Podcast Summary
Pathologist with unique perspective as COVID dissident: Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist with expertise in melanoma, skin cancer, immunology, and virology, uses his background to challenge mainstream COVID narratives
Dr. Ryan Cole is a multifaceted individual with extensive expertise as a board-certified pathologist, Mayo Clinic-trained, and a true Renaissance man with various hobbies and experiences. His background in pathology, specifically surgical pathology, provides a unique perspective as a COVID dissident. Pathologists serve as the unseen support team in the medical field, diagnosing tissue and fluid samples, and ensuring the quality control of medicine. With a focus on melanoma and skin cancer, as well as a PhD background in immunology and virology, Dr. Cole's expertise lies in recognizing patterns and identifying aberrancies. His commitment to memory and pattern recognition makes him an essential figure in the medical community.
Pathologists' unique perspective from large sample size and trend detection: Pathologists, with their vast experience analyzing numerous cases, can detect health trends and identify clues during critical times, contributing to the broader understanding of health and disease.
A pathologist's unique perspective comes from their large sample size and ability to detect patterns in health trends across a large population. This perspective, while anecdotal, gains statistical power from the sheer volume of cases they analyze. During critical times, such as the pandemic, pathologists can identify clues in the data that may indicate shifts in health trends, including immune suppression, clotting patterns, and cancer aggressiveness. Each cancer is an evolutionary event with unique mutations that drive its growth, and as it progresses, it becomes more deviant from the original cellular pattern. While most cancers are not contagious, the evolutionary trend is generally a dead end. Pathologists play a crucial role in identifying these trends and contributing to the broader understanding of health and disease.
Mitochondria's role in cancer development and metabolic approach to cancer treatment: Exploring mitochondria's role in cancer and focusing on energy needs of cancer cells through metabolic approach may lead to more effective cancer treatments. Stay open-minded and curious for new discoveries.
Cancer is a complex and evolving disease, and treating it with a single approach may not be effective in the long term. The mitochondria, which have their own genome, play a crucial role in cancer development as they can cause cellular hits in the nuclear DNA through reactive oxygen species and other mechanisms. Cancers have a common need for energy, which is produced through functional mitochondria. Therefore, a metabolic approach to cancer treatment, focusing on the energy needs of cancer cells, may be more effective than traditional methods. The speaker also emphasized the importance of recognizing the limitations of current medical knowledge and the need for continued exploration and learning. The informal observation of patterns and testing hypotheses, even without formal experiments, can contribute to scientific understanding. The speaker's own observation of a change in viral patterns after the mRNA vaccine campaign began led them to consider the possibility of a link between vaccines and cancer, highlighting the importance of staying open-minded and curious in the face of new information.
Resurgence of molluscum contagiosum and increase in certain cancers in older adults could be a sign of weakened immune systems.: The re-emergence of molluscum contagiosum and the increase in certain cancers in older adults could be indicators of weakened immune systems and the need for further investigation into immune regulation in the aging population.
The re-emergence of molluscum contagiosum in older adults and the increase in certain types of cancer in elderly patients could be a sign of weakened immune systems. This viral infection, which is usually acquired in childhood, is a result of a weakened immune response. The body recognizes the virus and develops immunity, but as people age, their immune systems may not function as effectively, leading to a resurgence of the virus. This same phenomenon has been observed in certain types of cancer, such as endometrial and melanoma. These cancers were previously rare in older adults but have been increasing in frequency. This change in pattern is significant and could indicate a larger issue with immune regulation in the aging population. As a pathologist, it's important to observe patterns and not discount anomalies without proper investigation. This is a hypothesis test, and if the pattern continues, it could indicate a larger issue that needs to be addressed. It's essential to let the cells speak and not let preconceived notions or demographics influence the diagnosis.
