Podcast Summary
The US has less family-friendly policies leading to parenting stress: US parents face significant stress due to lack of institutional support and resources, contributing to falling fertility rates
The US has less family-friendly policies compared to other western industrialized countries, leading to a significant amount of stress and overwhelm for parents. This stress, according to sociologist Kaitlyn Collins, is not just about happiness on an hour-to-hour basis but about the deeper meaning and satisfaction that comes with parenthood. Despite this, the majority of adults in the US still choose to have children during their working lives. However, the lack of institutional support and resources in the US can make parenting a significant stressor, which may contribute to the falling fertility rates in the country. Collins' research in her book "Making Motherhood Work" highlights the importance of understanding the unique social universes, or "life worlds," that shape the employment and caregiving possibilities for women in different countries. In the US, the life world for parents is defined by stress and overwhelm, but the impact of this on fertility rates is a complex issue that requires further exploration.
Impact of economic independence and policies on fertility rates: Economic independence and supportive policies, such as paid parental leave and reduced working hours, influence the decision to have children and impact fertility rates.
The dramatic decrease in total fertility rates across countries is a complex issue influenced by various social, political, historical, and economic factors. Women's increased economic independence and access to birth control have shifted the opportunity cost of having children versus other fulfilling pursuits. Policies that support working parents, such as Sweden's extensive paid parental leave and reduced working hours, can significantly impact the lived experience of parenthood. Sweden, as a social democratic welfare state, prioritizes gender equality and sends a message that investing in family and childcare is of paramount importance. These policies contribute to a more nuanced and complex understanding of the changing world of parenthood.
Sweden's Early Childhood Education System: A Collective Responsibility: Sweden's affordable, high-quality early childhood education system, generous parental leave policies, and emphasis on work-life balance promote gender equality, encourage family-friendly workplaces, and support children's well-being without harming the economy.
Sweden's highly subsidized, high-quality early childhood education system, which is available to children as young as one, sends a message that childbearing is a collective responsibility and a public good. Parents, regardless of income, pay reasonable rates for full-time childcare, with the most expensive rate being equivalent to just $175 US dollars a month. This policy, which prioritizes children's well-being, also encourages workplaces to be family-friendly, with managers and executives taking time off for family and leisure. Sweden's 25 days of paid vacation per year, including at least 4 consecutive weeks in the summer, further emphasizes the importance of work-life balance. Sweden's gender-neutral paid parental leave policy, implemented in 1974, incentivizes men to take time off after having children, with high wage replacement rates making it illogical for them not to do so. These policies have not negatively impacted Sweden's economy, productivity, or creativity, and may even contribute to better workers by reducing stress and burnout.
Sweden's cultural norms and policies impact men's involvement in parenting: Sweden's cultural norms and policies encourage men to participate in caregiving, contrasting with the US where parenting is often seen as a burden for highly educated individuals
Sweden's cultural norms and policies have significantly influenced men's involvement in parenting, leading to a societal shift where men feel a right and duty to spend time with their children. This cultural change, coupled with Sweden's family-friendly policies, has resulted in high father participation in caregiving, which contrasts with the cultural expectations and limited policies in the United States that often make parenting seem burdensome and inaccessible for many, particularly for highly educated and socioeconomically advantaged individuals. Despite Sweden's extensive efforts to make parenting easier through policy interventions, the total fertility rate remains similar to that of the United States. This suggests that while policies are necessary, cultural norms and expectations play a significant role in individuals' decisions to have children.
Competing Devotions: The Ideal Worker and Intensive Parenting Norms: Swedish work family policies promote individual independence and self-sufficiency, not childbirth. The tension between the ideal worker and intensive parenting norms causes significant stress for many parents, particularly in the US.
Swedish work family policies are designed to enable individuals' independence and self-sufficiency, not to encourage or incentivize childbirth. Policies aimed at increasing fertility rates, such as those in South Korea, Japan, and Singapore, have not been effective. The tension between the ideal worker norm and the intensive parenting norm, which are incompatible, is a significant source of stress for many parents, particularly in the US. The ideal worker norm requires full commitment to one's job, while the intensive parenting norm demands time-intensive, emotionally involved child-rearing. Sociologist Mary Blair Loys refers to these competing devotions as a source of moral weight and stress for parents. Despite efforts to balance both, research shows that it is a painful and crushing experience for many.
