissive or negligent. Additionally, important documents, such as Pfizer's agreement with Israel, have gone missing, further complicating the situation. Ultimately, it's crucial to approach scientific information with a critical eye, ensuring that we're not overlooking essential data or being misled by sensational claims.
White House summit on STEM equity and inclusion: Strive for inclusivity, but maintain individual responsibility and meritocracy. Equal opportunities, not equal capabilities, are the goal.
The virtual universe has endless possibilities for hiding documents, with potentially hundreds or even more cubbies in various virtual universes. Another notable event this week was the White House summit on STEM equity and inclusion. While the idea of creating an inclusive learning environment is valuable, the concept of every person being responsible for the success of every other person on campus could be detrimental. This concept, if taken to the extreme, could weaken meritocracy and individual responsibility. It's important to strike a balance between inclusivity and individual achievement. Additionally, the idea that everyone should graduate with equal capability is unrealistic and could lead to sabotage or lowering standards. Instead, efforts should focus on providing equal opportunities for all students to succeed.
Equalizing education standards isn't desirable: Attempting to make everyone graduate at the same level decreases overall standards and lacks inspiration for students. Instead, institutions should aim for inclusivity and provide opportunities for students to reach their full potential.
Attempting to make everyone graduate at the same level in education leads to a decrease in overall standards and a lack of inspiration and learning for students. This approach, which some might label as "cognitive communism," is not achievable or desirable as it doesn't provide the necessary environment for students to grow and learn, especially those with high potential who haven't been well-served by their previous experiences. Instead, institutions should aim to be inclusive and provide opportunities for students with potential, regardless of their backgrounds, to reach their full potential. This approach not only benefits individual students but also contributes to a stronger and more diverse educational community.
Exploring diverse areas of knowledge: Instead of focusing solely on controversies, broaden your knowledge by exploring diverse areas of life and science, which can lead to unexpected discoveries and advancements.
Instead of focusing solely on the negatives, such as the perceived issues with communism or the controversy surrounding COVID-19 vaccines, we should strive to increase everyone's capacity and knowledge in various areas. This can lead to better outcomes and new possibilities. For instance, in the realm of biology, there are ongoing debates and research questions that can pique our curiosity, like whether or not female snakes experience sexual pleasure. While these discussions might seem unrelated to pressing issues, they can provide valuable insights and broaden our understanding of the world. It's essential to remember that the diversity of life and knowledge is vast, and exploring different areas can lead to unexpected discoveries and advancements. So, let's keep an open mind and continue learning, whether it's about the intricacies of snake phylogeny or the latest developments in public health.
New Research on Female Snake and Lizard Reproductive Organs: Recent study reveals functional significance of female snake and lizard hemichlitteries, challenging assumptions of underdeveloped or non-existent structures
Recent research challenges the long-held belief that the reproductive organs of female snakes and lizards, known as hemipenes, are underdeveloped versions of those in males. Instead, these structures, called hemichlitteries, have been found to have functional significance in mating. This discovery, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, was made through careful histological analysis of female death adders, revealing erectile tissue, nerves, and no spines, unlike male hemipenes. This finding challenges previous assumptions that these structures were insignificant or non-existent in females. The researchers suggest that the overlooked nature of female genitalia in herpetology has limited our understanding of sexual reproduction across vertebrate lineages. This discovery adds to the diversity of reproductive structures found in squamates, further highlighting the importance of rigorous scientific inquiry and challenging long-held assumptions.
Challenging assumptions about female and male genitalia in death adders: New research reveals that female and male death adder genitalia are not just simplified versions of each other, but have distinct structures relevant to sexual selection and internal fertilization.
Recent research on the genitalia of female death adders and male death adders challenges the assumption that female genitalia are just simpler versions of male genitalia. Although they share some similarities due to their homologous nature, they are not just half-assed versions of each other. This discovery is significant because it adds to our understanding of sexual selection and the rapid evolution of genitalia in amniotes with internal fertilization. The structures of these genitalia are relevant to sexual selection, and the conditions under which internal fertilization evolves, along with the types of birth, are fascinating areas for further exploration. Snakes provide an excellent system for studying the diversity of internal fertilization and the associated reproductive structures. The presence of erectile bodies with blood cells and abundant nerve bundles in female snake genitalia suggests that they may provide sensory feedback to the females, challenging the assumption that they only exist to please males. This research underscores the importance of studying female sexuality and the complexity of reproductive structures in all organisms.
Unexpected circumstances can lead to enjoyable experiences: Believe in the power of unexpected opportunities, they might lead to delightful experiences
Individuals, even snakes, may hold the belief that they are the best partner their mate has ever had. During a recent conversation, this notion was discussed, leaving the female labrador visibly uncomfortable. I'd like to share a personal anecdote that occurred shortly after our last livestream. Upon arriving in Florida for a conference, I found myself in a less-than-ideal car rental situation. The available options ranged from unimpressive to questionable. However, I was surprised to find a convertible Mustang in the mix. Despite my initial hesitation, I decided to take it, reasoning that I didn't want to come into contact with the other less desirable vehicles. The car had a minor issue with the rear windows not closing fully, but it was otherwise fine. I ended up driving Jay Bhattacharya in the Mustang to his hotel, and he was thrilled with the experience. This incident serves as a reminder that sometimes, unexpected circumstances can lead to enjoyable experiences, even if they don't align with our initial plans or expectations.
Exploring the importance of asking questions and seeking knowledge: Ask questions, seek knowledge, love those around you, eat good food, spend time outdoors, and continue the conversation at darkhorseemissions.com
During this discussion, we explored various topics related to the importance of asking questions and seeking knowledge. We learned about the platform Dark Horse Emissions and how it provides a space for asking questions and gaining insights. We were reminded that logistical queries can be sent to a specific email address. The speakers also encouraged us to live well and enjoy life by emphasizing the importance of loving those around us, eating good food, and spending time outdoors. Overall, the message was to never stop asking questions and to live a fulfilling life. Remember, you can continue the conversation and ask more questions at darkhorseemissions.com.