Observing unusual patterns in medical data can reveal significant findings: Unbiased analysis of medical data can lead to discoveries of unusual patterns, such as changes in tumor size or clotting anomalies, which may be overlooked due to biases and warrant further investigation
Objective analysis of patterns in medical data, such as changes in cancer cell patterns or clotting anomalies, can reveal significant findings that may be overlooked if biases are brought to the table. For instance, the observation of a pathologist seeing an unusual pattern of larger and more aggressive tumors in children, which continued to appear after the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, was a departure from historical norms and raised concerns. Additionally, the observation of an increase in microclots in the small vessels by another pathologist during the COVID-19 pandemic, which then spiked after the vaccine rollout, is a real phenomenon that has been observed by various researchers. These clotting anomalies are caused by the spike protein's ability to bind to different receptors on various cells, leading to inflammation and clotting cascades. The unusual behavior of this lab-created protein, which doesn't break down like regular clots, is a cause for concern and warrants further investigation.
Unusual, firm, and rubbery blood clots: A growing concern among medical professionals: Medical professionals are concerned about unusual blood clots that form post-mortem or in life, contributing to various health issues. These clots are difficult to detect and may be hindered by the consolidation of healthcare systems.
There is a growing concern among medical professionals about the formation of unusual, firm, and rubbery blood clots in patients, particularly after receiving certain injections. These clots are different from typical gelatinous clots and are not easily detected through routine scans, especially when they accumulate in smaller vessels. The cause of these clots is still under investigation, but some believe they may be forming post-mortem or in life and contributing to various health issues. Doctors have reported seeing an increase in such cases, but many are hesitant to speak out due to fear of career repercussions or being part of a larger healthcare system that prioritizes conformity over individual expression. This consolidation of systems may hinder the dissemination of crucial information and slow down the process of addressing these mysterious pathologies.
Collective action problem in healthcare: Unusual clots and potential patterns: Medical professionals need to openly discuss unusual observations, allowing for scientific testing and potential life-saving discoveries. Adversity and questioning the status quo can lead to growth and improvement.
The current situation involving unusual clots and potential patterns in health issues is a collective action problem, or a tragedy of the commons. Radiologists and clinicians who notice unusual patterns are hesitant to speak up due to fear of being ostracized or labeled as conspiracy theorists. This results in a lack of information being shared, leading to potential harm for those who could benefit from early detection and intervention. The situation parallels the debate around vaccines, where those who question the narrative are often silenced. To move forward, it's crucial for medical professionals to come together and openly discuss their observations, even if they're not certain of the cause. This would allow for scientific testing to be conducted and potentially lead to life-saving discoveries. It's important to remember that adversity and questioning our current understanding can lead to growth and improvement, both individually and societally. The unwillingness to face adversity and challenge the status quo can hinder progress. Additionally, it's essential to recognize that the forces pushing for certain outcomes are not in the past, and the current situation may be a test case for future developments.
Rapid deployment of Moderna's mRNA vaccine raises concerns over long-term effects and potential risks: Historically inexperienced Moderna admits need for further understanding of vaccine components, potential risks of lipid nanoparticles, and slippage causing incorrect protein production. Existing safe drugs could have managed viral pathology, making rapid vaccine deployment an unnecessary risk.
The rush to distribute mRNA vaccines, specifically from Moderna, without a full understanding of their long-term effects and potential risks is a cause for concern. Historically, Moderna had no experience in safely bringing a product to market before the pandemic. The manufacturers themselves admit they need to further understand the lipid nanoparticles used in the vaccines, which raises questions about their safety and efficacy. Additionally, a recent study revealed that a synthetic uridine used in the shots can cause slippage, leading to the production of incorrect proteins. With potential autoimmune diseases and cancer pathways at risk, it's crucial to exercise caution and consider the long-term consequences of this technology. The fact that the lipid nanoparticles are ubiquitously distributed throughout the body, with high concentrations in critical areas like bone marrow and gonads, further emphasizes the need for caution. The hubris in the scientific community that led to the rapid deployment of this technology, despite its unknown risks, is alarming. It's important to remember that existing safe drugs could have effectively managed the viral pathology, making the emergence of this technology an unnecessary risk.
The Importance of T Cells in Immunity: T cells, not just antibodies, play a crucial role in immunity by surveilling and creating memory. IgG 4 antibodies, which can tolerate a pathogen, may also narrow the immune response and create problems in the future.