Parents spend more time caring for children today: Married fathers, mothers, and single mothers all spend significantly more time caring for children than in the 1960s, sacrificing personal time for intensive parenting.
Despite the increasing labor force participation and longer work hours among parents in the US, particularly among married and single mothers, there has been a significant increase in the amount of time spent caring for children since the 1960s. Married fathers were found to have spent 153% more time per week, married mothers 21% more time, and single mothers 57% more time. This trend suggests a cultural imperative towards intensive parenting, which includes not only meeting basic needs but also cultivating children's development through extracurricular activities. However, this comes at a cost as parents often sacrifice their own time for self-care, romantic relationships, and leisure pursuits. The changing nature of parenting means that parents today spend more time in the public sphere with their children, engaging in various activities, compared to past generations. The question remains, what did less intensive parenting look like, and how did it differ from today's norms?
The role of parents and children in society has evolved significantly: Parenting has shifted from a passive role to an intensive, emotionally and financially invested one, prioritizing children's development and happiness, making it harder and costlier for families to have multiple kids, and changing the way we spend time with them.
The role of parents and children in society has shifted significantly over the generations. In the past, children were often left to their own devices or in the care of extended family members, while parents focused on their work or social lives. Today, however, there is a cultural ideal of intensive parenting, where parents are expected to be emotionally and financially invested in their children's lives, focusing on their development and happiness above all else. This shift has led to a societal orientation towards individual children, making it increasingly difficult and expensive for families to have multiple children. The way we spend our time with children has also changed, with parents now prioritizing activities that promote sensory play and socioemotional skills, rather than just passing the time. Overall, the relationship between parents and children has become more child-centered and time-consuming, reflecting changing societal values and expectations.
The rewards and exhaustion of contemporary parenting: Policies and communal support structures can help alleviate the guilt and exhaustion of intensive parenting, making it a more balanced community experience.
Contemporary parenting, especially in the context of full-time caregiving, can be both rewarding and exhausting. The cultural ideals of intensive parenting, which prioritize spending vast amounts of time with children, can be morally weighty and lead to feelings of guilt and inadequacy if not fulfilled. Policies aimed at supporting families, such as extended paid parental leave, can be beneficial but often reinforce the intensive parenting model. A potential solution could be the creation of communal support structures, like those found in Sweden, which help parents get out of the house and connect with others in similar situations. This approach could make parenting feel less like a job and more like a community experience, potentially making it easier for parents to balance their responsibilities and maintain a healthy work-life balance.
The tension between work and family life in the US: The US cultural emphasis on professional identity and lack of abundant family resources can lead to feelings of exhaustion and overwhelm for individuals, particularly those without supportive jobs or community.
The combination of external pressures to be an ideal worker and intensive parent in the US, along with the internal pressure to derive meaning and identity from both aspects of life, can lead to feelings of exhaustion and overwhelm. This is particularly challenging for those without supportive resources or jobs that provide fulfillment. The cultural emphasis on professional identity and the lack of abundant community resources for families, such as parks and playgrounds, exacerbate these feelings. It's important to recognize that this tension is not unique to individuals, but rather a systemic issue that impacts many families in the US. Additionally, the connection between employment and access to basic needs like healthcare and security adds complexity to the issue. Ultimately, addressing this tension requires a societal shift towards valuing and supporting both personal and professional growth, as well as providing resources for families to thrive.
Community and alternative living for modern life: Explore community support and alternative living arrangements to alleviate feelings of guilt and isolation in modern life. Embrace the joy and fulfillment of motherhood while acknowledging its challenges.
The demands of modern life, particularly parenting and work, can feel overwhelming and lead to feelings of guilt and isolation. The speaker expresses a desire for community support and alternative living arrangements, such as cohousing communes, to help alleviate these feelings. The portrayal and conversation around motherhood in modern society often focus on the negative aspects, leading many to dread the experience. However, the speaker shares that there can be joy and fulfillment in raising a child, and it's essential to acknowledge and share these positive experiences. To create meaningful and fulfilling lives, we need to think creatively and expansively about our relationships, communities, and living arrangements.