The focus on antibodies as the sole indicator of immunity from vaccines may be misguided. The speaker shares an example of an employee in a hospital setting who was told to get additional Hep B vaccines due to low antibody levels, but after addressing her vitamin D deficiency, her antibody levels returned. The speaker emphasizes the importance of a robust active surveillance system, specifically T cells, which are responsible for surveilling and creating memory. However, if the body falls back on antibody production, it may result in the production of IgG 4 antibodies, which can tolerate a pathogen but may also narrow the immune response and create problems down the line. The speaker also mentions concerns about the production of IgG 4 antibodies from mRNA vaccines and the potential for these vaccines to be used as biological weapons through a dual use exception. Overall, the speaker argues that the importance of T cells and the potential issues with IgG 4 antibodies have been overlooked in immunology research, and the reliance on antibodies as a surrogate marker for immunity may be problematic.
Misguided focus on antibodies as the sole indicator of vaccine effectiveness: A holistic understanding of immunology, including T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and genetic differences, is essential to effectively combat diseases and promote overall health.
The current focus on antibodies generated by COVID-19 vaccines as the primary indicator of their effectiveness is a misguided obsession. The immune system is a complex network involving various cells such as T cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages, and the role of antibodies is just one aspect of the immune response. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding immunology as a whole to truly grasp the functioning of the body's defense mechanisms. Furthermore, the repeated introduction of similar spike proteins through vaccines, especially to variants that are no longer in existence, could potentially weaken the immune response and create opportunities for future health risks. The speaker also touches upon the genetic differences among populations and the importance of considering these variations in biological research and potential biological warfare scenarios. In essence, a holistic understanding of immunology is crucial to effectively combat diseases and promote overall health.
The importance of evolutionary thinking in therapeutic arts: Understanding evolutionary principles can lead to more productive conversations and better solutions in therapeutic arts, particularly in the context of immunology and vaccines.
The lack of proper evolutionary thinking in therapeutic arts is a significant issue. This absence of understanding is particularly problematic when discussing topics like antibody-dependent enhancement, which is a natural consequence of pathogens' long evolutionary history. Understanding evolutionary principles would allow for more productive conversations and better solutions. For instance, the clonal selection theory of adaptive immunity is a fascinating example of evolution in action, equipping organisms with the ability to adapt to pathogens. However, many people lack a fundamental understanding of these concepts. Furthermore, the potential long-term consequences of vaccines on the immune system, such as damage to the thymus gland, should be considered and studied more thoroughly before widespread implementation. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of evolution and its applications in immunology could lead to more effective solutions and better health outcomes.
Investing in immunology education and vitamin D interventions: Promoting vitamin D education and supplementation, especially for at-risk populations, could save billions in healthcare costs and reduce disease impact, including COVID-19.
Investing in basic immunology education for doctors and scientists, and promoting the use of vitamin D as a simple, cost-effective intervention to strengthen the immune system, could potentially save billions in healthcare costs and reduce the impact of various diseases, including COVID-19. Vitamin D, a pro-hormone and master conductor of the immune system, can be augmented through sunlight exposure or supplementation. However, society's increasing indoor living and consumption of high fructose corn syrup, a vitamin D inactivator, contribute to widespread vitamin D deficiency. This deficiency, particularly in colder regions and among certain populations, increases vulnerability to various diseases, including cancer. Therefore, promoting vitamin D supplementation, especially in at-risk populations, could lead to significant health benefits.
Maximizing Natural Health Mechanisms: Optimize natural health mechanisms like sunlight exposure for vitamin D production and overall health benefits, while being aware of potential risks from modern interventions like mRNA vaccines.
Our bodies have natural ways of fighting diseases, such as producing vitamin D from sunlight and regulating metabolism and immune responses. However, due to modern lifestyles, we may not be able to optimally utilize these natural mechanisms. For instance, during certain seasons or weather conditions, we may not be able to produce enough vitamin D from sunlight, making supplementation necessary. Additionally, exposure to sunlight, even during winter months, has benefits beyond vitamin D production, such as stimulating mitochondria and producing intracellular melatonin, the most powerful antioxidant in the body. In the context of cancer, the ongoing production of spike proteins from mRNA vaccines could potentially contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction, a known mechanism of cancer. The persistence of spike protein exposure from vaccines is also a concern, as natural viral infections are typically cleared within days, whereas the synthetic injections continue to produce spike proteins. Overall, it's essential to prioritize overall health by optimizing natural mechanisms, such as sunlight exposure, while being aware of potential risks from modern interventions, like mRNA vaccines.
Possible long-term consequences of mRNA technology: The Nobel Prize-winning mRNA technology, designed for COVID-19 vaccines, may have unintended consequences such as binding to cancer genes and integrating contaminating DNA into the cell's nucleus, potentially leading to cancer.
The Nobel Prize awarded for the development of mRNA technology may not have been a brilliant insight as it was initially perceived, but rather a medical experiment with potential long-term consequences. The mRNA technology, designed to produce spike proteins for COVID-19 vaccines, has been found to persist indefinitely in the body, leading to concerns about its potential impact on cellular health. The synthetic mRNA can bind to various cancer regulatory genes, disrupting their functions and potentially leading to mutations. Furthermore, contaminating DNA in the injected products, which was initially overlooked in safety testing, may result in integration into the cell's nucleus and potentially lead to cancer. These findings raise important questions about the long-term safety and efficacy of mRNA technology, and the need for further research to fully understand its potential risks.
Spike protein production in cancer cells implies complex mechanism: Dysregulation of cellular pathways through spike protein integration or duplication in cancer cells can lead to cancer development, emphasizing the importance of rigorous testing and safety measures.
That the production of spike protein in cancer cells suggests integration or duplication of the mRNA message responsible for producing the spike protein. This implies a complex and concerning mechanism, as it involves the dysregulation of normal cellular pathways. Furthermore, the presence of interferons, which are crucial for the body's response to viruses and cancer, adds another layer of complexity to the issue. The persistent presence of atypical proteins, possibly due to contamination or synthetic RNA, can lead to the disruption of normal cellular processes and the development of cancer. In essence, the introduction of informational chaos into cells through ill-conceived vaccines or therapeutics can result in the failure mode of cancer, emphasizing the need for rigorous testing and safety measures.
Potential risks of mRNA vaccines on heart and brain functions: The mRNA technology's convenience for rapid production comes with potential risks, including disruption of normal cellular functions in the heart and brain, leading to cardiac damage and other health issues. Ongoing research explores hypotheses suggesting lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines may interfere with metabolic processes in these organs.
The convenience of rapidly producing synthetic mRNA vaccines through cold-based manufacturing comes with potential risks. These risks include disrupting normal cellular functions, particularly in the heart and brain, which primarily use lipids and ketones as fuel. The mRNA technology, while revolutionary, could lead to cardiac damage and other health issues. The mitochondria, which provide energy to cells, are particularly vulnerable. This hypothesis, which has received criticism, suggests that the lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines may circulate in the body and interfere with the metabolic processes of various organs, including the heart and brain. The ongoing research in this area could provide new insights into the potential causes of myocarditis and other health issues associated with mRNA vaccines. It's crucial to continue exploring these hypotheses to ensure the safety and efficacy of these vaccines.
Production of foreign proteins from circulating lipid nanoparticles can lead to myocarditis: The production of foreign proteins from mRNA vaccine lipid nanoparticles can trigger an immune response, leading to myocarditis and potential heart damage. Proper pharmacokinetic studies are crucial to understand these risks.
The circulating lipid nanoparticles from mRNA vaccines can be haphazardly absorbed by various tissues in the body, leading to the production of foreign proteins. This process, called antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, can trigger an immune response that destroys the cells producing these proteins. If this occurs in the heart, it can result in myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart. Myocarditis is not the disease itself but a symptom of the destruction of heart cells by the immune system. This process can lead to scarring and compromise the heart's capacity to function properly. Additionally, the decrease in certain toll like receptors can make individuals more susceptible to viral infections, including herpes simplex virus and Epstein Barr virus, after receiving the mRNA vaccines. These findings highlight the importance of proper pharmacokinetic studies and the potential risks associated with the production of foreign proteins in the body.