Parenting brings joy and fulfillment but US parents lack support: US parents lack policies for flexible schedules and extended leave, leading to guilt and declining fertility rates, while Sweden's policies enable parents to spend more time with children and celebrate parenthood.
While caring for a child can be exhausting, it also brings immense joy and fulfillment. However, many US parents lack the time and resources to fully experience these positive aspects due to the lack of public policy support. In contrast, parents in countries like Sweden have access to policies like flexible schedules and extended parental leave, enabling them to spend more time with their children and alleviate feelings of guilt. This not only benefits parents but also contributes to higher fertility rates. Yet, the conversation around parenting often focuses on negativity, making it difficult for parents to openly express the joy they experience. This cultural norm may contribute to the declining fertility rates, suggesting that addressing this issue goes beyond policy and resources. The internalized feeling of guilt is a significant problem that needs to be addressed, and we should strive to create a cultural shift towards acknowledging and celebrating the positive aspects of parenthood.
Perspective on child rearing and its value: In societies that prioritize individual choice and satisfaction, higher-income households have lower birth rates due to viewing family support as a privilege and higher opportunity cost of having children.
In the US, socioeconomically advantaged individuals often view family support and child rearing as a privilege, while in other countries, it's seen as a right. This perspective, along with the opportunity cost of having children being higher for those with more resources, contributes to lower birth rates among higher-income households in the US. Additionally, societies that prioritize individual choice and satisfaction over communal values and continuity tend to have lower birth rates. As a sociologist and feminist, I don't believe policy should aim to encourage more births, but rather, open borders and increased immigration could address population growth concerns. The discussion also touched upon the importance of meaning and fulfillment in parenting, which is prioritized by some communities over careers or personal satisfaction. Overall, the discourse around child rearing and its value varies greatly between societies, leading to different demographic trends.
Creating a society where adults have the power to make choices: Shifting societal values to prioritize joy, meaning, fulfillment, and happiness for adults requires addressing underlying cultural norms.
Creating a society where adults have the opportunity and power to make choices for themselves, leading to joy, meaning, fulfillment, and happiness, is crucial. This goes beyond the goal of work-family balance for parents and extends to the concept of justice. Culture plays a significant role in shaping the choices we make, and changing it requires addressing the underlying societal values that prioritize work over other aspects of life. Big disruptions, such as the pandemic, can bring about cultural change, leading to new possibilities for adults. Ross's argument that having children is a form of self-emptying, or living entirely for someone other than oneself, challenges the notion that it's selfish not to have children. Ultimately, shifting the cultural narrative about what is possible for adults requires a broad and expansive approach, turning to communities often overlooked to explore new ways of living.
Focusing on responsibility, community, family, and others for a more meaningful life: Exploring the importance of responsibility, community, family, and others beyond individual rights and secular liberalism can lead to deeper happiness. Consider intersectional approaches in research to understand diverse experiences.
A more meaningful and rooted life can be achieved by focusing on responsibility, community, family, and others, rather than just individual rights and secular liberalism. Ross argues that this approach is not sacrificial but can lead to deeper happiness. Parenting is an example of this idea, as it can be both selfless and selfish at the same time. In the realm of work and family research, it's essential to consider intersectional approaches and not just focus on white experiences. Three books that can help deepen this understanding are "Competing Devotions" by Mary Blair Loy, "Mothering While Black" by Dawn Dow, and "Hope in the Dark" by Rebecca Solnit. The first two books provide insights into the experiences of women executives and African American middle-class mothers, respectively. The third book, "Hope in the Dark," encourages collective action and sees hope as a tool for change, rather than a passive feeling.
![[BEST OF] Robots In My Head: Deep Brain Stimulation (EP298 Rerun)](https://www.podcastworld.io/podcast-images/out-of-patients-with-matthew-zachary-fmw53tux.webp)