A novel pathogen during COVID-19 pandemic: The COVID-19 pandemic was caused by a new virus, SARS-CoV-2, which exhibited unique behaviors and caused novel pathologies, unlike common cold coronaviruses.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a novel pathogen circulating that exhibited unique behaviors leading to various novel pathologies. The presence of this pathogen was not a product of human imagination or a hoax, but rather a natural occurrence that may have originated in a laboratory setting. The novelty of SARS-CoV-2 lies in its ability to bind to human cells and cause harm, which is different from other common cold coronaviruses. Although some argue that no new pathogen was necessary for most of what took place during the pandemic, the evidence suggests otherwise. The pathogen's ability to cause extreme clotting and other harms not typically seen with common cold coronaviruses highlights its novelty. While there may be debates about the origin of the virus, its existence and the resulting health impacts are undeniable.
Comparing COVID-19 to the flu doesn't account for the increase in overall sickness: Even if COVID-19 isn't worse than the flu, the simultaneous presence of both viruses increases overall sickness and suffering.
The argument against the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic being overblown due to the presence of other common viruses like the flu, doesn't hold water. Even if SARS-CoV-2 is not worse than the flu, the fact that people are getting sick with both at the same time means a significant increase in overall sickness and suffering for the human population. Additionally, the excess use of PCR tests with high cycle thresholds led to an overhyped pandemic, as many positive results were due to contamination rather than actual infection. The speaker also emphasized the power and elegance of PCR technology, but warned of its potential dangers in a contaminated world, where even the slightest fragment of a virus can be amplified and misdiagnosed as an infection. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of understanding and navigating a global health crisis, and the importance of considering multiple perspectives and factors in making informed decisions.
The rarity of viruses attacking the heart and the immune system's response: Viruses attacking the heart are rare due to risks for both virus and host, but immune response to any protein can lead to potential autoimmune disorders, highlighting the ongoing battle between immune system and pathogens
Just because we can detect something in the environment or in the body, it doesn't automatically have meaning or significance. This was discussed in relation to the possibility of a novel pathogen in the water supply and the potential for viruses to attack the heart. The evolutionary rarity of viruses attacking the heart is due to the risks involved for the virus and the host, as well as the hapten-like response in immunology, which can trigger an immune response even if the virus isn't directly replicating in the heart. The immune system's ability to react to any protein, but being turned off to self-produced proteins, creates an opportunity for pathogens to evolve and mimic human proteins, leading to potential autoimmune disorders. The ongoing battle between the immune system and pathogens was emphasized, with our immune systems usually winning without us even realizing it. However, interventions like vaccinations that induce the production of a single protein can disrupt this natural process, potentially leading to evolutionary advantages for the pathogen.
Criticizing the current gene injection approach and advocating for natural infection: The speaker argues that natural infection can lead to broader immunity than current gene injection methods, which may not provide long-term or broad immunity due to pathogen evolution. He emphasizes the importance of curiosity, questioning authority, and engaging in dialogue for personal and societal growth.
The current gene injection approach to immunity, while marketed as a vaccine, may not provide long-term or broad immunity due to the rapid evolution of pathogens when only one protein is targeted. Natural infection, on the other hand, can lead to broader immunity. The speaker argues that the pharmaceutical industry's primary focus is on their bottom line and shareholders, rather than the health of the patient or a deep understanding of immunology. The importance of curiosity, questioning authority, and engaging in dialogue were also emphasized as essential for personal and societal growth. The speaker criticized the current trend towards silencing opposing viewpoints and called for more speech and engagement in dialogue as the solution to disagreements. The authoritarian approach to medical advice and the lack of transparency in how it is determined were also criticized. In essence, the speaker advocated for an open and curious approach to learning and understanding, rather than relying on authority figures or institutions.
COVID-19 hindered medical progress with restrictions on treatments and informed consent: Restrictions on treatments and informed consent during COVID-19 hindered medical progress, potentially denying benefits to patients and delaying discovery of effective drugs.
Unnecessary restrictions on medical treatments and informed consent during the COVID-19 pandemic hindered progress in discovering effective and safe treatments. Doctors, left to their own devices, could have identified many existing drugs that worked against the virus, even if they came with risks. The suppression of treatments like Ivermectin, a second safest drug on the planet, denied potential benefits to patients, particularly in reducing the likelihood of getting and suffering severely from other RNA viruses during the pandemic. The pharmacy system's complicity in this process highlights the power dynamics at play. Despite the overwhelming propaganda against these treatments, many individuals and healthcare professionals refused to be swayed, and their commitment to helping patients led to a boom in independent pharmacies. Ultimately, the COVID-19 story underscores the importance of individual autonomy, scientific inquiry, and the resilience of the human spirit.
Challenging the status quo in public health: Questioning mainstream narratives and standing up for your beliefs, even during uncertain times, can lead to personal and professional growth and make a difference in people's lives.
Standing up for what you believe in, even during times of uncertainty and misinformation, can lead to significant personal and professional growth. The speaker, a doctor who questioned the mainstream narrative about the COVID-19 pandemic and its treatments, shared how his courage to educate others resulted in a viral talk, attacks from the media, and board complaints. Despite these challenges, he continued to share his observations based on scientific data and his clinical experience. This journey required him to step out of his comfort zone, face criticism, and ultimately make a difference in the lives of many. It serves as a reminder that being a dissident and challenging the status quo, especially when it comes to matters of public health, can be a noble and impactful endeavor.
Doctor's free speech under attack in healthcare industry: Speaking against the system, especially financially, can lead to severe consequences, but protecting free speech and professional autonomy is crucial.
Free speech and professional autonomy are under attack in various industries, including healthcare. A doctor, who spoke against experimental genetic injections and acted in good conscience, faced significant consequences. He was complained against by a hospital CEO, which led to the cancellation of his biggest contract, accounting for 30% of his business. This occurred despite no patient complaints or harm. The doctor's career was dismantled, but he gained a world of friends and managed to save his patients. This situation echoes the silencing of those who challenge the status quo and can be compared to historical instances of repression. It's a reminder that speaking against the system, especially when it involves financial implications, can result in severe consequences. The doctor's story underscores the importance of protecting free speech and professional autonomy.
The importance of challenging illegitimate control: Citizens must get involved at the local level and true leaders prioritize institutions' missions over personal gain or political correctness to combat iatrogenic harm in medicine and lack of competent leadership in politics.
The current state of various systems, including medicine and politics, is a result of complacency and the absence of those who stand up against illegitimate control. This has led to a rise in iatrogenic harm in medicine and a lack of competent leadership in politics. It's crucial for individuals to get involved at the local level and for true leaders to prioritize the mission of their institutions over personal gain or political correctness. The current presidential election year highlights the need for citizen politicians and a renewed commitment to enforcing the laws we already have. Ultimately, it's up to us as a nation to regain our political will and demand competent leadership.
Bobby Kennedy Jr.'s Intellect and Patriotism: Bobby Kennedy Jr.'s deep understanding of constitutional principles and patriotism make him a strong contender for addressing pandemic accountability and preventing future breaches.
Bobby Kennedy Jr. is a well-informed and intellectual figure who has a deep understanding of the constitutional principles breached during the pandemic response. He is not a puppet and is open to conversation, despite having political differences with some. Many are looking for accountability and are drawn to Kennedy's ability to address the issues of what happened during the pandemic and ensuring it never happens again. Kennedy's encyclopedic knowledge and patriotism make him a strong contender for addressing these issues without being vindictive. Despite some disagreements, his focus on the constitutional republic and getting the country back on track resonates with many.
Emphasizing the importance of unity and maturity amidst political differences: Recognize the urgency of the current state of the nation, set aside personal ideological differences, and work towards the greater good through collective leadership and understanding.
During this discussion, the importance of addressing the current state of the nation was emphasized, with a focus on unity and maturity among adults to overcome political differences and work towards the greater good. The speakers acknowledged the urgency of the situation and compared it to historical turning points, emphasizing the need for collective leadership and understanding. They also touched upon the importance of recognizing and appreciating those who demonstrate maturity and a clear perspective of the current situation. Overall, the conversation highlighted the importance of setting aside personal ideological differences for the sake of the nation.
